The Accuracy of Portable Monitoring in Diagnosing Significant Sleep Disordered Breathing in Hospitalized Patients

Sex-specific differences in diagnostic approaches of inpatient sleep testing for obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated sex-specific disparities in inpatient sleep testing. We postulate that women are more likely to have a milder degree of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and lower extent of hypoxia on Type III sleep studies versus polysomnography (PSG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Cleveland Clinic Sleep laboratory registry was leveraged to identify all adult inpatient sleep studies performed for OSA. Demographics, comorbidities, and sleep study measures were collected and compared by sex and sleep study type. Logistic regression was used to examine sleep study type predictive of OSA (apnea hypopnea index [AHI; ≥5, ≥15 and ≥ 30]) and hypoxia, (median percentage of sleep time spent at <90% SaO2 [TST<90%,≥ 11%,] adjusted for covariates.

RESULTS

The sample 778 patients had a mean age of 56.1 ± 16.1 years; 44.5% were female and 72.2% Caucasian. At an AHI≥5, women showed an increase odds of OSA (adjusted, OR = 2.04,95%; CI:1.24-3.35, p = 0.005) with Type III sleep study vs PSG compared to men. At an AHI≥15, men had less odds of OSA (adjusted OR = 0.60,95%CI:0.39-0.90,p = 0.015) with Type III sleep study vs PSG compared to women (OR = 1.15,95%CI:0.72-1.85,p = 0.56), with an interaction p-value of 0.040. These results were attenuated when the analysis was restricted using the 3% hypopnea scoring rule. Men and women had higher odds of TST <90 ≥ 11% (OR:2.60,95%CI:1.60-4.21,p=<0.001; OR:3.46,95%CI:1.97-6.05,p < 0.001) with Type III sleep study versus PSG, albeit no sex-interaction was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sex-specific differences in diagnostic performance of sleep testing type in the inpatient setting should be considered according to level of OSA severity, which are influenced by hypopnea-related desaturation extent.

Portable evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A systematic review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a significant healthcare burden affecting approximately one billion people worldwide. The prevalence of OSA is rising with the ongoing obesity epidemic, a key risk factor for its development. While in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA, it has significant drawbacks that prevent widespread use. Portable devices with different levels of monitoring are available to allow remote assessment for OSA. To better inform clinical practice and research, this comprehensive systematic review evaluated diagnostic performances, study cost and patients' experience of different levels of portable sleep studies (type 2, 3, and 4), as well as wearable devices and non-contact systems, in adults. Despite varying study designs and devices used, portable diagnostic tests are found to be sufficient for initial screening of patients at risk of OSA. Future studies are needed to evaluate cost effectiveness with the incorporation of portable diagnostic tests into the diagnostic pathway for OSA, as well as their application in patients with chronic respiratory diseases and other comorbidities that may affect test performance.

ERS technical standards for using type III devices (limited channel studies) in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in adults and children

For more than three decades, type III devices have been used in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing in supervised as well as unsupervised settings. They have satisfactory positive and negative predictive values for detecting obstructive and central sleep apnoea in populations with moderately high pre-test probability of symptoms associated with these events. However, standardisation of commercially available type III devices has never been undertaken and the technical specifications can vary widely. None have been subjected to the same rigorous processes as most other diagnostic modalities in the medical field. Although type III devices do not include acquisition of electroencephalographic signals overnight, the minimum number of physical sensors required to allow for respiratory event scoring using standards outlined by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine remains debatable. This technical standard summarises data on type III studies published since 2007 from multiple perspectives in both adult and paediatric sleep practice. Most importantly, it aims to provide a framework for considering current type III device limitations in the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing while raising research- and practice-related questions aimed at improving our use of these devices in the present and future.

A Minimum Set of Physiological Parameters to Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Using Non-Invasive Portable Monitors. A Systematic Review

Introduction. Despite its high accuracy, polysomnography (PSG) has several drawbacks for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Consequently, multiple portable monitors (PMs) have been proposed. Objective. This systematic review aims to investigate the current literature to analyze the sets of physiological parameters captured by a PM to select the minimum number of such physiological signals while maintaining accurate results in OSA detection. Methods. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the selection of publications were established prior to the search. The evaluation of the publications was made based on one central question and several specific questions. Results. The abilities to detect hypopneas, sleep time, or awakenings were some of the features studied to investigate the full functionality of the PMs to select the most relevant set of physiological signals. Based on the physiological parameters collected (one to six), the PMs were classified into sets according to the level of evidence. The advantages and the disadvantages of each possible set of signals were explained by answering the research questions proposed in the methods. Conclusions. The minimum number of physiological signals detected by PMs for the detection of OSA depends mainly on the purpose and context of the sleep study. The set of three physiological signals showed the best results in the detection of OSA.

Portable Sleep Monitoring for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Sleep apnea is an underdiagnosed condition in patients with heart failure. Efficient identification of sleep apnea is needed, as treatment may improve heart failure-related outcomes. Currently, use of portable sleep monitoring in hospitalized patients and those at risk for central sleep apnea is discouraged. This study examined whether portable sleep monitoring with respiratory polygraphy can accurately diagnose sleep apnea in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure underwent concurrent respiratory polygraphy and polysomnography. Both recordings were scored for obstructive and central disordered breathing events in a blinded fashion, using standard criteria, and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was determined. Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to examine the concordance among the overall, obstructive, and central AHI values derived by respiratory polygraphy and polysomnography.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 53 patients (47% women) with a mean age of 59.0 years. The correlation coefficient for the overall AHI from the two diagnostic methods was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96). The average difference in AHI between the two methods was 3.6 events/h. Analyses of the central and obstructive AHI values showed strong concordance between the two methods, with correlation coefficients of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), respectively. Complete agreement in the classification of sleep apnea severity between the two methods was seen in 89% of the sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Portable sleep monitoring can accurately diagnose sleep apnea in hospitalized patients with heart failure and may promote early initiation of treatment.