A Possible Role of the Full-Length Nascent Protein in Post-Translational Ribosome Recycling

A Structural Basis for Restricted Codon Recognition Mediated by 2-thiocytidine in tRNA Containing a Wobble Position Inosine

Three of six arginine codons (CGU, CGC, and CGA) are decoded by two Escherichia coli tRNA^Arg isoacceptors. The anticodon stem and loop (ASL) domains of tRNA^Arg1 and tRNA^Arg2 both contain inosine and 2-methyladenosine modifications at positions 34 (I₃₄) and 37 (m²A₃₇). tRNA^Arg1 is also modified from cytidine to 2-thiocytidine at position 32 (s²C₃₂). The s²C₃₂ modification is known to negate wobble codon recognition of the rare CGA codon by an unknown mechanism, while still allowing decoding of CGU and CGC. Substitution of s²C₃₂ for C₃₂ in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA^Ile_IAU anticodon stem and loop domain (ASL) negates wobble decoding of its synonymous A-ending codon, suggesting that this function of s²C at position 32 is a generalizable property. X-ray crystal structures of variously modified ASL^Arg1_ICG and ASL^Arg2_ICG constructs bound to cognate and wobble codons on the ribosome revealed the disruption of a C_32-A₃₈ cross-loop interaction but failed to fully explain the means by which s²C₃₂ restricts I₃₄ wobbling. Computational studies revealed that the adoption of a spatially broad inosine-adenosine base pair at the wobble position of the codon cannot be maintained simultaneously with the canonical ASL U-turn motif. C_32-A₃₈ cross-loop interactions are required for stability of the anticodon/codon interaction in the ribosomal A-site.

The kinetic mechanism of bacterial ribosome recycling

Bacterial ribosome recycling requires breakdown of the post-termination complex (PoTC), comprising a messenger RNA (mRNA) and an uncharged transfer RNA (tRNA) cognate to the terminal mRNA codon bound to the 70S ribosome. The translation factors, elongation factor G and ribosome recycling factor, are known to be required for recycling, but there is controversy concerning whether these factors act primarily to effect the release of mRNA and tRNA from the ribosome, with the splitting of the ribosome into subunits being somewhat dispensable, or whether their main function is to catalyze the splitting reaction, which necessarily precedes mRNA and tRNA release. Here, we utilize three assays directly measuring the rates of mRNA and tRNA release and of ribosome splitting in several model PoTCs. Our results largely reconcile these previously held views. We demonstrate that, in the absence of an upstream Shine–Dalgarno (SD) sequence, PoTC breakdown proceeds in the order: mRNA release followed by tRNA release and then by 70S splitting. By contrast, in the presence of an SD sequence all three processes proceed with identical apparent rates, with the splitting step likely being rate-determining. Our results are consistent with ribosome profiling results demonstrating the influence of upstream SD-like sequences on ribosome occupancy at or just before the mRNA stop codon.