Mutant prevention concentration of ozenoxacin for quinolone-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis

Alternate Antimicrobial Therapies and Their Companion Tests

New antimicrobial approaches are essential to counter antimicrobial resistance. The drug development pipeline is exhausted with the emergence of resistance, resulting in unsuccessful trials. The lack of an effective drug developed from the conventional drug portfolio has mandated the introspection into the list of potentially effective unconventional alternate antimicrobial molecules. Alternate therapies with clinically explicable forms include monoclonal antibodies, antimicrobial peptides, aptamers, and phages. Clinical diagnostics optimize the drug delivery. In the era of diagnostic-based applications, it is logical to draw diagnostic-based treatment for infectious diseases. Selection criteria of alternate therapeutics in infectious diseases include detection, monitoring of response, and resistance mechanism identification. Integrating these diagnostic applications is disruptive to the traditional therapeutic development. The challenges and mitigation methods need to be noted. Applying the goals of clinical pharmacokinetics that include enhancing efficacy and decreasing toxicity of drug therapy, this review analyses the strong correlation of alternate antimicrobial therapeutics in infectious diseases. The relationship between drug concentration and the resulting effect defined by the pharmacodynamic parameters are also analyzed. This review analyzes the perspectives of aligning diagnostic initiatives with the use of alternate therapeutics, with a particular focus on companion diagnostic applications in infectious diseases.

In vitro antibacterial activity of OPS-2071 against Gram-positive and Gram-negative enteropathogenic bacteria

BACKGROUND

Enteric infections are a major public health issue in developing countries. Antimicrobial resistance is also a problem for enteric infection. OPS-2071 is a novel quinolone antibiotic with low oral absorption and potent antibacterial activity against Clostridioides difficile.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to confirm the antimicrobial activity of OPS-2071 against major enteropathogenic bacteria and to evaluate the risk of emergence of drug resistance.

METHODS

The antibacterial activity was evaluated by the agar dilution method. The inhibitory activity against DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV was determined by supercoiling assay and decatenation assay, respectively. The mutant prevention concentration and frequency of spontaneous resistance were determined by inoculation on drug-containing agar.

RESULTS

Compared with the reference drugs, the antibacterial activity of OPS-2071 was more potent against Gram-positive bacteria and Campylobacter jejuni, including quinolone-resistant strains. Against other Gram-negative bacteria, OPS-2071 was comparable to existing quinolones. The inhibitory activities against DNA gyrase with quinolone-resistant mutations closely correlated with the antibacterial activity. Spontaneous resistance to OPS-2071 was not observed in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and was lower than that of existing quinolones and higher than that of azithromycin in C. jejuni. The mutant prevention concentration of OPS-2071 was lower than that of tested compounds in S. aureus and C. jejuni and slightly higher than that of existing quinolones in E. coli.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad and potent in vitro antibacterial activity and lower risk of drug resistance suggested that OPS-2071 may be useful for enteric infections caused by major pathogens including quinolone-resistant Campylobacter.

Nisin Mutant Prevention Concentration and the Role of Subinhibitory Concentrations on Resistance Development by Diabetic Foot Staphylococci

The most prevalent microorganism in diabetic foot infections (DFI) is Staphylococcus aureus, an important multidrug-resistant pathogen. The antimicrobial peptide nisin is a promising compound for DFI treatment, being effective against S. aureus. However, to avoid the selection of resistant mutants, correct drug therapeutic doses must be established, being also important to understand if nisin subinhibitory concentrations (subMIC) can potentiate resistant genes transfer between clinical isolates or mutations in genes associated with nisin resistance. The mutant selection window (MSW) of nisin was determined for 23 DFI S. aureus isolates; a protocol aiming to prompt vanA horizontal transfer between enterococci to clinical S. aureus was performed; and nisin subMIC effect on resistance evolution was assessed through whole-genome sequencing (WGS) applied to isolates subjected to a MEGA-plate assay. MSW ranged from 5–360 μg/mL for two isolates, from 5–540 μg/mL for three isolates, and from 5–720 μg/mL for one isolate. In the presence of nisin subMIC values, no transconjugants were obtained, indicating that nisin does not seem to promote vanA transfer. Finally, WGS analysis showed that incubation in the presence of nisin subMIC did not promote the occurrence of significant mutations in genes related to nisin resistance, supporting nisin application to DFI treatment.

In vitro activity and resistance rates of topical antimicrobials fusidic acid, mupirocin and ozenoxacin against skin and soft tissue infection pathogens obtained across Canada (CANWARD 2007-18)

BACKGROUND

Current antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance data versus skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) pathogens help to guide empirical treatment using topical antimicrobials.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the in vitro activity and resistance rates of fusidic acid, mupirocin, ozenoxacin and comparator agents against pathogens isolated from patients with SSTIs in Canada.

METHODS

SSTI isolates of MSSA (n = 422), MRSA (n = 283) and Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 46) obtained from CANWARD 2007-18 were tested using CLSI broth microdilution. Fusidic acid low-level resistance was defined as an MIC of ≥2 mg/L and high-level resistance as an MIC ≥512 mg/L. Mupirocin high-level resistance was defined as an MIC ≥512 mg/L and low-level resistance was an MIC of 2-256 mg/L.

RESULTS

Low-level and high-level fusidic acid resistance in MSSA was 10.9% and 1.7%, respectively. Low-level and high-level fusidic acid resistance in MRSA was 10.6% and 3.5%, respectively. High-level mupirocin resistance was identified in 1.4% of MSSA and 14.1% of MRSA, respectively. Versus MSSA, ozenoxacin demonstrated MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.004 and 0.25 mg/L, respectively. Against MRSA, ozenoxacin inhibited all isolates at an MIC of ≤0.5 mg/L, including isolates with ciprofloxacin MICs >2 mg/L, clarithromycin-resistant, clindamycin-resistant, high-level fusidic acid-resistant and high-level mupirocin-resistant isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that fusidic acid low-level resistance exceeded 10% for both MSSA and MRSA while fusidic acid high-level resistance was ≤3.5%. Mupirocin high-level resistance exceeded 10% in MRSA. Ozenoxacin is active versus SSTI pathogens including MRSA resistant to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, clindamycin, fusidic acid and mupirocin.

In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities of a Novel Quinolone Compound, OPS-2071, against Clostridioides difficile

OPS-2071 is a novel quinolone antibacterial agent characterized by low oral absorption that reduces the risk of adverse events typical of fluoroquinolone class antibiotics. The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of OPS-2071 against Clostridioides difficile were evaluated in comparison to vancomycin and fidaxomicin.

OPS-2071 is a novel quinolone antibacterial agent characterized by low oral absorption that reduces the risk of adverse events typical of fluoroquinolone class antibiotics. The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of OPS-2071 against Clostridioides difficile were evaluated in comparison to vancomycin and fidaxomicin. OPS-2071 exhibited potent antibacterial activity against 54 clinically isolated C. difficile strains with a MIC of 0.125 μg/ml (MIC₅₀) and 0.5 μg/ml (MIC₉₀), making it more active than vancomycin on a concentration basis (MIC₅₀, 2 μg/ml; MIC₉₀, 4 μg/ml) and comparable to fidaxomicin (MIC₅₀, 0.063 μg/ml; MIC₉₀, 8 μg/ml). OPS-2071 showed equally potent antibacterial activity against both hypervirulent and nonhypervirulent strains, while a significant difference in susceptibility to fidaxomicin was observed. Spontaneous resistance to OPS-2071 and vancomycin was not observed; however, resistance to fidaxomicin was observed at 4× MIC. The mutant prevention concentration of OPS-2071 was 16-fold lower than those of fidaxomicin and vancomycin, and the postantibiotic effect of OPS-2071 was longer than those of fidaxomicin and vancomycin. Also, OPS-2071 showed low systemic exposure, with OPS-2071 having 2.9% oral bioavailability at 1 mg/kg in rats. Furthermore, OPS-2071 showed significant in vivo efficacy at 0.0313 mg/kg/day (50% effective doses), 39.0-fold and 52.1-fold lower than those of vancomycin and fidaxomicin, respectively, in a hamster model of C. difficile infection. OPS-2071 has the potential to become a new therapeutic option for treating C. difficile infection.