Radiographic prediction of meningioma grade by semantic and radiomic features

Meningioma: Molecular Updates from the 2021 World Health Organization Classification of CNS Tumors and Imaging Correlates

Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial neoplasms, account for more than one-third of primary CNS tumors. While traditionally viewed as benign, meningiomas can be associated with considerable morbidity, and specific meningioma subgroups display more aggressive behavior with higher recurrence rates. The risk stratification for recurrence has been primarily associated with the World Health Organization (WHO) histopathologic grade and extent of resection. However, a growing body of literature has highlighted the value of molecular characteristics in assessing recurrence risk. While maintaining the previous classification system, the 5th edition of the 2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System tumors (CNS5) book expands upon the molecular information in meningiomas to help guide management. The WHO CNS5 stratifies meningioma into 3 grades (1-3) based on histopathology criteria and molecular profile. The telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions now signify a grade 3 meningioma with increased recurrence risk. Tumor location also correlates with underlying mutations. Cerebral convexity and most spinal meningiomas carry a 22q deletion and/or NF2 mutations, while skull base meningiomas have AKT1, TRAF7, SMO, and/or PIK3CA mutations. MRI is the primary imaging technique for diagnosing and treatment-planning of meningiomas, while DOTATATE PET imaging offers supplementary information beyond anatomic imaging. Herein, we review the evolving molecular landscape of meningiomas, emphasizing imaging/genetic biomarkers and treatment strategies relevant to neuroradiologists.

Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) grade of meningiomas is determined based on the biopsy results. Therefore, accurate non-invasive preoperative grading could significantly improve treatment planning and patient outcomes. Considering recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of these models in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. A systematic search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 1, 2024, and reporting the performance metrics of the ML models in predicting of WHO meningioma grade using imaging studies. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), specificity, and sensitivity were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed based on a number of potential influencing variables. A total of 32 studies with 15,365 patients were included in the present study. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of ML methods for prediction of tumor grade in meningioma were 85% (95% CI, 79-89%), 87% (95% CI, 81-91%), and 93% (95% CI, 90-95%), respectively. Both the type of validation and study cohort (training or test) were significantly associated with model performance. However, no significant association was found between the sample size or the type of ML method and model performance. The ML predictive models show a high overall performance in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. Further studies on the performance of DL algorithms in larger datasets using external validation are needed.

Differentiating Cystic Lesions in the Sellar Region of the Brain Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis: A Prospective Review of the Novel Diagnostic Modalities

This paper investigates the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to enhance the differentiation of cystic lesions in the sellar region, such as pituitary adenomas, Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs) and craniopharyngiomas (CP), through the use of advanced neuroimaging techniques, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The goal is to explore how AI-driven models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), deep learning, and ensemble methods, can overcome the limitations of traditional diagnostic approaches, providing more accurate and early differentiation of these lesions. The review incorporates findings from critical studies, such as using the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) dataset (Kaggle, San Francisco, USA) for MRI-based brain research, highlighting the significance of statistical rigor and automated segmentation in developing reliable AI models. By drawing on these insights and addressing the challenges posed by small, single-institutional datasets, the paper aims to demonstrate how AI applications can improve diagnostic precision, enhance clinical decision-making, and ultimately lead to better patient outcomes in managing sellar region cystic lesions.

Prediction of early recurrence of adult-type diffuse gliomas following radiotherapy using multi-modal magnetic resonance images

BACKGROUND

Adult-type diffuse gliomas are among the central nervous system's most aggressive malignant primary neoplasms. Despite advancements in systemic therapies and technological improvements in radiation oncology treatment delivery, the survival outcome for these patients remains poor. Fast and accurate assessment of tumor response to oncologic treatments is crucial, as it can enable the early detection of recurrent or refractory gliomas, thereby allowing timely intervention with life-prolonging salvage therapies.

PURPOSE

Radiomics is a developing field with great potential to improve medical image interpretation. This study aims to apply a radiomics-based predictive model for classifying response to radiotherapy within the first 3 months post-treatment.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients were selected from the Burdenko Glioblastoma Progression Dataset. Tumor regions were delineated in the axial plane on contrast-enhanced T1(CE T1W) and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2_FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Hand-crafted radiomic (HCR) features, including first- and second-order features, were extracted using PyRadiomics (3.7.6) in Python (3.10). Then, recursive feature elimination with a random forest (RF) classifier was applied for feature dimensionality reduction. RF and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were built to predict treatment outcomes using the selected features. Leave-one-out cross-validation was employed to tune hyperparameters and evaluate the models.

RESULTS

For each segmented target, 186 HCR features were extracted from the MRI sequence. Using the top-ranked radiomic features from a combination of CE T1W and T2_FLAIR, an optimized classifier achieved the highest averaged area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 ± 0.075 using the RF classifier. The HCR features of CE T1W produced the worst outcomes among all models (0.603 ± 0.024 and 0.615 ± 0.075 for RF and SVM classifiers, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and evaluated a radiomics-based predictive model for early tumor response to radiotherapy, demonstrating excellent performance supported by high AUC values. This model, harnessing radiomic features from multi-modal MRI, showed superior predictive performance compared to single-modal MRI approaches. These results underscore the potential of radiomics in clinical decision support for this disease process.

A large scale multi institutional study for radiomics driven machine learning for meningioma grading

This study aims to develop and evaluate radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models for predicting meningioma grades using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The study utilized the BraTS-MEN dataset's training split, including 698 patients (524 with grade 1 and 174 with grade 2-3 meningiomas). We extracted 4872 radiomic features from T1, T1 with contrast, T2, and FLAIR MRI sequences using PyRadiomics. LASSO regression reduced features to 176. The data was split into training (60%), validation (20%), and test (20%) sets. Five ML algorithms (TabPFN, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Random Forest) were employed to build models differentiating low-grade (grade 1) from high-grade (grade 2-3) meningiomas. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using Optuna, optimizing model-specific parameters and feature selection. The CatBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.838 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.689-0.935], precision of 0.492 (95% CI: 0.371-0.623), recall of 0.838 (95% CI: 0.689-0.935), F1 score of 0.620 (95% CI: 0.495-0.722), accuracy of 0.729 (95% CI: 0.650-0.800), an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.620 (95% CI: 0.433-0.753), and Brier score of 0.156 (95% CI: 0.122-0.200). Other models showed comparable performance, with mean AUROCs ranging from 0.752 to 0.784. The radiomics-based ML approach presented in this study showcases the potential for non-invasive and pre-operative grading of meningiomas using multiparametric MRI. Further validation on larger and independent datasets is necessary to establish the robustness and generalizability of these findings.

Preoperative prediction of CNS WHO grade and tumour aggressiveness in intracranial meningioma based on radiomics and structured semantics

Preoperative identification of intracranial meningiomas with aggressive behaviour may help in choosing the optimal treatment strategy. Radiomics is emerging as a powerful diagnostic tool with potential applications in patient risk stratification. In this study, we aimed to compare the predictive value of conventional, semantic based and radiomic analyses to determine CNS WHO grade and early tumour relapse in intracranial meningiomas. We performed a single-centre retrospective analysis of intracranial meningiomas operated between 2007 and 2018. Recurrence within 5 years after Simpson Grade I-III resection was considered as early. Preoperative T1 CE MRI sequences were analysed conventionally by two radiologists. Additionally a semantic feature score based on systematic analysis of morphological characteristics was developed and a radiomic analysis were performed. For the radiomic model, tumour volume was extracted manually, 791 radiomic features were extracted. Eight feature selection algorithms and eight machine learning methods were used. Models were analysed using test and training datasets. In total, 226 patients were included. There were 21% CNS WHO grade 2 tumours, no CNS WHO grade 3 tumour, and 25 (11%) tumour recurrences were detected in total. In ROC analysis the best radiomic models demonstrated superior performance for determination of CNS WHO grade (AUC 0.930) and early recurrence (AUC 0.892) in comparison to the semantic feature score (AUC 0.74 and AUC 0.65) and conventional radiological analysis (AUC 0.65 and 0.54). The combination of human classifiers, semantic score and radiomic analysis did not markedly increase the model performance. Radiomic analysis is a promising tool for preoperative identification of aggressive and atypical intracranial meningiomas and could become a useful tool in the future.

Research Progress of Artificial Intelligence in the Grading and Classification of Meningiomas

A meningioma is a common primary central nervous system tumor. The histological features of meningiomas vary significantly depending on the grade and subtype, leading to differences in treatment and prognosis. Therefore, early diagnosis, grading, and typing of meningiomas are crucial for developing comprehensive and individualized diagnosis and treatment plans. The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging, particularly radiomics and deep learning (DL), has contributed to the increasing research on meningioma grading and classification. These techniques are fast and accurate, involve fully automated learning, are non-invasive and objective, enable the efficient and non-invasive prediction of meningioma grades and classifications, and provide valuable assistance in clinical treatment and prognosis. This article provides a summary and analysis of the research progress in radiomics and DL for meningioma grading and classification. It also highlights the existing research findings, limitations, and suggestions for future improvement, aiming to facilitate the future application of AI in the diagnosis and treatment of meningioma.

Multiparameter MRI-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of brain invasion in atypical meningioma:a multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To develop a nomogram based on tumor and peritumoral edema (PE) radiomics features extracted from preoperative multiparameter MRI for predicting brain invasion (BI) in atypical meningioma (AM).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, according to the 2021 WHO classification criteria, a total of 469 patients with pathologically confirmed AM from three medical centres were enrolled and divided into training (n = 273), internal validation (n = 117) and external validation (n = 79) cohorts. BI was diagnosed based on the histopathological examination. Preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images (T1C) and T2-weighted MR images (T2) for extracting meningioma features and T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences for extracting meningioma and PE features were obtained. The multiple logistic regression was applied to develop separate multiparameter radiomics models for comparison. A nomogram was developed by combining radiomics features and clinical risk factors, and the clinical usefulness of the nomogram was verified using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Among the clinical factors, PE volume and PE/tumor volume ratio are the risk of BI in AM. The combined nomogram based on multiparameter MRI radiomics features of meningioma and PE and clinical indicators achieved the best performance in predicting BI in AM, with area under the curve values of 0.862 (95% CI, 0.819-0.905) in the training cohort, 0.834 (95% CI, 0.780-0.908) in the internal validation cohort and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.785-0.950) in the external validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on tumor and PE radiomics features extracted from preoperative multiparameter MRI and clinical factors can predict the risk of BI in patients with AM.

Predicting meningioma grades and pathologic marker expression via deep learning

OBJECTIVES

To establish a deep learning (DL) model for predicting tumor grades and expression of pathologic markers of meningioma.

METHODS

A total of 1192 meningioma patients from two centers who underwent surgical resection between September 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The pathological data and post-contrast T1-weight images for each patient were collected. The patients from institute I were subdivided into training, validation, and testing sets, while the patients from institute II served as the external testing cohort. The fine-tuned ResNet50 model based on transfer learning was adopted to classify WHO grade in the whole cohort and predict Ki-67 index, H3K27me3, and progesterone receptor (PR) status of grade 1 meningiomas. The predictive performance was evaluated by the accuracy and loss curve, confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The DL prediction model for each label achieved high predictive performance in two cohorts. For WHO grade prediction, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.966 (95%CI 0.957-0.975) in the internal testing set and 0.669 (95%CI 0.643-0.695) in the external validation cohort. The AUC in predicting Ki-67 index, H3K27me3, and PR status were 0.905 (95%CI 0.895-0.915), 0.773 (95%CI 0.760-0.786), and 0.771 (95%CI 0.750-0.792) in the internal testing set and 0.591 (95%CI 0.562-0.620), 0.658 (95%CI 0.648-0.668), and 0.703 (95%CI 0.674-0.732) in the external validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DL models can preoperatively predict meningioma grades and pathologic marker expression with favorable predictive performance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our DL model could predict meningioma grades and expression of pathologic markers and identify high-risk patients with WHO grade 1 meningioma, which would suggest a more aggressive operative intervention preoperatively and a more frequent follow-up schedule postoperatively.

KEY POINTS

WHO grades and some pathologic markers of meningioma were associated with therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes. A deep learning-based approach was employed to develop a model for predicting meningioma grades and the expression of pathologic markers. Preoperative prediction of meningioma grades and the expression of pathologic markers was beneficial for clinical decision-making.

Development of a Clinicopathological-Radiomics Model for Predicting Progression and Recurrence in Meningioma Patients

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Tumor progression and recurrence（P/R）after surgical resection are common in meningioma patients and can indicate poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the values of clinicopathological information and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in predicting P/R and progression-free survival (PFS) in meningioma patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 169 patients with pathologically confirmed meningioma were included in this study, 54 of whom experienced P/R. Clinicopathological information, including age, gender, Simpson grading, World Health Organization (WHO) grading, Ki-67 index, and radiotherapy history, as well as preoperative traditional radiographic findings and radiomics features for each MRI modality (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and enhanced T1-weighted images) were initially extracted. After feature selection, the optimal performance was estimated among the models established using different feature sets. Finally, Cox survival analysis was further used to predict PFS.

RESULTS

Ki-67 index, Simpson grading, WHO grading, and radiotherapy history were found to be independent predictors for P/R in the multivariate regression analysis. This clinicopathological model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.865 and 0.817 in the training and testing sets, respectively. The performance of the combined radiomics model reached 0.85 and 0.84, respectively. A clinicopathological-radiomics model was then established, which significantly improved the prediction of meningioma P/R (AUC = 0.93 and 0.88, respectively). Finally, the risk ratio was estimated for each selected feature, and the C-index of 0.749 was obtained.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics signatures of preoperative MRI have the ability to predict meningioma at the risk of P/R. By integrating clinicopathological information, the best performance was achieved.

Multi-parametric MRI-based machine learning model for prediction of WHO grading in patients with meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram combined multiparametric MRI and clinical indicators for identifying the WHO grade of meningioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in this study, who were diagnosed pathologically as having meningiomas. Firstly, radiomics features were extracted from CE-T1, T2, and 1-cm-thick tumor-to-brain interface (BTI) images. Then, difference analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were orderly used to select the most representative features. Next, the support vector machine algorithm was conducted to predict the WHO grade of meningioma. Furthermore, a nomogram incorporated radiomics features and valuable clinical indicators was constructed by logistic regression. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by calibration and clinical effectiveness, as well as internal validation.

RESULTS

Peritumoral edema volume and gender are independent risk factors for predicting meningioma grade. The multiparametric MRI features incorporating CE-T1, T2, and BTI features showed the higher performance for prediction of meningioma grade with a pooled AUC = 0.885 (95% CI, 0.821-0.946) and 0.860 (95% CI, 0.788-0.923) in the training and test groups, respectively. Then, a nomogram with a pooled AUC = 0.912 (95% CI, 0.876-0.961), combined radiomics score, peritumoral edema volume, and gender improved diagnostic performance compared to radiomics model or clinical model and showed good calibration as the true results. Moreover, decision curve analysis demonstrated satisfactory clinical effectiveness of the proposed nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel nomogram is simple yet effective in differentiating WHO grades of meningioma and thus can be used in patients with meningiomas.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

We proposed a nomogram that included clinical indicators and multi-parameter radiomics features, which can accurately, objectively, and non-invasively differentiate WHO grading of meningioma and thus can be used in clinical work.

KEY POINTS

• The study combined radiomics features and clinical indicators for objectively predicting the meningioma grade. • The model with CE-T1 + T2 + brain-to-tumor interface features demonstrated the best predictive performance by investigating seven different radiomics models. • The nomogram potentially has clinical applications in distinguishing high-grade and low-grade meningiomas.

Deep-learning models for image-based gynecological cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta- analysis

Introduction

Gynecological cancers pose a significant threat to women worldwide, especially those in resource-limited settings. Human analysis of images remains the primary method of diagnosis, but it can be inconsistent and inaccurate. Deep learning (DL) can potentially enhance image-based diagnosis by providing objective and accurate results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the recent advances of deep learning (DL) techniques for gynecological cancer diagnosis using various images and explore their future implications.

Methods

The study followed the PRISMA-2 guidelines, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Five databases were searched for articles published from January 2018 to December 2022. Articles that focused on five types of gynecological cancer and used DL for diagnosis were selected. Two reviewers assessed the articles for eligibility and quality using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data was extracted from each study, and the performance of DL techniques for gynecological cancer classification was estimated by pooling and transforming sensitivity and specificity values using a random-effects model.

Results

The review included 48 studies, and the meta-analysis included 24 studies. The studies used different images and models to diagnose different gynecological cancers. The most popular models were ResNet, VGGNet, and UNet. DL algorithms showed more sensitivity but less specificity compared to machine learning (ML) methods. The AUC of the summary receiver operating characteristic plot was higher for DL algorithms than for ML methods. Of the 48 studies included, 41 were at low risk of bias.

Conclusion

This review highlights the potential of DL in improving the screening and diagnosis of gynecological cancer, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, the high heterogeneity and quality of the studies could affect the validity of the results. Further research is necessary to validate the findings of this study and to explore the potential of DL in improving gynecological cancer diagnosis.

The development of a combined clinico-radiomics model for predicting post-operative recurrence in atypical meningiomas: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

Atypical meningiomas could manifest early recurrence after surgery and even adjuvant radiotherapy. We aimed to construct a clinico-radiomics model to predict post-operative recurrence of atypical meningiomas based on clinicopathological and radiomics features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort was comprised of 224 patients from two neurosurgical centers. 164 patients from center I were divided to the training cohort for model development and the testing cohort for internal validation. 60 patients from center II were used for external validation. Clinicopathological characteristics, radiological semantic, and radiomics features were collected. A radiomic signature was comprised of four radiomics features. A clinico-radiomics model combining the radiomics signature and clinical characteristics was constructed to predict the recurrence of atypical meningiomas.

RESULTS

1920 radiomics features were extracted from the T1 Contrast and T2-FLAIR sequences of patients in center I. The radiomics signature was able to differentiate post-operative patients into low-risk and high-risk groups based on tumor recurrence (P < 0.001). A clinic-radiomics model was established by combining age, extent of resection, Ki-67 index, surgical history and the radiomics signature for recurrence prediction in atypical meningiomas. The model achieved a good prediction performance with the integrated AUC of 0.858 (0.802-0.915), 0.781 (0.649-0.912) and 0.840 (0.747-0.933) in the training, internal validation and external validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study established a radiomics signature and a clinico-radiomics model with a favorable performance in predicting tumor recurrence for atypical meningiomas.

Diversity in Renal Mass Data Cohorts: Implications for Urology AI Researchers

INTRODUCTION

We examine the heterogeneity and distribution of the cohort populations in two publicly used radiological image cohorts, the Cancer Genome Atlas Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma (TCIA TCGA KIRC) collection and 2019 MICCAI Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge (KiTS19), and deviations in real-world population renal cancer data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) Participant User Data File (PUF) and tertiary center data. PUF data are used as an anchor for prevalence rate bias assessment. Specific gene expression and, therefore, biology of RCC differ by self-reported race, especially between the African American and Caucasian populations. AI algorithms learn from datasets, but if the dataset misrepresents the population, reinforcing bias may occur. Ignoring these demographic features may lead to inaccurate downstream effects, thereby limiting the translation of these analyses to clinical practice. Consciousness of model training biases is vital to patient care decisions when using models in clinical settings.

METHODS

Data elements evaluated included gender, demographics, reported pathologic grading, and cancer staging. American Urological Association risk levels were used. Poisson regression was performed to estimate the population-based and sample-specific estimation for prevalence rate and corresponding 95% confidence interval. SAS 9.4 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to PUF, KiTS19 and TCGA KIRC oversampled Caucasian by 9.5% (95% CI, -3.7 to 22.7%) and 15.1% (95% CI, 1.5 to 28.8%), undersampled African American by -6.7% (95% CI, -10% to -3.3%), and -5.5% (95% CI, -9.3% to -1.8%). Tertiary also undersampled African American by -6.6% (95% CI, -8.7% to -4.6%). The tertiary cohort largely undersampled aggressive cancers by -14.7% (95% CI, -20.9% to -8.4%). No statistically significant difference was found among PUF, TCGA, and KiTS19 in aggressive rate; however, heterogeneities in risk are notable.

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneities between cohorts need to be considered in future AI training and cross-validation for renal masses.

Predicting Histologic Grade of Meningiomas Using a Combined Model of Radiomic and Clinical Imaging Features from Preoperative MRI

Meningiomas are common primary brain tumors, and their accurate preoperative grading is crucial for treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the value of radiomics and clinical imaging features in predicting the histologic grade of meningiomas from preoperative MRI. We retrospectively reviewed patients with intracranial meningiomas from two hospitals. Preoperative MRIs were analyzed for tumor and edema volumes, enhancement patterns, margins, and tumor-brain interfaces. Radiomics features were extracted, and machine learning models were employed to predict meningioma grades. A total of 212 patients were included. In the training group (Hospital 1), significant differences were observed between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas in terms of tumor volume (p = 0.012), edema volume (p = 0.004), enhancement (p = 0.001), margin (p < 0.001), and tumor-brain interface (p < 0.001). Five radiomics features were selected for model development. The prediction model for radiomics features demonstrated an average validation accuracy of 0.74, while the model for clinical imaging features showed an average validation accuracy of 0.69. When applied to external test data (Hospital 2), the radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.72 and accuracy of 0.69, while the clinical imaging model achieved an AUC of 0.82 and accuracy of 0.81. An improved performance was obtained from the model constructed by combining radiomics and clinical imaging features. In the combined model, the AUC and accuracy for meningioma grading were 0.86 and 0.73, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential value of radiomics and clinical imaging features in predicting the histologic grade of meningiomas. The combination of both radiomics and clinical imaging features achieved the highest AUC among the models. Therefore, the combined model of radiomics and clinical imaging features may offer a more effective tool for predicting clinical outcomes in meningioma patients.

Prediction of meningioma grade by constructing a clinical radiomics model nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical value of a clinical radiomics model nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative meningioma grading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected retrospectively 544 patients with pathological diagnosis of meningiomas were categorized into training (n = 380) and validation (n = 164) groups at the ratio of 7∶ 3. There were 3,376 radiomics features extracted from T2WI and T1C by shukun technology platform after manual segmentation using an independent blind method by two radiologists. The Selectpercentile and Lasso are used to filter the most strongly correlated features. Random forest (RF) radiomics model and clinical radiomics model nomogram were constructed respectively. The calibration, discrimination, and clinical validity were evaluated by using the calibration curve and decision analysis curve (DCA).

RESULTS

The RF radiomics model based on T1C and T2WI was the most effective to predict meningioma grade before surgery among the six different classifiers. The predictive ability of clinical radiomics model was slightly higher than that of RF model alone. The AUC, SEN, SPE, and ACC of the training set were 0.949, 0.976, 0.785, and 0.826, and the AUC, SEN, SPE, and ACC of the validation set were 0.838, 0.829, 0.783, and 0.793, respectively. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed the predictive probability of the fusion model was similar to the actual differentiated LGM and HGM. The analysis of the decision curve showed that the clinical radiomics model could obtain the best clinical net profit.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical radiomics model nomogram based on T1C and T2WI has high accuracy and sensitivity for predicting meningioma grade.

Predictors of recurrence after surgical resection of parafalcine and parasagittal meningiomas

PURPOSE

Owing to their vicinity near the superior sagittal sinus, parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas are challenging tumors to surgically resect. In this study, we investigate key factors that portend increased risk of recurrence after surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent resection of parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas at our institution between 2012 and 2018. Relevant clinical, radiographic, and histopathological variables were selected for analysis as predictors of tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 110 consecutive subjects (mean age: 59.4 ± 15.2 years, 67.3% female) with 74 parasagittal and 36 parafalcine meningiomas (92 WHO grade 1, 18 WHO grade 2/3), are included in the study. A total of 37 patients (33.6%) exhibited recurrence with median follow-up of 42 months (IQR: 10-71). In the overall cohort, parasagittal meningiomas exhibited shorter progression-free survival compared to parafalcine meningiomas (Kaplan-Meier log-rank p = 0.045). On univariate analysis, predictors of recurrence include WHO grade 2/3 vs. grade 1 tumors (p < 0.001), higher Ki-67 indices (p < 0.001), partial (p = 0.04) or complete sinus invasion (p < 0.001), and subtotal resection (p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed high-grade meningiomas (HR: 3.62, 95% CI: 1.60-8.22; p = 0.002), complete sinus invasion (HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.16-7.79; p = 0.024), and subtotal resection (HR: 3.10, 95% CI: 1.38-6.96; p = 0.006) as independent factors that portend shorter time to recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies several pertinent factors that confer increased risk of recurrence after resection of parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas, which can be used to devise appropriate surgical strategy to achieve improved patient outcomes.

Dual-Level Augmentation Radiomics Analysis for Multisequence MRI Meningioma Grading

BACKGROUND

Preoperative, noninvasive prediction of meningioma grade is important for therapeutic planning and decision making. In this study, we propose a dual-level augmentation strategy incorporating image-level augmentation (IA) and feature-level augmentation (FA) to tackle class imbalance and improve the predictive performance of radiomics for meningioma grading on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This study recruited 160 consecutive patients with pathologically proven meningioma (129 low-grade (WHO grade I) tumors; 31 high-grade (WHO grade II and III) tumors) with preoperative multisequence MRI imaging. A dual-level augmentation strategy combining IA and FA was applied and evaluated in 100 repetitions in 3-, 5-, and 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

The best area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of our method in 100 repetitions was ≥0.78 in all cross-validations. The corresponding cross-validation sensitivities (cross-validation specificity) were 0.72 (0.69), 0.76 (0.71), and 0.63 (0.82) in 3-, 5-, and 10-fold cross-validation, respectively. The proposed method achieved significantly better performance and distribution of results, outperforming single-level augmentation (IA or FA) or no augmentation in each cross-validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The dual-level augmentation strategy using IA and FA significantly improves the performance of the radiomics model for meningioma grading on MRI, allowing better radiomics-based preoperative stratification and individualized treatment.

Traditional Machine Learning Methods versus Deep Learning for Meningioma Classification, Grading, Outcome Prediction, and Segmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are emerging to improve accuracy in 4 primary domains: classification, grading, outcome prediction, and segmentation. Such algorithms include both traditional approaches that rely on hand-crafted features and deep learning (DL) techniques that utilize automatic feature extraction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of published traditional ML versus DL algorithms in classification, grading, outcome prediction, and segmentation of meningiomas.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Major databases were searched through September 2021 for publications evaluating traditional ML versus DL models on meningioma management. Performance measures including pooled sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-) along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-four records were screened, and 43 articles were included, regarding classification (3 articles), grading (29), outcome prediction (7), and segmentation (6) of meningiomas. Of the 29 studies that reported on grading, 10 could be meta-analyzed with 2 DL models (sensitivity 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96; specificity 0.91, 95% CI: 0.45-0.99; LR+ 10.1, 95% CI: 1.33-137; LR- 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.59) and 8 traditional ML (sensitivity 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.83; specificity 0.93, 95% CI: 0.79-0.98; LR+ 10.5, 95% CI: 2.91-39.5; and LR- 0.28, 95% CI: 0.17-0.49). The insufficient performance metrics reported precluded further statistical analysis of other performance metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

ML on meningiomas is mostly carried out with traditional methods. For meningioma grading, traditional ML methods generally had a higher LR+, while DL models a lower LR-.

Changes in radiomic and radiologic features in meningiomas after radiation therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the radiologic and radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in meningioma after radiation therapy and investigated the impact of radiation therapy in treating meningioma based on routine brain MRI.

METHODS

Observation (n = 100) and radiation therapy (n = 62) patients with meningioma who underwent MRI were randomly divided (7:3 ratio) into training (n = 118) and validation (n = 44) groups. Radiologic findings were analyzed. Radiomic features (filter types: original, square, logarithm, exponential, wavelet; feature types: first order, texture, shape) were extracted from the MRI. The most significant radiomic features were selected and applied to quantify the imaging phenotype using random forest machine learning algorithms. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for predicting both the training and validation sets were computed with multiple-hypothesis correction.

RESULTS

The radiologic difference in the maximum area and diameter of meningiomas between two groups was statistically significant. The tumor decreased in the treatment group. A total of 241 series and 1691 radiomic features were extracted from the training set. In univariate analysis, 24 radiomic features were significantly different (P < 0.05) between both groups. Best subsets were one original, three first-order, and six wavelet-based features, with an AUC of 0.87, showing significant differences (P < 0.05) in multivariate analysis. When applying the model, AUC was 0.76 and 0.79 for the training and validation set, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In meningioma cases, better size reduction can be expected after radiation treatment. The radiomic model using MRI showed significant changes in radiomic features after radiation treatment.

Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy: Current status and future perspective

Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare plays a pivotal role in combating many fatal diseases, such as skin, breast, and lung cancer. AI is an advanced form of technology that uses mathematical-based algorithmic principles similar to those of the human mind for cognizing complex challenges of the healthcare unit. Cancer is a lethal disease with many etiologies, including numerous genetic and epigenetic mutations. Cancer being a multifactorial disease is difficult to be diagnosed at an early stage. Therefore, genetic variations and other leading factors could be identified in due time through AI and machine learning (ML). AI is the synergetic approach for mining the drug targets, their mechanism of action, and drug-organism interaction from massive raw data. This synergetic approach is also facing several challenges in data mining but computational algorithms from different scientific communities for multi-target drug discovery are highly helpful to overcome the bottlenecks in AI for drug-target discovery. AI and ML could be the epicenter in the medical world for the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of almost any disease in the near future. In this comprehensive review, we explore the immense potential of AI and ML when integrated with the biological sciences, specifically in the context of cancer research. Our goal is to illuminate the many ways in which AI and ML are being applied to the study of cancer, from diagnosis to individualized treatment. We highlight the prospective role of AI in supporting oncologists and other medical professionals in making informed decisions and improving patient outcomes by examining the intersection of AI and cancer control. Although AI-based medical therapies show great potential, many challenges must be overcome before they can be implemented in clinical practice. We critically assess the current hurdles and provide insights into the future directions of AI-driven approaches, aiming to pave the way for enhanced cancer interventions and improved patient care.

Advanced Meningioma Imaging

Noninvasive imaging methods are used to accurately diagnose meningiomas and track their growth and location. These techniques, including computed tomography, MRI, and nuclear medicine, are also being used to gather more information about the biology of the tumors and potentially predict their grade and impact on prognosis. In this article, we will discuss the current and developing uses of these imaging techniques including additional analysis using radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas, including treatment planning and prediction of tumor behavior.

A Radiologist's Guide to the 2021 WHO Central Nervous System Tumor Classification: Part 2-Newly Described and Revised Tumor Types

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), published in 2021, introduces major shifts in the classification of brain and spine tumors. These changes were necessitated by rapidly increasing knowledge of CNS tumor biology and therapies, much of which is based on molecular methods in tumor diagnosis. The growing complexity of CNS tumor genetics has required reorganization of tumor groups and acknowledgment of new tumor entities. For radiologists interpreting neuroimaging studies, proficiency with these updates is critical in providing excellent patient care. This review will focus on new or revised CNS tumor types and subtypes, beyond infiltrating glioma (described in part 1 of this series), with an emphasis on imaging features.

Clinical features and surgical outcomes of primary spinal anaplastic meningioma: a cases series and literature review

Background

Primary spinal anaplastic meningioma (PSAM) is a very rare entity in the spinal canal. Therefore, the clinical features, treatment strategy, and long-term outcomes remain poorly studied.

Case Description

Clinical data of six patients with PSAM treated at one single institution were retrospectively analyzed and all previously reported cases in the English literature were reviewed. There were three male and three female patients with a median age of 25 years. The duration of symptoms before initial diagnosis ranged from one week to one year. PSAMs occurred at cervical level in four, cervicothoracic in one and thoracolumbar in one. In addition, PSAMs presented isointensity on T1 weighted imaging (WI), hyperintensity on T2WI, and hetero- or homogeneously marked enhancement with contrast. Eight operations were performed in six patients. Simpson II resection was achieved in four (50%), Simpson IV in three (37.5%), Simpson V in one (12.5%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed in five patients. With a median survival time of 14 months (4-136 months), three patients had recurrence, two experienced metastases, and four died of respiratory failure.

Conclusions

PSAMs are a rare disease, and there is limited evidence as to the management of these lesions. They may metastasize, recur, and portend a poor prognosis. A close follow-up and further investigation are therefore necessary.

Radiomics and machine learning for predicting the consistency of benign tumors of the central nervous system: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Predicting the consistency of benign central nervous system (CNS) tumors prior to surgery helps to improve surgical outcomes. This review summarizes and analyzes the literature on using radiomics and/or machine learning (ML) for consistency prediction.

METHOD

The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) database was screened for studies published in English from January 1st 2000. Data was extracted according to the PRISMA guidelines and quality of the studies was assessed in compliance with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

Eight publications were included focusing on pituitary macroadenomas (n = 5), pituitary adenomas (n = 1), and meningiomas (n = 2) using a retrospective (n = 6), prospective (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1) study design with a total of 763 patients for the consistency prediction. The studies reported an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71-0.99 for their respective best performing model regarding the consistency prediction. Of all studies, four articles validated their models internally whereas none validated their models externally. Two articles stated making data available on request with the remaining publications lacking information with regard to data availability.

CONCLUSIONS

The research on consistency prediction of CNS tumors is still at an early stage regarding the use of radiomics and different ML techniques. Best-practice procedures regarding radiomics and ML need to be followed more rigorously to facilitate the comparison between publications and, accordingly, the possible implementation into clinical practice in the future.

Imaging score for differentiation of meningioma grade

PURPOSE

We sought to establish a comprehensive imaging score indicating the likelihood of higher WHO grade meningiomas pre-operatively.

METHODS

All surgical intracranial meningioma patients at our institution between 2014 and 2018 underwent retrospective chart review. Preoperative MRI sequences were reviewed, and imaging features were included in the score based on statistical and clinical significance. Point values for each significant feature were assigned based on the beta coefficients obtained from multivariate analysis. The imaging score was calculated by adding up the points, for a total score of 0 to 5. The predictive ability of the score to identify higher-grade meningiomas was evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety patients, 50% of whom had a postoperative diagnosis of WHO grade II meningioma, were included. The mean age for the population was 59.9 years and 70% were female. Tumor volume ≥ 36.0 cc was assigned 2 points, presence of irregular tumor borders was assigned 2 points, and presence of peritumoral edema was assigned 1 point. The probability of having a WHO grade II meningioma was 0% with a score of 0, 25.0% with a score of 1, 38.5% with a score of 2, 65.4% with a score of 3, and 83.3% with a score of 4 or greater. A threshold of ≥ 3 points achieved a recall of 0.80, precision of 0.73, F1-score of 0.77, accuracy of 0.76, and AUC of 0.82.

CONCLUSION

The proposed imaging scoring system had good predictive capability for WHO grade II meningiomas with good discrimination and calibration. External validation is needed.

Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps replace Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) maps to predict the volumetric response of meningiomas to Gamma Knife Radiosurgery?

PURPOSE

Noninvasive methods are desired to predict the treatment response to Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to improve individual tumor management. In a previous study, we demonstrated that Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)-derived parameter maps significantly correlate to SRS response. This study aimed to analyze and compare the predictive value of intratumoral ADC and DTI parameters in patients with meningiomas undergoing radiosurgery.

METHODS

MR images of 70 patients treated with Gamma Knife SRS for WHO grade I meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed. MR acquisition included pre- and post-treatment DWI and DTI sequences, and subtractions were calculated to assess for radiation-induced changes in the parameter values.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up period (FUP) of 52.7 months, 69 of 70 meningiomas were controlled, with a mean volume reduction of 34.9%. Whereas fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the initial exam showed the highest correlation to tumor volume change at the last FU (CC = - 0.607), followed by the differences between first and second FU values of FA (CC = - 0.404) and the first longitudinal diffusivity (LD) value (CC = - 0.375), the correlation coefficients of all ADC values were comparably low. Nevertheless, all these correlations, except for ADC measured at the first follow-up, reached significance.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, the prognostic value of ADC maps measured in meningiomas before and at first follow-up after Gamma Knife SRS, was compared to simultaneously acquired DTI parameter maps. Quantities assessed from ADC maps present significant correlations to the volumetric meningioma response but are less effective than correlations with DTI parameters.

Imaging of Skull Base Tumors

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of imaging modalities and findings associated with common skull base tumors including meningiomas and how to use imaging features to guide surveillance and treatment decision making.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Ease of access to cranial imaging has led to a higher number of incidentally diagnosed skull base tumors, which merit careful consideration for management with observation or treatment. The point of origin of the tumor dictates the pattern of anatomic displacement and involvement by the tumor as it grows. Careful study of vascular encroachment on CT angiography, as well as the pattern and extent of bony invasion on CT, abets treatment planning. Quantitative analyses of imaging, such as with radiomics, may further elucidate phenotype-genotype associations in the future.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Combinatorial application of CT and MRI analyses improves the diagnosis of skull base tumors, clarifies their point of origin, and dictates the extent of treatment needed.

A magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics model to predict mitosis cycles in intracranial meningioma

The aim of this study was to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based radiomics model to predict mitosis cycles in intracranial meningioma grading prior to surgery. Preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) cerebral MRI data of 167 meningioma patients between 2015 and 2020 were obtained, preprocessed and segmented using the 3D Slicer software and the PyRadiomics plugin. In total 145 radiomics features of the T1CE MRI images were computed. The criterion on the basis of which the feature selection was made is whether the number of mitoses per 10 high power field (HPF) is greater than or equal to zero. Our analyses show that machine learning algorithms can be used to make accurate predictions about whether the number of mitoses per 10 HPF is greater than or equal to zero. We obtained our best model using Ridge regression for feature pre-selection, followed by stepwise logistic regression for final model construction. Using independent test data, this model resulted in an AUC (Area under the Curve) of 0.8523, an accuracy of 0.7941, a sensitivity of 0.8182, a specificity of 0.7500 and a Cohen's Kappa of 0.5576. We analyzed the performance of this model as a function of the number of mitoses per 10 HPF. The model performs well for cases with zero mitoses as well as for cases with more than one mitosis per 10 HPF. The worst model performance (accuracy = 0.6250) is obtained for cases with one mitosis per 10 HPF. Our results show that MRI-based radiomics may be a promising approach to predict the mitosis cycles in intracranial meningioma prior to surgery. Specifically, our approach may offer a non-invasive means of detecting the early stages of a malignant process in meningiomas prior to the onset of clinical symptoms.

Parasagittal Meningiomas: Prognostic Factors for Recurrence

The term parasagittal meningioma applies to those tumors that are associated with the superior sagittal sinus (SSS), originating from the dura mater in close relation to the parasagittal wall or angle, with no intervening brain tissue, possibly extending to the dura of the convexity and/or falx cerebri.(Cushing et al., Meningiomas: their classification, regional behaviour, life history, and surgeical and results. Hafner, 1938) They make up about 20-30% of all meningiomas. There is a vast literature correlating the Simpson grade of resection with later recurrence. Frequent involvement of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) by these tumors means that the optimal treatment recommended in the literature-complete resection, including of the dural base-is one of the most challenging.

Preoperative surgical risk assessment of meningiomas: a narrative review based on MRI radiomics

Meningiomas are one of the most common intracranial primary central nervous system tumors. Regardless of the pathological grading and histological subtypes, maximum safe resection is the recommended treatment option for meningiomas. However, considering tumor heterogeneity, surgical treatment options and prognosis often vary greatly among meningiomas. Therefore, an accurate preoperative surgical risk assessment of meningiomas is of great clinical importance as it helps develop surgical treatment strategies and improve patient prognosis. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have proved that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics has wide application values in the diagnostic, identification, and prognostic evaluations of brain tumors. The vital importance of MRI radiomics in the surgical risk assessment of meningiomas must be apprehended and emphasized in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the current research status of MRI radiomics in the preoperative surgical risk assessment of meningiomas, focusing on the applications of MRI radiomics in preoperative pathological grading, assessment of surrounding tissue invasion, and evaluation of tumor consistency. We further analyze the prospects of MRI radiomics in the preoperative assessment of meningiomas angiogenesis and adhesion with surrounding tissues, while pointing out the current challenges of MRI radiomics research.

Radiomic Features of the Edema Region May Contribute to Grading Meningiomas With Peritumoral Edema

BACKGROUND

Meningiomas are frequently accompanied by peritumoral edema (PTE). The potential value of radiomic features of edema region in meningioma grading has not been investigated.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether radiomic features of edema region contribute to grading meningiomas with PTE.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 444 patients including 196 grade II and 248 WHO grade I meningiomas: 356 patients for training, 88 for validation.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 1.5-T/3.0-T, noncontrast T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) spin echo sequences.

ASSESSMENT

A total of 851 radiomic features were extracted from each sequence on each region (tumor and edema region). These features were integrated by region respectively. Three subsets of clinical-radiomic features were constructed by joining clinical information (sex, age, tumor volume, and edema volume) and radiomic features of three regions: tumor, edema, and combined subsets. For each subset, features were filtered by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Random Forest algorithm. Top 20 features of each subset were finally selected.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Stochastic Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Bagged AdaBoost predictive models were built based on each subset. Discriminative abilities of models were quantified using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Random Forest model based on combined subset (AUC [95% CI] = 0.880 [0.807-0.953]) had the best discriminative ability in grading meningiomas among the final models. The best model of edema subset and tumor subset were Random Forest model (AUC [95% CI] = 0.864 [0.791-0.938]) and Stochastic Gradient Boosting model (AUC [95% CI] = 0.844 [0.760-0.928]), respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

Radiomic features of edema region may contribute to grading meningiomas with PTE. The Random Forest model based on combined subset surpasses the best model based on tumor or edema subset regarding grading meningiomas with PTE.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Radiographic Differentiation of Secretory Meningiomas and WHO Grade 2 Meningiomas: When Atypical Features Are Not Always Predictive of Atypical Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Secretory meningioma (SM) is a rare subtype of World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 meningioma, associated with significant peritumoral brain edema (PTBE). Because of this, SM may be mistaken preoperatively to be a WHO grade 2 meningioma (G2M). In this study, we identified radiographic features to differentiate these 2 tumor types preoperatively to help inform surgical decision-making.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with histologically confirmed intracranial SM and G2M at a single institution from 2000 to 2019. Relevant clinic, demographic and radiographic data were collected. We performed a stepwise multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of SM.

RESULTS

A total of 43 SM and 140 G2M patients were included in this study. In multivariable analysis, severe PTBE, meaning edema size greater than tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 4.44, P = 0.01), tumor hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging sequences (OR 7.80, P = 0.002), and higher normalized apparent diffusion coefficient (nADC) values (OR 1.54, P < 0.001) were strong predictors of SM. Conversely, larger tumor volume (OR 1.79 per 10 mL volume increase, P < 0.001) and cystic component (OR 12.50, P = 0.007) correlated with G2M.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that preoperative FLAIR hyperintensity, severe PTBE, and higher nADC values correlated with SM pathology, and larger size and cystic component were associated with G2M. Accurate identification of SM on preoperative imaging may provide surgeons useful information in decision-making.

A radiomics nomogram for predicting the meningioma grade based on enhanced T1WI images

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop a radiomics nomogram for predicting the meningioma grade based on enhanced T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) images.

METHODS

188 patients with meningioma were analyzed retrospectively. There were 94 high-grade meningioma to form high-grade group and 94 low-grade meningioma were selected randomly to form low-grade group. Clinical data and MRI features were analyzed and compared. The clinical model was built by using the significant variables. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to select the most valuable radiomics feature. The radiomics signature was built and the Rad-score was calculated. The radiomics nomogram was developed by the significant variables of the clinical factors and Rad-score. The calibration curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the radiomics nomogram. Different models were compared by Delong test and decision curve analysis curve.

RESULTS

The sex, size and surrounding invasion were used to build clinical model. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of clinical model was 0.870 (95% CI: 0.782-0.959). Nine features were used to construct the radiomics signature. The AUC of the radiomics signature was 0.885 (95% CI: 0.802-0.968). The AUC of radiomics nomogram was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.904-1). The AUC of radiomics nomogram was higher than that of clinical model and radiomics signature with a significant difference (p＜0.05). The decision curve analysis curve showed that the radiomics nomogram had a larger net benefit than the clinical model and radiomics signature.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics nomogram based on enhanced T1 weighted imaging images for predicting the meningioma grade showed high predictive value and might contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of meningioma.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

1. We first constructed a radiomic nomogram to predict the meningioma grade.2. We compared the results of the clinical model, radiomics signature and radiomics nomogram.

Updated Systematic Review on the Role of Brain Invasion in Intracranial Meningiomas: What, When, Why?

Simple Summary

Meningioma is still the most common adult tumor of the CNS, most of which are slow-growing, benign tumors and could even be accidentally diagnosed; nonetheless, they sometimes show more aggressive behavior with higher recurrence rates and relatively reduced overall survival. Assuming this, in recent years, scientific research has been accelerated, looking for new insights and applications that could improve preoperative investigation, tailor surgical planning, and strongly impact meningioma patients’ prognosis. Many fields have been developed, and the detection of brain invasion has firmly gained its potential role, leading to the revised version of WHO for CNS tumors in 2016 as a further criterion for defining atypia. Further studies are still ongoing to assess a widely accepted application of BI evaluation in intracranial meningioma management.

Abstract

Several recent studies are providing increasing insights into reliable markers to improve the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of meningioma patients. The evidence of brain invasion (BI) signs and its associated variables has been focused on, and currently, scientific research is investing in the study of key aspects, different methods, and approaches to recognize and evaluate BI. This paradigm shift may have significant repercussions for the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic approach to higher-grade meningioma, as long as the evidence of BI may influence patients’ prognosis and inclusion in clinical trials and indirectly impact adjuvant therapy. We intended to review the current knowledge about the impact of BI in meningioma in the most updated literature and explore the most recent implications on both clinical practice and trials and future directions. According to the PRISMA guidelines, systematic research in the most updated platform was performed in order to provide a complete overview of characteristics, preoperative applications, and potential implications of BI in meningiomas. Nineteen articles were included in the present paper and analyzed according to specific research areas. The detection of brain invasion could represent a crucial factor in meningioma patients’ management, and research is flourishing and promising.

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

IMPORTANCE

Deep learning may be able to use patient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to aid in brain tumor classification and diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and clinically validate a deep learning system for automated identification and classification of 18 types of brain tumors from patient MRI data.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This diagnostic study was conducted using MRI data collected between 2000 and 2019 from 37 871 patients. A deep learning system for segmentation and classification of 18 types of intracranial tumors based on T1- and T2-weighted images and T2 contrast MRI sequences was developed and tested. The diagnostic accuracy of the system was tested using 1 internal and 3 external independent data sets. The clinical value of the system was assessed by comparing the tumor diagnostic accuracy of neuroradiologists with vs without assistance of the proposed system using a separate internal test data set. Data were analyzed from March 2019 through February 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in neuroradiologist clinical diagnostic accuracy in brain MRI scans with vs without the deep learning system were evaluated.

RESULTS

A deep learning system was trained among 37 871 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [11.4] years; 18 519 women [48.9%]). It achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99) on 1339 patients from 4 centers' data sets in diagnosis and classification of 18 types of tumors. Higher outcomes were found compared with neuroradiologists for accuracy and sensitivity and similar outcomes for specificity (for 300 patients in the Tiantan Hospital test data set: accuracy, 73.3% [95% CI, 67.7%-77.7%] vs 60.9% [95% CI, 46.8%-75.1%]; sensitivity, 88.9% [95% CI, 85.3%-92.4%] vs 53.4% [95% CI, 41.8%-64.9%]; and specificity, 96.3% [95% CI, 94.2%-98.4%] vs 97.9%; [95% CI, 97.3%-98.5%]). With the assistance of the deep learning system, the mean accuracy of neuroradiologists among 1166 patients increased by 12.0 percentage points, from 63.5% (95% CI, 60.7%-66.2%) without assistance to 75.5% (95% CI, 73.0%-77.9%) with assistance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that deep learning system-based automated diagnosis may be associated with improved classification and diagnosis of intracranial tumors from MRI data among neuroradiologists.

A triple-classification for the evaluation of lung nodules manifesting as pure ground-glass sign: a CT-based radiomic analysis

OBJECTIVES

To construct a noninvasive radiomics model for evaluating the pathological degree and an individualized treatment strategy for patients with the manifestation of ground glass nodules (GGNs) on CT images.

METHODS

The retrospective primary cohort investigation included patients with GGNs on CT images who underwent resection between June 2015 and June 2020. The intratumoral regions of interest were segmented semiautomatically, and radiomics features were extracted from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions. After feature selection by ANOVA, Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression, a random forest (RF) model was generated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to evaluate each classification. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret the radiomics features.

RESULTS

In this study, 241 patients including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (n = 72), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) (n = 83) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) (n = 86) were selected for radiomics analysis. Three intratumoral radiomics features and one peritumoral feature were finally identified by the triple RF classifier with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.960 (0.963 for AAH/AIS, 0.940 for MIA, 0.978 for IAC) in the training set and 0.944 (0.955 for AAH/AIS, 0.952 for MIA, 0.926 for IAC) in the testing set for evaluation of the GGNs.

CONCLUSION

The triple classification based on intra- and peritumoral radiomics features derived from the noncontrast CT images had satisfactory performance and may be used as a noninvasive tool for preoperative evaluation of the pure ground-glass nodules and developing of individualized treatment strategies.

Machine Learning for the Detection and Segmentation of Benign Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Machine learning in radiology of the central nervous system has seen many interesting publications in the past few years. Since the focus has largely been on malignant tumors such as brain metastases and high-grade gliomas, we conducted a systematic review on benign tumors to summarize what has been published and where there might be gaps in the research. We found several studies that report good results, but the descriptions of methodologies could be improved to enable better comparisons and assessment of biases.

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize the available literature on using machine learning (ML) for the detection and segmentation of benign tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) and to assess the adherence of published ML/diagnostic accuracy studies to best practice. Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for the use of ML in patients with any benign tumor of the CNS, and the records were screened according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Eleven retrospective studies focusing on meningioma (n = 4), vestibular schwannoma (n = 4), pituitary adenoma (n = 2) and spinal schwannoma (n = 1) were included. The majority of studies attempted segmentation. Links to repositories containing code were provided in two manuscripts, and no manuscripts shared imaging data. Only one study used an external test set, which raises the question as to whether some of the good performances that have been reported were caused by overfitting and may not generalize to data from other institutions. Conclusions: Using ML for detecting and segmenting benign brain tumors is still in its infancy. Stronger adherence to ML best practices could facilitate easier comparisons between studies and contribute to the development of models that are more likely to one day be used in clinical practice.

Cycle-consistent adversarial networks improves generalizability of radiomics model in grading meningiomas on external validation

The heterogeneity of MRI is one of the major reasons for decreased performance of a radiomics model on external validation, limiting the model’s generalizability and clinical application. We aimed to establish a generalizable radiomics model to predict meningioma grade on external validation through leveraging Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks (CycleGAN). In this retrospective study, 257 patients with meningioma were included in the institutional training set. Radiomic features (n = 214) were extracted from T2-weighted (T2) and contrast-enhanced T1 (T1C) images. After radiomics feature selection, extreme gradient boosting classifiers were developed. The models were validated in the external validation set consisting of 61 patients with meningiomas. To reduce the gap in generalization associated with the inter-institutional heterogeneity of MRI, the smaller image set style of the external validation was translated into the larger image set style of the institutional training set using CycleGAN. On external validation before CycleGAN application, the performance of the combined T2 and T1C models showed an area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1 score of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.63–0.91), 70.7%, and 0.54, respectively. After applying CycleGAN, the performance of the combined T2 and T1C models increased, with an AUC, accuracy, and F1 score of 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.70–0.97), 73.2%, and 0.59, respectively. Quantitative metrics (by Fréchet Inception Distance) showed that CycleGAN can decrease inter-institutional image heterogeneity while preserving predictive information. In conclusion, leveraging CycleGAN may be helpful to increase the generalizability of a radiomics model in differentiating meningioma grade on external validation.

A Spotlight on the Role of Radiomics and Machine-Learning Applications in the Management of Intracranial Meningiomas: A New Perspective in Neuro-Oncology: A Review

Background: In recent decades, the application of machine learning technologies to medical imaging has opened up new perspectives in neuro-oncology, in the so-called radiomics field. Radiomics offer new insight into glioma, aiding in clinical decision-making and patients’ prognosis evaluation. Although meningiomas represent the most common primary CNS tumor and the majority of them are benign and slow-growing tumors, a minor part of them show a more aggressive behavior with an increased proliferation rate and a tendency to recur. Therefore, their treatment may represent a challenge. Methods: According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was performed. We included selected articles (meta-analysis, review, retrospective study, and case–control study) concerning the application of radiomics method in the preoperative diagnostic and prognostic algorithm, and planning for intracranial meningiomas. We also analyzed the contribution of radiomics in differentiating meningiomas from other CNS tumors with similar radiological features. Results: In the first research stage, 273 papers were identified. After a careful screening according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, 39 articles were included in this systematic review. Conclusions: Several preoperative features have been identified to increase preoperative intracranial meningioma assessment for guiding decision-making processes. The development of valid and reliable non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic modalities could have a significant clinical impact on meningioma treatment.

Improving diagnosing performance for malignant parotid gland tumors using machine learning with multifeatures based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

In this study, the performance of machine learning in classifying parotid gland tumors based on diffusion-related features obtained from the parotid gland tumor, the peritumor parotid gland, and the contralateral parotid gland was evaluated. Seventy-eight patients participated in this study and underwent magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. Three regions of interest, including the parotid gland tumor, the peritumor parotid gland, and the contralateral parotid gland, were manually contoured for 92 tumors, including 20 malignant tumors (MTs), 42 Warthin tumors (WTs), and 30 pleomorphic adenomas (PMAs). We recorded multiple apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) features and applied a machine-learning method with the features to classify the three types of tumors. With only mean ADC of tumors, the area under the curve of the classification model was 0.63, 0.85, and 0.87 for MTs, WTs, and PMAs, respectively. The performance metrics were improved to 0.81, 0.89, and 0.92, respectively, with multiple features. Apart from the ADC features of parotid gland tumor, the features of the peritumor and contralateral parotid glands proved advantageous for tumor classification. Combining machine learning and multiple features provides excellent discrimination of tumor types and can be a practical tool in the clinical diagnosis of parotid gland tumors.

Imaging Biomarkers in Thoracic Oncology: Current Advances in the Use of Radiomics in Lung Cancer Patients and its Potential Use for Therapy Response Prediction and Monitoring

BACKGROUND

 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The development of therapies targeting molecular alterations has significantly improved the treatment of NSCLC patients. To identify these targets, tumor phenotyping is required, with tissue biopsies and molecular pathology being the gold standard. Some patients do not respond to targeted therapies and many patients suffer from tumor recurrence, which can in part be explained by tumor heterogeneity. This points out the need for new biomarkers allowing for better tumor phenotyping and monitoring during treatment to assess patient outcome.

METHOD

 The contents of this review are based on a literature search conducted using the PubMed database in March 2021 and the authors' experience.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

 The use of radiomics and artificial intelligence-based approaches allows for the identification of imaging biomarkers in NSCLC patients for tumor phenotyping. Several studies show promising results for models predicting molecular alterations, with the best results being achieved by combining structural and functional imaging. Radiomics could help solve the pressing clinical need for assessing and predicting therapy response. To reach this goal, advanced tumor phenotyping, considering tumor heterogeneity, is required. This could be achieved by integrating structural and functional imaging biomarkers with clinical data sources, such as liquid biopsy results. However, to allow for radiomics-based approaches to be introduced into clinical practice, further standardization using large, multi-center datasets is required.

KEY POINTS

  · Some NSCLC patients do not benefit from targeted therapies, and many patients suffer from tumor recurrence, pointing out the need for new biomarkers allowing for better tumor phenotyping and monitoring during treatment.. · The use of radiomics-based approaches allows for the identification of imaging biomarkers in NSCLC patients for tumor phenotyping.. · A multi-omics approach integrating not only structural and functional imaging biomarkers but also clinical data sources, such as liquid biopsy results, could further enhance the prediction and assessment of therapy response..

CITATION FORMAT

· Kroschke J, von Stackelberg O, Heußel CP et al. Imaging Biomarkers in Thoracic Oncology: Current Advances in the Use of Radiomics in Lung Cancer Patients and its Potential Use for Therapy Response Prediction and Monitoring. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1729-1516.

Beyond Glioma: The Utility of Radiomic Analysis for Non-Glial Intracranial Tumors

Simple Summary

Tumor qualities, such as growth rate, firmness, and intrusion into healthy tissue, can be very important for operation planning and further treatment. Radiomics is a promising new method that allows the determination of some of these qualities on images performed before surgery. In this article, we provide a review of the use of radiomics in various tumors of the central nervous system, such as metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Abstract

The field of radiomics is rapidly expanding and gaining a valuable role in neuro-oncology. The possibilities related to the use of radiomic analysis, such as distinguishing types of malignancies, predicting tumor grade, determining the presence of particular molecular markers, consistency, therapy response, and prognosis, can considerably influence decision-making in medicine in the near future. Even though the main focus of radiomic analyses has been on glial CNS tumors, studies on other intracranial tumors have shown encouraging results. Therefore, as the main focus of this review, we performed an analysis of publications on PubMed and Web of Science databases, focusing on radiomics in CNS metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Artificial intelligence and infrared thermography as auxiliary tools in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder

OBJECTIVE

To assess three machine learning (ML) attribute extraction methods: radiomic, semantic and radiomic-semantic association on temporomandibular disorder (TMD) detection using infrared thermography (IT); and to determine which ML classifier, KNN, SVM and MLP, is the most efficient for this purpose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

78 patients were selected by applying the Fonseca questionnaire and RDC/TMD to categorize control patients (37) and TMD patients (41). IT lateral projections of each patient were acquired. The masseter and temporal muscles were selected as regions of interest (ROI) for attribute extraction. Three methods of extracting attributes were assessed: radiomic, semantic and radiomic-semantic association. For radiomic attribute extraction, 20 texture attributes were assessed using co-occurrence matrix in a standardized angulation of 0°. The semantic features were the ROI mean temperature and pain intensity data. For radiomic-semantic association, a single dataset composed of 28 features was assessed. The classification algorithms assessed were KNN, SVM and MLP. Hopkins's statistic, Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to assess data. The significance level was set at 5% (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Training and testing accuracy values differed statistically for the radiomic-semantic association (p = 0.003). MLP differed from the other classifiers for the radiomic-semantic association (p = 0.004). Accuracy, precision and sensitivity values of semantic and radiomic-semantic association differed statistically from radiomic features (p = 0.008, p = 0.016 and p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Semantic and radiomic-semantic-associated ML feature extraction methods and MLP classifier should be chosen for TMD detection using IT images and pain scale data. IT associated with ML presents promising results for TMD detection.

Preoperative Prediction of Intracranial Meningioma Grade Using Conventional CT and MRI

Objective

Preoperative diagnosis of tumor grade can assist in treatment-related decision-making for patients with intracranial meningioma. This study aimed to distinguish between high-grade and low-grade meningiomas using conventional CT and MRI.

Methodology

We retrospectively analyzed 173 consecutive patients with intracranial meningioma (149 low-grade and 24 high-grade tumors) who were treated surgically at the National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center from 2008 to 2020. Clinical and radiological features, including tumor doubling time (Td) and relative growth rate (RGR), were compared between low-grade and high-grade meningiomas.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that symptomatic tumor (p=0.001), non-skull base location (p=0.006), irregular tumor shape (p=0.043), tumor heterogeneity (p=0.025), and peritumoral brain edema (p=0.003) were independent predictors of high-grade meningioma. In 53 patients who underwent surgery because of tumor progression, progression to symptoms (p=0.027), intratumoral heterogeneity (p<0.001), peritumoral brain edema (p=0.001), larger tumor volume (p=0.005), shorter Td (p<0.001), and higher RGR (P<0.001) were significantly associated with high-grade meningioma. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal Td and annual RGR cut-off values to distinguish high-grade from low-grade meningioma were 460.5 days and 73.2%, respectively (100% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity).

Conclusion

Based on our findings, conventional CT and MRI are useful methods to predict meningioma grades before surgery. High-grade lesions are associated with non-skull base location, irregular tumor shape, intratumoral heterogeneity, and peritumoral brain edema. High-grade meningioma should be suspected in tumors that exhibit Td <460.5 days or annual RGR >73.2% or those that develop intratumoral heterogeneity or surrounding brain edema on surveillance imaging.

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomic Model for the Noninvasive Preoperative Differentiation Between Transitional and Atypical Meningiomas

Preoperative distinction between transitional meningioma and atypical meningioma would aid the selection of appropriate surgical techniques, as well as the prognosis prediction. Here, we aimed to differentiate between these two tumors using radiomic signatures based on preoperative, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. A total of 141 transitional meningioma and 101 atypical meningioma cases between January 2014 and December 2018 with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging before surgery. For each patient, 1227 radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted images each. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis was performed to select the most informative features of different modalities. Subsequently, stepwise multivariate logistic regression was chosen to further select strongly correlated features and build classification models that can distinguish transitional from atypical meningioma. The diagnostic abilities were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Furthermore, a nomogram was built by incorporating clinical characteristics, radiological features, and radiomic signatures, and decision curve analysis was used to validate the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Sex, tumor shape, brain invasion, and four radiomic features differed significantly between transitional meningioma and atypical meningioma. The clinicoradiomic model derived by fusing the above features resulted in the best discrimination ability, with areas under the curves of 0.809 (95% confidence interval, 0.743-0.874) and 0.795 (95% confidence interval, 0.692-0.899) and sensitivity values of 74.0% and 71.4% in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The clinicoradiomic model demonstrated good performance for the differentiation between transitional and atypical meningioma. It is a quantitative tool that can potentially aid the selection of surgical techniques and the prognosis prediction and can thus be applied in patients with these two meningioma subtypes.

Extendable and explainable deep learning for pan-cancer radiogenomics research

Radiogenomics is a field where medical images and genomic profiles are jointly analyzed to answer critical clinical questions. Specifically, people want to identify non-invasive imaging biomarkers that are associated with both genomic features and clinical outcomes. Deep learning is an advanced computer science technique that has been applied in many fields, including medical image and genomic data analysis. This review summarizes the current state of deep learning in pan-cancer radiogenomic research, discusses its limitations, and indicates the potential future directions. Traditional machine learning in radiomics, genomics, and radiogenomics have also been briefly discussed. We also summarize the main pan-cancer radiogenomic research resources. Two characteristics of deep learning are emphasized when discussing its application to pan-cancer radiogenomics, which are extendibility and explainability.