Is there a reliable size cut-off for splenic involvement in lymphoma? A [18F]FDG-PET controlled study

Optimal index for detecting splenic involvement on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Accurate clinical staging is important in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to adapt to optimal therapy. Splenic involvement of DLBCL has been recently more detectable with the advancement of a diagnostic scan by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Our clinical question is whether splenic involvement was adequately diagnosed by FDG-PET/CT imaging. This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal index for evaluating splenic involvement in patients with DLBCL. Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who were examined with FDG-PET/CT at diagnosis and the end of induction chemotherapy (EOI) was enrolled. The splenic involvement with the splenic FDG uptake value higher than that of the liver at diagnosis or with the decrease of splenic uptake at EOI by visual evaluation was evaluated as positive. The calculative evaluation of splenic involvement, based on the data of standardized uptake value (SUV) of the spleen, used maximum SUV (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), spleen total lesion glycolysis (spleen TLG), and spleen length. A change in each index following induction chemotherapy was expressed as an index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to set the cutoff value for each index. This study included 52 patients. Spleen TLG (0.904) showed the best accuracy, followed by SUVmax (0.885) and SUVmean (0.885), among the 5 indexes for splenic involvement at diagnosis. Splenic involvement was predicted with a higher accuracy level (0.923) when selecting the cases with values higher than the cutoff level on both spleen TLG and SUVmax. The decision at EOI was more suitable by selecting both positive cases of ∆ TLG and ∆ SUVmax. Obtaining both the positive spleen TLG and SUVmax is recommended at diagnosis to predict splenic involvement. The assessment by ∆ spleen TLG and ∆ SUVmax seems to be optimal.

68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MRI for Treatment Response Assessment in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Comparison Between Changes in Lesion CXCR4 Expression on PET and Lesion Size and Diffusivity on MRI

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare CXCR4 imaging with 68Ga-pentixafor PET to MRI for treatment response assessment in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two posttreatment 68Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI scans of 16 patients (7 women and 9 men; mean age, 69.9 ± 7.9) with a total of 67 target lesions on baseline PET/MRI were analyzed. Rates of complete remission per lesion and per scan, according to MRI (based on lesion size) and 68Ga-pentixafor PET (based on SUV decrease to lower than liver and blood pool uptake), were compared using McNemar tests. The t tests and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to compare rates of change in lesion diameter products (DPs) on MRI, and standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean) on PET, relative to baseline.

RESULTS

At interim PET/MRI, 18/32 (56.3%) target lesions met CR criteria on 68Ga-pentixafor PET, and 16/32 (50.0%) lesions met size-based MRI criteria for CR (P = 0.63). At end-of-treatment PET/MRI, 40/57 (70.2%) target lesions met 68Ga-pentixafor PET criteria for CR, and 27/57 (47.4%) lesions met size-based MRI criteria for CR (P = 0.021). Complete remission after treatment was observed more frequently on 68Ga-pentixafor PET (11/22 scans, 54.5%) than on MRI (6/22 scans, 27.3%) (P = 0.031). Rates of change did not differ significantly between lesion DP (-69.20% ± 34.62%) and SUVmax (-64.59% ± 50.78%, P = 0.22), or DP and SUVmean (-60.15 ± 64.58, P = 0.064). Correlations were strong between DP and SUVmax (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) and DP and SUVmean (r = 0.73, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In MCL patients, 68Ga-pentixafor PET may be superior for assessment of complete remission status than anatomic MRI using lesion size criteria, especially at the end of treatment.

CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [68Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [18F]FDG-PET

For PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), [18F]FDG (2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose) is the currently recommended radiotracer, although uptake is variable and bone marrow evaluation is limited. In this prospective study, we evaluated the novel CXCR4 (G-protein-coupled C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4) tracer [68Ga]Pentixafor in MCL patients, and compared it to [18F]FDG. Methods: MCL patients underwent [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET/MRI, and, if required for routine purposes, also [18F]FDG-PET/MRI, before treatment. PET was evaluated separately for 23 anatomic regions (12 lymph node stations and 11 organs/tissues), using MRI as the main reference standard. Standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRblood and TBRliver) were calculated. General Estimation Equations (GEE) were used to compare [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET and [18F]FDG-PET sensitivities and positive predictive values (PPV). For bone marrow involvement, where biopsy served as the main reference standard, and splenic involvement, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the optimal SUV and TBR cut-off values, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: Twenty-two MCL patients were included. [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET sensitivity (100%) was significantly higher than for [18F]FDG-PET (75.2%) (P<0.001), and PPV was slightly, but not significantly lower (94.0%.vs. 96.5%; P=0.21). SUVs and TBRs were significantly higher for [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET than for [18F]FDG-PET (P<0.001 in all cases); the greatest difference was observed for mean TBRblood, with 4.9 for [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET and 2.0 for [18F]FDG-PET. For bone marrow involvement, [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET SUVmean showed an AUC of 0.92; and for splenic involvement, TBRblood showed an AUC of 0.81. Conclusion: [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET may become an alternative to [18F]FDG-PET in MCL patients, showing clearly higher detection rates and better tumor-to-background contrast.