1
|
Beckman M, Lindqvist H, Öhman L, Forsberg L, Lundgren T, Ghaderi A. Correspondence between practitioners’ self-assessment and independent motivational interviewing treatment integrity ratings. Front Psychol 2022; 13:890579. [PMID: 35959019 PMCID: PMC9360749 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
As evaluation of practitioners’ competence is largely based on self-report, accuracy in practitioners’ self-assessment is essential for ensuring high quality treatment-delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between independent observers’ ratings and practitioners’ self-reported treatment integrity ratings of Motivational interviewing (MI). Practitioners (N = 134) were randomized to two types of supervision [i.e., regular institutional group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on the MI Treatment Integrity (MITI) code]. The mean age was 43.2 years (SD = 10.2), and 62.7 percent were females. All sessions were recorded and evaluated with the MITI, and the MI skills were self-assessed with a questionnaire over a period of 12 months. The associations between self-reported and objectively assessed MI skills were overall weak, but increased slightly from baseline to the 12-months assessment. However, the self-ratings from the group that received monthly objective feedback were not more accurate than those participating in regular group supervision. These results expand findings from previous studies and have important implications for assessment of practitioners’ treatment fidelity: Practitioners may learn to improve the accuracy of self-assessment of competence, but to ensure that patients receive intended care, adherence and competence should be assessed objectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Beckman
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Maria Beckman,
| | - Helena Lindqvist
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lina Öhman
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Tobias Lundgren
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ata Ghaderi
- Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beckman M, Alfonsson S, Rosendahl I, Berman AH, Lindqvist H. A Behavior-based Coding Tool for Assessing Supervisors' Adherence and Competence: Findings From a Motivational Interviewing Implementation Study. Clin Psychol Psychother 2022; 29:1942-1949. [PMID: 35727807 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Supervision seems to be an essential part of therapist training, and thus also of implementing evidence-based practices. However, there is a shortage of valid and reliable instruments for objective assessment of supervision competence that include both global measures and frequency counts of behavior - two essential aspects of supervisory competence. This study tests the internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of an assessment tool that includes both these measures. Additionally, strategies and techniques used by ten supervisors in 35 Motivational interviewing supervision sessions are described. Codings were conducted after two separate coding training sessions. The internal consistency across the global measures was acceptable (α = 0.70; 0.71). After the second training, the inter-rater reliabilities for all frequency counts were in the moderate to good range, except for two that were in the poor range; inter-rater reliability for one of the four global measures was in the moderate range, and three were in the poor range. A prerequisite for identifying specific supervisor skills central to the development of therapist skills, teaching these skills to supervisors, and performing quality assurance of supervision, is to create instruments that can measure these behaviors. This study is a step in that direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Beckman
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| | - Sven Alfonsson
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| | - Ingvar Rosendahl
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| | - Anne H Berman
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden.,Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Helena Lindqvist
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
In Search of the Common Elements of Clinical Supervision: A Systematic Review. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2022; 49:623-643. [PMID: 35129739 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01188-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The importance of clinical supervision for supporting effective implementation of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) is widely accepted; however, very little is known about which supervision practice elements contribute to implementation effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to generate a taxonomy of empirically-supported supervision practice elements that have been used in treatment trials and shown to independently predict improved EBT implementation. Supervision practice elements were identified using a two-phase, empirically-validated distillation process. In Phase I, a systematic review identified supervision protocols that had evidence of effectiveness based on (a) inclusion in one or more EBT trials, and (b) independent association with improved EBT implementation in one or more secondary studies. In Phase II, a hybrid deductive-inductive coding process was applied to the supervision protocols to characterize the nature and frequency of supervision practice elements across EBTs. Twenty-one of the 876 identified articles assessed the associations of supervision protocols with implementation or clinical outcomes, representing 13 separate studies. Coding and distillation of the supervision protocols resulted in a taxonomy of 21 supervision practice elements. The most frequently used elements were: reviewing supervisees' practice (92%; n = 12), clinical suggestions (85%; n = 11), behavioral rehearsal (77%; n = 10), elicitation (77%; n = 10), and fidelity assessment (77%; n = 10). This review identified supervision practice elements that could be targets for future research testing which elements are necessary and sufficient to support effective EBT implementation. Discrepancies between supervision practice elements observed in trials as compared to routine practice highlights the importance of research addressing supervision-focused implementation strategies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Foldal VS, Solbjør M, Standal MI, Fors EA, Hagen R, Bagøien G, Johnsen R, Hara KW, Fossen H, Løchting I, Eik H, Grotle M, Aasdahl L. Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Motivational Interviewing as a Return to Work Intervention in a Norwegian Social Insurance Setting: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2021; 31:785-795. [PMID: 33761083 PMCID: PMC8558277 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-09964-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators for implementing motivational interviewing (MI) as a return to work (RTW) intervention in a Norwegian social insurance setting. Methods A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial involving MI sessions delivered by social insurance caseworkers. The study was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework using focus groups with the caseworkers. MI fidelity was evaluated through audio-recordings of MI sessions and questionnaires to sick-listed participants. Results Lack of co-worker and managerial support, time and place for practicing to further develop MI skills, and a high workload made the MI intervention challenging for the caseworkers. The MI method was experienced as useful, but difficult to master. MI fidelity results showed technical global scores over the threshold for "beginning proficiency" whereas the relational global score was under the threshold. The sick-listed workers reported being satisfied with the MI sessions. Conclusions Despite caseworker motivation for learning and using MI in early follow-up sessions, MI was hard to master and use in practice. Several barriers and facilitators were identified; these should be addressed before implementing MI in a social insurance setting.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03212118 (registered July 11, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vegard Stolsmo Foldal
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marit Solbjør
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Martin Inge Standal
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Egil Andreas Fors
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roger Hagen
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research Institute, Modum Bad, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunnhild Bagøien
- Division of Psychiatry, Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Roar Johnsen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Karen Walseth Hara
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Trøndelag, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Complex Symptom Disorders, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Heidi Fossen
- The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service of Trøndelag, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ida Løchting
- Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hedda Eik
- Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Margreth Grotle
- Faculty of Health Science, Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI) Clinic for Surgery and Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lene Aasdahl
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
- Unicare Helsefort Rehabilitation Centre, Rissa, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Løchting I, Hagen R, Monsen CK, Grotle M, Storheim K, Aanesen F, Øiestad BE, Eik H, Bagøien G. Fidelity of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Improving Return to Work for People with Musculoskeletal Disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph181910324. [PMID: 34639624 PMCID: PMC8507704 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to conduct a fidelity evaluation of a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention delivered by social insurance caseworkers, in a three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) for improving return to work for people on sick leave with musculoskeletal disorders. The caseworkers received six days of MI training, including an intervention manual prior to the trial onset, as well as supervision throughout the trial. The caseworkers recorded 21 MI sessions at regular intervals during the trial. An independent MI analysis center scored the recordings using the MI treatment integrity code (MITI 4). In addition, three experienced MI trainers assessed the adherence to the MI intervention manual on a 1–4 Likert scale and MI competence. Total MITI 4 mean scores were at beginning proficiency levels for two components (global technical, mean 3.0; SD 0.6 and the reflections/questions ratio, mean 1.1; SD 0.2) and under beginning proficiency for two components (global relational, mean 3.2; SD 0.7 and complex question, mean 34.0; SD 21.2). The MI trainers’ assessment showed similar results. The mean adherence score for the MI sessions was 2.96 (SD 0.9). Despite delivering a thorough course and supervision package, most of the caseworkers did not reach proficiency levels of good MI competence during the study. The fidelity evaluation showed that a large amount of training, supervision and practice is needed for caseworkers to become competent MI providers. When planning to implement MI, it is important that thorough consideration is given regarding the resources and the time needed to train caseworkers to provide MI in a social insurance setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Løchting
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.G.); (K.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +47-9183-2700
| | - Roger Hagen
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1094, 0317 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8900, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
- Research Institute, Modum Bad, P.O. Box 33, 3370 Vikersund, Norway
| | - Christine K. Monsen
- Division of Mental Health & Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, P.O. Box 2168, 3103 Tønsberg, Norway;
| | - Margreth Grotle
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.G.); (K.S.)
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (F.A.); (B.E.Ø.); (H.E.)
| | - Kjersti Storheim
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.G.); (K.S.)
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (F.A.); (B.E.Ø.); (H.E.)
| | - Fiona Aanesen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (F.A.); (B.E.Ø.); (H.E.)
| | - Britt Elin Øiestad
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (F.A.); (B.E.Ø.); (H.E.)
| | - Hedda Eik
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (F.A.); (B.E.Ø.); (H.E.)
| | - Gunnhild Bagøien
- Nidelv Community Mental Health Centre, Department of Mental Health, Trondheim University Hospital, P.O. Box 3250, 7006 Trondheim, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beckman M, Lindqvist H, Öhman L, Forsberg L, Lundgren T, Ghaderi A. Ongoing supervision as a method to implement Motivational interviewing: Results of a randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2037-2044. [PMID: 33541759 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess skills in Motivational interviewing (MI) at the Swedish National Board of Institutional Care (SiS), and to evaluate different ways to provide MI supervision. METHODS SiS practitioners (n = 134) were randomized to regular group supervision, or individual telephone supervision based on only the behavioral component of a feedback protocol, or the full protocol. Participant's mean age was 43.2 (SD =10.2), and the majority (62.7%) were females. RESULTS Many participants showed beginning proficiency already at baseline, indicating a successful implementation. Still, results varied widely. The regular supervision and the supervision based on objective feedback were equally effective, and the group receiving feedback based on fewer variables of the protocol performed better on only one of the seven skill measures. The objective feedback did not provoke supervisee discomfort/distress, or negatively affect the supervisory relationship. CONCLUSIONS Extensive MI implementation can increase practitioners' skills in MI, but the question of the best mode of ongoing supervision needs further attention. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Objective feedback does not seem to negatively affect the supervisee's skill acquisition or the supervisor-supervisee working alliance, but the question of how to most efficiently provide feedback from multifaceted feedback tools remains unanswered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Beckman
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden.
| | - Helena Lindqvist
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| | - Lina Öhman
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| | | | - Tobias Lundgren
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| | - Ata Ghaderi
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Centre for Eating Disorders, Stockholm County Council, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rietkerk W, de Jonge-de Haan J, Slaets JPJ, Zuidema SU, Gerritsen DL. Increasing Older Adult Involvement in Geriatric Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation. J Aging Health 2021; 33:482-492. [PMID: 33625262 PMCID: PMC8236665 DOI: 10.1177/0898264321993321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Goal setting and motivational interviewing (MI) may increase well-being by promoting healthy behavior. Since we failed to show improved well-being in a proactive assessment service for community-dwelling older adults applying these techniques, we studied whether implementation processes could explain this. Methods: Goals set during the comprehensive geriatric assessment were evaluated on their potential for behavior change. MI and goal setting adherence wasassessed by reviewing audiotaped interactions and interviewing care professionals. Results: Among the 280 goals set with 230 frail older adults (mean age 77 ± 6.9 years, 59% women), more than 90% had a low potential for behavior change. Quality thresholds for MI were reached in only one of the 11 interactions. Application was hindered by the context and the limited proficiency of care professionals. Discussion: Implementation was suboptimal for goal setting and MI. This decreased the potential for improved well-being in the participating older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanda Rietkerk
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, 3647University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joris P J Slaets
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, 3647University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,443696Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sytse U Zuidema
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, 3647University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Debby L Gerritsen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Svensson C, Wickström H, Emanuelson U, Bard AM, Reyher KK, Forsberg L. Training in motivational interviewing improves cattle veterinarians' communication skills for herd health management. Vet Rec 2020; 187:191. [PMID: 32303667 PMCID: PMC7509394 DOI: 10.1136/vr.105646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication skills to promote changes in management routines are especially important in veterinary herd health management (VHHM). Motivational interviewing (MI) is a communication methodology shown to be effective in stimulating client behaviour change. This study aimed to evaluate a 6-month MI-training programme for veterinarians. METHODS Thirty-eight cattle veterinarians gathered in groups of four to eight at six workshops separated by 3-4 weeks, during which they read literature and practised their skills. MI skills were evaluated before and after training using audio recordings of role-play conversations with professional actors. Recordings were coded using the MI Treatment Integrity Code (MITI) V.4.2.1. The effect of training was evaluated by 16 regression models. Participants filled in questionnaires about their experiences. RESULTS All participants improved their MI skills after training in at least one parameter and significant improvements were found in all but 3 of the 16 statistically evaluated MITI variables. The mean (25th-75th percentiles) ratings of the veterinarians' perceived relevance of MI skills in their work was 4.9 (4.0-6.0) and of their satisfaction with the programme was 5.1 (5.0-6.0) on a 6-point Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS Results show that MI training was perceived to be useful and relevant and successfully improved veterinarians' communication skills in VHHM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Svensson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Ulf Emanuelson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Alison M Bard
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Providing objective feedback in supervision in motivational interviewing: results from a randomized controlled trial. Behav Cogn Psychother 2019; 48:383-394. [PMID: 31685078 DOI: 10.1017/s1352465819000687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of the use of objective feedback in supervision on the supervisory relationship and skill acquisition is unknown. AIMS The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different types of objective feedback provided during supervision in motivational interviewing (MI) on: (a) the supervisory relationship, including potential feelings of discomfort/distress, provoked by the supervision sessions, and (b) the supervisees' skill acquisition. METHOD Data were obtained from a MI dissemination study conducted in five county councils across five county councils across Sweden. All 98 practitioners recorded sessions with standardized clients and were randomized to either systematic feedback based on only the behavioral component of a feedback protocol, or systematic feedback based on the entire protocol. RESULTS The two different ways to provide objective feedback did not negatively affect the supervisory relationship, or provoke discomfort/distress among the supervisees, and the group that received the behavioural component of the feedback protocol performed better on only two of the seven skill measures. CONCLUSIONS Objective feedback does not seem to negatively affect either the supervisor-supervisee working alliance or the supervisees' supervision experience. The observed differences in MI skill acquisition were small, and constructive replications are needed to ascertain the mode and complexity of feedback that optimizes practitioners' learning, while minimizing the sense of discomfort and distress.
Collapse
|
10
|
"…or else I close my ears" How women with obesity want to be approached and treated regarding gestational weight management: A qualitative interview study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222543. [PMID: 31536545 PMCID: PMC6752788 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The importance of helping pregnant women maintain a healthy lifestyle and prevent excessive gestational weight gain is well recognized, but pregnant women do not always perceive communication about body weight as respectful or helpful. Furthermore, fear of inducing shame or guilt can prohibit some midwives from talking about body weight, especially if the woman has obesity. We aimed to explore what women of reproductive age with obesity regard to be the most important and relevant aspects when discussing gestational weight management. METHODS Qualitative interview study using focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews with 17 women of reproductive age (19-39 y) with obesity. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS We identified three themes: 1) Importance of obtaining vital medical information; 2) A wish to feel understood and treated with respect; 3) Midwives' approach is crucial in sensitive key situations, which include bringing up the subject of body weight, weighing, providing weight-related information, coaching lifestyle modification, dealing with emotional reactions and ending a conversation. CONCLUSIONS A majority of the interviewed women wished to receive information about risks about obesity and gestational weight gain, and recommendations on weight management. However, the risk of midwives offending someone by raising the topic may be increased if the pregnant woman believe that gestational weight gain is uncontrollable by the individual. Also, several situations during maternity care meetings can be stigmatizing and make women less receptive to advice or support. Women suggest that a good working alliance is likely to be achieved if midwives have knowledge about the causes of obesity, take interest in the patients' background, have a non-judgmental approach and refrain from giving unsolicited advice.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kramer Schmidt L, Moyers TB, Nielsen AS, Andersen K. Is fidelity to motivational interviewing associated with alcohol outcomes in treatment-seeking 60+ year-old citizens? J Subst Abuse Treat 2019; 101:1-11. [PMID: 31174708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Part of the variability in treatment outcomes for Motivational Interviewing (MI) may be explained by differences in the fidelity to MI. The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity manual version 4 (MITI 4) is an improved measure of fidelity to elements of MI. It is not known whether the fidelity to MI, as measured by the MITI 4, is related to treatment outcome. OBJECTIVES To examine whether fidelity to MI is associated with alcohol use outcomes - predictive validity of the MITI 4. METHOD Twenty percent of the recorded sessions at the Danish sites of the Elderly Study were randomly drawn and coded for fidelity to MI with the MITI 4. The Elderly Study was an international, randomized controlled trial, in which people 60 years or older with Alcohol Use Disorders received either four weeks of Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) or four weeks of MET combined with up to eight additional sessions of the Community Reinforcement Approach- Senior (MET+CRA-S). Elements of MI and summary scores of the MITI 4 were used as predictors in a mixed effects regression analysis. Treatment outcomes were use of alcohol and consequences of drinking at 26-weeks follow-up. RESULTS In total, 423 sessions representing 238 participants were randomly drawn and coded for fidelity to MI. Mean values of the treatment elements indicated high fidelity to MI, with higher fidelity to MI in the MET sessions, as compared to CRA-S sessions. None of the predictors in the multilevel model analyses were associated with outcome at follow-up. Exploratory analysis indicated reverse associations between one measure of MI-fidelity and drinking outcomes in the combined treatment (CRAS). CONCLUSION The fidelity of the MI intervention, received by participants in this study, did not predict better treatment outcomes. MI may be less effective in populations which are already committed to change behavior. As expected and validating for the MITI 4, fidelity to MI-elements was lower in the combination of MI with other treatment approaches. Additionally, the timing of MI in these combined settings might be important for effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Kramer Schmidt
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 18, entrance 220B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Theresa B Moyers
- Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, MSC11 6280, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, United States.
| | - Anette Søgaard Nielsen
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 18, entrance 220B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; OPEN Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Denmark.
| | - Kjeld Andersen
- Unit of Clinical Alcohol Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløwsvej 18, entrance 220B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark; Department of Mental Health, Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kramer Schmidt L, Andersen K, Nielsen AS, Moyers TB. Lessons learned from measuring fidelity with the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity code (MITI 4). J Subst Abuse Treat 2019; 97:59-67. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|