1
|
Kuemmerli C, Balzano G, Bouwense SA, Braga M, Coolsen M, Daniel SK, Dervenis C, Falconi M, Hwang DW, Kagedan DJ, Kim SC, Lavu H, Nussbaum D, Partelli S, Passeri MJ, Pecorelli N, Pillarisetty VG, Pucci MJ, Sutcliffe RP, Tingstedt B, van der Kolk M, Vrochides D, Armstrong M, Wei A, Williamsson C, Yeo CJ, Zani S, Zouros E, Rozzini R, Abu Hilal M. Are enhanced recovery protocols after pancreatoduodenectomy still efficient when applied in elderly patients? A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2024; 31:308-317. [PMID: 38282543 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis investigated the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols compared to conventional care on postoperative outcomes in patients aged 70 years or older undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS Five databases were systematically searched. Comparative studies with available individual patient data (IPD) were included. The main outcomes were postoperative morbidity, length of stay, readmission and postoperative functional recovery elements. To assess an age-dependent effect, the group was divided in septuagenarians (70-79 years) and older patients (≥80 years). RESULTS IPD were obtained from 15 of 31 eligible studies comprising 1109 patients. The overall complication and major complication rates were comparable in both groups (OR 0.92 [95% CI: 0.65-1.29], p = .596 and OR 1.22 [95% CI: 0.61-2.46], p = .508). Length of hospital stay tended to be shorter in the ERAS group compared to the conventional care group (-0.14 days [95% CI: -0.29 to 0.01], p = .071) while readmission rates were comparable and the total length of stay including days in hospital after readmission tended to be shorter in the ERAS group (-0.28 days [95% CI: -0.62 to 0.05], p = .069). In the subgroups, the length of stay was shorter in octogenarians treated with ERAS (-0.36 days [95% CI: -0.71 to -0.004], p = .048). The readmission rate increased slightly but not significantly while the total length of stay was not longer in the ERAS group. CONCLUSION ERAS in the elderly is safe and its benefits are preserved in the care of even in patients older than 80 years. Standardized care protocol should be encouraged in all pancreatic centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis - University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan A Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Braga
- Department of Surgery, Monza Hospital, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Mariëlle Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sara K Daniel
- HPB Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel J Kagedan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Song Cheol Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Harish Lavu
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Division of Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael J Passeri
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicolò Pecorelli
- Division of Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Michael J Pucci
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marion van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Misha Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alice Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sabino Zani
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Efstratios Zouros
- Department of Surgery, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Renzo Rozzini
- Geriatrics Operating Units, Foundation Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuemmerli C, Tschuor C, Kasai M, Alseidi AA, Balzano G, Bouwense S, Braga M, Coolsen M, Daniel SK, Dervenis C, Falconi M, Hwang DW, Kagedan DJ, Kim SC, Lavu H, Liang T, Nussbaum D, Partelli S, Passeri MJ, Pecorelli N, Pillai SA, Pillarisetty VG, Pucci MJ, Su W, Sutcliffe RP, Tingstedt B, van der Kolk M, Vrochides D, Wei A, Williamsson C, Yeo CJ, Zani S, Zouros E, Abu Hilal M. Impact of enhanced recovery protocols after pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2022; 109:256-266. [PMID: 35037019 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This individual-patient data meta-analysis investigated the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols compared with conventional care on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically for articles reporting outcomes of ERAS after pancreatoduodenectomy published up to August 2020. Comparative studies were included. Main outcomes were postoperative functional recovery elements, postoperative morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and readmission. RESULTS Individual-patient data were obtained from 17 of 31 eligible studies comprising 3108 patients. Time to liquid (mean difference (MD) -3.23 (95 per cent c.i. -4.62 to -1.85) days; P < 0.001) and solid (-3.84 (-5.09 to -2.60) days; P < 0.001) intake, time to passage of first stool (MD -1.38 (-1.82 to -0.94) days; P < 0.001) and time to removal of the nasogastric tube (3.03 (-4.87 to -1.18) days; P = 0.001) were reduced with ERAS. ERAS was associated with lower overall morbidity (risk difference (RD) -0.04, 95 per cent c.i. -0.08 to -0.01; P = 0.015), less delayed gastric emptying (RD -0.11, -0.22 to -0.01; P = 0.039) and a shorter duration of hospital stay (MD -2.33 (-2.98 to -1.69) days; P < 0.001) without a higher readmission rate. CONCLUSION ERAS improved postoperative outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. Implementation should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Kuemmerli
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis-University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Basle, Basle, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Centre, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Meidai Kasai
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Adnan A Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Braga
- Department of Surgery, Monza Hospital, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Mariëlle Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sara K Daniel
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Christos Dervenis
- Department of Surgery, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel J Kagedan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Song Cheol Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Harish Lavu
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Daniel Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael J Passeri
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Centre, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicolò Pecorelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sastha Ahanatha Pillai
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India
| | - Venu G Pillarisetty
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Michael J Pucci
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wei Su
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marion van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Centre, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alice Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sabino Zani
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Efstratios Zouros
- Department of Surgery, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Foundation Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hufkens AS, van Cleven S, Abreu de Carvalho L, Vanlander A, Berrevoet F. Evaluation of an enhanced recovery program for outcome improvement after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijso.2020.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
4
|
Abbasi A, Wakeman KM, Pillarisetty VG. Pancreatic paraganglioma mimicking pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Rare Tumors 2020; 12:2036361320982799. [PMID: 33425308 PMCID: PMC7756035 DOI: 10.1177/2036361320982799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Extra-adrenal paragangliomas are rare tumors arising from the chromaffin cells of the autonomic nervous system. Retroperitoneal paragangliomas may present as a pancreatic mass. We present a case of a 61-year-old woman with an incidentally found pancreatic mass (7.2 × 6.5 cm) in the CT scan. EUS- guided FNA result was compatible with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and histopathologic assessment revealed the mass was an extra-adrenal paraganglioma. Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic paragangliomas can be challenging due to imaging and histopathologic similarities with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezou Abbasi
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang XY, Cai JP, Huang CS, Huang XT, Yin XY. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of non-randomized and randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1373-1383. [PMID: 32811766 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely applied in many surgical specialties. However, with respect to the impact of ERAS on pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), there still exist some controversies. METHODS Literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from January, 1990 to July, 2019. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects or random-effects models. RESULTS Twenty-two studies containing 4147 patients were identified. The entire pooled data showed that ERAS significantly reduced overall and minor morbidity (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.88, p < 0.001; RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.88, p < 0.001, respectively), but didn't affect major morbidity (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84-1.13, p = 0.72). ERAS markedly reduced the incidences of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55-0.88, p = 0.002), incisional infection (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01) and intra-abdominal infection (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, p = 0.05), but didn't influence clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.01, p = 0.07). Shorter length of stay (LOS) (WMD: -5.07, 95% CI: -6.71 to -3.43, p < 0.001) was noted in ERAS group, without increasing 30-day readmission (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.86-1.24, p = 0.71) and mortality (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.41-1.21, p = 0.20). CONCLUSION ERAS significantly reduced overall and minor morbidity, incidences of DGE, incisional and intra-abdominal infections, and shortened LOS in PD, without increasing 30-day readmission and mortality. However, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are still needed to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi-Yu Wang
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Peng Cai
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chen-Song Huang
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi-Tai Huang
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Yu Yin
- Department of Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Flick KF, Sublette CM, Yip-Schneider MT, Maatman TK, Colgate CL, Soufi M, Kelley KE, Schmidt CM. Insurance Type and Marital Status Impact Hospital Length of Stay After Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 2020; 257:587-592. [PMID: 32927325 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recognition of the impact of social determinants on health care and surgical outcomes is imperative to improve patient care. This study aims to examine the impact social determinants have on hospital length of stay (LOS) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS Retrospective review of a prospective American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified patients who underwent PD from 2013 to 2018. Patients were categorized by insurance type (public/private/multiple), and electronic medical record review was performed to obtain distance from home, marital status, and race. Public insurance included Medicare and Medicaid; multiple types were defined as public insurance supplemented by a private insurance. Univariable analysis was used to identify potential confounders. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were controlled for using multivariable regression models to examine the effect of variables on LOS. RESULTS About 813 PDs were included (n = 341 public; n = 238 private; and n = 234 multiple). Patients with public insurance had significantly longer LOS than patients with private on univariate (P < 0.001) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.021) (8 versus 7 d). Patients with multiple insurance types showed significantly increased LOS compared with patients with private on univariable (P < 0.001) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.006) (8 versus 7 d). Single patients had significantly longer LOS compared with married patients on univariable (P = 0.012) and multivariable analyses (P = 0.005) (8 versus 7 d). Distance from home, race, gender, or age did not have a significant impact on LOS. CONCLUSIONS Single patients and patients with public or multiple insurance types are more likely to have longer hospital LOS after PD. These findings will enable physicians to identify patients at risk and target them for enhanced recovery programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn F Flick
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Michele T Yip-Schneider
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Thomas K Maatman
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Cameron L Colgate
- Center for Outcomes Research in Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mazhar Soufi
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Kristen E Kelley
- Department of Infection Prevention, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - C Max Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Biochemistry/Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| |
Collapse
|