One-year clinical outcomes of patients with versus without acute coronary syndrome with 3-month duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after everolimus-eluting stent implantation

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndrome: impact on morbidity and mortality

AIMS

Accumulating evidence questions the clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We therefore compare the impact of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) vs. PCI in patients with CCS on 18-month mortality and morbidity, and evaluate the effects of combining PCI with exercise-based CR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in March 2021. An online, real-world dataset of CCS patients was acquired, utilizing TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Patients with CCS who received PCI were first compared with patients who were prescribed exercise-based CR. Second, we compared patients who received both CR + PCI vs. CR alone. For both comparisons, patients were propensity-score matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and procedures. We ascertained 18-month incidence of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular comorbidity [stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and new-onset heart failure]. The initial cohort consisted of 18 383 CCS patients. Following propensity score matching, exercise-based CR was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality [0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.47)], rehospitalization [0.29 (95% CI: 0.27-0.32)], and cardiovascular morbidities, compared to PCI. Subsequently, patients that received both CR + PCI did not have significantly different odds for all-cause mortality [1.00 (95% CI: 0.63-1.60)], rehospitalization [1.00 (95% CI: 0.82-1.23)], AMI [1.11 (95% CI: 0.68-1.81)], and stroke [0.71 (95% CI: 0.39-1.31)], compared to CR only.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to PCI, exercise-based CR associated with significantly lower odds of 18-month all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with CCS, whilst combining PCI and exercise-based CR associated with lower incident heart failure only.

Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis After Treatment for Acute Versus Chronic Coronary Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the current analysis was to assess the association between the clinical presentation at index procedure and mortality in patients with second-generation drug-eluting stent thrombosis (G2-ST).

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have a higher risk for stent thrombosis (ST) as compared with those with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). However, clinical outcomes of patients with G2-ST after treatment for ACS and CCS remain poorly understood.

METHODS

From the REAL-ST (Retrospective Multicenter Registry of ST After First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation) registry, this study evaluated 313 patients with G2-ST. According to baseline clinical presentation, patients were divided into the 2 groups: the ACS and CCS groups (n = 147 and n = 166, respectively). The primary endpoint was the cumulative 3-year incidence of all-cause death after the index ST events. Timing of ST, target lesion revascularization, and recurrent ST were also assessed.

RESULTS

Early ST was more frequently observed in the ACS group (71.4% vs. 44.6%), while very late ST was less likely to occur in the ACS group than in the CCS group (11.6% vs. 30.7%). Cumulative 3-year incidence of all-cause death after the index ST events was comparable between the ACS and CCS groups (28.6% vs. 28.3%; hazard ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 1.73; p = 0.55). Compared with the CCS group, the ACS group showed higher incidences of target lesion revascularization and recurrent ST (23.8% vs. 17.2%; p = 0.06; and 9.9% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with G2-ST were associated with higher mortality irrespective of baseline clinical presentation.