1
|
Velicia Peñas C, Del Campo Pérez VM, Rivero Calle I, Armenteros Del Olmo L, Pérez Rodríguez MT, Gestal Otero JJ. [Expert opinion on strategies to improve vaccination coverage against seasonal influenza]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA : PUBLICACION OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA 2022; 35:435-443. [PMID: 35726347 PMCID: PMC9548073 DOI: 10.37201/req/031.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Seasonal flu continues to be a major public health concern, and the influenza vaccine remains the most effective preventive measure. In Spain, vaccination coverage data from previous seasons show vaccination rates well below official targets; however, these figures improved significantly after the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the importance of achieving and maintaining high vaccination rates in order to avoid the clinical and economic impact of influenza, our multidisciplinary group of experts on vaccines analyzed the impact of low vaccination rates in Spain and drafted a series of measures to boost influenza vaccination coverage, particularly among priority groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - J J Gestal Otero
- Prof. Dr. Juan Jesús Gestal Otero. Profesor emérito de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública de la USC, Facultad de Medicina. c/ San Francisco s/n. 15701. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acosta L, Soldevila N, Torner N, Martínez A, Ayneto X, Rius C, Jané M, Domínguez A. Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Severe Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza during the 2017-2018 Season. A Retrospective Cohort Study in Catalonia (Spain). Viruses 2021; 13:v13081465. [PMID: 34452337 PMCID: PMC8402781 DOI: 10.3390/v13081465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Seasonal influenza is a common cause of hospital admission, especially in older people and those with comorbidities. The objective of this study was to determine influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing intensive care admissions and shortening the length of stay (LOS) in hospitalized laboratory-confirmed influenza cases (HLCI) in Catalonia (Spain). A retrospective cohort study was carried out during the 2017-2018 season in HLCI aged ≥18 years from 14 public hospitals. Differences in means and proportions were assessed using a t-test or a chi-square test as necessary and the differences were quantified using standardized effect measures: Cohen's d for quantitative and Cohen's w for categorical variables. Adjusted influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing severity was estimated by multivariate logistic regression where the adjusted VE = (1 - adjusted odds ratio) · 100%; adjustment was also made using the propensity score. We analyzed 1414 HLCI aged ≥18 years; 465 (33%) were vaccinated, of whom 437 (94%) were aged ≥60 years, 269 (57.8%) were male and 295 (63.4%) were positive for influenza type B. ICU admission was required in 214 (15.1%) cases. There were 141/1118 (12.6%) ICU admissions in patients aged ≥60 years and 73/296 (24.7%) in those aged <60 years (p < 0.001). The mean LOS and ICU LOS did not differ significantly between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. There were 52/465 (11.2%) ICU admissions in vaccinated cases vs. 162/949 (17.1%) in unvaccinated cases. Patients admitted to the ICU had a longer hospital LOS (mean: 22.4 [SD 20.3] days) than those who were not (mean: 11.1 [SD 14.4] days); p < 0.001. Overall, vaccination was associated with a lower risk of ICU admission. Taking virus types A and B together, the estimated adjusted VE in preventing ICU admission was 31% (95% CI 1-52; p = 0.04). When stratified by viral type, the aVE was 40% for type A (95% CI -11-68; p = 0.09) and 25% for type B (95% CI -18-52; p = 0.21). Annual influenza vaccination may prevent ICU admission in cases of HLCI. A non-significantly shorter mean hospital stay was observed in vaccinated cases. Our results support the need to increase vaccination uptake and public perception of the benefits of influenza vaccination in groups at a higher risk of hospitalization and severe outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesly Acosta
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Polytechnic University of Catalonia/BARCELONATECH, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Nuria Soldevila
- CIBER Epidemiología Salud Pública, CIBERESP, PREVICET Program, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (N.S.); (A.M.); (C.R.); (M.J.); (A.D.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nuria Torner
- CIBER Epidemiología Salud Pública, CIBERESP, PREVICET Program, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (N.S.); (A.M.); (C.R.); (M.J.); (A.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-934024566
| | - Ana Martínez
- CIBER Epidemiología Salud Pública, CIBERESP, PREVICET Program, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (N.S.); (A.M.); (C.R.); (M.J.); (A.D.)
- Public Health Agency of Catalonia, 08005 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Xavier Ayneto
- Public Health Agency of Catalonia, 08005 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Cristina Rius
- CIBER Epidemiología Salud Pública, CIBERESP, PREVICET Program, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (N.S.); (A.M.); (C.R.); (M.J.); (A.D.)
- Public Health Agency of Barcelona, 08024 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Jané
- CIBER Epidemiología Salud Pública, CIBERESP, PREVICET Program, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (N.S.); (A.M.); (C.R.); (M.J.); (A.D.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Public Health Agency of Catalonia, 08005 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Angela Domínguez
- CIBER Epidemiología Salud Pública, CIBERESP, PREVICET Program, 28029 Madrid, Spain; (N.S.); (A.M.); (C.R.); (M.J.); (A.D.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Behavior of hospitalized severe influenza cases according to the outcome variable in Catalonia, Spain, during the 2017-2018 season. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13587. [PMID: 34193898 PMCID: PMC8245597 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92895-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Influenza is an important cause of severe illness and death among patients with underlying medical conditions and in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with ICU admission and death in patients hospitalized with severe laboratory-confirmed influenza during the 2017–2018 season in Catalonia. An observational epidemiological case-to-case study was carried out. Reported cases of severe laboratory-confirmed influenza requiring hospitalization in 2017–2018 influenza season were included. Mixed-effects regression analysis was used to estimate the factors associated with ICU admission and death. A total of 1306 cases of hospitalized severe influenza cases were included, of whom 175 (13.4%) died and 217 (16.6%) were ICU admitted. Age 65–74 years and ≥ 75 years and having ≥ 2 comorbidities were positively associated with death (aOR 3.19; 95%CI 1.19–8.50, aOR 6.95, 95%CI 2.76–1.80 and aOR 1.99; 95%CI 1.12–3.52, respectively). Neuraminidase inhibitor treatment and pneumonia were negatively associated with death. The 65–74 years and ≥ 75 years age groups were negatively associated with ICU admission (aOR 0.41; 95%CI 0.23–0.74 and aOR 0.30; 95%CI 0.17–0.53, respectively). A factor positively associated with ICU admission was neuraminidase inhibitor treatment. Our results support the need to investigate the worst outcomes of hospitalized severe cases, distinguishing between death and ICU admission.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazagatos C, Monge S, Olmedo C, Vega L, Gallego P, Martín-Merino E, Sierra MJ, Limia A, Larrauri A. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths in elderly long-term care facility residents, Spain, weeks 53 2020 to 13 2021. Euro Surveill 2021; 26:2100452. [PMID: 34142647 PMCID: PMC8212595 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.24.2100452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) experienced a large morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain and were prioritised for early COVID-19 vaccination. We used the screening method and population-based data sources to obtain estimates of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for elderly LTCF residents. The estimates were 71% (95% CI: 56-82%), 88% (95% CI: 75-95%), and 97% (95% CI: 92-99%), against SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic), and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mazagatos
- National Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Susana Monge
- Centre for the Coordination of Alerts and Health Emergencies, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Olmedo
- Vaccines Division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorena Vega
- National Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Gallego
- National Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María José Sierra
- Centre for the Coordination of Alerts and Health Emergencies, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurora Limia
- Vaccines Division, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amparo Larrauri
- National Centre for Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain, Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maltezou HC, Rodolakis A. Vaccination of pregnant women against influenza: what is the optimal timing? Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:2723-2727. [PMID: 33599569 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1889934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women and young infants are at increased risk for severe influenza and its complications. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy is increasingly implemented as a strategy aiming to protect the pregnant woman, the fetus and the young infant. In clinical practice, the achievement of satisfactory protection for the pregnant woman without compromising the protection of her infant during the first months of life remains a challenge. Determinants that are implicated in the optimal timing of influenza vaccination in pregnancy include influenza season, trimester of pregnancy, maternal host factors and infant factors. This article addresses influenza vaccination in pregnancy and presents recent published evidence on issues that affect the optimization of the timing of maternal vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena C Maltezou
- Directorate of Research, Studies and Documentation, National Public Health Organization, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazagatos C, Godoy P, Muñoz Almagro C, Pozo F, Larrauri A. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination during pregnancy to prevent severe infection in children under 6 months of age, Spain, 2017-2019. Vaccine 2020; 38:8405-8410. [PMID: 32741669 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Influenza vaccination is recommended to pregnant women in Spain to reduce the risk of influenza-related complications. Influenza related hospitalizations pose a significant disease burden in children every year. Although children below 6 months are too young to be vaccinated, they can receive protection against influenza through vaccination of their mothers during pregnancy. We estimated the effectiveness of maternal influenza vaccination to prevent influenza hospitalizations in infants under 6 months of age. METHODS This is a retrospective pilot study, using data from the Severe Hospitalized Confirmed Influenza Cases (SHCIC) surveillance system in seasons 2017/18 and 2018/19 in Spain. Maternal vaccination status during pregnancy was collected for cases in children 6 months and younger hospitalized with confirmed influenza infection. Influenza vaccine effectiveness was estimated using the screening method, by comparing the proportion of children with vaccinated mothers during pregnancy (proportion of cases vaccinated, PCV), with the vaccination coverage among pregnant women in Spain (proportion of population vaccinated, PPV). RESULTS For all the study period, the PCV was 17% and the PPV was 35%. Influenza vaccination in mothers during pregnancy prevented influenza confirmed hospitalizations in infants aged 6 months and younger with a 61% (95%CI: 27-79%) effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS In line with evidence from other countries, influenza vaccination during pregnancy protects infants up to 6 months of age from influenza hospitalizations in Spain. These results support current recommendations of influenza vaccination in pregnant women, and more studies are needed in Spain to confirm the double protection of maternal vaccination in mothers and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mazagatos
- Dirección General de Salud Pública y Ordenación Farmacéutica, Consejería de Salud, Andalucía, Spain; Servicio de Epidemiología y Prevención, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Canarias, Spain
| | - Pere Godoy
- Servicio de Vigilancia y Salud, Consejería de Salud, Andalucía, Spain; Servicio de Epidemiología y Prevención, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Canarias, Spain
| | - Carmen Muñoz Almagro
- Dirección General de Salud Pública, Aragón, Spain; Servicio de Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad, Asturias, Spain; Servicio de Epidemiología y Prevención, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Canarias, Spain
| | - Francisco Pozo
- Servicio de Epidemiología, Dirección General de Salud Pública y Participación, Baleares, Spain; Servicio de Epidemiología y Prevención, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Larrauri
- Dirección General de Salud Pública y Ordenación Farmacéutica, Consejería de Salud, Andalucía, Spain; Servicio de Epidemiología y Prevención, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Canarias, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Song JY, Park KV, Han SW, Choi MJ, Noh JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ, Oh MJ, Cho GJ. Paradoxical long-term impact of maternal influenza infection on neonates and infants. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:502. [PMID: 32652939 PMCID: PMC7353799 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05236-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnant women are at high risk of influenza-related morbidity and mortality. In addition, maternal influenza infection may lead to adverse birth outcomes. However, there is insufficient data on long-term impact of maternal influenza infection. Methods This study was conducted to assess the impact of maternal influenza infection on birth outcomes and long-term influence on infants by merging the Korea National Health Insurance (KNHI) claims database and National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children (NHSP-IC). Mother-offspring pairs were categorized by maternal influenza infection based on the ICD-10 code. Results Multivariate analysis revealed that maternal influenza infection significantly increased the risk of preterm birth (OR 1.408) and low birth weight (OR 1.198) irrespective of gestational age. The proportion of low birth weight neonates was significantly higher in influenza-infected women compared to those without influenza. However, since the fourth health screening (30–80 months after birth), the fraction of underweight was no longer different between children from influenza-infected and non-infected mothers, whereas the rates of overweight increased paradoxically in those born to mothers with influenza infection. Conclusions Maternal influenza infection might have long-term effects on the health of children and adolescents even after infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Young Song
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Keon Vin Park
- School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Won Han
- School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Joo Choi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yun Noh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Jin Cheong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Joo Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Jeong Oh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro Hospital, Gurodong-ro 148, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea
| | - Geum Joon Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro Hospital, Gurodong-ro 148, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buchy P, Badur S. Who and when to vaccinate against influenza. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 93:375-387. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
9
|
Buchy P, Badur S, Kassianos G, Preiss S, Tam JS. Vaccinating pregnant women against influenza needs to be a priority for all countries: An expert commentary. Int J Infect Dis 2019; 92:1-12. [PMID: 31863875 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2012, the World Health Organization recommended influenza vaccination for all pregnant women worldwide and the prioritisation of pregnant women in national influenza vaccination programmes. Nevertheless, vaccination rates in pregnant women often remain much lower than national targets. OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and risks associated with influenza infection and vaccination during pregnancy, and to consider obstacles that work against influenza vaccine uptake during pregnancy. RESULTS There is strong evidence that maternal and foetal outcomes can be compromised if women develop influenza infections during pregnancy. Influenza vaccines have been administered to millions of pregnant women and have demonstrated benefits in terms of disease prevention in mothers and their infants. There is a consensus amongst several recommending authorities that influenza vaccines may be safely administered during all stages of pregnancy. Healthcare professionals are recognised as the most important influencers of vaccine uptake, being well placed to recommend vaccination and directly address safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Despite data supporting the value of influenza vaccination during pregnancy, vaccine uptake remains low globally. Low uptake appears to be largely due to ineffective communication with pregnant women about the risks and benefits of influenza vaccination. A graphical abstract is available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Selim Badur
- GSK, Büyükdere Caddesi No:173 1. Levent Plaza B Blok, 34394 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - George Kassianos
- President of the British Global & Travel Health Association, Chairman of RAISE Pan- European Committee on Influenza, National Immunisation Lead Royal College of General Practitioners, United Kingdom, Board Director of the European Working Group on Influenza
| | | | - John S Tam
- Chairman of the Asia Pacific Alliance for the control of influenza (APACI); Adjunct Professor, Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Böhm S, Röbl-Mathieu M, Scheele B, Wojcinski M, Wichmann O, Hellenbrand W. Influenza and pertussis vaccination during pregnancy - attitudes, practices and barriers in gynaecological practices in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:616. [PMID: 31477095 PMCID: PMC6719372 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4437-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Germany, antenatal influenza vaccination is recommended since 2010, but uptake remains low. Several countries recently introduced antenatal pertussis vaccination, which is currently under consideration in Germany. We conducted a survey among gynaecologists on attitudes, practices and barriers regarding influenza and pertussis vaccination during pregnancy. Methods Gynaecologists were invited to complete a pre-tested, 24-item questionnaire published in the German Professional Association of Gynaecologists’ journal in September 2017 within 2 months. Associations between variables were examined using Chi-Squared, Fischer’s Exact or t-tests. Variables associated with gynaecologists’ self-reported implementation of vaccination in pregnant women were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Of 867 participants (response 11%), 91.4 and 59.4% reported currently vaccinating pregnant women against influenza and pertussis, respectively. Gynaecologists who reported obtaining annual influenza vaccination and actively informing their patients about these vaccinations were significantly more likely to vaccinate pregnant women against influenza (96.5% vs. 65.7 and 95.1% vs. 62.2%) and pertussis (63.1% vs. 44.3 and 82.4% vs. 12.9%). Performing influenza vaccination was least likely among gynaecologists who perceived logistical difficulties as a vaccination barrier (35.9%), while pertussis vaccination was least likely if the lacking official recommendation (32.0%), logistical difficulties (27.1%), safety concerns (17.5%) and limited vaccine effectiveness (11.1%) were perceived as barriers. Of participants not yet vaccinating pregnant women against pertussis, 86.5% reported they would follow an official recommendation. Including vaccination recommendations in the maternity record (95.2%) and informing the public (88.7%) and health care professionals (86.6%) were considered the most suitable measures to achieve high pertussis vaccination coverage. Conclusions The large proportion reporting performance of influenza vaccination during pregnancy and high acceptance of a potential recommendation for pertussis vaccination reflected positive attitudes towards vaccination among participants. However, factors associated with failure to vaccinate may be more prevalent among non-participants. Results suggest that gynaecologists’ confidence in vaccination is crucial for implementing vaccination in pregnancy. Thus, doubts on vaccine effectiveness and safety should be allayed among gynaecologists and pregnant women via various communication channels, and solutions for logistical barriers sought. Including antenatal vaccination recommendations in the maternity record would serve as an important reminder for both groups. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4437-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Böhm
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Marianne Röbl-Mathieu
- Standing Committee on Vaccination, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | - Burkhard Scheele
- German Professional Association of Gynaecologists, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Wojcinski
- Working Group Immunization, German Professional Association of Gynaecologists, Munich, Germany
| | - Ole Wichmann
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodríguez-Blanco N, Tuells J. Knowledge and Attitudes about the Flu Vaccine among Pregnant Women in the Valencian Community (Spain). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 55:medicina55080467. [PMID: 31405260 PMCID: PMC6723429 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55080467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To describe the knowledge and attitudes related to the acceptance of the flu vaccine during pregnancy in women, from two Health Departments of the Valencian Community (VC), during the 2015–2016 season, after receiving prenatal care. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted during the annual vaccine season of women ascribed to prenatal care. A midwife offered flu vaccine advice and afterwards conducted a telephone poll of a representative sample, in order to find out the reason for accepting or rejecting the vaccine. Results: Of the 1017 expectant women who received advice about the vaccine, 77.4% (95% CI: 74.8–79.9%) declared their intention to vaccinate. After the recommendation, the vaccine coverage was 61.6%, with a percentage of accordance of 98.8% (95% CI: 98.0–99.6%) between the coverage declared and the Nominal Vaccination Registry (NVR) of the VC. Additionally, 67.2% of the expectant women were interviewed (n = 683). Most were aware of the recommendation and identified the health center and the midwife as the main sources of information. The internet was a consistent source in favor of vaccination 80.8% (n = 42). The obstetric variables (risk during the pregnancy, end of pregnancy, and feeding the newborn) did not have a statistically significant relationship with the vaccination. The women declared a high adherence to the vaccinations present in the child vaccination calendar, but rejected (31.3%) the flu vaccine, as they had not received it previously and did not want it because of their expectant state. Conclusions: The women positively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines. However, with the flu vaccine, “not being previously vaccinated” and the “doubts about its safety” represented more than half of the reasons put forth for its rejection. Ensuring that the flu vaccine is perceived as more effective and acceptable through the messages directed towards the expectant mothers, directly through the midwives or through the communication media and social networks, will result in an increase of vaccine coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó, Spain C/Tonico Sansano Mora, 14, 03293 Elche, Spain
- Department of Nursing Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera. Plaza Reyes Católicos, 19, 03204 Elche, Spain
| | - José Tuells
- Cátedra Balmis de Vacunología. University of Alicante. Campus de San Vicente Raspeig. Ap.99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hauge SH, Bakken IJ, de Blasio BF, Håberg SE. Burden of medically attended influenza in Norway 2008-2017. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2019; 13:240-247. [PMID: 30637942 PMCID: PMC6468058 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The burden of influenza in Norway remains uncertain, and data on seasonal variations and differences by age groups are needed. Objective To describe number of patients diagnosed with influenza in Norway each season and the number treated in primary or specialist health care by age. Further, to compare the burden of seasonal influenza with the 2009‐2010 pandemic outbreak. Methods We used Norwegian national health registries and identified all patients diagnosed with influenza from 2008 to 2017. We calculated seasonal rates, compared hospitalized patients with patients in primary care and compared seasonal influenza with the 2009‐2010 pandemic outbreak. Results Each season, on average 1.7% of the population were diagnosed with influenza in primary care, the average rate of hospitalization was 48 per 100 000 population while the average number of hospitalized patients each season was nearly 2500. The number of hospitalized influenza patients ranged from 579 in 2008‐2009 to 4973 in 2016‐2017. Rates in primary care were highest among young adults while hospitalization rates were highest in patients 80 years and older and in children below 5 years. The majority of in‐hospital deaths were in patients 70 years and older. Fewer patients were hospitalized during the 2009‐2010 pandemic than in seasonal outbreaks, but during the pandemic, more people in the younger age groups were hospitalized and fatal cases were younger. Conclusion Influenza causes a substantial burden in primary care and hospitals. In non‐pandemic seasons, people above 80 years have the highest risk of influenza hospitalization and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri Helene Hauge
- Division of Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inger Johanne Bakken
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Birgitte F de Blasio
- Division of Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri E Håberg
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|