1
|
Dunne EG, Fick CN, Mastrogiacomo B, Tan KS, Toumbacaris N, Vanstraelen S, Rocco G, Chaft JE, Iyengar P, Gomez D, Adusumilli PS, Park BJ, Isbell JM, Bott MJ, Sihag S, Molena D, Huang J, Jones DR. Clinicopathologic and genomic features associated with brain metastasis after resection of lung adenocarcinoma. JTCVS OPEN 2024; 22:458-469. [PMID: 39780816 PMCID: PMC11704575 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Objective To identify clinicopathologic and genomic features associated with brain metastasis after resection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and to evaluate survival after brain metastasis. Methods Patients who underwent complete resection of stage I-IIIA LUAD between 2011 and 2020 were included. A subset of patients had broad-based panel next-generation sequencing performed on their tumors. Fine-Gray models for the development of brain metastasis were constructed, with death without brain metastasis as a competing risk. Results A total of 2660 patients were included. The median duration of follow-up was 71 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 69-73 months). The cumulative incidence of brain metastasis at 10 years was 9.8%. Among patients who developed a brain metastasis, the median time from surgery to brain metastasis was 21 months (interquartile range, 10-42 months). Higher maximum standardized uptake value of the primary tumor, neoadjuvant therapy, lymphovascular invasion, and stage III disease were associated with the development of brain metastasis. Among patients who underwent next-generation sequencing, a multivariable analysis identified neoadjuvant therapy, pathologic stage, and TP53 mutations as associated with development of brain metastasis. The median survival after brain metastasis was 18 months (95% CI, 13-24 months). Better performance status, lack of extracranial metastasis, stereotactic radiosurgery, and targeted therapy were associated with better survival after brain metastasis. Conclusions Brain metastasis is common after complete resection of LUAD and often occurs within 2 years. Markers of aggressive tumor biology, including higher maximum standardized uptake value, lymphovascular invasion, and TP53 mutations, and neoadjuvant therapy are associated with brain metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth G. Dunne
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Cameron N. Fick
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brooke Mastrogiacomo
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicolas Toumbacaris
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Stijn Vanstraelen
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jaime E. Chaft
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bernard J. Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James M. Isbell
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew J. Bott
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Huang
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tatineni V, O’Shea PJ, Ozair A, Khosla AA, Saxena S, Rauf Y, Jia X, Murphy ES, Chao ST, Suh JH, Peereboom DM, Ahluwalia MS. First- versus Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2382. [PMID: 37190312 PMCID: PMC10137202 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Up to 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor EGFR alterations, the most common etiology behind brain metastases (BMs). First-generation EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) are limited by blood-brain barrier penetration and T790M tumor mutations, wherein third-generation EGFR-TKIs, like Osimertinib, have shown greater activity. However, their efficacy has not been well-studied in later therapy lines in NSCLC patients with BMs (NSCLC-BM). We sought to compare outcomes of NSCLC-BM treated with either first- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs in first-line and 2nd-to-5th-line settings. Methods: A retrospective review of NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, US, a quaternary-care center, was performed and reported following 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic, histopathological, molecular characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes were median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score matching were utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: 239 NSCLC-BM patients with EGFR alterations were identified, of which 107 received EGFR-TKIs after diagnosis of BMs. 77.6% (83/107) received it as first-line treatment, and 30.8% (33/107) received it in later (2nd-5th) lines of therapy, with nine patients receiving it in both settings. 64 of 107 patients received first-generation (erlotinib/gefitinib) TKIs, with 53 receiving them in the first line setting and 13 receiving it in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. 50 patients received Osimertinib as third-generation EGFR-TKI, 30 in first-line, and 20 in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. Univariable analysis in first-line therapy demonstrated mOS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs as 18.2 and 19.4 months, respectively (p = 0.57), while unadjusted mPFS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs was 9.3 and 13.8 months, respectively (p = 0.14). In 2nd-5th line therapy, for first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, mOS was 17.3 and 11.9 months, (p = 0.19), while mPFS was 10.4 and 6.08 months, respectively (p = 0.41). After adjusting for age, performance status, presence of extracranial metastases, whole-brain radiotherapy, and presence of leptomeningeal metastases, hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.25 (95% CI 0.63-2.49, p = 0.52) for first-line therapy. Adjusted HR for mOS in 2nd-to-5th line therapy was 1.60 (95% CI 0.55-4.69, p = 0.39). Conclusions: No difference in survival was detected between first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in either first or 2nd-to-5th lines of therapy. Larger prospective studies are warranted reporting intracranial lesion size, EGFR alteration and expression levels in primary tumor and brain metastases, and response rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineeth Tatineni
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Patrick J. O’Shea
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Ahmad Ozair
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | - Atulya A. Khosla
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | - Shreya Saxena
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | - Yasmeen Rauf
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Xuefei Jia
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Erin S. Murphy
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Samuel T. Chao
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - John H. Suh
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - David M. Peereboom
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Novaes LAC, Sussuchi da Silva L, De Marchi P, Cavagna RDO, de Paula FE, Zanon MF, Evangelista AF, Albino da Silva EC, Duval da Silva V, Leal LF, Reis RM. Simultaneous analysis of ALK, RET, and ROS1 gene fusions by NanoString in Brazilian lung adenocarcinoma patients. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:292-303. [PMID: 33569313 PMCID: PMC7867767 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Gene fusions have been successfully employed as therapeutic targets for lung adenocarcinoma. However, tissue availability for molecular testing of multiples alterations is frequently unfeasible. We aimed to detect the presence of ALK, RET, and ROS1 rearrangements by a RNA-based single assay in Brazilian lung adenocarcinomas and to associate with clinicopathological features and genetic ancestry. Methods From a FFPE series of 444 molecularly characterized lung adenocarcinomas, 253 EGFR/KRAS wild-type cases were eligible for gene rearrangement analysis. Following RNA isolation, ALK, RET, and ROS1 rearrangements were simultaneously analyzed employing the ElementsXT Custom panel (NanoString Technologies). Rearrangements were further associated with clinicopathological features and genetic ancestry of the patients. Results The NanoString platform was performed in subset of 142 cases. Gene fusion results were conclusive for 94.4% (n=134) cases (failure rate =5.6%). ALK rearrangements were observed in 21 out of 134 cases, and associated with younger, never smokers, metastatic disease, and metastases in the central nervous system. RET and ROS1 fusions were detected in two and one out of 134 cases, respectively. Genetic ancestry was not associated with gene fusions. Overall, considering all cases for which a molecular analysis was conclusive (EGFR/KRAS/ALK/RET/ROS1), ALK fusions frequency was observed in 6.5% (21/325), RET in 0.6% (2/325), and ROS1 in 0.3% (1/325). Conclusions This study successfully used a RNA-based single assay for the simultaneous analysis of ALK, RET, and ROS1 fusions employing routine biopsies from Brazilian patients lung adenocarcinoma allowing an extensive molecular testing for actionable rearrangements contributing to guide clinical strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pedro De Marchi
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Department of Medical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Oncoclinicas Group, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo de Oliveira Cavagna
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Department of Molecular Diagnosis, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | - Maicon Fernando Zanon
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Department of Molecular Diagnosis, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | - Vinícius Duval da Silva
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Department of Pathology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Barretos School of Medicine Dr. Paulo Prata - FACISB, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Letícia Ferro Leal
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Barretos School of Medicine Dr. Paulo Prata - FACISB, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Rui Manuel Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Department of Molecular Diagnosis, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|