Conformational flexibility of fork-remodeling helicase Rad5 shown by full-ensemble hybrid methods

Helicase activities of Rad5 and Rrm3 genetically interact in the prevention of recombinogenic DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The genome must be monitored to ensure its duplication is completed accurately to prevent genome instability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the 5' to 3' DNA helicase Rrm3, a member of the conserved PIF1 family, facilitates replication fork progression through an unknown mechanism. Disruption of Rrm3 helicase activity leads to increased replication fork pausing throughout the yeast genome. Here, we show that Rrm3 contributes to replication stress tolerance in the absence of the fork reversal activity of Rad5, defined by its HIRAN domain and DNA helicase activity, but not in the absence of Rad5's ubiquitin ligase activity. The Rrm3 and Rad5 helicase activities also interact in the prevention of recombinogenic DNA lesions, and DNA lesions that accumulate in their absence need to be salvaged by a Rad59-dependent recombination pathway. Disruption of the structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 leads to accumulation of recombinogenic DNA lesions and chromosomal rearrangements in the absence of Rrm3, but not Rad5. Thus, at least two mechanisms exist to overcome fork stalling at replication barriers, defined by Rad5-mediated fork reversal and Mus81-mediated cleavage, and contribute to the maintenance of chromosome stability in the absence of Rrm3.

Fork-Remodeling Helicase Rad5 Preferentially Reverses Replication Forks with Gaps in the Leading Strand

DNA damage bypass pathways promote the replication of damaged DNA when replication forks stall at sites of DNA damage. Template switching is a DNA damage bypass pathway in which fork-reversal helicases convert stalled replication forks into four-way DNA junctions called chicken foot intermediates, which are subsequently extended by replicative DNA polymerases. In yeast, fork-reversal is carried out by the Rad5 helicase using an unknown mechanism. To better understand the mechanism of Rad5 and its specificity for different fork DNA substrates, we used a FRET-based assay to observe fork reversal in real time. We examined the ability of Rad5 to bind and catalyze the reversal of various fork DNA substrates in the presence of short gaps in the leading or lagging strand as well as in the presence or absence of RPA and RNA primers in the lagging strand. We found that Rad5 preferentially reverses fork DNA substrates with short gaps (10 to 30 nt.) in the leading strand. Thus, Rad5 preferentially reverses fork DNA substrates that form chicken foot intermediates with 5' overhangs that can be extended by replicative DNA polymerases during the subsequent steps of template switching.

Rad5 HIRAN domain: Structural insights into its interaction with ssDNA through molecular modeling approaches

The Rad5 protein is an SWI/SNF family ubiquitin ligase that contains an N-terminal HIRAN domain and a RING C3HC4 motif. The HIRAN domain is critical for recognition of the stalled replication fork during the replication process and acts as a sensor to initiate the damaged DNA checkpoint. It is a conserved domain widely distributed in eukaryotic organisms and is present in several DNA-binding proteins from all kingdoms. Here we showed that distant species have important differences in key residues that affect affinity for ssDNA. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that different HIRAN domains might affect fork reversal and translesion synthesis through different metabolic processes. To address this question, we predicted the tertiary structure of both yeast and human HIRAN domains using molecular modeling. Structural dynamics experiments showed that the yeast HIRAN domain exhibited higher structural denaturation than its human homolog, although both domains became stable in the presence of ssDNA. Analysis of atomic contacts revealed that a greater number of interactions between the ssDNA nucleotides and the Rad5 domain are electrostatic. Taken together, these results provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of the HIRAN domain of Rad5 and may guide us to further elucidate differences in the ancient eukaryotes HIRAN sequences and their DNA affinity. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms

DNA replication is laden with obstacles that slow, stall, collapse, and break DNA replication forks. At each obstacle, there is a decision to be made whether to bypass the lesion, repair or restart the damaged fork, or to protect stalled forks from further demise. Each "decision" draws upon multitude of proteins participating in various mechanisms that allow repair and restart of replication forks. Specific functions for many of these proteins have been described and an understanding of how they come together in supporting replication forks is starting to emerge. Many questions, however, remain regarding selection of the mechanisms that enable faithful genome duplication and how "normal" intermediates in these mechanisms are sometimes funneled into "rogue" processes that destabilize the genome and lead to cancer, cell death, and emergence of chemotherapeutic resistance. In this review we will discuss molecular mechanisms of DNA damage bypass and replication fork protection and repair. We will specifically focus on the key players that define which mechanism is employed including: PCNA and its control by posttranslational modifications, translesion synthesis DNA polymerases, molecular motors that catalyze reversal of stalled replication forks, proteins that antagonize fork reversal and protect reversed forks from nucleolytic degradation, and the machinery of homologous recombination that helps to reestablish broken forks. We will also discuss risks to genome integrity inherent in each of these mechanisms.

Control of DNA Damage Bypass by Ubiquitylation of PCNA

DNA damage leads to genome instability by interfering with DNA replication. Cells possess several damage bypass pathways that mitigate the effects of DNA damage during replication. These pathways include translesion synthesis and template switching. These pathways are regulated largely through post-translational modifications of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), an essential replication accessory factor. Mono-ubiquitylation of PCNA promotes translesion synthesis, and K63-linked poly-ubiquitylation promotes template switching. This article will discuss the mechanisms of how these post-translational modifications of PCNA control these bypass pathways from a structural and biochemical perspective. We will focus on the structure and function of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Rad18 and Rad5 that facilitate the mono-ubiquitylation and poly-ubiquitylation of PCNA, respectively. We conclude by reviewing alternative ideas about how these post-translational modifications of PCNA regulate the assembly of the multi-protein complexes that promote damage bypass pathways.