Matucci T, Riccardi N, Occhineri S, Pontarelli A, Tiseo G, Falcone M, Puci M, Saderi L, Sotgiu G. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in incarcerated people: a systematic review.
Clin Microbiol Infect 2023:S1198-743X(23)00086-1. [PMID:
36868354 DOI:
10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.016]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The estimated number of people deprived of liberty is increasing, with 11.55 million incarcerated globally in 2021. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains is facilitated in over-crowded, poorly ventilated settings such as jails and penitentiaries. Moreover, inmates may show individual risk factors for the development of tuberculosis (TB) disease. Treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) may require up to 9 months of drug exposure and are characterized by adverse events (AEs) and low completion rates.
OBJECTIVES
to describe current scientific evidence on feasibility, acceptability and completion rate of LTBI treatment in prison/correctional institutes.
DATA SOURCES
Articles were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, no time restriction was applied.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Human retrospective and prospective studies published on LTBI treatment in incarcerated populations were included.
ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS
Bias assessment plots and Egger weighted regression test were used to determine the risk of bias.
METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS
Absolute and relative frequencies were assessed for qualitative data. Pooled proportion of included study groups and 95% confidence interval estimates, weighted for sample sizes, were illustrated in forest plots. I2 indicator association were used for true variability and overall variation. Fixed and random-effects models were chosen depending on the estimated between-study heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Of11 selected studies only 1 was conducted in a high TB incidence country. Overall, completion rates ranged from 26% to 100% across the included studies. Reason for discontinuation of treatment were transfer to other facilities, release, or loss to follow-up (LTFU) (range 0-74%), incidence of AEs (range 0-18%), and refusal or withdrawal from treatment (range 0-16%).
CONCLUSIONS
Implementation of short-course regimens in prisons should be considered given the low incidence of AEs observed; however, inmates consistently refused to complete LTBI treatment, thus underlining the need for improvement in retention in care.
Collapse