1
|
Gao Z, Jha A, Hudson CL, Hopper AL, Critzer FJ, Micallef SA, Schaffner DW, Tikekar RV. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid in reducing cross-contamination during washing of baby spinach at different water quality levels. J Food Sci 2025; 90:e17657. [PMID: 39828401 PMCID: PMC11743063 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.17657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
We evaluated the antimicrobial performance of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and peracetic acid (PAA) during washing of baby spinach in water of varying levels of organic load, as measured by its chemical oxygen demand (COD). Escherichia coli TVS353 was spot inoculated onto one unwashed leaf. Sanitizers were added into water with preadjusted COD (300 or 2500 ppm) to achieve concentrations from 20 to 80 ppm. One inoculated leaf was washed with nine uninoculated leaves in 500 mL water (n = 6). Bacterial load on inoculated leaves was lowered by sanitizers in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05) and the lowest bacterial survivor levels were observed at 80 ppm with 2.7 ± 1.2 and 5.1 ± 0.5 Log MPN/leaf for PAA and NaOCl, respectively, at low CODs. PAA was more effective in reducing bacterial load from the inoculated leaf than NaOCl at high CODs (p < 0.05), with 2.9 ± 2.8 and 5.3 ± 0.8 Log MPN/leaf survivors for PAA and NaOCl, respectively. At 80 ppm sanitizer levels, the bacteria was not detected in wash water at any condition but was detected at 20 and 40 ppm at high CODs. The lowest levels of bacteria transferred to uninoculated leaves were observed at 80 ppm sanitizer, at 0.3 ± 0.2 and 0.2 ± 0.1 Log MPN/leaf for PAA and 1.1 ± 1.0 and 0.3 ± 0.3 Log MPN/leaf for NaOCl at low and high CODs, respectively. The log percentage of bacteria transferred ranged from -1.1 at 0 ppm to over -4.5 at 80 ppm, highlighting a reduction in cross-contamination by the sanitizers. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: This study provides effective data on sanitizer usage to fresh produce industry for ensuring food safety during washing of produce. It evaluated the sanitizer effect in a broad range of scenarios including various sanitizer concentrations, and wash water with low and high organic load that is common when recirculating wash water. The results also revealed the differences in two common sanitizers (PAA and NaOCl) in terms of their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhujun Gao
- Department of Nutrition and Food ScienceUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Aprajeeta Jha
- Department of Nutrition and Food ScienceUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Claire L. Hudson
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Adam L. Hopper
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | - Faith J. Critzer
- Department of Food Science and TechnologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensGeorgiaUSA
| | - Shirley A. Micallef
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
- Center for Food Safety and Security SystemsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| | | | - Rohan V. Tikekar
- Department of Nutrition and Food ScienceUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koutsoumanis K, Ordóñez AA, Bolton D, Bover‐Cid S, Chemaly M, De Cesare A, Herman L, Hilbert F, Lindqvist R, Nauta M, Nonno R, Peixe L, Ru G, Simmons M, Skandamis P, Suffredini E, Banach J, Ottoson J, Zhou B, da Silva Felício MT, Jacxsens L, Martins JL, Messens W, Allende A. Microbiological hazards associated with the use of water in the post-harvest handling and processing operations of fresh and frozen fruits, vegetables and herbs (ffFVHs). Part 1 (outbreak data analysis, literature review and stakeholder questionnaire). EFSA J 2023; 21:e08332. [PMID: 37928944 PMCID: PMC10623241 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The contamination of water used in post-harvest handling and processing operations of fresh and frozen fruit, vegetables and herbs (ffFVHs) is a global concern. The most relevant microbial hazards associated with this water are: Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., human pathogenic Escherichia coli and enteric viruses, which have been linked to multiple outbreaks associated with ffFVHs in the European Union (EU). Contamination (i.e. the accumulation of microbiological hazards) of the process water during post-harvest handling and processing operations is affected by several factors including: the type and contamination of the FVHs being processed, duration of the operation and transfer of microorganisms from the product to the water and vice versa, etc. For food business operators (FBOp), it is important to maintain the microbiological quality of the process water to assure the safety of ffFVHs. Good manufacturing practices (GMP) and good hygienic practices (GHP) related to a water management plan and the implementation of a water management system are critical to maintain the microbiological quality of the process water. Identified hygienic practices include technical maintenance of infrastructure, training of staff and cooling of post-harvest process water. Intervention strategies (e.g. use of water disinfection treatments and water replenishment) have been suggested to maintain the microbiological quality of process water. Chlorine-based disinfectants and peroxyacetic acid have been reported as common water disinfection treatments. However, given current practices in the EU, evidence of their efficacy under industrial conditions is only available for chlorine-based disinfectants. The use of water disinfection treatments must be undertaken following an appropriate water management strategy including validation, operational monitoring and verification. During operational monitoring, real-time information on process parameters related to the process and product, as well as the water and water disinfection treatment(s) are necessary. More specific guidance for FBOp on the validation, operational monitoring and verification is needed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Vaid M, Sarma K, Kala P, Gupta A. The plight of Najafgarh drain in NCT of Delhi, India: assessment of the sources, statistical water quality evaluation, and fate of water pollutants. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 29:90580-90600. [PMID: 35871193 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21710-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The Najafgarh drain is the first major drain that joins the Yamuna River at Wazirabad in Delhi, India, and is known to contribute to the maximum pollution load to this river. The drain is originally an extension of the Sahibi River and was intentionally constructed as a canal to carry stormwater, but presently, it is carrying more of sewage, agricultural, and industrial effluents received through various small and large secondary drains. The present study has analyzed the water quality status of this interconnected system, i.e., the Najafgarh drain, its associated secondary drains, and the Yamuna River for physicochemical parameters (n = 16), microbiological parameter (n = 1), and heavy metal concentrations (n = 8). The analysis of the surface water samples collected during pre- and post-monsoon seasons showed that secondary drain discharges significantly impacted the water quality of the Najafgarh drain, which in turn affected the Yamuna River. Out of the eight selected secondary drains for this study, the Goyla dairy outlet came out as the most polluted site in terms of organic pollutants while the Basaidarapur drain was loaded with heavy metal contaminants. Statistical tools comprising hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), Pearson's correlation, and principal component analysis (PCA) were further implemented on the water quality dataset for a better understanding of the possible sources of contamination for organic and inorganic pollutants in the selected sampling sites. The present study, thus, might help in providing key highlights to the policymakers for effective regulation and management of the point source discharges in Najafgarh drain, which will ultimately restrict its pollution loadings in Yamuna River, Delhi, and also help in the restoration of this important water body.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansi Vaid
- University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110078, India
| | - Kiranmay Sarma
- University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110078, India
| | - Pramod Kala
- Office of the Superintending Engineer, Flood Circle-III, Govt. of Delhi, Office Complex, Sector-15, Rohini, Delhi, 110089, India
| | - Anshu Gupta
- University School of Environment Management, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110078, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balasubramanian B, Shah T, Allen J, Rankin K, Xue J, Luo Y, Mancini R, Upadhyay A. Eugenol nanoemulsion inactivates Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on cantaloupes without affecting rind color. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.984391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 are the major foodborne pathogens that have been implicated in outbreaks related to consumption of contaminated cantaloupes. Current chlorine-based decontamination strategies are not completely effective for inactivating the aforementioned pathogens on cantaloupes, especially in the presence of organic matter. This study investigated the efficacy of eugenol nanoemulsion (EGNE) wash treatments in inactivating L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and E. coli O157:H7 on the surface of cantaloupes. In addition, the efficacy of EGNE in inhibiting the growth of the three pathogens on cantaloupes during refrigerated and room temperature storage of 5 days was investigated. Moreover, the effect of EGNE wash treatment on cantaloupe color was assessed using a Miniscan® XE Plus. The EGNE was prepared with either Tween 80 (TW) or a combination of Gum arabic and Lecithin (GA) as emulsifiers. The cantaloupe rind was washed with EGNE (0.3, 0.6, and 1.25%), in presence or absence of 5% organic load, for 1, 5, or 10 min at 25°C. Enumeration of surviving pathogens on cantaloupe was performed by serial dilution and plating on Oxford, XLD or SMA agar followed by incubation at 37°C for 24–48 h. EGNE-GA and EGNE-TW wash significantly reduced all three pathogens by at least 3.5 log CFU/cm2 as early as 5 min after treatment. EGNE-GA at 1.25% inactivated L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7 and S. Enteritidis on cantaloupes to below the detectable limit within 5 and 10 min of treatment, respectively (~4 log CFU/cm2, P < 0.05). EGNE treatments significantly reduced the survival of L. monocytogenes, S. Enteritidis, and E. coli O157:H7 on cantaloupe by at least 6 log CFU/cm2 at day 5 of storage at 25 and 4°C (P < 0.05). Presence of organic matter did not modulate the antimicrobial efficacy of nanoemulsion treatments (P > 0.05). EGNE treatments did not affect the rind color of cantaloupes (P > 0.05). In conclusion, eugenol nanoemulsions could potentially be used as a natural sanitizer to inactivate foodborne pathogens on cantaloupes. Further investigations in an industry setting are warranted.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bertoldi B, Bardsley CA, Baker CA, Pabst CR, Gutierrez A, De J, Luo Y, Schneider KR. Determining Bacterial Load and Water Quality Parameters of Chlorinated Tomato Flume Tanks in Florida Packinghouses. J Food Prot 2021; 84:1784-1792. [PMID: 34086886 DOI: 10.4315/jfp-21-100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Monitoring and maintenance of water quality in dump tanks or flume systems is crucial to maintaining proper sanitizer levels to prevent pathogen cross-contamination during postharvest washing of tomatoes, but there is limited information on how organic matter influences sanitizer efficacy in the water. The main objective of this study was to monitor water quality in flume tanks and evaluate the efficacy of postharvest washing of tomatoes in commercial packinghouses. Flume tank water samples (n = 3) were collected on an hourly basis from three packinghouses in Florida and analyzed for pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), free chlorine, chemical oxygen demand (COD), oxidation-reduction potential, and turbidity. Additionally, three flume-water samples were collected and tested for total aerobic plate count (APC), total coliforms (TC), and Escherichia coli. Fresh tomatoes (n = 3), both before and after washing, were collected and analyzed for the same bacterial counts. Turbidity, COD, and TDS levels in flume water increased over time in all packinghouses. Correlations observed include COD and turbidity (r = 0.631), turbidity and TDS (r = 0.810), and oxidation-reduction potential and chlorine (r = 0.660). APC for water samples had an average range of 0.0 to 4.7 log CFU/mL and TC average range of 0.0 to 4.7 log CFU/mL. All water samples were negative for E. coli. The average APC for pre- and postflume tomatoes from the three packinghouses was 6.0 log CFU per tomato and ranged from 2.2 to 7.4 log CFU per tomato. The average TC count was <1.5 and 7.0 log CFU per tomato for pre- and postwash tomatoes, respectively. There was no significant effect (P > 0.05) of postharvest washing on the microbiological qualities of tomatoes. Water quality in flume tanks deteriorated over time in all packinghouses during a typical operational day of 4 to 8 h. HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna Bertoldi
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| | - Cameron A Bardsley
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| | - Christopher A Baker
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| | - Christopher R Pabst
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| | - Alan Gutierrez
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| | - Jaysankar De
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| | - Yaguang Luo
- Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratories, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
| | - Keith R Schneider
- Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Characterization and mitigation of chemical oxygen demand and chlorine demand from fresh produce wash water. Food Control 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
7
|
Abnavi MD, Kothapalli CR, Srinivasan P. Total amino acids concentration as a reliable predictor of free chlorine levels in dynamic fresh produce washing process. Food Chem 2021; 335:127651. [PMID: 32739817 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
We establish the total amino acids (AA) concentration in wash water as an alternative indicator of free chlorine (FC) levels, and develop a model to predict FC concentration based on modeling the reaction kinetics of chlorine and amino acids. Using single wash of iceberg lettuce, green cabbage, and carrots, we report the first in situ apparent reaction rate β between FC and amino acids in the range of 15.3 - 16.6 M-1 s-1 and an amplification factor γ in the range of 11.52-11.94 for these produce. We also report strong linear correlations between AA levels and produce-to-water ratio (R2 = 0.87), and between chemical oxygen demand (COD) and AA concentrations (R2 = 0.87). The values of the parameters γ and β of the model were validated in continuous wash experiments of chopped iceberg lettuce, and predicted the FC (R2 = 0.96) and AA (R2 = 0.92) levels very well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadreza Dehghan Abnavi
- Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
| | - Chandrasekhar R Kothapalli
- Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
| | - Parthasarathy Srinivasan
- Department of Mathematics, 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Survival of Salmonella enterica and shifts in the culturable mesophilic aerobic bacterial community as impacted by tomato wash water particulate size and chlorine treatment. Food Microbiol 2020; 90:103470. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|