Dexamethasone pretreatment impairs the thymidylate synthase inhibition mediated flare in thymidine salvage pathway activity in non-small cell lung cancer

Impact of the redox-active MnTnHex-2-PyP5+ and cisplatin on the metabolome of non-small cell lung cancer cells

Redox-based cancer therapeutic strategies aim to raise reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in cancer cells, thus modifying their redox status, and eventually inducing cell death. Promising compounds, known as superoxide dismutase mimics (SODm), e.g. MnTnHex-2-Py5+ (MnTnHex), could increase intracellular H2O2 in cancer cells with deficient ROS removal systems and therefore enhance radio- and chemotherapy efficacy. We have previously shown that MnTnHex was cytotoxic either alone or combined with cisplatin to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. To gain a deeper understanding of the effects and safety of this compound, it is crucial to analyze the metabolic alterations that take place within the cell. Our goal was thus to study the intracellular metabolome (intracellular metabolites) of NSCLC cells (A549 and H1975) using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy-based metabolomics to evaluate the changes in cellular metabolism upon exposure to MnTnHex per se or in combination with cisplatin. 1H NMR metabolomics revealed a higher number of significantly altered metabolites in A549 cells exposed to MnTnHex alone or combined with cisplatin in comparison with non-treated cells (nine dysregulated metabolites), suggesting an impact on aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, taurine, hypotaurine, glycerophospholipid, pyruvate, arginine and proline metabolisms. Regarding H1975 cells, significant alterations in the levels of six metabolites were observed upon co-treatment with MnTnHex and cisplatin, suggesting dysregulations in aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, arginine and proline metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis. These findings help us to understand the impact of MnTnHex on NSCLC cells. Importantly, specific altered metabolites, such as taurine, may contribute to the chemosensitizing effects of MnTnHex.

Application of Metabolic Reprogramming to Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis

Cellular metabolism governs the signaling that supports physiological mechanisms and homeostasis in an individual, including neuronal transmission, wound healing, and circadian clock manipulation. Various factors have been linked to abnormal metabolic reprogramming, including gene mutations, epigenetic modifications, altered protein epitopes, and their involvement in the development of disease, including cancer. The presence of multiple distinct hallmarks and the resulting cellular reprogramming process have gradually revealed that these metabolism-related molecules may be able to be used to track or prevent the progression of cancer. Consequently, translational medicines have been developed using metabolic substrates, precursors, and other products depending on their biochemical mechanism of action. It is important to note that these metabolic analogs can also be used for imaging and therapeutic purposes in addition to competing for metabolic functions. In particular, due to their isotopic labeling, these compounds may also be used to localize and visualize tumor cells after uptake. In this review, the current development status, applicability, and limitations of compounds targeting metabolic reprogramming are described, as well as the imaging platforms that are most suitable for each compound and the types of cancer to which they are most appropriate.

Impact of the APE1 Redox Function Inhibitor E3330 in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Exposed to Cisplatin: Increased Cytotoxicity and Impairment of Cell Migration and Invasion

Elevated expression levels of the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) have been correlated with the more aggressive phenotypes and poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess the impact of the inhibition of the redox function of APE1 with E3330 either alone or in combination with cisplatin in NSCLC cells. For this purpose, complementary endpoints focusing on cell viability, apoptosis, cell cycle distribution, and migration/invasion were studied. Cisplatin decreased the viability of H1975 cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, with IC₅₀ values of 9.6 µM for crystal violet assay and 15.9 µM for 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay. E3330 was clearly cytotoxic for concentrations above 30 µM. The co-incubation of E3330 and cisplatin significantly decreased cell viability compared to cisplatin alone. Regarding cell cycle distribution, cisplatin led to an increase in sub-G1, whereas the co-treatment with E3330 did not change this profile, which was then confirmed in terms of % apoptotic cells. In addition, the combination of E3330 and cisplatin at low concentrations decreased collective and chemotactic migration, and also chemoinvasion, by reducing these capabilities up to 20%. Overall, these results point to E3330 as a promising compound to boost cisplatin therapy that warrants further investigation in NSCLC.