Prognostic Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Negative (N0), Triple-Negative (TN), Medullary Breast Cancer (MBC) in the Korean Population

Comparison of the prognosis of medullary breast carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma: a SEER-based study

Background

Medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare type of breast cancer. Our study aimed to compare the differences in clinical characteristics and prognosis between MBC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and to further develop and validate nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in MBC patients.

Methods

A total of 179,613 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015, including 596 MBC patients, were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM) to compare patients' OS and CSS. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in MBC patients. Nomograms were constructed based on Cox regression analysis whereas receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy.

Results

There were significant differences in the clinical characteristics between MBC and IDC. According to the logrank test, MBC had better OS and CSS than IDC before and after PSM. Cox multivariate analysis showed that age, race, tumor size, lymph node (LN), and radiation therapy were independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas age, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, laterality, type of surgery, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for CSS. Nomograms of OS and CSS were constructed based on independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

MBC had better OS and CSS than IDC. Nomograms based on clinicopathological features were sufficiently accurate in predicting the OS and CSS for MBC patients, which can effectively predict the survival risk of MBC patients and guide clinicians to provide more effective treatment measures.

A risk stratification model to predict chemotherapy benefit in medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based SEER database

Whether patients with medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) receive chemotherapy is controversial. Therefore, the aim of our study was to screen out patients with MBC who benefit from chemotherapy. We enrolled 618 consecutive patients with MBC from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2018). Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Next, a nomogram was constructed and evaluated using calibration plots and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan‒Meier curves were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) benefit of chemotherapy in different risk groups. A total of 618 MBC patients were involved in our study, and an 8:2 ratio was used to randomly split them into a training cohort (n = 545) and a validation cohort (n = 136). Next, a nomogram predicting 3- and 5-year OS rates was constructed based on the five independent factors (age at diagnosis, T stage, N status, subtype and radiation). The nomogram AUCs for 3- and 5-year OS (training set: 0.793 and 0.797; validation set: 0.781 and 0.823) and calibration plots exhibited good discriminative and predictive ability. Additionally, a novel risk classification system for MBC patients demonstrated that we do not have enough evidence to support the benefit effect of chemotherapy for the high-risk group as the result is not statistically significant (total population: p = 0.180; training set: p = 0.340) but could improve OS in the low-risk group (total population: p = 0.001; training set: p = 0.001). Our results suggested that chemotherapy should be selected more carefully for high-risk groups based on a combination of factors and that the possibility of exemption from chemotherapy should be confirmed by more clinical trials in the future.

Medullary breast cancer is a predominantly triple-negative breast cancer - histopathological analysis and comparison with invasive ductal breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Medullary breast cancer (MdBC) is an uncommon type of breast cancer representing 1-7% of all cases. It is characterized by the occurrence of many histopathological features associated with a high grade of malignancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve MdBCs chosen from a group of 1,122 women suffering from invasive breast cancer were analyzed. Histopathological examination and analysis of a basic molecular profile, i.e. estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and HER2 receptor expression, and their comparison with invasive ductal breast cancer (IDC), were performed.

RESULTS

MdBC accounted for 1.07% of all analyzed invasive breast cancer patients. All patients were female, with an average age of 58.54 years. The MdBC group exhibited a larger median tumor diameter (2.05 vs. 1.89 cm), although ≥ T2 tumors comprised 42% vs. 51% for IDCs. Women without regional lymph node involvement (pN0) (83%) formed the largest group. There was a statistically significant difference in the presence of nodal involvement between the studied groups (p < 0.001). Based on the histological grade of malignancy, the majority of MdBC comprised grade II tumors (G2) (93%). In general, MdBC showed statistically higher histologic grade (G1-G3) than IDC (p = 0.003). The 5-year overall survival rate of MdBC patients was 91%. Most MdBCs (92%) were triple-negative, whereas the remaining 8% were HER2 positive.

CONCLUSIONS

MdBC presented at a younger age than IDC, had a higher histological grade, larger median size and less frequent regional lymph node involvement. Most MdBCs were triple-negative, whereas IDCs were predominantly luminal. Despite numerous aggressive pathological features of MdBC, its clinical outcome and overall prognosis are favorable.

TNBC: Potential Targeting of Multiple Receptors for a Therapeutic Breakthrough, Nanomedicine, and Immunotherapy

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous, recurring cancer associated with a high rate of metastasis, poor prognosis, and lack of therapeutic targets. Although target-based therapeutic options are approved for other cancers, only limited therapeutic options are available for TNBC. Cell signaling and receptor-specific targets are reportedly effective in patients with TNBC under specific clinical conditions. However, most of these cancers are unresponsive, and there is a requirement for more effective treatment modalities. Further, there is a lack of effective biomarkers that can distinguish TNBC from other BC subtypes. ER, PR, and HER2 help identify TNBC and are widely used to identify patients who are most likely to respond to diverse therapeutic strategies. In this review, we discuss the possible treatment options for TNBC based on its inherent subtype receptors and pathways, such as p53 signaling, AKT signaling, cell cycle regulation, DNA damage, and programmed cell death, which play essential roles at multiple stages of TNBC development. We focus on poly-ADP ribose polymerase 1, androgen receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor as well as the application of nanomedicine and immunotherapy in TNBC and discuss their potential applications in drug development for TNBC.

Hormone receptor status and survival of medullary breast cancer patients. A Turkish cohort

Objectives:

To analyze the relationship between clinical features, hormonal receptor status, and survival in patients who were diagnosed with medullary breast cancer (MBC).

Methods:

Demographic characteristics, histopathological features, and survival statuses of 201 patients diagnosed with MBC between 1995 and 2015 were retrospectively recorded. Survival analyses were conducted with uni- and multivariate cox regression analysis.

Results:

Median follow-up time was 54 (4-272) months. Median patient age at the time of diagnosis was 47 years old (26-90). Of the patients, 91.5% were triple negative. Five-year recurrence free survival time (RFS) rate was 87.4% and overalll survival (OS) rate 95.7%. For RFS, progesterone receptor (PR) negativity, atypical histopathological evaluation, absence of lymphovascular invasion, smaller tumor, lower nodal involvement were found to be favourable prognostic factors by univariate analysis (p<0.05). The PR negativity and smaller tumor were found to be favourable factors by univariate analysis (p<0.05). However, none of these factors were determined as significant independent prognostic factors for OS (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

Turkish MBC patients exhibited good prognosis, which was comparable with survival outcomes achieved in the literature. The PR negativity was related to a better RFS and OS rates.