A randomized multicenter trial comparing the XIENCE everolimus eluting stent with the CYPHER sirolimus eluting stent in the treatment of female patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: The SPIRIT WOMEN study

Second-generation everolimus-eluting intracoronary stents: a comprehensive review of the clinical evidence

Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) has emerged as a mainstay for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease given its beneficial impact on clinical outcomes in these patients. Everolimus-eluting stents (EES) are one of the most frequently implanted second-generation DES; their use for the treatment of a wide range of patients including those with complex coronary lesions is supported by compelling evidence. Although newer stent platforms such as biodegradable polymer DES may lower local vessel inflammation, their efficacy and safety have not yet surpassed that of Xience stents. This article summarizes the properties of the Xience family of EES and the evidence supporting their use across diverse patient demographics and coronary lesion morphologies.

Treatment effect of metformin combined with atorvastatin in reducing in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary artery disease patients with type 2 diabetic patients

To investigate the effectiveness of metformin and atorvastatin in preventing in-stent restenosis (ISR) on coronary patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with percutaneous coronary intervention within 8 to 12 months after rapamycin-eluting stent implantation. A total of 1278 consecutive patients implanted with rapamycin-eluting stent from January 2012 to December 2019, who underwent coronary computed tomography or coronary angiography within 8 to 12 months. The patients were categorized into atorvastatin 20 mg, or atorvastatin 20 mg + metformin 1.5/d, or atorvastatin 40 mg + metformin 1.5/d groups. The clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared. The correlation between variables and ISR was analyzed. A total of 701 patients participated in the study. The ratio of ISR/nonstenosis (P = .039) and fasting blood sugar (P = .001) differed significantly in the 3 groups. Logistic regression showed that d, L, different therapeutic agents, and dosage groups were independent risk factors of ISR. The longer L and smaller d may increase ISR incidence with 8 to 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. Both metformin and atorvastatin are beneficial in reducing stent restenosis by a dose-dependent manner. An increasing dose of atorvastatin and a combination of metformin decreases the incidence of ISR in patients.

Differences in coronary artery disease and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in women and men

INTRODUCTION

Despite common perceptions, coronary artery disease (CAD) is not a male-specific condition, and sex-based differences do occur in many aspects, including clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) significantly improved post-PCI outcomes. However, no sex-specific guidelines on PCI and the use of DES are available as current evidence was derived from clinical trials enrolling predominantly male patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims at exploring sex-based disparities in CAD characteristics and manifestations, and comparing PCI outcomes and the efficacy and safety profiles of DES according to sex. In addition, a critical approach to trials' interpretation with an analysis of sources of bias is provided to inform future research and clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Sex gap in clinical outcomes after PCI with DES implantation is narrowing due to improved performances of new-generation DES. However, scientific research and biomedical engineering are striving to optimize DES profiles and generate new iterations of devices. At the same time, gender initiatives and sex-specific trials are accruing to overcome current issues in the field. Advances in these areas will foster improvements in early and long-term clinical outcomes of both women and men.

Endpoint selection for noninferiority percutaneous coronary intervention trials: a methodological description

Background:

The objective of this review is to provide a practical update on endpoint selection for noninferiority (NI) studies in percutaneous coronary intervention studies.

Methods:

A PubMed search was conducted for predefined terms to explore the use of NI designs and intrapatient comparisons to determine their current importance. Sample size calculations for the most frequently used endpoints with NI hypotheses were done to increase statistical awareness.

Results:

Reported NI trials, with the most frequently chosen clinical endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), had NI margins ranging from 1.66% to 5.00%, resulting in patient populations of 400–1500 per treatment group. Clinical study endpoints comprising of MACE complemented with rates of bleeding complications and stent thrombosis (ST) are suggested to conduct a statistically and clinically meaningful NI trial. Study designs with surrogate endpoints amenable to intrapatient randomizations, are a very attractive option to reduce the number of necessary patients by about half. Comparative clinical endpoint studies with MACE and ST/bleeding rates to study a shortened dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in coronary stent trials are feasible, whereas ST as the sole primary endpoint is not useful.

Conclusions:

Expanded composite clinical endpoints (MACE complemented by ST and bleeding rates and intrapatient randomization for selected surrogate endpoints) may be suitable tools to meet future needs in device approval, recertification and reimbursement.