Pharmacologic and surgical therapies for patients with Meniere's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Fluctuating hearing loss secondary to spontaneous intracranial hypotension: A case report and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has multiple etiologies, most commonly Ménière's disease (MD), recurrent sudden SNHL, and autoimmune inner ear disorders. Fluctuating SNHL has rarely been described as a symptom of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH).

PATIENT

A 39-year-old previously healthy female presented with "Ménière's like" symptoms responsive to steroid treatment, which worsened during the day and improved in the supine position. Conservative treatment for MD consisting of low salt and caffeine diet and betahistine medication yielded no improvement. Secondary revision of brain imaging scans showed signs indicative of SIH, and a spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak was ultimately found and treated by a novel technique of transvenous fistula embolization by means of Onyx® glue, leading to gradual clinical improvement and near-complete resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

SIH should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis of fluctuating SNHL. Clinical and radiological features should be known and sought. We suspect that early diagnosis and treatment can lead to cure and prevent permanent auditory damage.

15-year follow-up for steroid-responsive, fluctuating hearing loss in the ear with endolymphatic hydrops confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging

Autoimmune mechanisms may play crucial roles in the etiology of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH), which was previously regarded as a postmortem finding in the temporal bone. Recently, ELH has been visualized using 3-T MR imaging in living patients. A 47-year-old woman with deafness in the left ear since adolescence developed right-sided steroid-responsive sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies. During over 15 years of follow-up at our otolaryngology clinic, acute deteriorations of hearing in the only hearing ear repeatedly recovered with administration of intravenous and oral steroids. Hearing in the only hearing ear at 62 years old was preserved and comparable to that at 47 years old. At 61 years old, cochlear ELH was documented bilaterally on MR imaging, appearing more severe in the deafened ear than in the hearing ear. This case provides new evidence of the potential steroid-responsiveness of hearing loss due to contralateral-type delayed ELH distinctly visualized on MR imaging.

Endolymphatic Duct and Sac Decompression: A New Life for an Old Technique

BACKGROUND

Ménière's disease is an inner ear disorder causing recurrent vertigo, hearing loss, and tinnitus. Diagnosis is based on the variability of the symptoms over time and absence of radiological abnormalities. Medical therapy is effective only in a small percentage of patients. Surgical strategies remain controversial. In this article, we revisit a surgical technique neglected over the years: endolymphatic sac surgery.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients affected by Ménière's disease underwent endolymphatic duct and sac decompression. According to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria, vertigo control was evaluated with follow-up at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years from the intervention. Hearing results were evaluated before the surgery and at 2 years of follow-up using the pure tone average. The results were compared with similar techniques of endolymphatic sac surgery described in the literature.

RESULTS

According to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria classification, 2 years after surgery, 87% patients achieved complete control of vertigo (class A). The hearing remained stable in 93.5% of patients. The results appear compatible with other publications data regarding endolymphatic sac surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The duct and endolymphatic sac decompression allows the control of vertigo and preserves hearing from the pathological effects of Ménière's disease. The revised technique allows the functional restoration of endolymphatic homeostasis.

[Intratympanic Drug Application - Indication and Procedure]

Neurootologic disorders of the inner ear associated with symptoms such as tinnitus, vertigo, and hearing loss are common and often cause significant distress to affected patients. Treatment options are usually limited. There are now some indications for which intratympanic drug application is a possible treatment option. Intratympanic drug administration is a simple, inexpensive therapy option with few side effects that can be used on an outpatient basis. Therefore, it should not be disregarded when indicated.

Triple Semi-Circular Canal Occlusion and Cochlear Implantation: A Treatment Option for Single-Sided Menière's Disease with Functional Deafness-A Case Series

The surgical options for patients with single-sided Menière's disease and functional deafness are challenging. Our case series reports the outcomes of surgical treatments of patients with single-sided Menière's disease and functional deafness. These patients have undergone a one-staged occlusion of all semi-circular canals and cochlear implantation. Five patients (four female and one male; 62 ± 8.2 years with a range from 50 to 72 years) with single-sided Menière's disease and functional deafness were included in this study. In all cases, the patients suffered from frequent rotational vertigo episodes for many years. Other treatment options (e.g., medication) had not yet been successful. Preoperatively, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) of all patients indicated severe emotional, physical, and functional deficits. Patients showed a functional (near-total) deafness of the affected ear in all cases. All patients were supplied with cochlear implants in combination with a triple occlusion of all semi-circular canals in a one-stage procedure. After a short period of increased dizziness following surgery and after the activation of the cochlear implant and CI rehabilitation (auditory-verbal therapy), vertigo control and an adequate audiological outcome were achieved. The DHI showed a constant decrease after surgery. The combination of a triple semi-circular canal occlusion and cochlear implantation can be an efficient treatment for patients with single-sided Menière's disease.

Intratympanic corticosteroids for Ménière's disease

BACKGROUND

Ménière's disease is a condition that causes recurrent episodes of vertigo, associated with hearing loss and tinnitus. Corticosteroids are sometimes administered directly into the middle ear to treat this condition (through the tympanic membrane). The underlying cause of Ménière's disease is unknown, as is the way in which this treatment may work. The efficacy of this intervention in preventing vertigo attacks, and their associated symptoms, is currently unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of intratympanic corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment in people with Ménière's disease.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 14 September 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults with a diagnosis of Ménière's disease comparing intratympanic corticosteroids with either placebo or no treatment. We excluded studies with follow-up of less than three months, or with a cross-over design (unless data from the first phase of the study could be identified).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: 1) improvement in vertigo (assessed as a dichotomous outcome - improved or not improved), 2) change in vertigo (assessed as a continuous outcome, with a score on a numerical scale) and 3) serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were: 4) disease-specific health-related quality of life, 5) change in hearing, 6) change in tinnitus and 7) other adverse effects (including tympanic membrane perforation). We considered outcomes reported at three time points: 3 to < 6 months, 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies with a total of 952 participants. All studies used the corticosteroid dexamethasone, with doses ranging from approximately 2 mg to 12 mg.  Improvement in vertigo Intratympanic corticosteroids may make little or no difference to the number of people who report an improvement in their vertigo at 6 to ≤ 12 months follow-up (intratympanic corticosteroids 96.8%, placebo 96.6%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.10; 2 studies; 60 participants; low-certainty evidence) or at more than 12 months follow-up (intratympanic corticosteroids 100%, placebo 96.3%; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.23; 2 studies; 58 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, we note the large improvement in the placebo group for these trials, which causes challenges in interpreting these results.  Change in vertigo Assessed with a global score One study (44 participants) assessed the change in vertigo at 3 to < 6 months using a global score, which considered the frequency, duration and severity of vertigo. This is a single, small study and the certainty of the evidence was very low. We are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Assessed by frequency of vertigo Three studies (304 participants) assessed the change in frequency of vertigo episodes at 3 to < 6 months. Intratympanic corticosteroids may slightly reduce the frequency of vertigo episodes. The proportion of days affected by vertigo was 0.05 lower (absolute difference -5%) in those receiving intratympanic corticosteroids (95% CI -0.07 to -0.02; 3 studies; 472 participants; low-certainty evidence). This is equivalent to a difference of approximately 1.5 days fewer per month affected by vertigo in the corticosteroid group (with the control group having vertigo on approximately 2.5 to 3.5 days per month at the end of follow-up, and those receiving corticosteroids having vertigo on approximately 1 to 2 days per month). However, this result should be interpreted with caution - we are aware of unpublished data at this time point in which corticosteroids failed to show a benefit over placebo. One study also assessed the change in frequency of vertigo at 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months follow-up. However, this is a single, small study and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Therefore, we are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Serious adverse events Four studies reported this outcome. There may be little or no effect on the occurrence of serious adverse events with intratympanic corticosteroids, but the evidence is very uncertain (intratympanic corticosteroids 3.0%, placebo 4.4%; RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.85; 4 studies; 500 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for intratympanic corticosteroids in the treatment of Ménière's disease is uncertain. There are relatively few published RCTs, which all consider the same type of corticosteroid (dexamethasone). We also have concerns about publication bias in this area, with the identification of two large RCTs that remain unpublished. The evidence comparing intratympanic corticosteroids to placebo or no treatment is therefore all low- or very low-certainty. This means that we have very low confidence that the effects reported are accurate estimates of the true effect of these interventions. Consensus on the appropriate outcomes to measure in studies of Ménière's disease is needed (i.e. a core outcome set) in order to guide future studies in this area, and enable meta-analysis of the results. This must include appropriate consideration of the potential harms of treatment, as well as the benefits. Finally, we would also highlight the responsibility that trialists have to ensure results are available, regardless of the outcome of their study.

Systemic pharmacological interventions for Ménière's disease

BACKGROUND

Ménière's disease is a condition that causes recurrent episodes of vertigo, associated with hearing loss and tinnitus. A number of pharmacological interventions have been used in the management of this condition, including betahistine, diuretics, antiviral medications and corticosteroids. The underlying cause of Ménière's disease is unknown, as is the way in which these treatments may work. The efficacy of these different interventions at preventing vertigo attacks, and their associated symptoms, is currently unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of systemic pharmacological interventions versus placebo or no treatment in people with Ménière's disease.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 14 September 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults with definite or probable Ménière's disease comparing betahistine, diuretics, antihistamines, antivirals or systemic corticosteroids with either placebo or no treatment. We excluded studies with follow-up of less than three months, or with a cross-over design (unless data from the first phase of the study could be identified).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: 1) improvement in vertigo (assessed as a dichotomous outcome - improved or not improved), 2) change in vertigo (assessed as a continuous outcome, with a score on a numerical scale) and 3) serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were: 4) disease-specific health-related quality of life, 5) change in hearing, 6) change in tinnitus and 7) other adverse effects. We considered outcomes reported at three time points: 3 to < 6 months, 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies with a total of 848 participants. The studies evaluated the following interventions: betahistine, diuretics, antivirals and corticosteroids. We did not identify any evidence on antihistamines.  Betahistine Seven RCTs (548 participants) addressed this comparison. However, we were unable to conduct any meta-analyses for our primary outcomes as not all outcomes were considered by every study, and studies that did report the same outcome used different time points for follow-up, or assessed the outcome using different methods. Therefore, we were unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Some data were available for each of our primary outcomes, but the evidence was low- or very low-certainty throughout. One study reported on the outcome 'improvement in vertigo' at 6 to ≤ 12 months, and another study reported this outcome at > 12 months. Four studies reported on the change in vertigo, but again all used different methods of assessment (vertigo frequency, or a global score of vertigo severity) or different time points. A single study reported on serious adverse events.  Diuretics Two RCTs addressed this comparison. One considered the use of isosorbide (220 participants), and the other used a combination of amiloride hydrochloride and hydrochlorothiazide (80 participants). Again, we were unable to conduct any meta-analyses for our primary outcomes, as only one study reported on the outcome 'improvement in vertigo' (at 6 to ≤ 12 months), one study reported on change in vertigo (at 3 to < 6 months) and neither study assessed serious adverse events. Therefore, we were unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. The evidence was all very low-certainty.  Other pharmacological interventions We also identified one study that assessed antivirals (24 participants), and one study that assessed corticosteroids (16 participants). The evidence for these interventions was all very low-certainty. Again, serious adverse events were not considered by either study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for systemic pharmacological interventions for Ménière's disease is very uncertain. There are few RCTs that compare these interventions to placebo or no treatment, and the evidence that is currently available from these studies is of low or very low certainty. This means that we have very low confidence that the effects reported are accurate estimates of the true effect of these interventions. Consensus on the appropriate outcomes to measure in studies of Ménière's disease is needed (i.e. a core outcome set) in order to guide future studies in this area and enable meta-analyses of the results. This must include appropriate consideration of the potential harms of treatment, as well as the benefits.

Sonoporation of the Round Window Membrane on a Sheep Model: A Safety Study

Sonoporation using microbubble-assisted ultrasound increases the permeability of a biological barrier to therapeutic molecules. Application of this method to the round window membrane could improve the delivery of therapeutics to the inner ear. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of sonoporation of the round window membrane in a sheep model. To achieve this objective, we assessed auditory function and cochlear heating, and analysed the metabolomics profiles of perilymph collected after sonoporation, comparing them with those of the control ear in the same animal. Six normal-hearing ewes were studied, with one sonoporation ear and one control ear for each. A mastoidectomy was performed on both ears. On the sonoporation side, Vevo MicroMarker^® microbubbles (MBs; VisualSonics-Fujifilm, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) at a concentration of 2 × 10⁸ MB/mL were locally injected into the middle ear and exposed to 1.1 MHz sinusoidal ultrasonic waves at 0.3 MPa negative peak pressure with 40% duty cycle and 100 μs interpulse period for 1 min; this was repeated three times with 1 min between applications. The sonoporation protocol did not induce any hearing impairment or toxic overheating compared with the control condition. The metabolomic analysis did not reveal any significant metabolic difference between perilymph samples from the sonoporation and control ears. The results suggest that sonoporation of the round window membrane does not cause damage to the inner ear in a sheep model.

Changes of Vestibular Symptoms in Menière's Disease After Triple Semicircular Canal Occlusion: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Background

The clinical efficacy of triple semicircular canal occlusion (TSCO) and vestibular nerve resection (VNS) for patients with Ménière's disease has been unclear.

Objective

To explore changes in vestibular symptoms after TSCO and its advantages compared to the classical operation of VNS in patients with Menière's disease.

Methods

In total, 36 patients with Menière's disease performed TSCO or VNS at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, China from May 2005 to July 2021, and all of them were enrolled in our study. Twelve of them underwent TSCO, 23 underwent VNS, and 1 had both treatments. We compared the demographic parameters, clinical symptoms, and selected test results between the two surgical methods. Ten patients each who underwent TSCO and VNS completed the follow-up. We collected and compared data pertaining to changes in vestibular symptoms.

Results

No significant difference in demographic parameters, clinical symptoms, or auditory or vestibular test results was detected between the two groups preoperatively. The TSCO group with vertigo as the main complaint experienced less residual paroxysmal dizziness after surgery than the VNS group (P = 0.020). Also, 57% of the patients in the VNS group had unsteadiness after surgery, while no such problems were reported in the TSCO group (P = 0.025).

Conclusions

Our study shows that TSCO controls vertigo in most Menière's disease patients, and also has the advantage of lower rates of postoperative paroxysmal dizziness and unsteadiness than VNS. Thus, TSCO may be an effective surgery for refractory Menière's disease.

Pharmacotherapy of cerebellar and vestibular disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Major therapeutic advances have been made in patients with episodic and progressive cerebellar ataxias, downbeat nystagmus and some vestibular disorders. We provide an update review on this subject highlighting important research findings from the last two years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, the use of omaveloxolone for 2 years significantly improved upright stability in Friedreich's ataxia patients. In an open-label study, N-acetyl-l-leucine administered for 6-weeks significantly improved clinical impression of change, ataxia, and quality of life in patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C1. A 12-week treatment with dalfampridine was associated with improved standing balance in a subgroup of patients with multiple sclerosis. A gluten-free diet alone improved ataxia in half of patients with antiglutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) ataxia, suggesting that gluten sensitivity might be part of the underlying pathogenesis in anti-GAD ataxia. In a head-to-head trial, both prolonged-release 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and acetazolamide effectively reduced the attacks up to 60% in patients with episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2), albeit 4-AP had fewer adverse effects. Small observational studies have shown that patients with episodic vestibular syndrome who cannot be diagnosed as definite or probable vestibular migraine, might still improve vestibular symptoms following preventive treatment for migraine. The use of vitamin D supplementation in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, steroids in acute unilateral vestibulopathy, and betahistine in Ménière's disease patients remains controversial.

SUMMARY

Although the use of several therapies is being established in the treatment of cerebellar and vestibular disorders, there is an urgent need for prospective controlled therapeutic trials.

Current Insights into Treating Vertigo in Older Adults

The number of older people has been increasing over recent decades in Western populations. Dizziness, imbalance, and vertigo constitute some of the most common complaints in older patients, and risk of falling is the most frequent and worrying consequence. It has been reported that 15–20% of the adult population experiences these debilitating symptoms. Among the diseases that may be associated with vertigo, the three classes of otological, central, and functional (psychological) dizziness may be distinguished. Overall, vestibular disorders account for 48% of vertiginous complaints in the older population. The main focus of this article is to review the forms of pharmacotherapy for vertigo, especially with regard to older patients, who may be treated simultaneously with other drugs for different comorbidities. Interactions with other drugs should be considered in the choice of a particular course of treatment. Moreover, overuse of pharmacotherapy for the management of vertigo in the elderly may prevent the development of the central compensatory mechanism that sustains both static and dynamic imbalance after a vertiginous crisis. In the majority of patients, vestibular and physical rehabilitation are strongly advised and rarely contraindicated.