Comparison of cardiac function index derived from femoral and jugular indicator injection for transpulmonary thermodilution with the PiCCO-device: A prospective observational study

Injection Site Matters: A Comparative Analysis of Transpulmonary Thermodilution via Simultaneous Femoral and Jugular Indicator Injections under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy

Background: The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) in acute lung failure has witnessed a notable increase. The PiCCO system is frequently used for advanced hemodynamic monitoring in this cohort. Our study aimed to investigate whether the choice of indicator injection site (jugular vs. femoral) in patients undergoing vv-ECMO therapy affects transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) measurements using the PiCCO® device (Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany). Methods: In a retrospective single-center analysis, we compared thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters after simultaneous jugular and femoral injections in 28 measurements obtained in two patients with respiratory failure who were undergoing vv-ECMO therapy. Results: Elevated values of the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) were observed following femoral indicator injection compared to jugular indicator injection (EVLWI: 29.3 ± 10.9 mL/kg vs. 18.3 ± 6.71 mL/kg, p = 0.0003; ITBVI: 2163 ± 631 mL/m2 vs. 806 ± 125 mL/m2, p < 0.0001; GEDVI: 1731 ± 505 mL/m2 vs. 687 ± 141 mL/m2, p < 0.0001). The discrepancy between femoral and jugular measurements exhibited a linear correlation with extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF). Conclusions: In a PiCCO®-derived hemodynamic assessment of patients on vv-ECMO, the femoral indicator injection, as opposed to the jugular injection, resulted in an overestimation of all index parameters. This discrepancy can be attributed to mean transit time (MTt) and downslope time-dependent (DSt) variations in GEDVI and cardiac function index and is correlated with ECBF.

Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting

Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.

Transpulmonary thermodilution techniques in the haemodynamically unstable patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) devices invasively measure not only cardiac output but also several other haemodynamic variables estimating cardiac preload, cardiac preload, systolic function, the lung oedema and systolic function, the lung oedema and the pulmonary permeability. In light of the recent literature, we describe how different indices are measured, emphasize their clinical interest and list potential limits and side-effects of the technique.

RECENT FINDINGS

Estimation of cardiac output measurement with TPTD is now well established, at least when compared with the pulmonary artery catheter. The advantage of calibrating the pulse contour analysis, as it is allowed by TPTD indices, is clearly established over uncalibrated devices. The greatest advantage of TPTD is to measure extravascular lung water and pulmonary permeability, which may be useful to diagnose acute respiratory distress syndrome and manage fluid therapy in various critical diseases. It also allows a rapid detection of left ventricular systolic failure. The information it provides must be considered complementary to that provided by echocardiography.

SUMMARY

TPTD provides several indices that may help in making decisions during the therapeutic management of haemodynamically unstable patients. It should be used for the most critically ill patients, whose management requires a reliable, precise and holistic view of the cardiopulmonary condition.

Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

One of the most important variables in assessing hemodynamic status in the intensive care unit (ICU) is the cardiac function and blood pressure. Invasive methods such as pulmonary artery catheter and arterial line allow monitoring of blood pressure and cardiac function accurately and reliably. However, their use is not without drawbacks, especially when the invasive nature of these procedures and complications associated with them are considered. There are several newer methods of noninvasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring available. In this manuscript, we will review these different methods of minimally invasive and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and will discuss their advantages, drawbacks and limitations.