Determinants of operative time in thyroid surgery: A prospective multicenter study of 3454 thyroidectomies

Sometimes Less Is More: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Commercially-Negotiated Price Variation for Thyroidectomy

Introduction

The Hospital Price Transparency Rule requires hospitals to publicly report prices for healthcare services to enhance transparency. Among the most common thyroidectomy procedures are thyroid lobectomy (TL) and total thyroidectomy alone (TT) or with central neck dissection (TT+CND). This study aimed to examine factors associated with variations in commercially-negotiated prices for thyroidectomy.

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis examined commercial price data obtained from Turquoise Health and linked to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Thyroidectomy procedures were categorized using Current Procedural Terminology codes (60220 TL, 60240 TT, and 60252 TT+CND, listed in increasing extent of surgery). The main outcome included intrahospital variation in commercially-negotiated prices and hospital-level factors associated with price differences.

Results

Overall, 1299 hospitals (30.4%) reported commercial prices for TL and TT. In increasing order of surgical complexity, the median price (interquartile range) was $6483 ($2217-$11,443) for TL, $6732 ($2566-$11,321) for TT, and $6232 ($3118-$10,916) for TT+CND. Only 28% (n = 303) reported median negotiated prices concordant with increasing extent of thyroidectomy. Risk-adjusted mean negotiated prices found that not-for-profit hospitals had significantly lower adjusted mean prices compared with for-profit ($8266 vs $10,625, P = 0.022). Procedure type significantly impacted adjusted mean prices, with TT+CND having lower prices compared with TT ($8295 vs $9446, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The complexity of thyroidectomy is not reflected in the price-negotiated rates paid by insurers to hospitals. Most hospitals are paid less when taking on more complex procedures. These findings underscore concerns about fair reimbursement to hospitals and the potential of the Price Transparency Rule to illuminate unwarranted differences in negotiated rates.

Quantifying the impact of surgical teams on each stage of the operating room process

Introduction

Operating room (OR) efficiency is a key factor in determining surgical healthcare costs. To enable targeted changes for improving OR efficiency, a comprehensive quantification of the underlying sources of variability contributing to OR efficiency is needed. Previous literature has focused on select stages of the OR process or on aggregate process times influencing efficiency. This study proposes to analyze the OR process in more fine-grained stages to better localize and quantify the impact of important factors.

Methods

Data spanning from 2019-2023 were obtained from a surgery center at a large academic hospital. Linear mixed models were developed to quantify the sources of variability in the OR process. The primary factors analyzed in this study included the primary surgeon, responsible anesthesia provider, primary circulating nurse, and procedure type. The OR process was segmented into eight stages that quantify eight process times, e.g., procedure duration and procedure start time delay. Model selection was performed to identify the key factors in each stage and to quantify variability.

Results

Procedure type accounted for the most variability in three process times and for 44.2% and 45.5% of variability, respectively, in procedure duration and OR time (defined as the total time the patient spent in the OR). Primary surgeon, however, accounted for the most variability in five of the eight process times and accounted for as much as 21.1% of variability. The primary circulating nurse was also found to be significant for all eight process times.

Discussion

The key findings of this study include the following. (1) It is crucial to segment the OR process into smaller, more homogeneous stages to more accurately assess the underlying sources of variability. (2) Variability in the aggregate quantity of OR time appears to mostly reflect the variability in procedure duration, which is a subinterval of OR time. (3) Primary surgeon has a larger effect on OR efficiency than previously reported in the literature and is an important factor throughout the entire OR process. (4) Primary circulating nurse is significant for all stages of the OR process, albeit their effect is small.

Improving Operating Room Efficiency in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

One minute of operating room (OR) time costs $36 to 37. However, ORs are notoriously inefficient. There is growing literature on improving OR efficiency, but no formal review of this topic within otolaryngology has been performed. This study reviews and synthesizes the current literature on improving OR efficiency within otolaryngology.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, preprints.org, and medRxiv were searched on November 4, 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Published English studies were included if they reported on metrics for improving OR efficiency within otolaryngology. There were no publication date restrictions. Articles were screened by 2 reviewers. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis reporting for scoping reviews was followed.

RESULTS

The search yielded 9316 no-duplicate articles; 129 articles were included. Most of the studies reported on head and neck procedures (n = 52/129). The main tactics included surgical considerations: hemostatic devices, techniques, and team/simultaneous approaches; anesthetic considerations: local anesthetic and laryngeal mask airways; procedure location considerations: procedures outside of the OR and remote technologies; standardization: equipment, checklists, and personnel; scheduling considerations: use of machine learning for booking, considering patient/surgeon factors, and utilizing dedicated OR time/multidisciplinary teams for on-call cases.

CONCLUSION

The current literature brings to attention numerous strategies for improving OR efficiency within otolaryngology. Applying these strategies and implementing novel techniques to manage surgical cases may assist in offloading overloaded health care systems and improving access to care while facilitating patient safety and outcomes. Anticipated barriers to implementation include resistance to change, funding, and the current strain on health care systems and providers.

TSH receptor antibody as a predictor of difficult robotic thyroidectomy in patients with Graves' disease

Thyroidectomy in Graves' disease can be challenging due to greater thyroid size and vascularity. While thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) level is associated with disease severity and thyroid vascularity, its impact on operative outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to compare challenging factors for robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and open thyroidectomy (OT) in Graves' disease patients, including TRAb as a predictive factor for difficult thyroidectomy. This retrospective study included Graves' disease patients who underwent total thyroidectomy between September 2013 and January 2023. The clinical characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between patients who received OT and bilateral axillo-breast approach RT. Factors affecting operation time and estimated blood loss (EBL) were evaluated in both groups using regression analyses. A total of 85 patients received either OT (n = 48) or RT (n = 37). Median thyroid volumes in the OT and RT groups were 72.4 g and 57.6 g, respectively. Operation time was affected by thyroid volume in both groups. Additionally, higher thyroid hormone levels and bilateral central neck node dissection prolonged operation time in the RT group. EBL was marginally associated with thyroid volume in the OT group. However, in the RT group, TRAb level was independently associated with greater EBL (p = 0.04), while no significant association was found with thyroid volume. Predictive factors for difficult thyroidectomy differed by operation approaches. TRAb significantly predicted intraoperative bleeding in RT, while this association was absent in OT. Caution is warranted when performing RT on Graves' disease patients with high TRAb levels.

Accurate Operative Time Prediction in Thyroid Surgery: A Rural Tertiary Care Facility Experience

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether surgeons can estimate thyroid operative time more accurately than a system-generated average time estimate.

METHODS

Four otolaryngologists at a single institution with extensive endocrine surgery experience were asked to predict their operative times for all eligible thyroid surgeries. These estimates were compared to system-generated operative time predications based on averaging the surgeon's previous 10 cases with the same Current Procedural Terminology code. The surgeon-generated estimations and system-generated estimations were then compared to each other and the actual operative time.

RESULTS

A final sample of 73 cases was used for all analyses. Average age was 51 years old and the majority of patients were female. Surgeon-generated operative time estimates were significantly more accurate than system-generated estimates based on time averaging (P < .001). These findings were consistent across each surgeon individually and within each procedure type (hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy). These findings had a power of over 99% based on mean differences.

CONCLUSION

As the financial center of modern hospitals, an efficient operating room is integral to economic success. Improving the precision of operative time estimation reduces costly unplanned staff overtime, canceled cases, and underutilization. Our research at a rural tertiary care center shows that experienced thyroid surgeons can substantially reduce the error of estimating thyroid operative times by considering individual patient characteristics. Although no objective variables have so far been identified to correlate with thyroid operative time, surgeon-generated operative time estimation is significantly more accurate than a generic system approach of averaging previous operative times.

Assessing the Precision of Surgery Duration Estimation: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives

The operating room (OR) is considered the highest source of cost and earnings. Therefore, measuring OR efficiency, which means how time and resources are allocated precisely for their intended purposes in the operating room is crucial. Both overestimation and underestimation negatively impact OR efficiency Therefore, hospitals defined metrics to Measuring OR Effeciency. Many studies have discussed OR efficiency and how surgery scheduling accuracy plays a vital role in increasing OR efficiency. This study aims to evaluate OR efficiency using surgery duration accuracy.

Methods

This retrospective, quantitative study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. We extracted data on 97,397 surgeries from 2017 to 2021 from the OR database. The accuracy of surgery duration was identified by calculating the duration of each surgery in minutes by subtracting the time of leaving the OR from the time of entering the OR. Based on the scheduled duration, the calculated durations were categorized as either underestimation or overestimation. Descriptive and bivariate analyses (Chi-square test) were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results

Sixty percent out of the 97,397 surgeries performed were overestimated compared to the time scheduled by the surgeons. Patient characteristics, surgical division, and anesthesia type showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05) in their OR estimation.

Conclusion

Significant proportion of procedures have overestimated. This finding provides insight into the need for improvement.

Recommendations

It is recommended to enhance the surgical scheduling method using machine learning (ML) models to include patient characteristics, department, anesthesia type, and even the performing surgeon increases the accuracy of duration estimation. Then, evaluate the performance of an ML model in future studies.

Selecting the Right Plane of Dissection in Thyroidectomy: Along the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve or the Thyroid Capsule? A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction  Total thyroidectomy remains highly technical, with a significant risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) compromise and hypoparathyroidism. After identifying RLN, at the level of the ligament of Berry, local factors may compel the surgeon to either dissect along the nerve or the thyroid capsule.

Objective  The objective of the present study is to compare these two approaches in terms of outcomes and complication rates.

Methods  This is a retrospective analysis from September, 2013 to April 2019 of 511 consecutive patients undergoing thyroidectomy. General demographics and disease parameters were recorded. At the discretion of the surgeon and according to the demands of the local operative factors, the patients either had dissection along the RLN or along the thyroid capsule. Perioperative and postoperative parameters such as blood loss, duration of surgery, hospital stay, pain scores, analgesia requirements and complications were recorded. The groups were compared with the Pearson chi-squared test or with the Fisher exact test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results  The incidence of transient hypocalcaemia and transient RLN compromise were higher when dissection was performed along the nerve as opposed to the plane along the thyroid capsule. Other parameters including operative time, hospital stay, pain scores, analgesia requirement, wound infection, seroma, hemorrhage, and recurrence did not differ between the groups. Subgroup analysis of the patients who presented with complications showed that local factors, malignancy, and extent of surgery correlated positively with complications when dissected along the RLN.

Conclusion  Dissection along the capsule of the thyroid during thyroidectomy is a safer plane in terms of low rate of transient RLN injury and hypoparathyroidism as opposed to dissection along the nerve.

Predictive model of operative time in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach

BACKGROUND

Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) has demonstrated excellent safety and is receiving wider use in North America. Understanding which factors lead to operative difficulty, as evaluated by operative time (OT), may help to improve safety and refine indications for this procedure.

METHODS

Cases of TOETVA performed at our institution were reviewed. Multivariate linear regression was performed using patient demographics, thyroid characteristics, and operative variables to predict OT.

RESULTS

A total of 207 cases were included for analysis. A multivariate linear regression model, controlling for age, sex, and BMI, was developed from 104 cases with an R² of 0.47 (p < 0.001). Cross-validation on 103 remaining cases showed root-mean-square error of 46.37. Total thyroidectomy and lobe size were the only significant predictors (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a model to predict OT for TOETVA based on preoperative and operative variables. Lobe size, but not BMI, is a significant predictor of OT.

The impact of operative duration and intraoperative fluid dynamics on postoperative hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: a prospective non-randomized study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy (TT) still remains common. This prospective observation study examined the role of intraoperative time period (IOP) and intravenous fluids (IVF) in transient and permanent (> 6 months) hypocalcemia post-TT.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

Consecutive patients (n = 328; age = median (IQR); 34 (15) years; M:F = 65:263) with benign or malignant thyroid disease undergoing TT were evaluated for IOP, intraoperative IVF, serum corrected calcium, intact parathormone (iPTH), and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels at baseline, 48 h, and 6 months post-TT.

RESULTS

The incidence of symptomatic transient and permanent hypocalcemia post-TT was 33.5% and 7.9% respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors for transient hypocalcemia were IOP (odds ratio: 11.6), 48-h iPTH (4.8), IVF (2.9), hyperthyroidism (2.8), and percent calcium decline (1.07), while 25OHD deficiency increased the risk by 10.5 odds in subset with preoperative hypocalcemia. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, IOP, and IVF strongly predicted transient hypocalcemia with a threshold of 123 min and 1085 mL. Area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.883 (95% CI: 0.838-0.928), 88.1%, and 74.4% and 0.883 (0.840-0.926; each P = 0.001), 84.4%, and 74.4% respectively. Serum 48-h calcium < 7.8 mg/dL was the only reliable predictor of permanent hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSION

Operative duration > 123 min and IVF > 1085 mL increased the risk of transient hypocalcemia post-TT manyfold but not permanent hypocalcemia. Routine intraoperative identification, preservation of viable in situ parathyroid glands, and laryngeal nerves increased IOP and rates of transient hypocalcemia but improved long-term outcome.

Surgical outcomes of parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism resistant to calcimimetic treatment: A retrospective single-center cohort study

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of parathyroidectomy (PTx) for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) resistant to calcimimetic treatment, we retrospectively studied 187 patients with SHPT who had no history of calcimimetic treatment (NCMT) (NCMT group) and 186 patients with SHPT who were resistant to calcimimetic treatment (RCMT) (RCMT group). Success rate and operative time of PTx were compared among the two groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the RCMT group than in the NCMT group (180 vs 158 minutes, P < .001), but the difference was attenuated after multivariate adjustment including the weight of the largest parathyroid gland. No significant differences were observed in success rate of PTx (90.9% vs 91.4%, P = 1.000) between the two groups. In patients with SHPT who are resistant to calcimimetic treatment, operative time could be elongated but success rate of PTx remains unchanged.

A prospective study evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of very early postoperative translaryngeal ultrasonography in the assessment of vocal cord function after neck surgery

BACKGROUND

Early recognition of postoperative vocal cord palsy enhances postoperative care. Translaryngeal ultrasonography can assess vocal cord function accurately and noninvasively, but it is unclear whether it is feasible or accurate when done immediately after extubation in the recovery room owing to possible interference from laryngeal swelling. This study assessed the feasibility and accuracy of translaryngeal ultrasonography in this setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing neck operations were subjected to translaryngeal ultrasonography and flexible direct laryngoscopy 1 day before and day 7 after thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. Translaryngeal ultrasonography was performed early in the recovery room immediately after extubation in the operating room. A standardized assessment protocol was used. Patient parameters were compared between those with assessable and unassessable vocal cords.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (91 recurrent laryngeal nerves-at-risk) were analyzed after excluding 2 male patients who failed preoperative translaryngeal ultrasonography. Fifty-six patients underwent thyroidectomy and 9 parathyroidectomy. The median age (range) was 57 (46-69); 44 (68%) were women. Sixty-one patients (94%) had assessable bilateral vocal cords on translaryngeal ultrasonography in the recovery room. Translaryngeal ultrasonography in the recovery room findings corresponded completely with day-7 findings on direct laryngoscopy. Long operative time was associated with nonassessable vocal cords on translaryngeal ultrasonography in the recovery room (P = .026).

CONCLUSION

Very early postoperative translaryngeal ultrasonography in the recovery room after neck surgery is highly feasible and accurate. Long operative time may hinder the use of translaryngeal ultrasonography in the recovery room.

Pediatric thyroidectomies: A surgical subspecialty comparison

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to establish the typical population, safety, and outcomes of pediatric thyroidectomies, specifically identifying surgical complication rates. Furthermore, the study compares management and complication differences between the two specialties that most often manage these patients - Pediatric General Surgery and Otolaryngology.

METHODS

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - Pediatrics (NSQIP-P) data between the years of 2012 and 2016 was reviewed and analyzed for patient characteristics, perioperative course and outcomes. Sub-group analysis was used to compare groups based on surgeon sub-specialty: Otolaryngology or Pediatric General Surgery.

RESULTS

The study identified 516 cases pediatric patients operated on by Pediatric Otolaryngology (229; 44.4%) and Pediatric General Surgery (287; 55.6%). Overall, rates of surgical and medical adverse events were low (1.2% and 0.7%, respectively). Upon univariate analysis, there were no differences between specialties in surgical adverse events (p = 1.000), medical adverse events (p = 0.196), reoperation (p = 0.505), or readmission (p = 0.262). Indication for surgery differed between specialties, with benign neoplasm more common in the Pediatric Otolaryngology group (48.9% vs. 35.2%), and thyrotoxicosis more common in the Pediatric General Surgery group (43.9% vs. 23.1%) (p < 0.001). Compared to cases done by Otolaryngology, Pediatric General Surgery was independently associated with a shorter operative time (B: -31.583 min [95% CI: -42.802 to -20.364]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Thyroidectomy in the pediatric population is a safe procedure with no differences in adverse outcomes noted when comparing Pediatric General Surgeons to Pediatric Otolaryngologists. Pediatric General Surgeons were observed to have a significantly shorter operative time.

Influence of Daily Variations in Individual Surgeon's Operative Time on Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Evidence is lacking regarding the potential association between daily variation in individual surgeon's operative time, procedure after procedure, and risk of patient complication. We assumed that surgeon deviation from the expected procedure duration may be harmful for patient.

METHOD

All patients who underwent a thyroidectomy undertaken in five hospitals during a 1-year period were included prospectively. For each thyroidectomy, we estimated the expected operative time from a multilevel linear regression considering the attending surgeon who performed the operation, the patient preoperative risk, and the procedure complexity. Three groups of thyroidectomies were identified according to whether the observed duration is: slower than expected, as expected, or faster than expected. Rates of permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism at 6 months were then compared between these groups.

RESULTS

A total of 3102 patients who underwent a thyroidectomy undertaken by 22 surgeons were considered. Risk of laryngeal nerve palsy was higher in the "slow" group than in the "normal" group (OR = 4.63, 95% confidence interval 2.21-9.70), as was that of hypoparathyroidism (OR = 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.21-4.88). There was no significant difference between "fast" and "normal" groups for either complication. Deviation from expected procedure duration was more frequent at the end than at the beginning of the daily operation schedule (29.4% vs. 18.3%, respectively, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients had a greater risk of complication when the surgeon performed thyroidectomy slower than expected. Surgeons avoiding excessive deviations from their expected procedures durations reflect safer practice.

Risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy for cancer: A NSQIP procedure-targeted analysis

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak is the most common major complication after esophagectomy. We investigated the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophagectomy targeted database to identify risk factors for anastomotic leak.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer were included. Patients experiencing an anstomotic leak were identified, and univariate and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

Of 915 patients included, 83% were male and the median age was 64 years. Patients with anastomotic leak more frequently had additional complications (87% vs 36%, P < .001). Rates of reoperation (64% vs 11%, P < .001) and mortality (8% vs 2%, P = .001) were higher in patients with anastomotic leak. After adjusting for patient and procedure characteristics, prolonged operative time (for each additional 30-minutes; adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 1.068, 95% CI, 1.022-1.115, P = .003), increased preoperative WBC count (for each 3000/µL increase; AOR 1.323, 95% CI, 1.048-1.670, P = .019), pre-existing diabetes (AOR 1.601, 95% CI, 1.012-2.534, P = .045), and perioperative transfusion (AOR 1.777, 95% CI, 1.064-2.965, P = .028) were independently associated with anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

Both patient and procedure-related factors are associated with anastomotic leak. Though frequently non-modifiable, these findings could facilitate risk stratification and early detection of anastomotic leak to reduce associated morbidity.

Operating list composition and surgical performance

BACKGROUND

Recent reviews suggest that the way in which surgeons prepare for a procedure (warm up) can affect performance. Operating lists present a natural experiment to explore this phenomenon. The aim was to use a routinely collected large data set on surgical procedures to understand the relationship between case list order and operative performance.

METHOD

Theatre lists involving the 35 procedures performed most frequently by senior surgeons across 38 private hospitals in the UK over 26 months were examined. A linear mixed-effects model and matched analysis were used to estimate the impact of list order and the cost of switching between procedures on a list while controlling for key prognosticators. The influence of procedure method (open versus minimally invasive) and complexity was also explored.

RESULTS

The linear mixed-effects model included 255 757 procedures, and the matched analysis 48 632 pairs of procedures. Repeating the same procedure in a list resulted in an overall time saving of 0·98 per cent for each increase in list position. Switching between procedures increased the duration by an average of 6·48 per cent. The overall reduction in operating time from completing the second procedure straight after the first was 6·18 per cent. This pattern of results was consistent across procedure method and complexity.

CONCLUSION

There is a robust relationship between operating list composition and surgical performance (indexed by duration of operation). An evidence-based approach to structuring a theatre list could reduce the total operating time.