Myasthenia gravis seronegative for acetylcholine receptor antibodies in South Korea: Autoantibody profiles and clinical features

Autoantibody detection by a live cell-based assay in conventionally antibody-tested triple seronegative Myasthenia gravis

Autoantibody testing is the mainstay in confirming the diagnosis of autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG). However, in approximately 15% of patients, antibody testing in clinical routine remains negative (seronegative MG). This study aimed at assessing the prevalence of "clustered" AChR- and MuSK- and LRP4- autoantibodies using a live cell-based assay in a large German cohort of seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG) patients. A total of 67 SNMG patients were included. Clustered AChR-ab were identified in 4.5% (n = 3) of patients. Two out of the three patients showed binding to the adult AchR as well as the fetal AchR. None of the patients was positive for MuSK- or LRP4-autoantibodies. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between the patients with and without clustered AChR-ab detection. Comparison of clinical data of our cohort with clinical data from the nationwide Myasthenia gravis registry showed broad similarities between seronegative MG patients of both cohorts.

Ophthalmologic clinical features of ocular myasthenia gravis

To investigate the clinical features of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) in ophthalmology. A total of 28 patients with ptosis or diplopia who were followed for at least 6 months between March 2016 and February 2022 were included in this study. The clinical symptoms of the patients and test results were analyzed. According to the positivity of serologic or electrophysiologic test, these patients were divided into 2 groups (positive and negative OMG results) and according to the clinical symptoms of diplopia or ptosis for comparison. Ptosis, diplopia, and both ptosis and diplopia were present in 6 (21.43%), 14 (50.0%), and 8 (28.57%) patients, respectively. Acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody (AchR Ab) was positive in 16 (57.14%) of 28 patients and the ice test was positive in 13 (92.86%) of 14 patients with ptosis. Abnormal thymic lesions were presented in 7 (25.0%) patients, and a definite improvement in response to pyridostigmine was observed in 27 (100.0%) patients. Both ptosis and diplopia were significantly higher in the group with positive results than that in the negative results group (P = .025). In addition, both horizontal and vertical diplopia was significantly higher in the group with AchR Ab titer > 5.0 than that in the group with AchR Ab titer < 5.0 (P = .041). After excluding cranial nerve palsy, if there is ptosis and diplopia, especially vertical diplopia, the possibility of OMG should be considered.

Clinical pitfalls and serological diagnostics of MuSK myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anti-muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibody (Ab) in a large cohort of anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) Ab-negative generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and also to investigate clinical contexts for the diagnosis of MuSK MG.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 160 patients with a clinical suspicion of AChR Ab-negative generalized MG was performed. The serum samples were tested for anti-clustered AChR Ab by cell-based assay (CBA), anti-MuSK Ab by ELISA, CBA and/or radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA). Clinical data were compared between anti-MuSK Ab-positive MG and double seronegative (AChR and MuSK) MG groups.

RESULTS

After excluding non-MG and clustered AChR Ab-positive patients, we identified 89 patients as a cohort of AChR Ab-negative generalized MG. Anti-MuSK Ab was positive by ELISA in 22 (24.7%) patients. While CBA identified five additional anti-MuSK Ab-positive patients, the results of ELISA were mostly consistent with CBA and RIPA with Cohen's kappa of 0.80 and 0.90, respectively (p < 0.001). The most frequent differential diagnosis was motor neuron disease particularly of bulbar onset which showed remarkably overlapping clinical and electrophysiological features with MuSK MG at presentation.

CONCLUSION

While confirming the highest sensitivity of CBA for detecting anti-MuSK Ab, our results highlight the clinical pitfalls in making a diagnosis of MuSK MG and may support a diagnostic utility of MuSK-ELISA in clinical practice.

Analysis of nAChR Autoantibodies Against Extracellular Epitopes in MG Patients

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder caused by autoantibodies targeting components of the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), leading to neuromuscular transmission deficiency. In the vast majority of patients, these autoantibodies target the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR), a heteropentameric ion channel anchored to the postsynaptic membrane of the NMJ. Autoantibodies in patients with MG may target all the subunits of the receptor at both their extracellular and intracellular regions. Here, we combine immunoadsorption with a cell-based assay to examine the specificity of the patients' autoantibodies against the extracellular part of the nAChR. Our results reveal that these autoantibodies can be divided into distinct groups, based on their target, with probably different impacts on disease severity. Although our findings are based on a small sample group of patients, they strongly support that additional analysis of the specificity of the autoantibodies of patients with MG could serve as a valuable tool for the clinicians' decision on the treatment strategy to be followed.

Bedside and laboratory diagnostic testing in myasthenia

Myasthenia gravis (MG) and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a group of disorders with a well characterised autoimmune or genetic and neurophysiological basis. We reviewed the literature from the last 20 years assessing the utility of various neurophysiological, immunological, provocative and genetic tests in MG and CMS. Diagnostic sensitivity of repetitive nerve stimulation test ranges between 14 and 94% and specificity between 73 and 100%; sensitivity of single-fibre EMG (SFEMG) test ranges between 64 and 100% and specificity between 22 and 100%; anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody sensitivity ranges from 13 to 97% and specificity ranges from 95 to 100%. Overall, SFEMG has the highest sensitivity while positive anti-AChR antibodies have the highest specificity. Newer testing strategies that have been investigated over the last couple of decades include ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, otoacoustic emissions and disease-specific circulating miRNAs in serum for autoimmune myasthenia, as well as next-generation sequencing for genetic testing of CMS. While there has been significant progress in developing newer testing strategies for diagnosing MG and CMS over the last couple of decades, more research is needed to assess the utility of these newer tools regarding their sensitivity and specificity.

A Stable Cell Line Expressing Clustered AChR: A Novel Cell-Based Assay for Anti-AChR Antibody Detection in Myasthenia Gravis

Cell-based assays (CBAs) and radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) are the most sensitive methods for identifying anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody in myasthenia gravis (MG). But CBAs are limited in clinical practice by transient transfection. We established a stable cell line (KL525) expressing clustered AChR by infecting HEK 293T cells with dual lentiviral vectors expressing the genes encoding the human AChR α1, β1, δ, ϵ and the clustering protein rapsyn. We verified the stable expression of human clustered AChR by immunofluorescence, immunoblotting, and real-time PCR. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used to detect anti-AChR antibodies in 103 MG patients and 58 healthy individuals. The positive results of MG patients reported by the KL525 was 80.6% (83/103), 29.1% higher than the 51.4% (53/103) of RIPA. 58 healthy individuals tested by both the KL525 CBA and RIPA were all negative. In summary, the stable expression of clustered AChR in our cell line makes it highly sensitive and advantageous for broad clinical application in CBAs.

No correlation between acetylcholine receptor antibody concentration and individual clinical symptoms of myasthenia gravis: A systematic retrospective study involving 67 patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR-Ab) concentration levels and individualized clinical symptoms in patients with AChR myasthenia gravis (AChR-MG) in China.

METHODS

ELISA was used to determine the concentration of AChR-Ab in patients with MG. The Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Clinical Classification, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score, and MG-specific activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scoring systems were used to evaluate the clinical status of patients. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between the AChR-Ab concentration and clinical score. The changes in the antibody concentration and clinical score are shown in MGFA-antibody concentration-treatment plots.

RESULTS

Autoantibody detection tests were performed in 67 patients, and their clinical scores were recorded. Forty-nine patients received immunosuppressive therapy, 17 patients received pyridostigmine only, and 1 patient under thymectomy without any medication. The AChR-Ab concentration correlated with the MGFA Classification in 5 (29.4%) patients in the pyridostigmine-only group and 15 (30.6%) patients in the immunosuppressive drug group. The changes in the MGFA Classification preceded the changes in the AChR-Ab concentration in 4 (23.5%) patients treated with pyridostigmine and 10 (20.4%) patients on immunosuppressive drugs. In patients on oral non-steroidal immunosuppressants, the AChR-Ab concentration changed by more than 50%, whereas the MGFA Classification did not increase. The AChR-Ab concentration decreased in 17/32 (53.1%) patients after thymectomy, and then increased, whereas the AChR-Ab concentration increased in 15/32 (46.9%) patients and the MGFA Classification decreased in 27/32 (81.8%) patients after thymectomy. The AChR-Ab concentration presented a slight correlation with the corresponding MGFA, QMG, and MG-ADL in patients with thymoma.

DISCUSSION

In the Chinese AChR-MG population, the Changes in the AChR-Ab concentration in individuals with AChR-MG did not consistently correlate with the severity of clinical symptoms.

Diagnostic yields and clinical features of ocular myasthenia gravis

To investigate clinical features and diagnosis process of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) in ophthalmology department.A total of 36 patients with ptosis or diplopia who had follow-up for at least 3 months between March 2016 and December 2019 were included in this study. Clinical symptoms of patients and the test results were analyzed. According to the positivity of serologic test, these patients were divided into 2 groups (confirmed OMG and possible OMG with relief of symptoms after antimyasthenic treatment) for comparison.Ptosis was present in 12 (33.33%) patients, diplopia was present in 14 (38.89%) patients, and both ptosis and diplopia were present in 10 (27.78%) patients. Acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody (AchR Ab) was positive in 14 (38.89%) of 36 patients and ice test was positive in 15 (71.43%) of 21 patients with ptosis. Unequivocal response to pyridostigmine was observed in 31 (86.11%) patients. For seropositive cases, AchR Ab titer was significantly higher in the group with 2 clinical symptoms than that in the 1 clinical symptom (P = .011).This study presents the usefulness and diagnostic validity of antimyasthenic treatment for OMG, especially seronegative OMG, with detailed symptom analysis.

Heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: considerations for disease management

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis is a rare disease of the neuromuscular junction and a prototype of B cell-driven immunopathology. Pathogenic antibodies target post-synaptic transmembrane proteins, most commonly the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, inducing end-plate alterations and neuromuscular transmission impairment. Several clinical subtypes are distinct on the basis of associated antibodies, age at symptom onset, thymus pathology, genetic factors, and weakness distribution. These subtypes have distinct pathogenesis that can account for different responses to treatment. Conventional therapy is based on the use of symptomatic agents, steroids, immunosuppressants and thymectomy. Of late, biologics have emerged as effective therapeutic options.Areas covered: In this review, we will discuss the management of myasthenia gravis in relation to its phenotypic and biological heterogeneity, in the light of recent advances in the disease immunopathology, new diagnostic tools, and results of clinical trialsExpert opinion: Clinical management is shaped on serological subtype, and patient age at onset, lifestyle and comorbidities, balancing therapeutic needs and safety. Although reliable biomarkers predictive of clinical and biologic outcome are still lacking, recent developments promise a more effective and safe treatment. Disease subtyping according to serological testing and immunopathology is crucial to the appropriateness of clinical management.

Improving laboratory diagnostics in myasthenia gravis

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterized by pathogenic autoantibodies targeting structures of the neuromuscular junction. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPAs) represent the gold standard for their detection. However, new methods are emerging to complement, or overcome RIPAs, also with the perspective of eliminating the use of radioactive reagents.Areas covered: We discuss advances in laboratory methods, prompted especially by cell-based assays (CBAs), for the detection of the autoantibodies of MG diagnostics, above all those to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), and low molecular-weight receptor-related low-density lipoprotein-4 (LRP4).Expert opinion: CBA technology makes AChRs aggregate on cell membranes, thus allowing to detect autoantibodies to clustered AChRs, with reduction of seronegative MG cases. The diagnostic relevance of RIPA/CBA-measurable LRP4 antibodies is still unclear, in Caucasian patients at least. Live CBAs for the detection of AChR, MuSK, and LRP4 antibodies might represent an alternative to RIPAs, but first require full validation. CBAs could be used as screening tests, limiting RIPAs for antibody quantification. To this end, ELISAs might be an alternative.Fixation procedures preserving enough degree of antigen conformationality could yield AChR and MuSK CBAs suitable for a wide use in clinical-chemistry laboratories.

Evaluating an In-House Cell-Based Assay for Detecting Antibodies Against Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase in Myasthenia Gravis

Background and Purpose

Detecting antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK Abs) is essential for diagnosing myasthenia gravis (MG). We applied an in-house cell-based assay (CBA) to detect MuSK Abs.

Methods

A stable cell line was generated using a lentiviral vector, which allowed the expression of MuSK tagged with green fluorescent protein in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. Serum and anti-human IgG antibody conjugated with red fluorescence were added. The presence of MuSK Abs was determined based on the fluorescence intensity and their colocalization in fluorescence microscopy. Totals of 218 serum samples collected from 177 patients with MG, 31 with other neuromuscular diseases, and 10 healthy controls were analyzed. The CBA results were compared with those of a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

The MuSK-HEK293 cell line stably expressed MuSK protein. The CBA detected MuSK Abs in 34 (19.2%) of 177 samples obtained from patients with MG and in none of the participants having other neuromuscular diseases or in the healthy controls. The clinical characteristics of the patients with MuSK MG determined based on the CBA were strongly correlated with known clinical features of MuSK MG. There was an almost perfect agreement between the results of the CBA and those of the RIPA (Cohen's kappa=0.880, p<0.001) and ELISA (Cohen's kappa=0.982, p<0.001).

Conclusions

The results of the in-house CBA showed excellent agreement with both the RIPA and ELISA. Our in-house CBA can be considered a reliable method for detecting MuSK Abs.

Therapeutic plasma exchange as adjunct therapy in 3 dogs with myasthenia gravis and myasthenia-like syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of therapeutic membrane-based plasma exchange (TPE) for treatment of clinical signs associated with suspected acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) in 3 dogs.

CASE SERIES SUMMARY

Three dogs presented with clinical signs consistent with acquired MG. All 3 dogs were medically managed prior to being treated with TPE. Two of the 3 dogs had increased acetylcholine receptor antibody titers that decreased after TPE. One dog diagnosed with primary MG became clinically normal after 2 sessions of TPE and continued to do well with medical management several months later. The second dog was diagnosed with a suspect thymoma, and TPE was performed as a bridge to surgery, with marked improvement of clinical signs after TPE. The dog was ultimately diagnosed with a thymic carcinoma. The third dog had a positive acetylcholine antibody titer and was ultimately diagnosed with hemangiosarcoma (spleen and liver) and invasive mediastinal thymoma. This dog developed severe pneumonia, was ventilator dependent, and died of multiple organ dysfunction. No immediate complications were observed secondary to TPE. All 3 dogs were concurrently treated with either immunosuppressive agents, anticholinesterase drugs, or both.

NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED

The use of TPE in dogs with MG appears to be well tolerated and safe. It may be a reasonable adjunct therapy to acetylcholinesterase drugs in cases that are not responding to medical management alone. Therapeutic plasma exchange might also be considered preoperatively to prevent postoperative complications in dogs with severe MG, although further studies should be performed.

Emerging Roles of Dysregulated MicroRNAs in Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare acquired autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Autoantibodies, cellular immunity, complement, and cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of MG. It is characterized by the dysfunction of neuromuscular junction transmission and skeletal muscle weakness. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding small molecule ribonucleic acids that regulate various biological processes (e.g., development, differentiation, and immunity) at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels of gene expression. miRNAs play an important regulatory role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, including MG. In recent studies, the functional mechanisms underlying the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of MG have received increasing attention. miRNAs are highly stable and have high specificity in peripheral body fluids. Therefore, the miRNAs in body fluids may represent promising biomarkers for determining the prognosis of MG and the efficacy of treatment. This article reviews the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of MG, highlights the potential of miRNAs as new biomarkers for the diagnosis of MG, and deepens our understanding of disease processes.

Clinical analysis of Chinese anti-low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-associated protein 4 antibodies in patients with myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-associated protein 4 (LRP4) autoantibodies have recently been detected in myasthenia gravis (MG), but little is known about the clinical characteristics associated with this serological type. In this study, the clinical features of Chinese patients with anti-LRP4 antibody-positive MG were characterized.

METHODS

A total of 2172 MG serum samples were collected from patients in various parts of China. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody and titin antibody, and cell-based assays were used to detect muscle-specific kinase antibody and LRP4 antibody. Clinical data for patients with MG were collected from different provinces in China.

RESULTS

In total, 16 (0.8%) patients with LRP4-MG were found amongst 2172 total patients, including three patients with AChR/LRP4-MG. Additionally, 13 (2.9%) patients with LRP4-MG were found amongst 455 patients with double seronegative MG. The ratio of males to females for these 13 patients was 1:1.6, and 53.8% patients were children. A total of 91.7% of cases exhibited initial ocular involvement, and 58.3% of cases exhibited simple eye muscle involvement. Responses to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and prednisone were observed.

CONCLUSION

The expanded sample confirmed that the positive rate of LRP4 antibodies in China is lower than that in western countries. Our results highlighted the differences between LRP4-MG and other antibody groups. Children and female patients with LRP4-MG have a higher prevalence, often involving the ocular muscles and limb muscles. The clinical symptoms are mild, and satisfactory responses to treatment are often achieved.

Autoantibodies in acquired myasthenia gravis: Clinical phenotype and immunological correlation

BACKGROUND

Data on antibody profile in myasthenia gravis (MG) from India are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate antibody profile in patients with MG and their clinical correlates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients of MG (n = 85, M:F::1.1:1, mean age: 39.29 ± 17.3 years, mean symptom duration: 72.94 ± 91.8 months) were evaluated for clinical features, MG foundation of America (MGFA) score, response to treatment, and outcome at last follow-up. Antibodies to acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MUSK), titin and ryanodine receptor (RYR) were analysed using ELISA.

RESULTS

Based on the regional distribution of weakness, the cohort could be categorized as: generalized: 60, ocular: 16 and oculo-bulbar: 9. Sixty patients were followed up for a mean duration of 26.74 ± 13.8 months. Outcome at last follow-up was as follows: remission-22, no remission-33 and dead-5. AChR and MUSK antibodies were detected in 58 and 8 patients, respectively. Frequency of generalized MG, worse MGFA score during the disease course and thymomatous histology significantly correlated with presence of AChR-antibodies, though outcome at last follow-up was comparable between AChR-antibody positive and negative groups. Patients with MUSK antibodies had oculo-bulbar or generalized MG and frequent respiratory crisis, but majority improved or remitted with treatment. Titin antibodies were detected in 31.8% and RYR antibodies in 32.9%. Their presence did not correlate with age at onset of MG, severity or presence of thymoma.

CONCLUSION

This report highlights the spectrum of antibodies in MG in an Indian cohort. AChR-antibody positivity correlated with clinical severity. Outcome was good in majority of MUSK antibody-positive MG. The role of other antibodies, complementary vs epiphenomenon, remains open.