The Impact of Diffusion-Weighted MRI on the Definition of Gross Tumor Volume in Radiotherapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Comparing the outcomes of MR-based versus CT-based tumor delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy

Background

Delineating gross tumor volume (GTV) using computed tomography (CT) imaging is the standard for lung cancer contouring, but discrepancies among observers compromise accuracy and reliability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft-tissue resolution compared to CT, thus, we design this retrospective study to compare the treatment outcomes of magnetic resonance-based (MR-based) and CT-based tumor delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients treated with hypo-fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (hypo-CCRT).

Methods

A total of 293 LA-NSCLC patients treated with hypo-CCRT from three trials between October 2015 and October 2020 were screened. Ninety patients with each MR-based delineation and CT-based delineation of the primary tumor were selected for analysis. In the MR-based delineation group, T1-enhanced MR images was rigidly registered with 10 respiratory phases of planning CT images, respectively. The primary tumors were contoured on each respiratory phase based on co-registered MRI. The locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities in both groups were analyzed.

Results

The 2-year LPFS rate was 69.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 59.6-80.2%] in the MR-based delineation group and 61.0% (95% CI: 50.9-73.0%) in the CT-based delineation group (P=0.37). There was no significant difference in median PFS (P=0.45) or OS (P=0.69) between the two groups. The MR-based delineation group had smaller planning target volume (186.1 vs. 315.3 cm3, P<0.001), lower incidences of ≥G2 pneumonitis (10% vs. 24.4%, P=0.001) and ≥G3 esophagitis (2.2% vs. 15.6%, P<0.001). In evaluating the patterns of recurrence, in-field recurrences were the dominant type in both groups (21 out of 27 patients in MR-based delineation group, 24 out of 32 patients in CT-based delineation group).

Conclusions

MR-based delineation in hypo-CCRT was feasible and achieved similar treatment efficacy to CT-based delineation. The use of MR imaging to reduce the target volume resulted in promising local control and lower incidence of radiation-induced toxicities.

Diffusion weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic biomarker in evaluating chemotherapy-antiangiogenic treated stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective, single-arm, open-label, clinical trial (BevMar)

PURPOSE

When treating Lung Cancer, it is necessary to identify early treatment failure to enable timely therapeutic adjustments. The Aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in tumor diffusion during treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab could serve as a predictor of treatment failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective single-arm, open-label, clinical trial was conducted between September 2014 and December 2020, enrolling patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients were treated with chemotherapy-antiangiogenic combination. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed at baseline, two, four, and sixteen weeks after initiating treatment. The differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between pre- and post-treatment MRIs were recorded as Delta values (ΔADC). We assessed whether ΔADC could serve as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS), with a five year follow up.

RESULTS

18 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with a ΔADC value ≥ -3 demonstrated a significantly longer OS with an HR of 0.12 (95 % CI; 0.03- 0.61; p = 0.003) The median OS in patients with a ΔADC value ≥ -3 was 18 months, (95 % C.I; 7-46) compared to 7 months (95 % C.I; 5-9) in those with a ΔADC value < -3.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that early changes in tumor ADC values, may be indicative of a longer OS. Therefore, DW-MRI could serve as an early biomarker for assessing treatment response in patients receiving chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy.

Non-contrast-enhanced breast MRI for evaluation of tumor volume change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (3D-Ce-MRI) is a most powerful tool for evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, the use of contrast agent is invasive, expensive, and time consuming, Thus, contrast agent-free imaging is preferable. We aimed to investigate the tumor volume change after NAC using maximum intensity projection diffusion-weighted image (MIP-DWI) and 3D-Ce-MRI.

METHOD

We finally enrolled 55 breast cancer patients who underwent NAC in 2018. All MRI analyses were performed using SYNAPSE VINCENT® medical imaging system (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan). We evaluated the tumor volumes before, during, and after NAC. Tumor volume before NAC on 3D-Ce-MRI was termed Pre-CE and those during and after NAC were termed Post-CE. The observer raised the lower end of the window width until the tumor was clearly visible and then manually deleted the non-tumor tissues. A month thereafter, the same observer who was blinded to the 3D-Ce-MRI results randomly evaluated the tumor volumes (Pre-DWI and Post-DWI) using MIP-DWI with the same method. Tumor volume change between ΔCE (Pre-CE - Post-CE/Pre-CE) and ΔDWI (Pre-DWI - Post-DWI/Pre-DWI) and the processing time for both methods (Time-DWI and Time-CE) were compared.

RESULTS

We enrolled 55 patients. Spearman's rho between ΔDWI and ΔCE for pure mass lesions, and non-mass enhancement (NME) was 0.89 (p < 0.01), 0.63(p < 0.01) respectively. Time-DWI was significantly shorter than Time-CE (41.3 ± 21.2 and 199.5 ± 98.3 respectively, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-contrast-enhanced Breast MRI enables appropriate and faster evaluation of tumor volume change after NAC than 3D-Ce-MRI especially for mass lesions.

Harnessing the Power of Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of the Evolving Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guidance

Compared with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traditionally plays a very limited role in lung cancer management, although there is plenty of room for improvement in the current CT-based workflow, for example, in structures such as the brachial plexus and chest wall invasion, which are difficult to visualize with CT alone. Furthermore, in the treatment of high-risk tumors such as ultracentral lung cancer, treatment-associated toxicity currently still outweighs its benefits. The advent of MR-Linac, an MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT) that combines MRI with a linear accelerator, could potentially address these limitations. Compared with CT-based technologies, MR-Linac could offer superior soft tissue visualization, daily adaptive capability, real-time target tracking, and an early assessment of treatment response. Clinically, it could be especially advantageous in the treatment of central/ultracentral lung cancer, early-stage lung cancer, and locally advanced lung cancer. Increasing demands for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer have led to MR-Linac adoption in some cancer centers. In this review, a broad overview of the latest research on imaging-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) with MR-Linac for lung cancer management is provided, and development pertaining to artificial intelligence is also highlighted. New avenues of research are also discussed.

Reduction of inter-observer variability using MRI and CT fusion in delineating of primary tumor for radiotherapy in lung cancer with atelectasis

Purpose

To compare the difference between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in delineating the target area of lung cancer with atelectasis.

Method

A retrospective analysis was performed on 15 patients with lung cancer accompanied by atelectasis. All positioning images were transferred to Eclipse treatment planning systems (TPSs). Six MRI sequences (T1WI, T1WI+C, T1WI+C Delay, T1WI+C 10 minutes, T2WI, DWI) were registered with positioning CT. Five radiation oncologists delineated the tumor boundary to obtain the gross tumor volume (GTV). Conformity index (CI) and dice coefficient (DC) were used to measure differences among observers.

Results

The differences in delineation mean volumes, CI, and DC among CT and MRIs were significant. Multiple comparisons were made between MRI sequences and CT. Among them, DWI, T2WI, and T1WI+C 10 minutes sequences were statistically significant with CT in mean volumes, DC, and CI. The mean volume of DWI, T2WI, and T1WI+C 10 minutes sequence in the target area is significantly smaller than that on the CT sequence, but the consistency is higher than that of CT sequences.

Conclusions

The recognition of atelectasis by MRI was better than that by CT, which could reduce interobserver variability of primary tumor delineation in lung cancer with atelectasis. Among them, DWI, T2WI, T1WI+C 10 minutes may be a better choice to improve the GTV delineation of lung cancer patients with atelectasis.

Variability of gross tumour volume delineation: MRI and CT based tumour and lymph node delineation for Lung radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare gross tumour volume (GTV) delineation of lung cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) versus computed tomography (CT) and PET.

METHODS

Three experienced thoracic radiation oncologists delineated GTVs on twenty-six patients with lung cancer, based on CT registered to PET, T2-weighted MRI registered to PET and T1-weighted MRI registered with PET. All observers underwent education on reviewing T1 and T2 images along with guidance on window and level setup. Interobserver and intermodality variation was performed based ondice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and average Hausdorff distance (AvgHD) metrics. To compute interobserver variability (IOV) a simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) volume for each image modality was used as reference volume. For intermodality analysis, each observers CT based primary and nodal GTV was used as reference volume.

RESULTS

A mean DSC of 0.9 across all observers for primary GTV (GTVp) and a DSC of > 0.7 for nodal GTV (GTVn) was demonstrated for IOV. Mean T2 and T1 GTVp and GTVn were smaller than CT GTVp and GTVn but the difference in volume between modalities was not statistically significant. Significant difference (p<0.01) for GTVp and GTVn was found between T2 and T1 GTVp and GTVn compared to CT GTVp and GTVn based on DSC metrics. Large variation in volume similarity was noted based on HD of up-to 5.4cm for observer volumes compared to STAPLE volume.

CONCLUSION

Interobserver variability in GTV delineation was similar for MRI and PET versus CT and PET. The significant difference between MRI compared to CT delineated volumes needs to be further explored.

Diffusion-weighted MRI improves response assessment after definitive radiotherapy in patients with NSCLC

Background

Computed tomography (CT) is the standard procedure for follow-up of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radiochemotherapy. CT has difficulties differentiating between tumor, atelectasis and radiation induced lung toxicity (RILT). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may enable a more accurate detection of vital tumor tissue. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of MRI versus CT in the follow-up of NSCLC.

Methods

Twelve patients with NSCLC stages I-III scheduled for radiochemotherapy were enrolled in this prospective study. CT with i.v. contrast agent and non enhanced MRI were performed before and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Standardized ROIs were used to determine the apparent diffusion weighted coefficient (ADC) within the tumor. Tumor size was assessed by the longest longitudinal diameter (LD) and tumor volume on DWI and CT. RILT was assessed on a 4-point-score in breath-triggered T2-TSE and CT.

Results

There was no significant difference regarding LD and tumor volume between MRI and CT (p ≥ 0.6221, respectively p ≥ 0.25). Evaluation of RILT showed a very high correlation between MRI and CT at 3 (r = 0.8750) and 12 months (r = 0.903). Assessment of the ADC values suggested that patients with a good tumor response have higher ADC values than non-responders.

Conclusions

DWI is equivalent to CT for tumor volume determination in patients with NSCLC during follow up. The extent of RILT can be reliably determined by MRI. DWI could become a beneficial method to assess tumor response more accurately. ADC values may be useful as a prognostic marker.

Chest Magnetic Resonance Imaging Decreases Inter-observer Variability of Gross Target Volume for Lung Tumors

Purpose: PET/CT is a standard medical imaging used in the delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in case of radiation therapy for lung tumors. However, PET/CT could present some limitations such as resolution and standardized uptake value threshold. Moreover, chest MRI has shown good potential in diagnosis for thoracic oncology. Therefore, we investigated the influence of chest MRI on inter-observer variability of GTV delineation.

Methods and Materials: Five observers contoured the GTV on CT for 14 poorly defined lung tumors during three contouring phases based on true daily clinical routine and acquisition: CT phase, with only CT images; PET phase, with PET/CT; and MRI phase, with both PET/CT and MRI. Observers waited at least 1 week between each phases to decrease memory bias. Contours were compared using descriptive statistics of volume, coefficient of variation (COV), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

Results: MRI phase volumes (median 4.8 cm³) were significantly smaller than PET phase volumes (median 6.4 cm³, p = 0.015), but not different from CT phase volumes (median 5.7 cm³, p = 0.30). The mean COV was improved for the MRI phase (0.38) compared to the CT (0.58, p = 0.024) and PET (0.53, p = 0.060) phases. The mean DSC of the MRI phase (0.67) was superior to those of the CT and PET phases (0.56 and 0.60, respectively; p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusions: The addition of chest MRI seems to decrease inter-observer variability of GTV delineation for poorly defined lung tumors compared to PET/CT alone and should be explored in further prospective studies.

Tumour volume of resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma measured with MRI correlates well with T category and lymphatic metastasis

OBJECTIVES

To determine association of gross tumour volume (GTV) of resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) measured on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with T category and lymphatic metastasis (LM).

METHODS

Sixty oesophageal SCC patients underwent fat-suppressed T2WI, CE-T1WI and DWI with b values of 0, 500 and 800 s/mm2. GTV was measured on three sequences. Statistical analyses were performed to determine association of GTV with T category and LM.

RESULTS

Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed positive association of GTV with T category and LM (all p values < 0.01). Differences in GTV were found between T1 and T2 or T3 categories shown by Kruskal-Wallis H and one-way ANOVA tests, and between T1/T2 and T3 and between tumours with and without LM by Mann-Whitney U tests (all p values < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed cut-off GTVs of 5.795, 5.276 and 10.11 cm3 on CE-T1WI could better differentiate T1 from T2 categories, T1 from T3, and T1-2 from T3 than those of 7.066, 7.045 and 8.504 cm3 on T2WI, of 5.793, 6.609 and 6.989 cm3 on DWI with b value of 500 s/mm2, and of 4.156, 4.519 and 4.985 cm3 with b value of 800 s/mm2, respectively. Cut-off of 10.462 cm3 on DWI with b value of 500 s/mm2 could better identify LM than of 12.38, 8.793 and 9.600 cm3 on T2WI, CE-T1WI and DWI with b value of 800 s/mm2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GTVs on T2WI, CE-T1WI and DWI are associated with T category of and LM of oesophageal SCC.

KEY POINTS

• GTV is associated with T category and lymphatic metastasis of oesophageal SCC • GTV measured on contrast-enhanced T 1 -weighted imaging better identifies T category • GTV measured on DWI with b value of 500 s/mm 2 better identifies lymphatic metastasis.

The impact of MRI sequence on tumour staging and gross tumour volume delineation in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal

OBJECTIVES

To compare maximum tumour diameter (MTD) and gross tumour volume (GTV) measurements between T2-weighted (T2-w) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) and assess sequence impact on tumour (T) staging. Second, to evaluate interobserver agreement and reader delineation confidence.

METHODS

The staging MRI scans of 45 SCCA patients (25 females) were assessed retrospectively by two independent radiologists (0 and 5 years' experience of anal cancer MRI). MTD and GTV were delineated on both T2-w and high-b-value DWI images and compared between sequences; T staging was derived from MTD. Interobserver agreement was assessed and delineation confidence scored (1 to 5) by each observer.

RESULTS

GTV and MTD were significantly and systematically lower on DWI versus T2-w sequences by 14.80%/9.98% (MTD) and 29.70%/12.25% (GTV) for each reader, respectively, causing T staging discordances in approximately a quarter of cases. Bland-Altman limits of agreement were narrower and intraclass correlation coefficients higher for DWI. Delineation confidence was greater on DWI: 40/42 cases were scored confidently (4 or 5) by each reader, respectively, versus 31/36 cases based on T2-w images.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequence selection affects SCCA measurements and T stage. DWI yields higher interobserver agreement and greater tumour delineation confidence.

KEY POINTS

• MTD and GTV measurements are significantly lower on DWI than on T 2 -w MRI. • Such differences cause T staging discordances in up to a quarter of cases. • DWI results in higher agreement between inexperienced and experienced observers. • DWI offers greater tumour delineation confidence to inexperienced readers.

Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of the Lung With Tri-60Co Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy System (ViewRay): A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Target Delineation

Introduction:

To evaluate the intra-/interobserver variability of gross target volumes between delineation based on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in patients simulated for stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary lung cancer and lung metastasis.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty-five patients (27 lesions) who underwent computed tomography and magnetic resonance simulation with the MR-⁶⁰Co system (ViewRay) were included in the study. Gross target volumes were delineated on the magnetic resonance imaging (GTV_MR) and computed tomography (GTV_CT) images by 2 radiation oncologists (RO1 and RO2). Volumes of all contours were measured. Levels of intraobserver (GTV_MR_RO vs GTV_CT_RO) and interobserver (GTV_MR_RO1 vs GTV_MR_RO2; GTV_CT_RO1 vs GTV_CT_RO2) agreement were evaluated using the generalized κ statistics and the paired t test.

Results:

No significant volumetric difference was observed between all 4 comparisons (GTV_MR_RO1 vs GTV_CT_RO1, GTV_MR_RO2 vs GTV_CT_RO2, GTV_MR_RO1 vs GTV_MR_RO2, and GTV_CT_RO1 vs GTV_CT_RO2; P > .05), with mean volumes of GTVs ranging 5 to 6 cm³. The levels of agreement between those 4 comparisons were all substantial with mean κ values of 0.64, 0.66, 0.74, and 0.63, respectively. However, the interobserver agreement level was significantly higher for GTV_CT compared to GTV_MR (P <.001). The mean κ values significantly increased in all 4 comparisons for tumors >5 cm³ compared to tumors ≤5 cm³ (all P < .05).

Conclusion:

No significant differences in volumes between magnetic resonance- and computed tomograpghy-based Gross target volumes were found among 2 ROs. Magnetic resonance-based GTV delineation for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy also demonstrated acceptable interobserver agreement. Tumors >5 cm³ show higher intra-/interobserver agreement compared to tumors <5 cm³. More experience should be accumulated to reduce variability in magnetic resonance-based Gross target volumes delineation in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Variabilities of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-, Computed Tomography-, and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Tumor and Lymph Node Delineations for Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy Planning

PURPOSE

To investigate interobserver delineation variability for gross tumor volumes of primary lung tumors and associated pathologic lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to compare the results with computed tomography (CT) alone- and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT-based delineations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven physicians delineated the tumor volumes of 10 patients for the following scenarios: (1) CT only, (2) PET-CT fusion images registered to CT ("clinical standard"), and (3) postcontrast T1-weighted MRI registered with diffusion-weighted MRI. To compute interobserver variability, the median surface was generated from all observers' contours and used as the reference surface. A physician labeled the interface types (tumor to lung, atelectasis (collapsed lung), hilum, mediastinum, or chest wall) on the median surface. Contoured volumes and bidirectional local distances between individual observers' contours and the reference contour were analyzed.

RESULTS

Computed tomography- and MRI-based tumor volumes normalized relative to PET-CT-based volumes were 1.62 ± 0.76 (mean ± standard deviation) and 1.38 ± 0.44, respectively. Volume differences between the imaging modalities were not significant. Between observers, the mean normalized volumes per patient averaged over all patients varied significantly by a factor of 1.6 (MRI) and 2.0 (CT and PET-CT) (P=4.10 × 10^-5 to 3.82 × 10^-9). The tumor-atelectasis interface had a significantly higher variability than other interfaces for all modalities combined (P=.0006). The interfaces with the smallest uncertainties were tumor-lung (on CT) and tumor-mediastinum (on PET-CT and MRI).

CONCLUSIONS

Although MRI-based contouring showed overall larger variability than PET-CT, contouring variability depended on the interface type and was not significantly different between modalities, despite the limited observer experience with MRI. Multimodality imaging and combining different imaging characteristics might be the best approach to define the tumor volume most accurately.

Evaluation of PET/MRI for Tumor Volume Delineation for Head and Neck Cancer

Introduction

Computed tomography (CT), combined positron emitted tomography and CT (PET/CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in head and neck radiation planning. Hybrid PET/MRI has garnered attention for potential added value in cancer staging and treatment planning. Herein, we compare PET/MRI vs. planning CT for head and neck cancer gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation.

Material and methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation to 60–70 Gy using IMRT. We performed pretreatment contrast-enhanced planning CT and gadolinium-enhanced PET/MRI. Primary and nodal volumes were delineated on planning CT (GTV-CT) prospectively before treatment and PET/MRI (GTV-PET/MRI) retrospectively after treatment. GTV-PET/MRI was compared to GTV-CT using separate rigid registrations for each tumor volume. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) metric evaluating spatial overlap and modified Hausdorff distance (mHD) evaluating mean orthogonal distance difference were calculated. Minimum dose to 95% of GTVs (D95) was compared.

Results

Eleven patients were evaluable (10 oropharynx, 1 larynx). Nine patients had evaluable primary tumor GTVs and seven patients had evaluable nodal GTVs. Mean primary GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 13.2 and 14.3 cc, with mean intersection 8.7 cc, DSC 0.63, and mHD 1.6 mm. D95 was 65.3 Gy for primary GTV-CT vs. 65.2 Gy for primary GTV-PET/MRI. Mean nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 19.0 and 23.0 cc, with mean intersection 14.4 cc, DSC 0.69, and mHD 2.3 mm. D95 was 62.3 Gy for both nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI.

Conclusion

In this series of patients with head and neck (primarily oropharynx) cancer, PET/MRI and CT-GTVs had similar volumes (though there were individual cases with larger differences) with overall small discrepancies in spatial overlap, small mean orthogonal distance differences, and similar radiation doses.