Hi-fidelity discrimination of isomiRs using G-quadruplex gatekeepers

A ligation-independent sequencing method reveals tRNA-derived RNAs with blocked 3' termini

Despite the numerous sequencing methods available, the diversity in RNA size and chemical modification makes it difficult to capture all RNAs in a cell. We developed a method that combines quasi-random priming with template switching to construct sequencing libraries from RNA molecules of any length and with any type of 3' modifications, allowing for the sequencing of virtually all RNA species. Our ligation-independent detection of all types of RNA (LIDAR) is a simple, effective tool to identify and quantify all classes of coding and non-coding RNAs. With LIDAR, we comprehensively characterized the transcriptomes of mouse embryonic stem cells, neural progenitor cells, mouse tissues, and sperm. LIDAR detected a much larger variety of tRNA-derived RNAs (tDRs) compared with traditional ligation-dependent sequencing methods and uncovered tDRs with blocked 3' ends that had previously escaped detection. Therefore, LIDAR can capture all RNAs in a sample and uncover RNA species with potential regulatory functions.

A ligation-independent sequencing method reveals tRNA-derived RNAs with blocked 3' termini

Despite the numerous sequencing methods available, the vast diversity in size and chemical modifications of RNA molecules makes the capture of the full spectrum of cellular RNAs a difficult task. By combining quasi-random hexamer priming with a custom template switching strategy, we developed a method to construct sequencing libraries from RNA molecules of any length and with any type of 3' terminal modification, allowing the sequencing and analysis of virtually all RNA species. Ligation-independent detection of all types of RNA (LIDAR) is a simple, effective tool to comprehensively characterize changes in small non-coding RNAs and mRNAs simultaneously, with performance comparable to separate dedicated methods. With LIDAR, we comprehensively characterized the coding and non-coding transcriptome of mouse embryonic stem cells, neural progenitor cells, and sperm. LIDAR detected a much larger variety of tRNA-derived RNAs (tDRs) compared to traditional ligation-dependent sequencing methods, and uncovered the presence of tDRs with blocked 3' ends that had previously escaped detection. Our findings highlight the potential of LIDAR to systematically detect all RNAs in a sample and uncover new RNA species with potential regulatory functions.

Comparing biological information contained in mRNA and non-coding RNAs for classification of lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Deciphering the meaning of the human DNA is an outstanding goal which would revolutionize medicine and our way for treating diseases. In recent years, non-coding RNAs have attracted much attention and shown to be functional in part. Yet the importance of these RNAs especially for higher biological functions remains under investigation.

METHODS

In this paper, we analyze RNA-seq data, including non-coding and protein coding RNAs, from lung adenocarcinoma patients, a histologic subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer, with deep learning neural networks and other state-of-the-art classification methods. The purpose of our paper is three-fold. First, we compare the classification performance of different versions of deep belief networks with SVMs, decision trees and random forests. Second, we compare the classification capabilities of protein coding and non-coding RNAs. Third, we study the influence of feature selection on the classification performance.

RESULTS

As a result, we find that deep belief networks perform at least competitively to other state-of-the-art classifiers. Second, data from non-coding RNAs perform better than coding RNAs across a number of different classification methods. This demonstrates the equivalence of predictive information as captured by non-coding RNAs compared to protein coding RNAs, conventionally used in computational diagnostics tasks. Third, we find that feature selection has in general a negative effect on the classification performance which means that unfiltered data with all features give the best classification results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to use ncRNAs beyond miRNAs for the computational classification of cancer and for performing a direct comparison of the classification capabilities of protein coding RNAs and non-coding RNAs.