1
|
Liu F, Wang Z, Song Y, Tian T, Li R, Qiao J, Huang S, Wang Y. The impact of HBV, HCV, or syphilis infections on embryo and pregnancy outcomes in couples undergoing IVF treatment: a matched cohort study. Hum Reprod Open 2025; 2025:hoaf015. [PMID: 40171332 PMCID: PMC11961197 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/03/2025] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do infectious diseases (hepatitis B virus [HBV], hepatitis C virus [HCV], and syphilis) impact embryo quality, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes following a complete IVF cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER Infections with HBV, HCV, or syphilis do not have detrimental impacts on live birth rates or neonatal outcomes in couples following a complete IVF cycle. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Maternal or paternal infections with HBV, HCV, or syphilis may decrease the clinical pregnancy rate, result in poorer embryo outcomes, and lower offspring birth weight. However, there is significant controversy regarding these effects across existing studies, highlighting the need for further research. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION This is a retrospective matched cohort study. Data were obtained from the clinical database of couples who underwent IVF treatment at a single academically affiliated fertility clinic from January 2011 to December 2019, with follow-up extending to December 2020. Out of 180 666 complete cycles recorded, 2443 cycles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS In cycles that fulfilled our inclusion criteria, there were 1997 cycles in the HBV study group, 154 cycles in the HCV study group, and 292 cycles in the syphilis study group. Each study cycle was paired with four controls based on participant age and the timing of IVF treatment, resulting in 7988 controls for the HBV group, 616 controls for the HCV group, and 1169 controls for the syphilis group. Infections could be either single-parent or biparental. The primary outcome was live birth per complete cycle (i.e. fresh cycle plus subsequent frozen-thawed cycles). Subgroup analyses were conducted dividing cycles into maternal infection and paternal infection. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the HBV group, pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates) and neonatal birth weight were similar to that of the controls. In the HCV group, no significant differences from the controls were observed except for a lower clinical pregnancy rate in the study group (36.4% vs 42.2%, adjusted β and 95% CI: 0.62 [0.39-0.96]). Similarly, no significant differences were found in pregnancy or neonatal outcomes between the syphilis group and the control group. As for subgroup analyses, the male-only HBV infection subgroup showed a higher miscarriage rate in the study group than in the control group (22.5% vs 17.7%, adjusted β and 95% CI: 1.56 [1.07-2.28]). For the HCV and syphilis subgroups, none of the outcomes showed significant differences between either the female-only infection or male-only infection subgroups and the controls. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION Although potential confounders were considered and adjusted for, residual bias may still exist due to the study design. The inclusion of participants solely from a single center limited the generalizability of our findings to a broader context. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS We presented a comprehensive overview of the impact of prevalent infectious diseases on IVF outcomes, hoping to address uncertainties surrounding the decisions of couples infected with these diseases and to assist in preventing adverse reproductive outcomes in clinical practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82204052), the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2705305), and the Clinical key project of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSYZD2023007). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Tian Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Rong Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Qiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuo Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuanyuan Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, The People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miao L, Xu L, Wang M, Xiong F, Zou L, Zhang Y, Weng M, Zeng H. Study on the influence of syphilis on the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in infertility patients. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29342. [PMID: 38628734 PMCID: PMC11019224 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective In this study, the effect of in vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer (IVF-ET) on the clinical outcome of patients with syphilis infertility during resuscitation cycle. Methods A retrospective single-center method was adopted. This study included 4430 pairs of infertile patients who underwent syphilis detection. The influence of the syphilis freeze-thaw embryos transplantation outcome was studied in the patients with infertility by comparing the general clinical characteristics of patients (age, years of infertility, body mass index (BMI), basal follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), serum basal estradiol (Estradiol, E2), transplanted intimal thickness, the number of embryos transferred) and the clinical pregnancy (biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, live birth rate and abortion rate). Results Firstly, in the clinical outcome of one frozen-thawed embryos transfer, the live birth rate of the woman's syphilis-infected group was lower than that of the uninfected group (71.3 % vs. 50.0 %), while the abortion rate was higher than that of the uninfected group (7.8 % vs. 26.7 %), and there was a statistical difference (P < 0.05), and there was no statistical difference in other indicators between other groups (P > 0.05). Secondly, in the clinical outcome of two frozen-thawed embryos transfers, the biochemical pregnancy rate (61.3 % vs. 28.6 %) and clinical pregnancy rate (42.9 % vs. 14.3 %) of the group which was infected with syphilis alone were lower than those of the uninfected group (P < 0.05), and other indicators among the other groups showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Thirdly, in the clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryos transfer three times or more, there was no significant difference in the clinical indicators between the syphilis infertility patients and the non-infected infertility patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion When the syphilis infertility patients and the non-infected infertile patients underwent IVF-ET treatment for the first time, the live birth rate and abortion rate of the syphilis group were significantly different (P < 0.05). In the outcome of two transplants, the biochemical pregnancy rate and clinical Pregnancy rates were significantly reduced so patients with syphilis infertility who undergo IVF-ET should be informed about the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixia Miao
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lishuang Xu
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Min Wang
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fang Xiong
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lian Zou
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Meiling Weng
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| | - Huiming Zeng
- Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Affiliated Women’s Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carbone L, Conforti A, La Marca A, Cariati F, Vallone R, Raffone A, Buonfantino C, Palese M, Mascia M, DI Girolamo R, Capuzzo M, Esteves SC, Alviggi C. The negative impact of most relevant infections on fertility and assisted reproduction technology. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2022; 74:83-106. [PMID: 34137567 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04870-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Infections may act with variable impact on the physiopathology of the reproductive organs, determining infertility or reducing the outcomes of assisted reproduction technology. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the existing evidence regarding the pathogens with a supposed or recognized role in reproductive medicine. Viral hepatitis, as well as HIV, can reduce sperm quality. Syphilis carries a risk of erectile dysfunction and increased endometrial thickness. Chlamydia is the main cause of pelvic inflammatory disease. In relation to Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma spp., only few species seem to show a correlation with infertility and poor in-vitro fertilization outcomes. There is evidence of a role for bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy loss. HPV infection in males seems to determine infertility. Herpesviruses are more a risk for fetuses than for fertility itself. Zika virus is responsible for altered early embryo development and waiting to conceive is recommended in suspected or confirmed cases. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 is yet to be elucidated. Rubella and toxoplasmosis can provoke important congenital defects and therefore screening is mandatory before conception; a vaccine for Rubella is recommended. Further and well-designed studies are still needed to better elucidate the role of some infectious agents, to improve fertility and its treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Carbone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy -
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Vallone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Cira Buonfantino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Michela Palese
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marika Mascia
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaella DI Girolamo
- Center for High-Risk Pregnancy and Fetal Care, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Martina Capuzzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Sandro C Esteves
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
- Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- ANDROFERT - Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|