The Type of Breast Reconstruction May Not Influence Patient Satisfaction in the Chinese Population: A Single Institutional Experience

Fat-augmented latissimus dorsi flap and implant-based latissimus dorsi flap: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Implant-related concerns have increased the interest in the use of complete autologous latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in breast reconstruction. To achieve the desired volume without implants, autologous fat transfer can be used to enhance the breast size. Fat-augmented LD (FALD) flap is an alternative technique for volume enhancement that incorporates autologous fat grafting, thereby replacing the need for implants.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocol using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ICTRP and Clinicaltrials.gov databases. Data on patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

The electronic database search identified 2606 records, among which 71 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 67 articles were included in the statistical analysis, reporting on 1185 FALD and 3958 implant-based LD flap breast reconstructions. Patient demographics and treatment characteristics were generally comparable across studies. The reported minor complication rate for implant-based LD was 23.9% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 18.2-30.6%) and 25.1% (95% CI: 17.5-34.5%) for FALD. The major complication rate was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.3-4.4%) in the FALD group and 4.9% (95% CI: 3.4-7.2%) in the implant-based LD group.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides an overview of the current literature on both techniques and presents the available data on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes. The findings suggest that FALD is a safe alternative, with a potential trend towards lower major complication rates. Further high-quality comparative studies are needed to enable direct comparison and to draw more definitive conclusions.

A Meta-analysis Comparing Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps and Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Breast Reconstruction

Background

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps are two widely used breast reconstruction techniques, each with distinct advantages and limitations. This meta-analysis aims to compare patient satisfaction and incidence of complications between these two techniques to inform clinical decision-making.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies. We included studies with data comparing DIEP and LD flaps, BREAST-Q patient satisfaction, and complications. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4.

Results

The search yielded 788 studies, of which 13 were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 2128 patients were analyzed, with 1378 undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction and 750 receiving LD flap reconstruction. The analysis showed greater improvement with DIEP flaps in breast satisfaction [mean difference (MD) = 9.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.90-12.05, P < 0.00001], physical well-being (MD = 5.95, 95% CI = 2.98-8.92, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with outcome (MD = 9.36, 95% CI = 3.01-15.71, P = 0.004). Nonetheless, DIEP flaps had higher rates of skin flap necrosis [risk ratio (RR) = 4.27, 95% CI = 2.44 to 7.46, P < 0.00001], wound dehiscence (RR = 5.12, 95% CI = 2.53-10.35, P < 0.00001), and reoperation (RR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.58 -3.16, P < 0.00001) but lower seroma rates (RR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.10-0.74, P = 0.01).

Conclusions

DIEP flap reconstruction offers superior patient satisfaction compared with LD flap reconstruction, despite a higher incidence of certain complications.

Use of patient-reported outcome measures after breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly administered in high-income countries to monitor health-related quality of life of breast cancer patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Although low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face a disproportionate burden of breast cancer, little is known about the use of PROMs in LMICs. This scoping review aims to examine the use of PROMs after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction among patients with breast cancer in LMICs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched in August 2022 for English-language studies using PROMs after breast reconstruction among patients with breast cancer in LMICs. Study screening and data extraction were completed. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

The search produced 1024 unique studies, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. Most were observational (48.5%) or retrospective (33.3%) studies. Studies were conducted in only 10 LMICs, with 60.5% in China and Brazil and none in low-income countries. Most were conducted in urban settings (84.8%) and outpatient clinics (57.6%), with 63.6% incorporating breast-specific PROMs and 33.3% including breast reconstruction-specific PROMs. Less than half (45.5%) used PROMs explicitly validated for their populations of interest. Only 21.2% reported PROM response rates, ranging from 43.1 to 96.9%. Barriers and facilitators of PROM use were infrequently noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the importance of PROM collection and use in providing patient-centered care, it continues to be limited in middle-income countries and is not evident in low-income countries after breast reconstruction. Further research is necessary to determine effective methods to address the challenges of PROM use in LMICs.

Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Following Breast Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Breast reconstruction is a promising surgical technique to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with breast cancer. However, the long-term risk factors associated with HRQoL after breast surgery are still unclear. Our aim was to evaluate breast satisfaction and HRQoL following breast reconstruction to identify clinical factors associated with each domain of BREAST-Q in the long-term.

Methods

Patient-reported BREAST-Q outcomes were analyzed 1 and 5 years after breast reconstruction in a single-blinded, prospective study. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the risk and protective factors associated with BREAST-Q scores. These scores at 1 and 5 years were also compared across three types of operation: mastectomy only, tissue expander/implant (TE/Imp), and a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap.

Results

Surveys were completed by 141 subjects after 1 year and 131 subjects after 5 years. Compared to mastectomy only, breast reconstruction was significantly associated with greater “Satisfaction with breasts” (TE/Imp, p &lt; 0.001; DIEP, p &lt; 0.001) and “Psychosocial well-being” (TE/Imp, p &lt; 0.001; DIEP, p &lt; 0.001), higher body mass index (BMI) resulted in lower “Satisfaction with breasts” (p = 0.004), and a history of psychiatric or neurological medication was significantly associated with “Physical well-being” at 1-year postoperatively (p = 0.02). At 5 years, reconstructive procedures were significantly positively associated with greater “Satisfaction with breasts” (TE/Imp, p &lt; 0.001; DIEP, p &lt; 0.001) and “Psychosocial well-being” (TE/Imp, p = 0.03; DIEP, p &lt; 0.001), and a bilateral procedure was a significant risk factor for lower “Psychosocial well-being” (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The results of this study show that breast reconstruction improves “Satisfaction with Breasts” and “Psychosocial well-being” compared to mastectomy. Among all three types of operation, DIEP gave the best scores at 5 years postoperatively. Thus, autologous reconstruction is recommended for promotion of long-term HRQoL after breast surgery.

Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004)

Objective

Multi-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with breast cancer.

Methods

A standardized questionnaire used to collect information on breast reconstruction among females diagnosed with breast cancer was distributed by 31 members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Information was collected on tumor characteristics, treatment, mesh application, nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation, postoperative complications, bilateral reconstruction, patient satisfaction and local recurrence. The overall rate of breast reconstruction was assessed, and the characteristics were compared across patient groups with different reconstruction approaches.

Results

A total of 1,554 patients underwent breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, with a reconstruction rate of 9.6%. Among them, 1,190 were implant-based, and 262 underwent autologous reconstructions, while 102 cases underwent a combination of both. Patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction were younger than those who received autologous reconstruction (40.1±4.6 vs. 45.0±5.9, P=0.004). Compared to patients with autologous reconstruction, mesh application (25.5% vs. 6.5%), NAC preservation (51.8% vs. 40.5%) and reconstruction failure (1.8% vs. 0) were more frequently reported among those with implant-based reconstruction. There was no significant difference in general satisfaction across three reconstruction approaches, though patients with autologous reconstruction reported the highest aesthetic satisfaction among the three groups (P=0.044).

Conclusions

Implant-based breast reconstruction remains the dominant choice among patients, while autologous reconstruction was associated with higher aesthetic satisfaction. Our multi-center investigation based on the findings of the tertiary hospitals of Chinese Society of Breast Surgery may guide a future series of clinical studies on breast reconstruction in China.

Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are the most common abdominally based breast reconstruction procedures. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages; however, how morbidity relates to satisfaction is not well-understood. Our aim was to compare complications and patient-reported outcomes following pedicled TRAM (pTRAM), free TRAM (fTRAM), and DIEP flaps to guide flap selection.

Patient satisfaction in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multi-center comparative patient evaluation of prosthesis, LDMF, and TRAM techniques

To analyze patient satisfaction and the predictive factors characterizing three types of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy, including prosthesis, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF), transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap techniques.Data were collected via face-to-face or telephone interviews from eight breast centers in China from January 2012 to December 2016. A standardized questionnaire that evaluated the general satisfaction and aesthetic satisfaction was sent to patients who had undergone IBR. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with patient satisfaction among the three types of breast reconstruction.A total of 412 questionnaires were sent out, and 309 copies were collected including 226 prosthesis, 46 LDMF, and 37 pedicle TRAM reconstruction. Logistic regression analysis showed that general satisfaction and aesthetic satisfaction were significantly correlated with radiotherapy (P < .001, P = .018), respectively. Besides, the aesthetic satisfaction was also associated with nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation (P < .001).Our multi-center study identified factors of higher patient satisfaction, like NAC preservation and absence of radiotherapy, in order to help breast surgeons make better decisions about individualized reconstruction plan.

Natural History of Seroma Following the Immediate Latissimus Dorsi Flap Method of Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap procedure remains a popular and useful breast reconstruction tool in China and Western countries, and donor site seroma formation is the main complication. This study was conducted in Chinese patients to determine whether stable cases of seromas would resolve without treatment.

METHODS

A.

retrospective review of 45 consecutive cases of immediate breast reconstruction with LD flap from April 2012 to February 2017 was conducted. The scope of the seroma was demarcated with a marker pen, and cases that remained stable over time (i.e. the size of the seroma did not increase) were observed without treatment. The measured outcomes included the incidence of seromas, the volume and duration of postoperative wound drainage, and other demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (53.3%) developed a seroma at the donor site. Of these, 21 patients (87.5%) did not require treatment, and the seroma resolved over time. The mean duration of a sustained seroma was 6.8 ± 1.4 weeks (range: 4-9 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

This study observed the scope and progression of the seromas and found that seromas at the LD donor sites resolved over time without treatment.

Most women recover from psychological distress after postoperative complications following implant or DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A prospective long-term follow-up study

Background

Substantial complication rates after postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR) in breast cancer patients have been reported. Few studies have reported on the resulting psychological distress (PD) and satisfaction with the aesthetic result in relation to postoperative complications after completion of implant or DIEP flap BR. The present study investigated whether women were able to recover from complication related distress in the long term.

Methods

PD was prospectively measured using questionnaires regarding anxiety, depression and cancer distress. Eligible patients completed questionnaires before BR (T0, n = 144), after one month (T1, n = 139) and after completion of BR, approximately 21 months after initial reconstructive surgery (T2, n = 119). Satisfaction with the aesthetic result was assessed 21 months after BR. Data concerning complications, subsequent additional surgery and total reconstruction failure up to T2 were collected from the medical records. Analyses were performed using multi-level regression analyses correcting for age.

Results

One or more complications occurred in 61 patients (42%) and 50 women required subsequent surgery (35%). In time, mean PD significantly declined towards baseline scores independent of complications. However, a total reconstruction failure (n = 10) was significantly associated with a large temporary increase in depression scores. After additional surgery due to complications patients were less satisfied with aesthetic outcome, although patient satisfaction was independent of PD.

Conclusions

PD outcomes generally declined to normal levels after completion of the entire BR course. Patients experiencing a total reconstruction failure reported more depression after this loss, but in the long term recovered to the same level as women without complications. These findings indicate that women generally can cope efficiently with these serious adverse events, even if they were less satisfied with the aesthetic result.