Correction: SVR12 rates higher than 99% after sofosbuvir/velpatasvir combination in HCV infected patients with F0-F1 fibrosis stage: A real world experience

Hepatitis C and Thalassemia: A Story with (Almost) a Happy Ending

Donor screening has nearly eliminated the risk of hepatitis C virus post-transfusion transmission in resource-rich settings. Moreover, the use of direct antiviral agents made it possible to treat the majority of patients with thalassemia and hepatitis C. However, this achievement, while extremely significant, does not erase the effects of the virus in terms of fibrogenesis and mutagenic risk, and adult patients with thalassemia are facing the long-term consequences of the chronic infection both on the liver and extrahepatically. As in the general population, it is in mainly patients with cirrhosis who are increasing in age, even though they are now HCV RNA-negative, who are at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, which continues to be statistically much more frequent in individuals with than without thalassemia. In certain resource-limited settings, the World Health Organization has estimated that up to 25 percent of blood donations do not undergo screening. It is therefore not surprising that hepatitis virus infection is still the most prevalent in patients with thalassemia worldwide.

Evaluation of Drug Interactions in Patients Treated with DAAs for Hepatitis C Therapy with Comorbidities and Cardiovascular Issues-A Delphi Consensus Project

Orally administered direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have dramatically changed the possibility of curing HCV (hepatitis C virus) infection, with the two principal HCV regimens based on the combination of glecaprevir + pibrentasvir (GLE-PIB) and sofosbuvir + velpatasvir (SOF-VEL). A combination of drugs containing NS3/4A protease inhibitors, as well as the fact that almost all HCV patients can be treated at present, may expose patients to a higher rate of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The hepatitis C treatment recommendations from the EASL (European Association for the Study of the Liver) state that, prior to starting treatment with a DAA, a detailed drug history should be taken; yet, the decision on managing the potential DDIs is not always clear. For this reason, a group of Italian cardiologists and hepatologists promoted a survey among colleagues to assess the controversial issues when treating patients with chronic hepatitis C taking concomitant cardiovascular drugs, aiming to reach a consensus on the best practice to apply when treating a patient with chronic hepatitis C who is taking concomitant drugs for cardiovascular diseases. Two consecutive questionnaires were proposed between June and July 2022 to a qualitative Expert Panel (EP) of 14 gastroenterologists, infectologists, hepatologists, and internists, with statistical analyses performed on 100% of the responses for both questionnaires. Agreement among experts was assessed following the Delphi method as developed by the RAND Corporation. The interviewed experts consider DDIs a critical clinical problem to be evaluated in HCV patients. Therefore, dose changes, drug substitution, and discontinuation of concomitant cardiovascular drugs should be discouraged, even if planned for a relatively short period. Since oral DAAs have different DDIs profiles, hepatologists should prefer the antiviral DAA combination presenting the lowest instance of potential interactions.

Directly observed therapy at opioid substitution facilities using sofosbuvir/velpatasvir results in excellent SVR12 rates in PWIDs at high risk for non-adherence to DAA therapy

Background & aims

We evaluated the effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) in difficult-to-treat PWIDs with presumed high risk for non-adherence to antiviral therapy using an innovative concept involving their opioid agonist therapy (OAT) facility.

Methods

N = 221 patients (m/f: 168/53; median age: 44.7 years (IQR 16.9); HCV-genotype 3: 45.2%; cirrhosis: 33.9%) treated with SOF/VEL were included. PWIDs at high risk for non-adherence to DAA therapy (n = 122) received HCV treatment alongside OAT under the supervision of medical staff ("directly observed therapy", DOT). These patients were compared to patients with presumed excellent drug compliance, who were treated in a "standard setting" (SS) of SOF/VEL prescription at a tertiary care center (n = 99).

Results

DOT-patients (n = 122/221; 55.2%) were younger than SS-patients (median age: 41.3 vs. 53.0 years), all had psychiatric comorbidities and most had a poor socioeconomic status. 83/122 (68.0%) reported ongoing intravenous drug use. Within the DOT-group, SVR12 was achieved in 99.1% (95% CI: 95.0–100; n = 109/110) with one patient experiencing treatment failure, while n = 12/122 (9.8%) patients were excluded due to loss of follow-up (FU). 5 patients showed HCV reinfection after achieving SVR12. SS-patients achieved SVR in 96.6% (95% CI: 90.3–99.3%; n = 84/87) after exclusion of 10/99 (10.1%) patients who were lost to FU and 2 patients who died prior to SVR12 due to reasons not related to DAA therapy.

Conclusions

SOF/VEL given as DOT along with OAT in PWIDs at high risk of non-adherence to antiviral therapy including those with ongoing intravenous drug use resulted in excellent SVR rates similar to patients with presumed “excellent compliance” under standard drug intake.

Analysis of hepatic stiffness after viral eradication in a population with chronic hepatitis C treated with DAAs

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Despite chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is still a global burden as the high morbidity and mortality, the recently approved direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) permit a very high rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) in these patients. The clinical improvement due to viral eradication is being documented, however it is not clear why a subset of patients does not benefit in terms of fibrosis regression or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. Aim of the study was to assess the hepatic stiffness regression at SVR24 and detect factors impacting stiffness course.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Hepatic stiffness assessed by acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and anthropometric- and biochemical parameters were retrospectively collected by 166 CHC patients treated with DAAs, form baseline and SVR24.

RESULTS

Viral eradication significantly improved overall hepatic stiffness and other related hepatitis hallmarks such as ALT, AST, γGT, platelets count, AST to Platelets ratio Index (APRI), total- and LDL cholesterol. The multiple regression analysis showed that patients with baseline glucose > 110mg/dl presented a stiffness regression significantly lower when compared to low glucose patients (<110mg/dl), moreover baseline HbA1c strongly correlated with DeltaStiffness. 7 patients (4.2%) developed HCC and importantly, presented hyperglycaemia and no stiffness regression nor platelets count recover.

CONCLUSIONS

Although viral eradication with DAAs entails overall benefits, glycaemic decompensation negatively affects fibrosis regression and probably facilitates HCC development.

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in treatment-experienced HCV-infected patients - short report

Aim of the study

The aim of this overview was to evaluate the efficacy of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) combination in a real-life setting, with particular regard to treatment-experienced individuals.

Material and methods

Seventy-five consecutive patients who were treated with SOF/VEL, completed the 12-week follow-up and had sustained virologic response (SVR) evaluated were included in the analysis. Out of them, 60 (80%) patients were treatment-naïve and 15 (20%) were treatment-experienced.

Results

SVR rates reached 89.4% (66/75) in the whole study group and were comparable irrespective of the fibrosis stage or HCV genotype. However, a significant difference in treatment efficacy between treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced individuals was observed, with SVR rates of 98.3% (59/60) and 46.7% (7/15), respectively (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Further studies including large real-life cohorts of treatment-experienced patients treated with SOF/VEL are warranted to elucidate the real efficacy of this regimen as a retreatment option.