Identification of hospitalized elderly patients at risk for adverse in-hospital outcomes in a university orthopedics and trauma surgery environment

Simplified Screening for Depression in Acutely Hospitalized Geriatric Patients: Comparison of the Two-Item Whooley Questions With the Geriatric Depression Scale-15

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to investigate sensitivity and specificity of the two-item Whooley questions compared to the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) for the detection of depressive symptoms in acutely hospitalized geriatric patients.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited. Two-item Whooley questions and GDS-15 were performed within 24 h of admission, the GDS-15 being part of the routine geriatric assessment. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) served as gold standard in the form of a structured interview which was performed within 48 h of admission. In addition, all patients were examined for independence (Barthel Index), cognition (mini-mental status examination), vision and hearing (finger rub test) and multimorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index).

RESULTS

248 patients were recruited. Median (Q1/3) age was 83 (/3 79/86) years, 157 patients (63%) were female. Whooley questions had a sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99) and specificity of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56) identifying moderate depressive symptoms (MADRS ≥ 20 points) with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99. This is compared to a sensitivity of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.37-0.75) and specificity of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.56-0.68) using GDS-15 to identify moderate depressive symptoms. Both functional impairment and cognitive deficits had an impact on the result of GDS-15, but did not influence the result of Whooley questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the GDS-15, the two-item Whooley questions are more accurate to screen for symptoms of depression in acutely hospitalized geriatric patients.

Factors involved in the development of hospital-acquired conditions in older patients in acute care settings: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Older patients hospitalized in acute care settings are at significant risk of presenting hospital-acquired conditions. Healthcare professionals should consider many factors involved in the development of such conditions, including factors related to the patients, as well as those related to the processes of care and the structure of hospitals. The aim of this study was to describe and identify the factors involved in the development of hospital-acquired conditions in older patients in acute care settings.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed based on a structured search in eight databases in September 2022. Data were extracted with an extraction tool and classified into categories. Mapping and a narrative summary were used to synthetize data.

RESULTS

A total of 237 articles were included in the scoping review. Functional decline and delirium were the most frequent hospital-acquired conditions studied. Among all categories, factors related to the patients provided most of the data, whereas factors related to the processes of care and the structure of hospitals were less frequently explored. In most articles, one or two categories of factors were retrieved; fewer articles examined factors among three categories. Personal factors, medications, and the human and work environment were the most frequent subcategories of factors retrieved, whereas social factors, hydration and nutrition, and organizational factors were less common.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of hospital-acquired conditions in older patients in acute care settings involves many factors related to the patients, as well as to the processes of care and the structure of hospitals. Prevention of hospital-acquired conditions must involve to consider the complexities of older patients and of acute care hospitals. Not considering all categories of factors might affect the implementation of new practices of care and interventions.

Predictors of adverse outcomes in elders hospitalised for isolated orthopaedic trauma: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients >64 years of age now represent more than 51% of injury hospitalisations in Canada. The tools used to identify older patients who could benefit the most from an interdisciplinary approach include complex parameters difficult to collect in the ED, which suggests that better tools with higher accuracy and using items that can be derived from routinely collected data are needed. We aimed to identify variables that are associated with adverse outcomes in older patients admitted to a trauma centre for an isolated orthopaedic injury.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2019 on older patients hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of isolated orthopaedic injury (n=19 928). Data were extracted from the provincial trauma registry (Registre des traumatismes du Québec). We used multilevel logistic regression to estimate the associations between potential predictors and adverse outcomes (extended length of stay, mortality, complications, unplanned readmission and adverse discharge destination).

RESULTS

Increasing age, male sex, specific comorbidities, type of orthopaedic injuries, increasing number of comorbidities, severe orthopaedic injury, head injuries and admission in the year before the injury were all significant predictors of adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We identified eight predictors of adverse outcomes in patients >64 years of age admitted to a trauma centre for orthopaedic injury. These variables could eventually be used to develop a clinical decision rule to identify elders who may benefit the most from interdisciplinary care.

The Effect of the Timing of Cold Application on Pain and Satisfaction in Patients With Fractures

This experimental study used a repeated-measures design to examine the effect of the timing of cold application on pain and satisfaction in a sample of 60 patients who had fracture surgery. Cold was applied for 20 minutes each hour for four hours to patients assigned to the experimental group. Whereas cold was applied once to those in the control group: for 20 minutes during the first hour after surgery. Results following data analysis from repeated measurements of pain before and after cold application in both groups showed a significant difference between the groups (p < .05). Patients' levels of satisfaction with nursing care practice were higher in the experimental group than in the control group, although not significantly (p > .05). The pain score in the experimental group decreased significantly with each cold application. In the control group, the pretreatment pain score decreased significantly after one cold application, increasing again in 3 hours without cold application. These findings are important for nurses caring for postoperative patients and giving discharge instructions. Our findings suggest repeated cold applications for 20 minutes at hourly intervals may result in better overall pain reduction than a single cold application.

Increased Age, Cardiovascular Comorbidities, COPD, and Diabetes mellitus Determine Excess Mortality in Trauma Patients with SSI or Chronic Wounds

BACKGROUND

The constant aging of the German population leads, among other things, to an increase in the average age of hospitalised patients. In association with the reduced physiological reserve and the endogenous defence mechanism, this results in an increased susceptibility to infections and complications. Compared with that in trauma patients, the age distribution in patients with surgical site infections (SSI) has been poorly studied. Studies on the impact of age, diverse underlying diseases and influence of alcohol and nicotine consumption on the mortality risk in patients with SSI are limited.

METHODS

In 2014/15 (Exam 1), 345 patients with SSI were included in this study. The 3-year follow-up examination was performed in 2017/18 (Exam 2). The questionnaires (Exams 1 and 2) assessed demographic parameters, comorbidities, medication use, alcohol and nicotine consumption, and different risk factors related to morbidity. The mortality risk in patients with SSI was calculated as a function of various risk factors (age, comorbidities, medication intake, and noxious agents). Furthermore, the development of the patients' age in the trauma department, especially of those with SSI, were evaluated between 2010 and 2019.

RESULTS

In 2014/15 (Exam 1), 345 patients were included in the study. Of these, 274 (79.4%) were contacted by telephone in 2017/18. Thirty-six (10.4%) declined to be questioned again. Twenty (8.4%) of the 238 remaining participants had already died, resulting in 218 patients (63.2%) re-participating. From 2010 (n = 492) to 2019 (n = 885), the number of patients with SSI increased by 79.9%, especially those aged < 65 years. After the age of 60 years, the mortality risk increased rapidly (60 years: 0.0377 vs 70 years: 0.1395); the mortality risk of a 60-year-old patient with SSI was equal to that of an 80-year-old in the general population. Nicotine (p = 0.93) and alcohol consumption (p = 0.344) had no significant effect on mortality, whereas history of cardiac disease (p = 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p = 0.01), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.05) and peripheral artery disease (p = 0.01) were associated with a significant increase in the mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

Age, pre-existing cardiac conditions, as well as COPD, diabetes mellitus and peripheral artery disease are associated with a significantly increased mortality risk in patients with SSI. Thus, an exponential increase in mortality risk was found between the ages of 50 and 60 years, with the mortality risk of a 60-year-old patient with SSI being equivalent to that of an 80-year-old in the general population.

Identification of Seniors at Risk Score to Determine Geriatric Evaluations on Trauma Patients With Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Trauma centers are confronted with rising numbers of geriatric trauma patients at high risk for adverse outcomes. Geriatric screening is advocated but not standardized within trauma centers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the impact of Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening on patient outcomes and geriatric evaluations.

METHODS

This study used a pre-/postdesign to assess the impact of ISAR screening on patient outcomes and geriatric evaluations in trauma patients 60 years and older, comparing the periods before (2014-2016) and after (2017-2019) screening implementation.

RESULTS

Charts for 1,142 patients were reviewed. Comparing pre- to post-ISAR groups, the post-ISAR group with geriatric evaluations were older (M = 82.06, SD = 9.51 vs. M = 83.64, SD = 8.69; p = .026) with higher Injury Severity Scores (M = 9.22, SD = 0.69 vs. M = 9.38, SD = 0.92; p = .001). There was no significant difference in length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, readmission rate, hospice consults, or inhospital mortality. Inhospital mortality (n = 8/380, 2.11% vs. n = 4/434, 0.92%) and length of stay in hours (M = 136.49, SD = 67.09 vs. M = 132.53, SD = 69.06) down-trended in the postgroup with geriatric evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Resources and care coordination efforts can be directed toward specific geriatric screening scores to achieve optimal outcomes. Varying results were found related to outcomes of geriatric evaluations prompting future research.

The Predictive Value of the “Identification of Seniors at Risk” Score on Mortality, Length of Stay, Mobility and the Destination of Discharge of Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients

Purpose

The German Society for Geriatrics recommends the “ISAR” questionnaire as a screening tool for patients ≥70 for geriatric screening in emergency rooms. Although the ISAR-score is collected routinely in the “AltersTraumaRegister DGU^®” (ATR-DGU), to date less is known about the predictive value of the “ISAR”-score in geriatric trauma patients.

Patients and Methods

Currently, 84 clinics participate in the ATR-DGU. This evaluation is limited to the subgroup of proximal femur fractures from 2016–2018. Patients ≥70 years, who underwent surgery for a hip fracture are included in the ATR-DGU. In this evaluation, the influence of the “ISAR”-score on mortality, length of stay, mobility and the destination of discharge was examined.

Results

Overall 10,098 patients were included in the present study. The median age was 85 years (interquartile range (IQ) 80–89 years). According to the ISAR-score 80.6% (n=8142) of the patients were classified as geriatric patients (cut off “ISAR”-score ≥2 points). These group of patients had a length of stay of 16 days (IQ10.1–22.1) compared to the non-geriatric patient cohort showing a length of stay of 15 days (IQ10.1–20.1). Patients showing an ISAR-score ≥2 had an increased risk of being discharged to a nursing home (OR 8.25), not being able to walk (OR 12.52) and higher risk of mortality (OR 3.45).

Conclusion

The “ISAR”-score shows predictive power for the length of stay, mobility, hospital mortality and discharge after hospital in the collective of geriatric trauma patients. It therefore seems suitable as a screening tool for geriatric trauma patients in the emergency department and should be considered in this context.

Identification of Seniors at Risk Scoring in Geriatric Trauma: Exploring Clinical Outcome Correlations

Introduction

Geriatric trauma patients (GTP) make up an increasing percentage of the overall trauma population. Due to frailty, GTP are at an increased risk of morbidity and readmission. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to prognosticate outcomes to assist with resource utilization. We hypothesized that the "Identification of Seniors at Risk" (ISAR) score may correlate with both clinical outcomes and resource utilization for geriatric trauma patients.

Methods

Patients older than 65 years who were admitted to the trauma service were screened using an ISAR scoring algorithm. Outcomes, including 30-day mortality, all-cause morbidity, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, functional independence measures (FIM) at discharge, and percent discharged to a facility, were analyzed. Both descriptive and data-appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches were utilized, with significance set at α = 0.05.

Results

One thousand and two hundred seventeen GTP were included in this study. The average age was 81, median injury severity score was 9, and 99% had a blunt trauma mechanism. ISAR scores were generally associated with increasing 30-day mortality (0%, 1.9%, 2.4%, and 2.1% for ISAR 0, ISAR 1-2, ISAR 3-4, and ISAR 5-6, respectively), morbidity (2.6%, 7.6%, 14.7%, and 7.3% for respective categories), longer hospital (3.1, 4.6, 5.1, and 4.3 days, respectively) and ICU stays (0.37, 0.64, 0.81, and 0.67, respectively), lower FIM score at discharge (18.5, 17.1, 15.8, and 14.4, for respective categories), as well as increasing percentage of patients discharged to a facility (29.8%, 58.9%, 72.1%, and 78.8% for respective categories).

Conclusions

This exploratory study provides important early insight into potential relationships between ISAR and geriatric trauma outcomes. ISAR screening is a quick and easy-to-use tool that may be useful in GTP triage, level-of-care determination, and disposition planning. Understanding populations at risk, especially those with more intricate discharge needs, is an important step in mitigating those risks and implementing appropriate care plans.

Functional Status among Polymedicated Geriatric Inpatients at Discharge: A Population-Based Hospital Register Analysis

This study explored and compared the functional status of polymedicated and non-polymedicated geriatric inpatients at hospital discharge. We used a cross-sectional registry of geriatric patients' hospital records from a multi-site public hospital center in Switzerland. The analysis included all inpatients aged 65 years old or more admitted between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 (n = 53,690), of whom 67.5% were polymedicated at hospital discharge, 52.1% were women (n = 18,909), and 42.7% were 75-84 years old (n = 15,485). On average, the polymedicated patients' hospital lengths of stay were six days longer, they presented with more than three comorbidities, and they were prescribed more than nine medications at hospital discharge (p < 0.001). They showed more frequent general mobility decline (43.2% vs. 41.9%), gait disorders (46.2% vs. 43%), fatigue (48.6% vs. 43.4%) and dependence on lower-body care (49.7% vs. 47.6%), and presented a higher malnutrition risk (OR = 1.411; 95%CI 1.263-1.577; p < 0.001). However, the non-polymedicated inpatients had proportionally more physical and cognitive impairments. The comparison of the functional status of polymedicated and non-polymedicated geriatric inpatients at hospital discharge is important for clinicians trying to identify and monitor those who are most vulnerable to functional decline, and to design targeted strategies for the prevention of functional impairment and related adverse health outcomes.

The PROMISE study protocol: a multicenter prospective study of process optimization with interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral care for German patients receiving hip and knee endoprostheses

Background and purpose - Knee and hip replacement are common and increasing procedures, and an optimized care process that could be implemented in different settings would be useful. The PROMISE trial investigates whether a new care process works equally in different German settings and how the results compare with current non-standardized care.Patients and methods - This multi-center prospective mixed-method study includes 2,000 German patients receiving arthritis-related hip or knee endoprostheses. An interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral care process was developed and implemented in 3 German hospitals with different levels of care, and corresponding rehabilitation centers were included to bridge the gap after acute care.Duration and outcome - The PROMISE trial recruited patients between May 2018 and March 2020. Follow-up will end in February 2021. Assessments are performed at: examination on clinical indication, 1 week before surgery, on the day of surgery, at the end of hospitalization, end of the rehabilitation program, and 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, medical examination findings, and routinely collected data regarding the surgery and complications. Guideline-based interviews are conducted with selected patients and care partners. The primary endpoint is the presence of chronic pain at 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints are the number of recognized pre-existing conditions, physical activity at 12 months after surgery, use of medical services, quality of life, and interactions between care partners.Trial registration - The trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (https://www.drks.de; DRKS00013972; March 23, 2018).

Analysis of Fall Risk Factors in an Aging Population Living in Long-Term Care Institutions in SPAIN: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Falls in the elderly are associated with morbidity and mortality. Research about fall risk factors in Spanish care facilities is scarce. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of falls among residents living in long-term care Spanish institutions and to identify fall risk factors in this population. A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted in 113 centers. Persons over 70 years old who were living in a residential setting for at least 1 year were included. Simple and multiple regression analyses were conducted to estimate the associations between the main clinical variables registered in the databases and the presence of falls. A total of 2849 subjects were analyzed (mean age 85.21 years). The period prevalence of fallers in the last 12 months was 45.3%, with a proportion of recurrent fallers of 51.7%. The presence of falls was associated with lower Tinetti Scale scores (OR = 1.597, 95% CI: 1.280, 1.991; OR = 1.362, 95% CI: 1.134, 1.635), severe or moderate cognitive impairment (OR= 1.992, 95% CI: 1.472, 2.695; OR = 1.507, 95% CI: 1.231, 1.845, respectively), and polypharmacy (OR = 1.291, 95% CI: 1.039, 1.604). Fall prevention interventions should focus on the prevention of balance and cognitive deterioration and the improvement of these functions when possible. It should also focus on a periodical medication history revision aiming to avoid inappropriate prescriptions.

Clinical and functional patient characteristics predict medical needs in older patients at risk of functional decline

Background

The rising number of older multimorbid in-patients has implications for medical care. There is a growing need for the identification of factors predicting the needs of older patients in hospital environments. Our aim was to evaluate the use of clinical and functional patient characteristics for the prediction of medical needs in older hospitalized patients.

Methods

Two hundred forty-two in-patients (57.4% male) aged 78.4 ± 6.4 years, who were consecutively admitted to internal medicine departments of the University Hospital Essen between July 2015 and February 2017, were prospectively enrolled. Patients were assessed upon admission using the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening followed by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The CGA included standardized instruments for the assessment of activities of daily living (ADL), cognition, mobility, and signs of depression upon admission. In multivariable regressions we evaluated the association of clinical patient characteristics, the ISAR score and CGA results with length of hospital stay, number of nursing hours and receiving physiotherapy as indicators for medical needs. We identified clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with higher medical needs.

Results

The 242 patients spent [median(Q1;Q3)]:9.0(4.0;16.0) days in the hospital, needed 2.0(1.5;2.7) hours of nursing each day, and 34.3% received physiotherapy.

In multivariable regression analyses including clinical patient characteristics, ISAR and CGA domains, the factors age (β = − 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) = − 0.66;-0.13), number of admission diagnoses (β = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.16;0.41), ADL impairment (B = 6.66, 95% CI = 3.312;10.01), and signs of depression (B = 6.69, 95% CI = 1.43;11.94) independently predicted length of hospital stay. ADL impairment (B = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.67;1.61), cognition impairment (B = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.07;1.07) and ISAR score (β =0.26, 95% CI = 0.01;0.28) independently predicted nursing hours. The number of admission diagnoses (risk ratio (RR) = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04;1.08), ADL impairment (RR = 3.54, 95% CI = 2.29;5.47), cognition impairment (RR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.20;2.62) and signs of depression (RR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.39;2.85) predicted receiving physiotherapy.

Conclusion

Among older in-patients at risk for functional decline, the number of comorbidities, reduced ADL, cognition impairment and signs of depression are important predictors of length of hospital stay, nursing hours, and receiving physiotherapy during hospital stay.

Timing and methods of frailty assessments in geriatric trauma patients: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The trauma population is aging and better prognostic measures for geriatric trauma patients are required. Frailty rather than age appears to be associated with poor outcomes. This systematic review aimed to identify the optimum frailty assessment instrument and timing of assessment in patients aged over 65 years admitted to hospital after traumatic injury. The secondary aim was to evaluate outcomes associated with frailty in elderly trauma populations.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018090620). A MEDLINE and EMBASE literature search was conducted from inception to June 2019 combining the concepts of injury, geriatric, frailty, assessment and prognosis. Included studies were in patients 65 years or older hospitalised after injury and exposed to an instrument meeting consensus definition for frailty assessment. Study quality was assessed using criteria for review of prognostic studies combined with a GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight papers met inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight frailty or component instruments were reported, and assessments of pre-injury frailty were made up to 1-year post injury. Pre-injury frailty prevalence varied from 13% (13/100) to 94% (17/18), with in-hospital mortality rates from 2% (5/250) to 33% (6/18). Eleven studies found an association between frailty and mortality. Eleven studies reported an association between frailty and a composite outcome of mortality and adverse discharge destination. Generalisability and assessment of strength of associations was limited by single centre studies with inconsistent findings and overlapping cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between frailty and adverse outcomes including mortality in geriatric trauma patients were demonstrated despite a range of frailty instruments, administering clinicians, time of assessment and data sources. Although evidence gaps remain, incorporating frailty assessment into trauma systems is likely to identify geriatric patients at risk of adverse outcomes. Consistency in frailty instruments and long-term geriatric specific outcome measures will improve research relevance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III prognostic.

Health outcome of older hospitalized patients in internal medicine environments evaluated by Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening and geriatric assessment

Background

Hospitals are in need of valid and economic screening and assessment tools that help identifying older patients at risk for complications which require intensified support during their hospital stay.

Methods

Five hundred forty-seven internal medicine in-patients (mean age 78.14 ± 5.96 years; 54.7% males) prospectively received Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening. If screening results were positive (ISAR score ≥ 2), a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was performed. We explored sensitivity and specificity of different ISAR and CGA cutoffs. Further, we analyzed the risk of falls and how patients got discharged from hospital.

Results

ISAR+/CGA abnormal patients spent more days in hospital (16.1 ± 14.5), received more nursing hours per day (3.0 ± 2.3), more hours of physiotherapy during their hospital stay (2.2 ± 3.2), and had more falls (10.1%) compared to ISAR+/CGA normal (10.9 ± 12.3, 2.0 ± 1.2, 1.2 ± 4.3, and 2.8%, respectively, all p ≤ 0.016) and ISAR- (9.6 ± 11.5, 2.3 ± 4.5, 0.7 ± 2.0, and 2.2%, respectively, all p ≤ 0.002) patients. ISAR+/CGA abnormal patients terminated their treatment regularly with being discharged back home less often (59.6%) compared to ISAR+/CGA normal (78.5%, p = 0.002) and ISAR- (78.2%, p = 0.056) patients. ISAR cutoff≥2 and CGA defined as abnormal in case of impairment of ADL plus another CGA domain achieved best sensitivity/specificity.

Conclusions

Abnormal geriatric risk screening and assessment are associated with longer hospital stay and higher amount of nursing and physiotherapy during hospital stay, greater risk of falling, and a lower percentage of successfully terminated treatment in older in-patients.

Association of depression with malnutrition, grip strength and impaired cognitive function among senior trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Depression is common among senior adults, yet understudied among trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of depressive symptoms among seniors hospitalized in acute trauma care, to compare patients with depressive symptoms vs. those without, and to evaluate whether depression symptoms affects discharge destination.

METHODS

This cross-sectional and prospective analysis was conducted among community-dwelling patients ≥70 years old, hospitalized at the Senior Trauma Center of the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. We used the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) to assess presence of depressive symptoms. Using a cutoff value of 5 points, we compared age- and gender-adjusted characteristics of patients with and without depressive symptoms. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of returning home vs. not adjusting for age, gender, nutritional status, cognitive function and others.

RESULTS

Of the 273 seniors enrolled, 104 (38.1%) were men and the mean age was 79.4 (SD = 6.5) years. We identified 52 (19.0%) patients with depressive symptoms. These patients were more likely to be older (p = 0.04), at risk for malnutrition (p<0.0001), at least pre-frail (p = 0.005), and have decreased cognitive function (p = 0.001). They were also more than twice as likely to be discharged to acute geriatric care compared to home (OR = 2.28 (CI = 1.12-4.68)).

LIMITATIONS

Depressive symptoms were assessed during acute care without data before hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Senior trauma patients with depressive symptoms during acute care were more likely to be at higher risk of malnutrition, have cognitive decline and are more likely to receive additional geriatric care.

Examining the relationship between obesity and mental health outcomes among individuals admitted to a level I trauma centre

The increased incidence of obesity in the general population translates into clinicians caring for an increased number of trauma patients with obesity. Previous research has documented the unique anatomical and physiological challenges that clinicians face when caring for trauma patients with obesity; however, little is known about psychological challenges that trauma patients with obesity may also experience in the months following injury. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between obesity and (i) mental health, (ii) demographic and injury-related variables and (iii) quality-of-life outcomes among trauma patients between hospitalization and 3-months post-injury. This is a prospective, longitudinal study conducted between March 2012 and May 2014 at a single, level I trauma centre in the southwest United States. Inclusion criteria for this convenience sample consisted of patients who were admitted to the trauma or orthopaedic trauma service ≥24 h, medically stable, spoke English or Spanish and ≥18 years of age. In total, 455 eligible patients were consented and enrolled; 343 (70.87%) completed 3-month follow-up. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between obesity and mental health among trauma patients in the months following injury. Demographic and injury-related data were also collected; patients' height and weight were used to determine body mass index. Health outcomes were assessed during initial hospitalization and at 3-month follow-up and included depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, pain and return to work. Prior to data collection, it was hypothesized that obesity would have a negative effect on mental health outcomes among patients 3 months post-injury. The final sample consisted of 343 participants; average age was 46.4 ± 17.3 years; majority male (n = 213, 63%) and Caucasian (n = 231, 69%). Patients with obesity had higher odds of screening positive for depression (odds ratio [OR] = 2.36, P = 0.02) and overweight patients had lower odds of returning to work (OR = 0.31, P = 0.01) 3 months post-injury compared to patients of normal weight (65% vs. 40%). No other significant differences were found. Results of the current study are novel in that they identify psychological challenges that overweight and trauma patients with obesity may experience. These results demonstrate the need for mental health professionals to be involved in follow-up care to extending in the months following injury.

[Validation of the Geriatric Check in a cohort of hospitalized neurological patients]

BACKGROUND

The Geriatrie-Check was developed as a screening tool for the identification of older patients with geriatric treatment requirements in hospitals. It was recommended by the Baden-Wuerttemberg Hospitals Association for routine use in hospitals in 2014 although no published validation studies are available. The test takes 3-5 min.

AIM

Validation of the Geriatrie-Check in a prospective cohort of hospitalized neurological patients with and without geriatric characteristics.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional observational study at the University Hospital Tübingen, Germany the Geriatrie-Check was compared with a comprehensive geriatric assessment in 107 neurological inpatients aged 70 years and older (41% women, mean age 76.7 years).

RESULTS

The Geriatrie-Check classified 61 patients (57%) as geriatric patients. These patients with a positive result in the Geriatrie-Check had a higher percentage of frailty (according to Fried et al.), higher values in the Gérontopôle frailty screening tool, higher values in the geriatric screening according to Lachs et el., slower gait speed, lower grip force, needed longer for the timed up-and-go test, had a greater fear of falling in the Falls Efficacy Scale - International, lower scores in the Mini Mental State Examination, needed more time to perform the Trail Making Test A and B, had higher values in the Beck's Depressions Inventar II and lower values in the visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D. A higher percentage of patients took more than five different drugs.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION

The Geriatrie-Check has been shown to be a useful and valid tool for the identification of geriatric inpatients in neurological wards due to the good agreement with the results of the geriatric assessment.