Effects of combination treatment with alendronate and raloxifene on skeletal properties in a beagle dog model

Effects of novel raloxifene analogs alone or in combination with mechanical loading in the Col1a2G610c/+ murine model of osteogenesis imperfecta

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a hereditary bone disease in which gene mutations affect collagen formation, leading to a weak, brittle bone phenotype that can cause severe skeletal deformity and increased fracture risk. OI interventions typically repurpose osteoporosis medications to increase bone mass, but this approach does not address compromised tissue-level material properties. Raloxifene (RAL) is a mild anti-resorptive used to treat osteoporosis that has also been shown to increase bone strength by a-cellularly increasing bone bound water content, but RAL cannot be administered to children due to its hormonal activity. The goal of this study was to test a RAL analog with no estrogen receptor (ER) signaling but maintained ability to reduce fracture risk. The best performing analog from a previous analog characterization project, named RAL-ADM, was tested in an in vivo study. Female wildtype (WT) and Col1a2G610C/+ (G610C) mice were randomly assigned to treated or untreated groups, for a total of 4 groups (n = 15). Starting at 10 weeks of age, all mice underwent compressive tibial loading 3×/week to induce an anabolic bone formation response in conjunction with RAL-ADM treatment (0.5 mg/kg; 5×/week) for 6 weeks. Tibiae were scanned via microcomputed tomography then tested to failure in four-point bending. RAL-ADM had reduced ER affinity, and increased post-yield properties, but did not improve bone strength in OI animals, suggesting some properties can be improved by RAL analogs but further development is needed to create an analog with decidedly positive impacts to OI bone.

Bone hydration: How we can evaluate it, what can it tell us, and is it an effective therapeutic target?

Water constitutes roughly a quarter of the cortical bone by volume yet can greatly influence mechanical properties and tissue quality. There is a growing appreciation for how water can dynamically change due to age, disease, and treatment. A key emerging area related to bone mechanical and tissue properties lies in differentiating the role of water in its four different compartments, including free/pore water, water loosely bound at the collagen/mineral interfaces, water tightly bound within collagen triple helices, and structural water within the mineral. This review summarizes our current knowledge of bone water across the four functional compartments and discusses how alterations in each compartment relate to mechanical changes. It provides an overview on the advent of- and improvements to- imaging and spectroscopic techniques able to probe nano-and molecular scales of bone water. These technical advances have led to an emerging understanding of how bone water changes in various conditions, of which aging, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and osteogenesis imperfecta are reviewed. Finally, it summarizes work focused on therapeutically targeting water to improve mechanical properties.

Impact of Single or Combined Drug Therapy on Bone Regeneration in Healthy and Osteoporotic Rats

Complications in bone regeneration in patients with systemic impaired bone metabolism (e.g., osteoporosis) represent a rapidly increasing clinical challenge. Alendronate and simvastatin are drugs commonly used to promote bone metabolism in osteoporotic conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate initial bone regeneration within osseous defects grafted with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in adjunction with systemic coadministrations of alendronate and simvastatin (i.e., daily subcutaneous injection for 3 weeks) in healthy and osteoporotic rats. Eighty Wistar female rats were ovariectomized (OVX; n = 40) or sham operated (n = 40). Six weeks later, osseous defects (a 3-mm critical-sized defect) were created in the left femoral condyles and then grafted with β-TCP. From the day following graft installation, OVX and sham animals received for 3 weeks a daily subcutaneous injection of alendronate (50 μg/kg of body weight) and simvastatin (5 mg/kg of body weight), alone or in combination. A control group was included, which received subcutaneous saline administration. At the end of the 3 weeks, rats were euthanized and specimens (femoral condyles) were retrieved for histological evaluation and histomorphometric measurements, that is, bone area (BA%) and remaining bone graft (RBG%). In osteoporotic rats, 3 weeks of daily subcutaneous injection of combined therapy (alendronate plus simvastatin) led to a significant (p < 0.05) increase in BA% and a significant decrease in RBG% compared to healthy controls in osseous defects grafted with β-TCP (BA%: 28.6 ± 12.0 vs. 18.2 ± 7.6, RBG% 61.3 ± 11.1 vs. 70.7 ± 7.3). No significant differences in BA% and RBG% were found in the OVX rats for single treatments. Furthermore, healthy controls showed similar BA% and RBG% upon single or combined therapy compared to nontreated control rats. Daily coinjections (for 3 weeks) of alendronate plus simvastatin result in a significant enhancement of bone regeneration within osseous defects grafted with β-TCP in osteoporotic rats. Despite the expected effects on osteoporotic bone, our study did not confirm the hypothesized benefit of alendronate and simvastatin on bone regeneration in osseous defects in healthy conditions. The efficacy of the combination drug therapy on bone regeneration demands further investigation to elucidate molecular and cellular aspects underlying this therapy.

Atypical Femur Fractures: Review of Epidemiology, Relationship to Bisphosphonates, Prevention, and Clinical Management

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are highly effective in treating osteoporosis and reducing hip, vertebral, and other fractures by as much as 50% to 70%. However, since 2006, atypical femur fractures (AFFs) emerged as potential side effects of BPs and other treatments. These fractures have unusual radiologic features and occur with little trauma. Public concern has led to a >50% decrease in BP usage. AFFs are rare: for each AFF, >1200 fractures, including 135 hip fractures, are prevented. Case definition criteria were updated by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research in 2014. Many epidemiologic studies have been reported, and although methodologically challenging, generally support a BP-AFF association. However, the magnitude of the association between BPs and AFFs is uncertain: estimates of relative risk for AFFs among BP users vs nonusers range from 1 to 65 with a meta-analysis estimate of 1.7. Although mechanistic studies have proposed several hypotheses explaining how BPs might decrease bone strength, AFF pathogenesis remains uncertain and cannot explain the paradox of efficacy of reduction of common fractures while increasing risk for rare fractures at one site. There are several consistent risk factors, including Asian race (in North America), femoral bowing, and glucocorticoid use, whereas others remain unclear. Consensus is emerging about strategies to prevent AFFs in BP users (including drug holidays after 5 years' use in some patients). In conclusion, AFFs can be devastating, but even under the most pessimistic assumptions, the benefit/risk ratio is highly positive for BPs, particularly during 3 to 5 years of use. As understanding of AFFs increases, it is becoming increasingly possible to maximize BP benefits while minimizing AFF risk.