Efficacy and safety of dapsone as second line therapy for adult immune thrombocytopenia: A retrospective study of 42 patients

Primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Time for a rethink

There are not many publications that provide a holistic view of the management of primary and secondary ITP as a whole, reflecting the similarities and differences between the two. Given the lack of major clinical trials, we believe that comprehensive reviews are much needed to guide the diagnosis and treatment of ITP today. Therefore, our review addresses the contemporary diagnosis and treatment of ITP in adult patients. With respect to primary ITP we especially focus on establishing the management of ITP based on the different and successive lines of treatment. Life-threatening situations, "bridge therapy" to surgery or invasive procedures and refractory ITP are also comprehensively reviewed here. Secondary ITP is studied according to its pathogenesis by establishing three major differential groups: Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Central Defects, Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Blocked Differentiation and Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Defective Peripheral Immune Response. Here we provide an up-to-date snapshot of the current diagnosis and treatment of ITP, including a special interest in addressing rare causes of this disease in our daily clinical practice. The target population of this review is adult patients only and the target audience is medical professionals.

Analyzing the Systems Biology Effects of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines to Assess Their Safety and Putative Side Effects

COVID-19 vaccines have been instrumental tools in reducing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infections around the world by preventing 80% to 90% of hospitalizations and deaths from reinfection, in addition to preventing 40% to 65% of symptomatic illnesses. However, the simultaneous large-scale vaccination of the global population will indubitably unveil heterogeneity in immune responses as well as in the propensity to developing post-vaccine adverse events, especially in vulnerable individuals. Herein, we applied a systems biology workflow, integrating vaccine transcriptional signatures with chemogenomics, to study the pharmacological effects of mRNA vaccines. First, we derived transcriptional signatures and predicted their biological effects using pathway enrichment and network approaches. Second, we queried the Connectivity Map (CMap) to prioritize adverse events hypotheses. Finally, we accepted higher-confidence hypotheses that have been predicted by independent approaches. Our results reveal that the mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine affects immune response pathways related to interferon and cytokine signaling, which should lead to vaccine success, but may also result in some adverse events. Our results emphasize the effects of BNT162b2 on calcium homeostasis, which could be contributing to some frequently encountered adverse events related to mRNA vaccines. Notably, cardiac side effects were signaled in the CMap query results. In summary, our approach has identified mechanisms underlying both the expected protective effects of vaccination as well as possible post-vaccine adverse effects. Our study illustrates the power of systems biology approaches in improving our understanding of the comprehensive biological response to vaccination against COVID-19.

Consensus guidelines for the management of adult immune thrombocytopenia in Australia and New Zealand

Introduction

The absence of high quality evidence for basic clinical dilemmas in immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) underlines the need for contemporary guidelines relevant to the local treatment context. ITP is diagnosed by exclusions, with a hallmark laboratory finding of isolated thrombocytopenia.

Main recommendations

Bleeding, family and medication histories and a review of historical investigations are required to gauge the bleeding risk and possible hereditary syndromes. Beyond the platelet count, the decision to treat is affected by individual bleeding risk, disease stage, side effects of treatment, concomitant medications, and patient preference. Treatment is aimed at achieving a platelet count > 20 × 10⁹/L, and avoidance of severe bleeding. Steroids are the standard first line treatment, with either 6‐week courses of tapering prednisone or repeated courses of high dose dexamethasone providing equivalent efficacy. Intravenous immunoglobulin can be used periprocedurally or as first line therapy in combination with steroids.

Changes in management as a result of this statement

There is no consensus on choice of second line treatments. Options with the most robust evidence include splenectomy, rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists. Other therapies include azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, dapsone and vinca alkaloids. Given that up to one‐third of patients achieve a satisfactory haemostatic response, splenectomy should be delayed for at least 12 months if possible. In life‐threatening bleeding, we recommend platelet transfusions to achieve haemostasis, along with intravenous immunoglobulin and high dose steroids.

A retrospective analysis of 122 immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with dapsone: Efficacy, safety and factors associated with treatment response

BACKGROUND

The optimum second-line treatment or best sequence of treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are yet to be determined. Our institution has accumulated extensive experience regarding the use of dapsone as second-line therapy for ITP.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the efficacy rate and safety of dapsone treatment in ITP patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Here we report our experience in a retrospective study, including 122 patients, with a median treatment duration with dapsone of 6 months and a median follow-up period of 3.4 years.

RESULTS

The overall response rate in this cohort was 66%, including 24% of complete responses. Among responders, in 24% a relapse occurred while on treatment. Therefore, a sustained response was observed in 51% of patients. Interestingly, 81% of the responders maintained the response after the interruption of treatment, for a median time of 26 months. Side effects were reported in 16% of the patients in this cohort and treatment was interrupted due to side effects in 11% of patients. The main cause in these cases was hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. Reductions in hemoglobin levels during the use of dapsone were seen in 94% of the patients. Responders presented significantly greater reductions in their hemoglobin levels than nonresponders did: median hemoglobin drop of 1.9 g/dl vs. 1.2 g/dl (p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that dapsone has adequate efficacy and is well tolerated. Although the mechanism of action is still unclear, our observation that the degree in the drop of hemoglobin is greater in responders suggest a possible role of the blockage of the reticuloendothelial system in the therapeutic effect of the drug.

Dapsone Hydroxylamine, an Active Metabolite of Dapsone, Can Promote the Procoagulant Activity of Red Blood Cells and Thrombosis

Dapsone hydroxylamine (DDS-NHOH), N-hydroxylated metabolite of a sulfonamide antibiotic, dapsone, is responsible for various adverse effects of dapsone that include methemoglobinemia, hemolytic anemia, and thrombosis. However, the mechanism underlying DDS-NHOH-induced thrombosis remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that DDS-NHOH, but not dapsone, could increase prothrombotic risks through inducing the procoagulant activity of red blood cells (RBCs). In freshly isolated human RBCs in vitro, sub-hemolytic concentrations of DDS-NHOH (10-50 μM) increased phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and augmented the formation of PS-bearing microvesicles (MV). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and the subsequent dysregulation of enzymes maintaining membrane phospholipid asymmetry were found to induce the procoagulant activity of DDS-NHOH. Dapsone hydroxylamine also accelerated thrombin generation and enhanced RBC self-aggregation and adherence of RBCs to endothelial cells in vitro. Most importantly, both the single dose of 50 or 100 mg/kg (i.p.) DDS-NHOH and repeated doses of 10 mg/kg per day (i.p.) for 4 days increased thrombus formation in rats (six rats per dose) in vivo, substantiating a potential prothrombotic risk of DDS-NHOH. Collectively, these results demonstrated the central role of RBC procoagulant activity induced by DDS-NHOH in the thrombotic risk of dapsone.

[Immune thrombocytopenia: From pathogenesis to treatment]

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune disease due to an immune peripheral destruction of platelets and an inappropriate platelet production. The pathogenesis of ITP is now better understood: it involves a humoral immune response which dependents on the stimulation of B cells by specific T cells called T follicular helper cells, leading to their differentiation into plasma cells that produce antiplatelet antibodies thus promoting the phagocytosis of platelets mainly by splenic macrophages. The deciphering of ITP pathogenesis has led to a better understanding of the inefficiency of treatments such as rituximab, although it has not provided yet the determination of biological predictive factor of response to treatments. Moreover, new therapeutic perspectives have been opened in the last few years with the development of molecules targeting Fcγ receptor signalling such as Syk inhibitor, or molecules increasing the clearance of pathogenic autoantibodies such as inhibitors of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn).

Treatment of primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medical therapies for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) complicating SLE are increasingly being investigated as alternatives to splenectomy and IVIG. The purpose of this review is to highlight the therapies that are utilized in the treatment of primary ITP and ITP secondary to lupus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Corticosteroids are still the standard initial treatment of ITP, with the addition of IVIG when a rapid response is needed. There are few studies dedicated to assessing the efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic (DMARD), biologic, and nonimmunosuppressive agents as treatment for lupus thrombocytopenia/lupus ITP. Rituximab and thrombopoeitin mimetics have been the most extensively studied therapies for primary ITP in recent years. Results of trials show adequate initial responses; however, the duration of therapy and sustainability of responses are variable. Splenectomy is less often utilized.

SUMMARY

Although corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and splenectomy have proven to be effective measures to treat immune thrombocytopenia, newer studies have demonstrated positive outcomes of immunosuppressives and thrombopoeitin mimetics. In most cases, the reported duration of therapy was not prolonged. More studies are needed to fully assess the effect of medical therapy in lupus ITP and to determine how long to continue maintenance therapy.

Is dapsone still relevant in immune thrombocytopenia in resource limited settings?

Immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder characterised by autoantibody production against platelets, increased platelet destruction and impaired thrombopoiesis. Steroids are the first-line agents whenever treatment is indicated; however, some patients may not respond and the responders may as well relapse while the dose is being tapered. Side effects of steroids prohibits their long-term use and patients often have to be switched to other agents. Standard drug management with intravenous immunoglobulins and thrombopoietin receptor analogues is difficult to administer in patients from low socioeconomic regions of the world making the management even more challenging. Hence, after reviewing the literature and considering the cost in comparison to all the second-line agents available, we tried dapsone in a steroid-dependent patient of immune thrombocytopenic purpura who had developed major steroid-related side effects. Patient showed good response to dapsone and has been in remission for around one and a half years.

Treatments for Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Review

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune condition that affects nearly 1:10,000 people in the world. It is traditionally defined by a platelet count of less than 100 x 109L, but treatment typically depends on symptomology rather than on the platelet count itself. For primary idiopathic ITP, corticosteroids have been the standard first-line of treatment for symptomatic patients, with the addition of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) or Rho(D) immune globulin (anti-RhD) for steroid-resistant cases. In cases of refractory or non-responsive ITP, second-line therapy includes splenectomy or rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen (anti-CD20). In patients who continue to have severe thrombocytopenia and symptomatic bleeding despite first- and second-line treatments, the diagnosis of "chronic refractory ITP" is appropriate, and third-line treatments are evaluated. This manuscript describes the efficacy of different treatment options for primary ITP and introduces the reader to various third-line options that are emerging as a means of treating chronic refractory ITP.