Increased medial olivocochlear reflex strength in normal-hearing, noise-exposed humans

Cochlear neural contributions to triple network changes in tinnitus, hyperacusis & misophonia? A perspective review

What do tinnitus, the perception of sounds without an internal or external source of noise, hyperacusis, the pathological hypersensitivity to noise, or misophonia, an intolerance to certain everyday noises, have in common, and what differentiates them? A large number of excellent studies focused in the last few decades on identifying the neural correlates of tinnitus, hyperacusis, or misophonia on the basis of central triple-network changes. In this perspective review we explicitly examine, possible differential and causal involvement of peripheral components as a presumptive trigger that may drive observed triple-network changes. Based on our results, we venture to hypothesize that: (i) tinnitus, hyperacusis, and misophonia can occur despite clinically normal hearing thresholds, and are likely causally independent of sex and age, (ii) tinnitus and hyperacusis, but possibly also misophonia are related to altered auditory processing that through desynchronized (tinnitus) or hyperactive (hyperacusis, misophonia) bottom-up ascending processing potentially explains the activity changes in, e.g., default or salient brain networks, as suggested in various studies of these different diseases. (iii) In misophonia a stress-induced top-down influence, as deep as the auditory nerve fibers, may be discussed as a contributor to generating misophonia-trigger sounds, a hypothesis that can be tested in future studies. We hope that the selective consideration of a possible interaction between peripheral and central components will help to minimize the greatest handicap of these pathologies to date towards successful therapy: the lack of clarification of the underlying causative mechanism of the diseases.

Heightened OAEs in young adult musicians: Influence of current noise exposure and training recency

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are a non-invasive metric of cochlear function. Studies of OAEs in musicians have yielded mixed results, ranging from evidence of diminished OAEs in musicians-suggesting noise-induced hearing loss-to no difference when compared to non-musicians, or even a trend for stronger OAEs in musicians. The goal of this study was to use a large sample of college students with normal hearing (n = 160) to compare OAE SNRs in musicians and non-musicians and to explore potential effects of training recency and noise exposure on OAEs in these cohorts. The musician cohort included both active musicians (who at the time of enrollment practiced at least weekly) and past musicians (who had at least 6 years of training). All participants completed a questionnaire about recent noise exposure (previous 12 months), and a subset of participants (71 musicians and 15 non-musicians) wore a personal noise dosimeter for one week to obtain a more nuanced and objective measure of exposure to assess how different exposure levels may affect OAEs before the emergence of a clinically significant hearing loss. OAEs were tested using both transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) and distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs). As predicted from the literature, musicians experienced significantly higher noise levels than non-musicians based on both subjective (self-reported) and objective measures. Yet we found stronger TEOAEs and DPOAEs in musicians compared to non-musicians in the ∼1-5 kHz range. Comparisons between past and active musicians suggest that enhanced cochlear function in young adult musicians does not require active, ongoing musical practice. Although there were no significant relations between OAEs and noise exposure as measured by dosimetry or questionnaire, active musicians had weaker DPOAEs than past musicians when the entire DPOAE frequency range was considered (up to ∼16 kHz), consistent with a subclinical noise-induced hearing loss that only becomes apparent when active musicians are contrasted with a cohort of individuals with comparable training but without the ongoing risks of noise exposure. Our findings suggest, therefore, that separate norms should be developed for musicians for earlier detection of incipient hearing loss. Potential explanations for enhanced cochlear function in musicians include pre-existing (inborn or demographic) differences, training-related enhancements of cochlear function (e.g., upregulation of prestin, stronger efferent feedback mechanisms), or a combination thereof. Further studies are needed to determine if OAE enhancements offer musicians protection against damage caused by noise exposure.

Inter-Subject Variability in the Dependence of Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Strength on Noise Bandwidth

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to quantify inter-subject variability in the dependence of the medial-olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) on noise bandwidth. Of specific interest was whether inter-subject variability in MOCR dependence on bandwidth explained variability in the MOCR response elicited by wideband noise.

DESIGN

Thirty-two young adults with normal hearing participated in the study. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions were measured in the ipsilateral ear with and without noise presented in the contralateral ear. Presentation of contralateral noise served to activate the MOCR. The MOCR was activated using five different noise stimuli with bandwidths ranging from 1- to 5-octaves wide (center frequency of 2 kHz; bandwidth incremented in 1-octave steps). Noise spectral levels (19.6 dB SPL/Hz) were held constant across all bandwidths. MOCR metrics included the normalized-percent change in the otoacoustic emission (OAE), the MOCR-induced OAE magnitude shift, and the MOCR-induced OAE phase shift. Linear mixed-effect models were fit to model the dependence of MOCR-induced OAE magnitude and phase changes on noise bandwidth. The use of a mixed-effect modeling approach allowed for the estimation of subject-specific model parameters that capture on- and off-frequency contributions to the MOCR effects. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive capacity of subject-specific model parameters on the MOCR response elicited by wideband noise.

RESULTS

All OAE-based MOCR metrics increased as the noise bandwidth increased from 1- to 5-octaves wide. The dependence of MOCR-induced OAE magnitude and phase shifts on activator bandwidth was well approximated using a linear model with intercept and slope terms. On average, MOCR-induced magnitude and phase shifts increased at a rate of 0.3 dB/octave and 0.01 cycles/octave, respectively, as bandwidth extended beyond the predicted region of OAE generation. A statistically significant random effect of subject was found for both the intercept and slope parameter of each model. Subject-specific slope estimates were statistically significant predictors of a repeated measure of the wideband MOCR response. A higher slope was predictive of larger wideband MOCR effects.

CONCLUSIONS

MOCR-induced changes to the OAE are greatest when the MOCR is elicited using wideband noise. Variability in the process of spectral integration within the MOCR pathway appears to explain, in part, inter-subject variability in OAE-based estimates of the MOCR response elicited by wideband noise.

Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Ears With Low-to-Moderate Annual Noise Exposure

PURPOSE

Studies in lower mammals demonstrate enhancement of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) following noise exposure. A similar effect may occur in humans, and there is some evidence of an individual's acoustic history affecting the MOCR. The current work evaluates the relationship between an individual's annual noise exposure history and their MOCR strength. Given the potential role of the MOCR as a biological hearing protector, it is important to identify factors associated with MOCR strength.

METHOD

Data were collected from 98 normal-hearing young adults. Annual noise exposure history was estimated using the Noise Exposure Questionnaire. MOCR strength was assayed using click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) measured with and without noise presented to the contralateral ear. MOCR metrics included the MOCR-induced otoacoustic emission (OAE) magnitude shift and phase shift. A CEOAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of at least 12 dB was required for estimation of the MOCR metrics. Linear regression was applied to evaluate the relationship between MOCR metrics and annual noise exposure.

RESULTS

Annual noise exposure was not a statistically significant predictor of the MOCR-induced CEOAE magnitude shift. However, annual noise exposure was a statistically significant predictor of the MOCR-induced CEOAE phase shift-the MOCR-induced phase shift decreased with increasing noise exposure. Additionally, annual noise exposure was a statistically significant predictor of OAE level.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings contrast with recent work that suggests MOCR strength increases with annual noise exposure. Compared with previous work, data for this study were collected using more stringent SNR criteria, which is expected to increase the precision of the MOCR metrics. Additionally, data were collected for a larger subject population with a wider range of noise exposures. Whether findings generalize to other exposure durations and levels is unknown and requires future study.

Short-Term and Long-Term Stability of Medial Olivocochlear Reflex in Adults with Typical Hearing

This study aimed to assess the stability of Medial Olivocochlear Reflex (MOCR) function in typical hearing adults with the use of Contralateral Suppression (CS) of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs). This study included fifty-three (90 ears) participants between the ages of 18-30. Participants were divided into 3 groups (Group A-daily stability, Group B-short-term stability, and Group C- long-term stability). For each group, 4 measurements (30 × 4 = 120sessions) were taken. Group A measurements were taken daily, Group B measurements were taken weekly and Group C measurements were taken monthly. DPOAEs and Contralateral Suppression of DPOAEs were measured for each group. Analyses indicated that Medial Olivocochlear Reflex (MOCR) measured through contralateral suppression of DPOAE was unstable. This result indicates a DPOAE-based measure of the MOCR was not repeated across time. A great deal has been learned using CS of DPOAEs to study medial efferent activation, but several unresolved methodological issues that could impact the data to produce poor stability across time. Those methodological issues need to be explored and researched in the future.

Auditory Electrophysiological and Perceptual Measures in Student Musicians with High Sound Exposure

This study aimed to determine (a) the influence of noise exposure background (NEB) on the peripheral and central auditory system functioning and (b) the influence of NEB on speech recognition in noise abilities in student musicians. Twenty non-musician students with self-reported low NEB and 18 student musicians with self-reported high NEB completed a battery of tests that consisted of physiological measures, including auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) at three different stimulus rates (11.3 Hz, 51.3 Hz, and 81.3 Hz), and P300, and behavioral measures including conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry, consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant (CNC) word test and AzBio sentence test for assessing speech perception in noise abilities at -9, -6, -3, 0, and +3 dB signal to noise ratios (SNRs). The NEB was negatively associated with performance on the CNC test at all five SNRs. A negative association was found between NEB and performance on the AzBio test at 0 dB SNR. No effect of NEB was found on the amplitude and latency of P300 and the ABR wave I amplitude. More investigations of larger datasets with different NEB and longitudinal measurements are needed to investigate the influence of NEB on word recognition in noise and to understand the specific cognitive processes contributing to the impact of NEB on word recognition in noise.

Contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in young noise-exposed Veterans

Although animal models show a clear link between noise exposure and damage to afferent cochlear synapses, the relationship between noise exposure and efferent function appears to be more complex. Animal studies indicate that high intensity noise exposure reduces efferent medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex strength, whereas chronic moderate noise exposure is associated with a conditioning effect that enhances the MOC reflex. The MOC reflex is predicted to improve speech-in-noise perception and protects against noise-induced auditory damage by reducing cochlear gain. In humans, MOC reflex strength can be estimated by measuring contralateral inhibition of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of military noise exposure on efferent auditory function by measuring DPOAE contralateral inhibition in young Veterans and non-Veterans with normal audiograms. Compared with non-Veteran controls, Veterans with high levels of reported noise exposure demonstrated a trend of reduced contralateral inhibition across a broad frequency range, suggesting efferent damage. Veterans with moderate noise exposure showed trends of reduced inhibition from 3 to 4 kHz but greater inhibition from 1 to 1.5 kHz, consistent with conditioning. These findings suggest that, in humans, the impact of noise exposure on the MOC reflex differs depending on the noise intensity and duration.

Contralateral Suppression of Transient-evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Leisure Noise Exposed Individuals

Background

Leisure noise may have a significant impact on hearing thresholds and young adults are often exposed to loud music during leisure activities. This behavior puts them at risk of developing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). A frequent initial indication of NIHL is reduced hearing acuity at 4 kHz. The objective of the current study was to assess the role of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in leisure noise-exposed individuals with and without a 4-kHz notch.

Materials and Methods

Audiological evaluation, including pure-tone and immittance audiometry, was performed for 156 college-going, young adults between May 2019 to December 2019. All participants had averaged pure-tone audiometric thresholds within normal limits, bilaterally. Annual individual exposure to personal listening devices (PLDs) was calculated using the Noise Exposure Questionnaire. The participants were then categorized into exposed (with and without audiometric 4 kHz notch) and nonexposed groups. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude and its contralateral suppression were measured using linear and nonlinear click stimuli to study the effect of leisure noise exposure on MOCR.

Results

A significantly reduced overall contralateral suppression effect in participants exposed to PLD usage (P = 0.01) in both linear and nonlinear modes. On the contrary, significantly increased suppression was observed in linear mode for the 4 kHz frequency band in the PLD-exposed group without an audiometric notch (P = 0.009), possibly suggesting an early biomarker of NIHL.

Conclusion

Measuring contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions may be an effective tool to detect early NIHL in leisure noise-exposed individuals.

AudioChip: A Deep Phenotyping Approach for Deconstructing and Quantifying Audiological Phenotypes of Self-Reported Speech Perception Difficulties

OBJECTIVES

About 15% of U.S. adults report speech perception difficulties despite showing normal audiograms. Recent research suggests that genetic factors might influence the phenotypic spectrum of speech perception difficulties. The primary objective of the present study was to describe a conceptual framework of a deep phenotyping method, referred to as AudioChipping, for deconstructing and quantifying complex audiometric phenotypes.

DESIGN

In a sample of 70 females 18 to 35 years of age with normal audiograms (from 250 to 8000 Hz), the study measured behavioral hearing thresholds (250 to 16,000 Hz), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (1000 to 16,000 Hz), click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR), complex ABR (cABR), QuickSIN, dichotic digit test score, loudness discomfort level, and noise exposure background. The speech perception difficulties were evaluated using the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing Scale-12-item version (SSQ). A multiple linear regression model was used to determine the relationship between SSQ scores and audiometric measures. Participants were categorized into three groups (i.e., high, mid, and low) using the SSQ scores before performing the clustering analysis. Audiometric measures were normalized and standardized before performing unsupervised k-means clustering to generate AudioChip.

RESULTS

The results showed that SSQ and noise exposure background exhibited a significant negative correlation. ABR wave I amplitude, cABR offset latency, cABR response morphology, and loudness discomfort level were significant predictors for SSQ scores. These predictors explained about 18% of the variance in the SSQ score. The k-means clustering was used to split the participants into three major groups; one of these clusters revealed 53% of participants with low SSQ.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlighted the relationship between SSQ and auditory coding precision in the auditory brainstem in normal-hearing young females. AudioChip was useful in delineating and quantifying internal homogeneity and heterogeneity in audiometric measures among individuals with a range of SSQ scores. AudioChip could help identify the genotype-phenotype relationship, document longitudinal changes in auditory phenotypes, and pair individuals in case-control groups for the genetic association analysis.

Sexual Dimorphism in the Functional Development of the Cochlear Amplifier in Humans

OBJECTIVES

Otoacoustic emissions, a byproduct of active cochlear mechanisms, exhibit a higher magnitude in females than in males. The relatively higher levels of androgen exposure in the male fetus are thought to cause this difference. Postnatally, the onset of puberty is also associated with the androgen surge in males. In this study, we investigated sexual dimorphism in age-related changes in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions for children.

DESIGN

In a retrospective design, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions were analyzed from a cross-sectional sample of 170 normal-hearing children (4 to 12 years) and 67 young adults. Wideband acoustic immittance and efferent inhibition measures were analyzed to determine the extent to which middle ear transmission and efferent inhibition can account for potential sex differences in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

RESULTS

Male children showed a significant reduction in otoacoustic emission magnitudes with age, whereas female children did not show any such changes. Females showed higher stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission magnitudes compared with males. However, the effect size of sex differences in young adults was larger compared with children. Unlike the otoacoustic emission magnitude, the noise floor did not show sexual dimorphism; however, it decreased with age. Neither the wideband absorbance nor efferent inhibition could account for the sex differences in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The cochlear-amplifier function remains robust in female children but diminishes in male children between 4 and 12 years of age. We carefully eliminated lifestyle, middle ear, and efferent factors to conclude that the androgen surge associated with puberty likely caused the observed masculinization of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in male children. These findings have significant theoretical consequences. The cochlea is considered mature at birth; however, the present findings highlight that functional cochlear maturation, as revealed by otoacoustic emissions, can be postnatally influenced by endogenous hormonal factors, at least in male children. Overall, work reported here demonstrates sexual dimorphism in the functional cochlear maturational processes during childhood.

Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Click-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Subjects

Purpose The objective of the current study was to investigate the short-term test-retest reliability of contralateral suppression (CS) of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. Method Twenty-three young normal-hearing subjects were tested. An otoscopic evaluation, admittance measures, pure-tone audiometry, measurements of CEOAEs without and with contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) to determine CS were performed at baseline (n = 23), an immediate retest without and with refitting of the probe (only CS of CEOAEs; n = 11), and a retest after 1 week (n = 23) were performed. Test-retest reliability parameters were determined on CEOAE response amplitudes without and with CAS, and on raw and normalized CS indices between baseline and the other test moments. Results Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated no random or systematic changes in CEOAE response amplitudes without and with CAS, and in raw and normalized CS indices between the test moments. Moderate-to-high intraclass correlation coefficients with mostly high significant between-subjects variability between baseline and each consecutive test moment were found for CEOAE response amplitude without and with CAS, and for the raw and normalized CS indices. Other reliability parameters deteriorated between CEOAE response amplitudes with CAS as compared to without CAS, between baseline and retest with probe refitting, and after 1 week, as well as for frequency-specific raw and normalized CS indices as compared to global CS indices. Conclusions There was considerable variability in raw and normalized CS indices as measured using CEOAEs with CAS using commercially available otoacoustic emission equipment. More research is needed to optimize the measurement of CS of CEOAEs and to reduce influencing factors, as well as to make generalization of test-retest reliability data possible.

Determinants of the Audiometric Notch at 4000 and 6000 Hz in Young Adults

Background Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is often characterized by the presence of an audiometric notch at 3000-6000 Hz in a behavioral audiogram. The audiometric notch is widely used to investigate NIHL in children and young adults. However, the determinants of the audiometric notch in young adults largely remain unknown.

Purpose The study aimed to investigate the determinants of the audiometric notch in young adults.

Research Design A cross-sectional design was adopted for the study.

Study Sample A sample of 124 adults (38 males and 86 females) aged 18-35 years with normal otoscopic and tympanometric findings was recruited.

Data Collection and Analysis Hearing thresholds and real-ear sound pressure levels (RESPLs) were obtained with calibrated ER-3A (Etymotic Research, Elk Grove Village, IL) andTDH-50P receivers (Telephonics, Farmingdale, NY). Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were used to evaluate the cochlear function. The external auditory canal (EAC) length was measured using the acoustical method. Noise exposure background (NEB) was estimated using the Noise Exposure Questionnaire. The notched audiograms were identified using: Phillips, Coles, and Niskar criteria.

Results The prevalence of notched audiograms was substantially higher for TDH-50P supra-aural receivers than for ER-3A insert receivers. RESPLs at 6000 and 8000 Hz were the major predictors of notched audiograms for TDH-50P receivers. These predictors explained around 45% of the variance in the notched audiograms. The notched audiograms obtained with TDH-50P receivers showed no association with NEB. Individuals with notched audiograms measured using TDH-50P did not show convincing evidence of cochlear dysfunction as assessed by DPOAEs. Individuals with notched audiograms obtained with TDH-50P receivers revealed an average of shorter EAC and a poorer hearing threshold at 6000 Hz.

Conclusions The calibration error in the RESPLs at 6000 and 8000 Hz that are likely to be influenced by the shorter EAC was the major determinant of the notched audiograms when the supra-aural transducers were used to measure hearing thresholds. Therefore, the supra-aural receivers should not be used to estimate the prevalence of NIHL in children and young adults when the less restrictive notch identification criteria are used to identify NIHL. Real-ear calibration techniques that are least influenced by the standing waves in the EAC should be preferred when investigating the prevalence of and risk factors for NIHL in young adults.

Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression

Human hearing adapts to background noise, as evidenced by the fact that listeners recognize more isolated words when words are presented later rather than earlier in noise. This adaptation likely occurs because the leading noise shifts ("adapts") the dynamic range of auditory neurons, which can improve the neural encoding of speech spectral and temporal cues. Because neural dynamic range adaptation depends on stimulus-level statistics, here we investigated the importance of "statistical" adaptation for improving speech recognition in noisy backgrounds. We compared the recognition of noised-masked words in the presence and in the absence of adapting noise precursors whose level was either constant or was changing every 50 ms according to different statistical distributions. Adaptation was measured for 28 listeners (9 men) and was quantified as the recognition improvement in the precursor relative to the no-precursor condition. Adaptation was largest for constant-level precursors and did not occur for highly fluctuating precursors, even when the two types of precursors had the same mean level and both activated the medial olivocochlear reflex. Instantaneous amplitude compression of the highly fluctuating precursor produced as much adaptation as the constant-level precursor did without compression. Together, results suggest that noise adaptation in speech recognition is probably mediated by neural dynamic range adaptation to the most frequent sound level. Further, they suggest that auditory peripheral compression per se, rather than the medial olivocochlear reflex, could facilitate noise adaptation by reducing the level fluctuations in the noise.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Recognizing speech in noise is challenging but can be facilitated by noise adaptation. The neural mechanisms underlying this adaptation remain unclear. Here, we report some benefits of adaptation for word-in-noise recognition and show that (1) adaptation occurs for stationary but not for highly fluctuating precursors with equal mean level; (2) both stationary and highly fluctuating noises activate the medial olivocochlear reflex; and (3) adaptation occurs even for highly fluctuating precursors when the stimuli are passed through a fast amplitude compressor. These findings suggest that noise adaptation reflects neural dynamic range adaptation to the most frequent noise level and that auditory peripheral compression, rather than the medial olivocochlear reflex, could facilitate noise adaptation.

Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects

There currently are no standardized protocols to evaluate auditory efferent function in humans. Typical tests use broadband noise to activate the efferents, but only test the contralateral efferent pathway, risk activating the middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR), and are laborious for clinical use. In an attempt to develop a clinical test of bilateral auditory efferent function, we have designed a method that uses clicks to evoke efferent activity, obtain click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), and monitor MEMR. This allows for near-simultaneous estimation of cochlear and efferent function. In the present study, we manipulated click level (60, 70, and 80 dB peak-equivalent sound pressure level [peSPL]) and rate (40, 50, and 62.5 Hz) to identify an optimal rate-level combination that evokes measurable efferent modulation of CEOAEs. Our findings (n = 58) demonstrate that almost all click levels and rates used caused significant inhibition of CEOAEs, with a significant interaction between level and rate effects. Predictably, bilateral activation produced greater inhibition compared to stimulating the efferents only in the ipsilateral or contralateral ear. In examining the click rate-level effects during bilateral activation in greater detail, we observed a 1-dB inhibition of CEOAE level for each 10-dB increase in click level, with rate held constant at 62.5 Hz. Similarly, a 10-Hz increase in rate produced a 0.74-dB reduction in CEOAE level, with click level held constant at 80 dB peSPL. The effect size (Cohen's d) was small for either monaural condition and medium for bilateral, faster-rate, and higher-level conditions. We were also able to reliably extract CEOAEs from efferent eliciting clicks. We conclude that clicks can indeed be profitably employed to simultaneously evaluate cochlear health using CEOAEs as well as their efferent modulation. Furthermore, using bilateral clicks allows the evaluation of both the crossed and uncrossed elements of the auditory efferent nervous system, while yielding larger, more discernible, inhibition of the CEOAEs relative to either ipsilateral or contralateral condition.