1
|
Chou TL, Krishna A, Fossesca M, Desai A, Goldberg J, Jones S, Stephens M, Basile BM, Gall MD. Interspecific differences in the effects of masking and distraction on anti-predator behavior in suburban anthropogenic noise. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290330. [PMID: 37594981 PMCID: PMC10437853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Predation is a common threat to animal survival. The detection of predators or anti-predator communication signals can be disrupted by anthropogenic noise; however, the mechanism by which responses are affected is unclear. Masking and distraction are the two hypotheses that have emerged as likely explanations for changes in behavior in noise. Masking occurs when the signal and noise fall within the same sensory domain; noise overlapping the energy in the signal reduces signal detection. Distraction can occur when noise in any sensory domain contributes to a greater cognitive load, thereby reducing signal detection. Here, we used a repeated measures field experiment to determine the relative contributions of masking and distraction in mediating reduced anti-predator responses in noise. We recorded the approaches and vocalizations of black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis) to both visual and acoustic cues of predator presence, either with or without simultaneous exposure to anthropogenic noise. Titmice increased their calling to both visual and acoustic cues of predator presence. However, there was no significant effect of noise on the calling responses of titmice regardless of stimulus modality. Noise appeared to produce a distraction effect in chickadees; however, this effect was small, suggesting that chickadees may be relatively unaffected by low levels of anthropogenic noise in suburban environments. White-breasted nuthatch calling behavior was affected by the interaction of the modality of the predator stimulus and the noise condition. Nuthatches had a delayed response to the predator presentations, with a greater calling rate following the presentation of the acoustic stimulus in quiet compared to the presentation of the acoustic stimulus in noise. However, there was no difference in calling rate between the quiet and noise conditions for the visual stimulus. Together this suggests that even moderate levels of noise have some masking effect for white-breasted nuthatches. We suggest that the mechanisms through which noise influences anti-predator behavior may depend on the social roles, foraging ecology and auditory capabilities of each species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trina L. Chou
- Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Anjali Krishna
- Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Mark Fossesca
- Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Avani Desai
- Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Julia Goldberg
- Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Sophie Jones
- Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Morgan Stephens
- Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| | - Benjamin M. Basile
- Department of Psychology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA, United States of America
| | - Megan D. Gall
- Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
- Biology Department, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hassett TC, Hampton RR. Control of Attention in Rhesus Monkeys Measured Using a Flanker Task. Atten Percept Psychophys 2022; 84:2155-2166. [PMID: 35174464 PMCID: PMC9885799 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02452-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
At least three processes determine whether information we encounter is attended to or ignored. First, attentional capture occurs when attention is drawn automatically by "bottom up" processes, to distinctive, salient, rewarding, or unexpected stimuli when they enter our sensory field. Second, "top down" attentional control can direct cognitive processing towards goal-relevant targets. Third, selection history, operates through repeated exposure to a stimulus, particularly when associated with reward. Attentional control is measured using tasks that require subjects to selectively attend to goal-relevant stimuli in the face of distractions. In the Eriksen flanker task, human participants report which direction a centrally placed arrow is facing, while ignoring "flanking" arrows that may point in the opposite direction. Attentional control is evident to the extent that performance reflects only the direction of the central arrow. We describe four experiments in which we systematically assessed attentional control in rhesus monkeys using a flanker task. In Experiment 1, monkeys responded according to the identity of a central target, and accuracy and latency varied systematically with manipulations of flanking stimuli, validating our adaptation of the Eriksen flanker task. We then tested for converging evidence of attentional control across three experiments in which flanker performance was modulated by the distance separating targets from flankers (Experiment 2), luminance differences (Experiment 3), and differences in associative value (Experiment 4). The approach described is a new and reliable measure of attentional control in rhesus monkeys that can be applied to a wide range of situations with freely behaving animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Hassett
- Department of Psychology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Robert R Hampton
- Department of Psychology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cai H, Dent ML. Dimensionally Specific Attention Capture in Birds Performing Auditory Streaming Task. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2022; 23:241-252. [PMID: 34988866 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00825-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) have indicated that they experience attention capture in a qualitatively similar way to humans. Here, we apply a similar objective auditory streaming paradigm, using modified budgerigar vocalizations instead of ABAB-… patterned pure tones, in the sound sequences. The birds were trained to respond to deviants in the target stream while ignoring the distractors in the background stream. The background distractor could vary among five different categories and two different sequential positions, while the target deviants could randomly appear at five different sequential positions and vary among two different categories. We found that unpredictable background distractors could deteriorate birds' sensitivity to the target deviants. Compared to conditions where the background distractor appeared right before the target deviant, the attention capture effect decayed in conditions when the background distractor appeared earlier. In contrast to results from the same paradigm using pure tones, the results here are evidence for a faster recovery from attention capture using modified vocalization segments. We found that the temporally modulated background distractor captured birds' attention more and deteriorated birds' performance more than other categories of background distractor, as the temporally modulated target deviant enabled the birds to focus their attention toward the temporal modulation dimension. However, different from humans, birds have lower tolerances for suppressing the distractors from the same feature dimensions as the targets, which is evidenced by higher false alarm rates for the temporally modulated distractor than other distractors from different feature dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaizhen Cai
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Micheal L Dent
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|