1
|
Melckenbeeck I, Audenaert P, Van Parys T, Van De Peer Y, Colle D, Pickavet M. Optimising orbit counting of arbitrary order by equation selection. BMC Bioinformatics 2019; 20:27. [PMID: 30646859 PMCID: PMC6334470 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2483-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Graphlets are useful for bioinformatics network analysis. Based on the structure of Hočevar and Demšar’s ORCA algorithm, we have created an orbit counting algorithm, named Jesse. This algorithm, like ORCA, uses equations to count the orbits, but unlike ORCA it can count graphlets of any order. To do so, it generates the required internal structures and equations automatically. Many more redundant equations are generated, however, and Jesse’s running time is highly dependent on which of these equations are used. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate which equations are most efficient, and which factors have an effect on this efficiency. Results With appropriate equation selection, Jesse’s running time may be reduced by a factor of up to 2 in the best case, compared to using randomly selected equations. Which equations are most efficient depends on the density of the graph, but barely on the graph type. At low graph density, equations with terms in their right-hand side with few arguments are more efficient, whereas at high density, equations with terms with many arguments in the right-hand side are most efficient. At a density between 0.6 and 0.7, both types of equations are about equally efficient. Conclusions Our Jesse algorithm became up to a factor 2 more efficient, by automatically selecting the best equations based on graph density. It was adapted into a Cytoscape App that is freely available from the Cytoscape App Store to ease application by bioinformaticians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ine Melckenbeeck
- Ghent University - imec, IDLab, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium
| | - Pieter Audenaert
- Ghent University - imec, IDLab, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium. .,Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Thomas Van Parys
- Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Technologiepark 927, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.,Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, Ghent, 9052, Belgium
| | - Yves Van De Peer
- Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Technologiepark 927, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.,Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.,Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa
| | - Didier Colle
- Ghent University - imec, IDLab, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.,Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mario Pickavet
- Ghent University - imec, IDLab, Technologiepark 15, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.,Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|