Real word evidence on rituximab utilization: Combining administrative and hospital-pharmacy data

Comparing clinical trial population representativeness to real-world users of 17 biologics approved for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: An external validity analysis of 66,639 biologic users from the Italian VALORE project

To date, no population-based studies have specifically explored the external validity of pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of biologics simultaneously for a broad spectrum of immuno-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The aims of this study were, firstly, to compare the patients' characteristics and median treatment duration of biologics approved for IMIDs between RCTs' and real-world setting (RW); secondly, to assess the extent of biologic users treated for IMIDs in the real-world setting that would not have been eligible for inclusion into pivotal RCT for each indication of use. Using the Italian VALORE distributed database (66,639 incident biologic users), adult patients with IMIDs treated with biologics in the Italian real-world setting were substantially older (mean age ± SD: 50 ± 15 years) compared to those enrolled in pivotal RCTs (45 ± 15 years). In the real-world setting, certolizumab pegol was more commonly used by adult women with psoriasis/ankylosing spondylitis (F/M ratio: 1.8-1.9) compared to RCTs (F/M ratio: 0.5-0.6). The median treatment duration (weeks) of incident biologic users in RW was significantly higher than the duration of pivotal RCTs in almost all indications for use and most biologics (4-100 vs. 6-167). Furthermore, almost half (46.4%) of biologic users from RW settings would have been ineligible for inclusion in the respective indication-specific pivotal RCTs. The main reasons were: advanced age, recent history of cancer and presence of other concomitant IMIDs. These findings suggest that post-marketing surveillance of biologics should be prioritized for those patients.

Validity of Italian administrative healthcare data in describing the real-world utilization of infusive antineoplastic drugs: the study case of rituximab use in patients treated at the University Hospital of Siena for onco-haematological indications

Introduction

Italian administrative healthcare databases are frequently used for studies on real-world drug utilization. However, there is currently a lack of evidence on the accuracy of administrative data in describing the use of infusive antineoplastics. In this study, we used rituximab as a case study to investigate the validity of the regional administrative healthcare database of Tuscany (RAD) in describing the utilization of infusive antineoplastics.

Methods

We identified patients aged 18 years or older who had received ≥1 rituximab administration between 2011 and 2014 in the onco-haematology ward of the University Hospital of Siena. We retrieved this information from the Hospital Pharmacy Database (HPD-UHS) and linked the person-level information to RAD. Patients who had received ≥1dispensing of rituximab, single administration episodes, and patients treated for non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (nHL) or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) were identified in RAD and validated using HPD-UHS as the reference standard. We identified the indications of use using algorithms based on diagnostic codes (ICD9CM codes, nHL=200*, 202*; CLL=204.1). We tested 22 algorithms of different complexity for each indication of use and calculated sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), as measures of validity.

Results

According to HPD-UHS, 307 patients received rituximab for nHL (N=174), CLL (N=21), or other unspecified indications (N=112) in the onco-haematology ward of the University Hospital of Siena. We identified 295 rituximab users in RAD (sensitivity=96.1%), but PPV could not be assessed due to missing information in RAD on dispensing hospital wards. We identified individual rituximab administration episodes with sensitivity=78.6% [95%CI: 76.4-80.6] and PPV=87.6% [95%CI: 86.1-89.2]. Sensitivity of algorithms tested for identifying nHL and CLL ranged from 87.7% to 91.9% for nHL and from 52.4% to 82.7% for CLL. PPV ranged from 64.7% to 66.1% for nHL and from 32.4% to 37.5% for CLL.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that RAD is a very sensitive source of information for identifying patients who received rituximab for onco-haematological indications. Single administration episodes were identified with good-to-high accuracy. Patients receiving rituximab for nHL were identified with high sensitivity and acceptable PPV, while the validity for CLL was suboptimal.

First-Line Pharmacotherapies and Survival among Patients Diagnosed with Non-Resectable NSCLC: A Real-Life Setting Study with Gender Prospective

Simple Summary

Women and men have a different biomolecular profile that could impact drug utilization and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of the study was to describe first-line pharmacotherapy and overall survival in non-resectable (nr)NSCLC patients by gender. About 4400 incident cases of nrNSCLC were included. We reported a different use of target therapies on the basis of the known biomolecular profile between the two sexes. The survival improved in the last decade, and women and men also showed different survival if diagnosed with a squamous or non-squamous nrNSCLC.

Abstract

(1) Purpose: To describe first-line pharmacotherapy and overall survival in non-resectable non-small cell lung cancer (nrNSCLC) patients by gender. (2) Methods: Incident cases of nrNSCLC recorded between 2009 and 2019 (cohort entry) in the pathology registry of the regional administrative healthcare database of Tuscany were identified. Records of antineoplastic therapies delivered up to 4 months following cohort entry were classified as chemotherapy, target therapies, immunotherapies, and undefined monoclonal antibodies. First-line treatment and survival of patients receiving drug treatment was described. Analyses were stratified according to histology, gender, and cohort entry year. (3) Results: 4393 incident cases of nrNSCLC were included. Women with non-squamous-NSCLC received target-therapy more frequently than men (14.9% vs. 6.5%). Immunotherapy incidence of use varied between 3.8% (2017) and 9.1% (2019). The 2-year survival rate increased over time: for non-squamous-NSCLC, it was 22.3% (2009–2011) and 30.6% (2018–2019), while for squamous-NSCLC, it was 13.5% and 22.5%, respectively. After multivariate analysis, a low reduction in mortality risk in 2018–2019 vs. 2009–2011 was found (non-squamous: HR: 0.95 CI95%: 0.92–0.98; squamous: HR: 0.94 CI95%: 0.90–0.98). Among non-squamous NSCLC, median survival was longer in women than in men (389 vs. 276 days). (4) Conclusion: In light of sex-related biomolecular differences, among non-squamous NSCLC, women received target-therapy more frequently than men. Survival seemed to slightly improve over the study period for both histologies, despite a poor reduction in mortality risk was still observed.