Prognostic Role of Functional Neuroimaging after Multilobar Resection in Patients with Localization-Related Epilepsy

Identifying important factors for successful surgery in patients with lateral temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE) has been diagnosed in only a small number of patients; therefore, its surgical outcome is not as well-known as that of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. We aimed to evaluate the long-term (5 years) and short-term (2 years) surgical outcomes and identify possible prognostic factors in patients with LTLE.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1995 and December 2018 among patients who underwent resective surgery in a university-affiliated hospital. Patients were classified as LTLE if ictal onset zone was in lateral temporal area. Surgical outcomes were evaluated at 2 and 5 years. We subdivided based on outcomes and compared clinical and neuroimaging data including cortical thickness between two groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up duration after the surgery was 8.4 years. Five years after surgery, 45 of the 63 (71.4%) patients achieved seizure freedom. Clinically and statistically significant prognostic factors for postsurgical outcomes were the duration of epilepsy before surgery and focal cortical dysplasia on postoperative histopathology at the 5-year follow-up. Optimal cut-off point for epilepsy duration was eight years after the seizure onset (odds ratio 4.375, p-value = 0.0214). Furthermore, we propose a model for predicting seizure outcomes 5 years after surgery using the receiver operating characteristic curve and nomogram (area under the curve = 0.733; 95% confidence interval, 0.588-0.879). Cortical thinning was observed in ipsilateral cingulate gyrus and contralateral parietal lobe in poor surgical group compared to good surgical group (p-value < 0.01, uncorrected).

CONCLUSIONS

The identified predictors of unfavorable surgical outcomes may help in selecting optimal candidates and identifying the optimal timing for surgery among patients with LTLE. Additionally, cortical thinning was more extensive in the poor surgical group.

The Legacy of the TTASAAN Report-Premature Conclusions and Forgotten Promises: A Review of Policy and Practice Part I

Brain perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans were initially developed in 1970's. A key radiopharmaceutical, hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO), was originally approved in 1988, but was unstable. As a result, the quality of SPECT images varied greatly based on technique until 1993, when a method of stabilizing HMPAO was developed. In addition, most SPECT perfusion studies pre-1996 were performed on single-head gamma cameras. In 1996, the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (TTASAAN) issued a report regarding the use of SPECT in the evaluation of neurological disorders. Although the TTASAAN report was published in January 1996, it was approved for publication in October 1994. Consequently, the reported brain SPECT studies relied upon to derive the conclusions of the TTASAAN report largely pre-date the introduction of stabilized HMPAO. While only 12% of the studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the TTASAAN report utilized stable tracers and multi-head cameras, 69 subsequent studies with more than 23,000 subjects describe the utility of perfusion SPECT scans in the evaluation of TBI. Similarly, dementia SPECT imaging has improved. Modern SPECT utilizing multi-headed gamma cameras and quantitative analysis has a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 89% for the diagnosis of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease-comparable to fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Advances also have occurred in seizure neuroimaging. Lastly, developments in SPECT imaging of neurotoxicity and neuropsychiatric disorders have been striking. At the 25-year anniversary of the publication of the TTASAAN report, it is time to re-examine the utility of perfusion SPECT brain imaging. Herein, we review studies cited by the TTASAAN report vs. current brain SPECT imaging research literature for the major indications addressed in the report, as well as for emerging indications. In Part II, we elaborate technical aspects of SPECT neuroimaging and discuss scan interpretation for the clinician.

Multilobar Epilepsy Surgery in Childhood and Adolescence: Predictors of Long-Term Seizure Freedom

BACKGROUND

Although multilobar resections correspond to one-fifth of pediatric epilepsy surgery, there are little data on long-term seizure control.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term seizure outcomes of children and adolescents undergoing multilobar epilepsy surgery and identify their predictors.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we considered 69 consecutive patients that underwent multilobar epilepsy surgery at the age of 10.0 ± 5.0 yr (mean ± SD). The magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion in all but 2 cases. Resections were temporo-parieto(-occipital) in 30%, temporo-occipital in 41%, parieto-occipital in 16%, and fronto-(temporo)-parietal in 13% cases. Etiologies were determined as focal cortical dysplasia in 67%, perinatal or postnatal ischemic lesions in 23%, and benign tumors in 10% of cases.

RESULTS

At last follow-up of median 9 yr (range 2.8-14.8), 48% patients were seizure free; 33% were off antiepileptic drugs. 10% of patients, all with dysplastic etiology, required reoperations: 4 of 7 achieved seizure freedom. Seizure recurrence occurred mostly (80%) within the first 6 mo. Among presurgical variables, only an epileptogenic zone far from eloquent cortex independently correlated with significantly higher rates of seizure arrest in multivariate analysis. Among postsurgical variables, the absence of residual lesion and of acute postsurgical seizures was independently associated with significantly higher rates of seizure freedom.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that multilobar epilepsy surgery is effective regarding long-term seizure freedom and antiepileptic drug withdrawal in selected pediatric candidates. Epileptogenic zones-and lesions-localized distant from eloquent cortex and, thus, fully resectable predispose for seizure control. Acute postsurgical seizures are critical markers of seizure recurrence that should lead to prompt reevaluation.

Multilobar Resections for 3T MRI-Negative Epilepsy: Worth the Trouble?

OBJECTIVE

Multilobar resection in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative drug-resistant epilepsy warrants attention because they account for up to one third of MRI-negative epilepsy surgery. Despite their high prevalence, data are sparse, and the risk/benefit ratio continues to be debated. The present study investigated the postoperative seizure outcomes in this especially challenging subgroup.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 4 consecutive patients with 3T MRI-negative findings and drug-resistant focal epilepsy who had undergone multilobar epilepsy surgery at our institution.

RESULTS

The mean age at first surgery was 28.5 years (range, 14-48); 1 patient required 2 consecutive reoperations. The final resection was in the frontotemporal and temporo-parieto-occipital regions in 2 patients each. Histopathological examination revealed mild malformations of cortical development in 2 patients and focal cortical dysplasia type Ia and type IIa in 1 patient each. At the last follow-up examination (median, 3.3 years; range, 1-11), 2 patients were completely seizure free (Engel class Ia), 1 patient had experienced some disabling seizures after surgery but had been free of disabling seizures for 2 years at the last follow-up examination (Engel class Ic), and 1 patient had experienced worthwhile improvement (Engel class IIb) and had been seizure free for 1 year at the last follow-up examination. No surgical complications developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results have demonstrated that multilobar epilepsy surgery is effective for lasting seizure control for selected 3T MRI-negative candidates, leading to favorable outcomes for all 4 of our patients. Comprehensive multimodal preoperative evaluation is a prerequisite for postoperative success. Reevaluation should be considered for patients with seizure recurrence, because reoperation could be especially beneficial for selected patients who have not responded to an initially limited resection.

The role of SISCOM in preoperative evaluation for patients with epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the specific value of subtraction ictal and inter-ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI (SISCOM) in identifying the epileptogenic zone (EZ) and predicting postoperative outcomes in epileptic surgical patients.

METHOD

A meta-analysis of studies published from January 1995 to June 2015 was conducted through a comprehensive literature search, and 11 studies were included. R software was first used to calculate a pooled positive rate, concordant rate and positive predictive value (PPV) for good outcomes. Stata software was then used to explore the relationship between SISCOM localization and surgical outcomes, including a subgroup analysis for extra-temporal lobe epilepsy.

RESULTS

The unweighted positive and concordant rates of SISCOM were 85.9% and 65.3%, respectively. In 142 MRI-negative patients, the SISCOM positive rate was 83.8%. The pooled PPV of 178 surgical patients with concordant SISCOM was 56%. In the meta-analysis of 275 surgical patients, the seizure-free odds ratio was 3.28-times higher in concordant than in non-concordant SISCOM patients [95%CI (1.90, 5.67)]. For extra-temporal lobe epilepsy, the seizure-free odds ratio was 2.44-times higher in concordant than in non-concordant SISCOM patients [95%CI (1.34, 4.43)].

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that SISCOM has moderate sensitivity in localizing the epileptogenic zone and can provide complementary information when MRI is negative. Furthermore, SISCOM localization concordant with the gold standard demonstrates slightly higher predictive value for good surgical outcomes. Further research is required to explore the influence of SISCOM localization results in temporal lobe versus extra-temporal lobe epilepsy.