Non-GABA sleep medications, suvorexant as risk factors for falls: Case-control and case-crossover study

Exploring clinical applications and long-term effectiveness of benzodiazepines: An integrated perspective on mechanisms, imaging, and personalized medicine

Benzodiazepines have been long-established treatments for various conditions, including anxiety disorders and insomnia. Recent FDA warnings emphasize the risks of misuse and dependence associated with benzodiazepines. This article highlights their benefits and potential drawbacks from various perspectives. It achieves this by explaining how benzodiazepines work in terms of neuroendocrinology, immunomodulation, sleep, anxiety, cognition, and addiction, ultimately improving their clinical effectiveness. Benzodiazepines play a regulatory role in the HPA axis and impact various systems, including neuropeptide Y and cholecystokinin. Benzodiazepines can facilitate sleep-dependent memory consolidation by promoting spindle wave activity, but they can also lead to memory deficits in older individuals due to reduced slow-wave sleep. The cognitive effects of chronic benzodiazepines use remain uncertain; however, no adverse findings have been reported in clinical imaging studies. This article aims to comprehensively review the evidence on benzodiazepines therapy, emphasizing the need for more clinical studies, especially regarding long-term benzodiazepines use.

The Administration of Lemborexant at Admission is Not Associated with Inpatient Falls: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

Purpose

There has been no large-scale investigation into the association between the use of lemborexant, suvorexant, and ramelteon and falls in a large population. This study, serving as a pilot investigation, was aimed at examining the relationship between inpatient falls and various prescribed hypnotic medications at admission.

Patients and Methods

This study was a sub-analysis of a multicenter retrospective observational study conducted over a period of 3 years. The target population comprised patients aged 20 years or above admitted to eight hospitals, including chronic care, acute care, and tertiary hospitals. We extracted data on the types of hypnotic medications prescribed at admission, including lemborexant, suvorexant, ramelteon, benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and other hypnotics; the occurrence of inpatient falls during the hospital stay; and patients' background information. To determine the outcome of inpatient falls, items with low collinearity were selected and included as covariates in a forced-entry binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

Overall, 150,278 patients were included in the analysis, among whom 3,458 experienced falls. The median age of the entire cohort was 70 years, with men constituting 53.1%. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the prescription of lemborexant, suvorexant, and ramelteon at admission was not significantly associated with inpatient falls.

Conclusion

The administration of lemborexant, suvorexant, and ramelteon at admission may not be associated with inpatient falls.

Ameliorative effects of topical ramelteon on imiquimod-induced psoriasiform inflammation in mice

Psoriasis is a long-lasting, immune-related inflammatory skin disease that affects 2-3% of the global population. It is distinguished by erythematous, silvery, and scaly patches. Ramelteon is a type of melatonin agonist that is used to treat insomnia. It has enhanced non-classical immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activities. The aim of the study is to assess the ameliorative effects of topical ramelteon on imiquimod (IMQ)-aggravated psoriasiform-like dermatosis in mice. The 32 albino mouse males were placed into six groups of eight animals, all of them. With the exception of the control group, all groups gained a once-a-day regimen of topical imiquimod 5% cream at a dose of 62.5 mg for eight uninterrupted days, while mice in the control group gained vaseline-based ointment alternately. Immediately after an 8-day induction period in the imiquimod group, mice in the clobetasol and ramelteon treatment groups obtained a twice-daily regimen of topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment and 0.1% ointment, respectively, for a further 8 days. This extends the total duration of the experimental study to 16 continuous days. The findings of our study found that ramelteon significantly mitigated the concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in the skin tissue, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17A, IL-23, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as well as the scores associated with psoriatic lesions, including erythema, scaling, skin thickening, ear thickness, and overall cumulative PASI scores. Additionally, the anti-inflammatory impact of ramelteon was achieved by markedly increasing IL-10 levels in the skin tissue and correcting cutaneous histopathological alterations. Ramelteon ointment (0.1%) was comparable to that of clobetasol (0.05%) ointment in alleviating a mouse model of imiquimod-induced psoriasiform inflammation; this is probably due to its potential anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. Therefore, ramelteon could be a good additive option for therapeutic management of immune-triggered inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis.

Efficacy of Zhumian Tang formula granules combined with eszopiclone for the treatment of poor sleep quality: a multi-center, randomized controlled, superiority trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zhumian Tang formula granules combined with eszopiclone for treating poor sleep quality.

METHODS

This multi-center, dynamic block-randomized, parallel-group superiority clinical trial included 130 patients. The combined treatment group received Zhumian Tang formula granules combined with eszopiclone treatment, and the control group received eszopiclone treatment only. The group allocation ratio was 1∶1. The duration of treatment was 2 weeks. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires before treatment, after 1 week of the intervention, after 2 weeks of the intervention, and at the follow-up on week 3. The primary outcomes were the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score and the total effective rate of treatment. The secondary outcome was the rate of adverse effects.

RESULTS

Compared with the eszopiclone treatment group, the PSQI score of the combined treatment group was significantly lower after 2 weeks of the intervention (6.98 vs 8.26, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the mean PSQI score after 1 week of the intervention (9.89 vs 9.15, P = 0.124). After the follow-up on week 3, the PSQI score of the combined treatment group remained significantly lower than that of the eszopiclone treatment group (6.12 vs 8.31, P < 0.001). The total effective rates of treatment of the combined group and the eszopiclone group were 36.92% vs 35.38% (Z = 0.033, P = 0.855) after 1 week of the intervention, 83.08% vs 58.46% (Z = 9.519, P < 0.05) after 2 weeks of the intervention, and 83.08% vs 61.54% (Z = 7.530, P < 0.05) and after the follow-up on week 3, respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of adverse reactions between the combined and eszopiclone treatment groups (21.53% vs 31.8%, P = 0.318).

CONCLUSION

The combination of Zhumian Tang formula granules with eszopiclone was found to be safe and more effective in improving sleep quality than eszopiclone alone. Traditional Chinese medicine can enhance the effectiveness of Western medicine in the treatment of insomnia.

Evaluating the use of methods to mitigate bias from non-transient medications in the case-crossover design: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The case-crossover design is a self-controlled study design used to compare exposure immediately preceding an event occurrence with exposure in earlier control periods. The design is most suitable for transient exposures in order to avoid biases that can be problematic when using the case-crossover design for non-transient (i.e., chronic) exposures. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review of case-crossover studies and its variants (case-time-control and case-case-time-control) in order to compare design and analysis choices by medication type.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search to identify recent case-crossover, case-time-control, and case-case-time-control studies focused on medication exposures. Articles indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE using these study designs that were published between January 2015 and December 2021 in the English language were identified. Reviews, methodological studies, commentaries, articles without medications as the exposure of interest, and articles with no available full text were excluded. Study characteristics including study design, outcome, risk window, control window, reporting of discordant pairs, and inclusion of sensitivity analyses were summarized overall and by medication type. We further evaluated the implementation of recommended methods to account for biases introduced by non-transient exposures among articles that used the case-crossover design on a non-transient exposure.

RESULTS

Of the 2036 articles initially identified, 114 articles were included. The case-crossover was the most common study design (88%), followed by the case-time-control (17%), and case-case-time-control (3%). Fifty-three percent of the articles included only transient medications, 35% included only non-transient medications, and 12% included both. Across years, the proportion of case-crossover articles evaluating a non-transient medication ranged from 30% in 2018 to 69% in 2017. We found that 41% of the articles that evaluated a non-transient medication did not apply any of the recommended methods to account for biases and more than half of which were conducted by authors with no previous publication history of case-crossover studies.

CONCLUSION

Using the case-crossover design to evaluate a non-transient medication remains common in pharmacoepidemiology. Researchers should apply appropriate design and analysis choices when opting to use a case-crossover design with non-transient medication exposures.

Treatment strategy for insomnia disorder: Japanese expert consensus

Purpose

There is a lack of evidence regarding answers for clinical questions about treating insomnia disorder. This study aimed to answer the following clinical questions: (1) how to use each hypnotic and non-pharmacological treatment differently depending on clinical situations and (2) how to reduce or stop benzodiazepine hypnotics using alternative pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

Methods

Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on 10 clinical questions about insomnia disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). The responses of 196 experts were collected, and the answers were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations.

Results

The primary pharmacological treatment, lemborexant (7.3 ± 2.0), was categorized as a first-line recommendation for sleep initiation insomnia, and lemborexant (7.3 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.8 ± 1.8) were categorized as the first-line recommendations for sleep maintenance insomnia. Regarding non-pharmacological treatments for primary treatment, sleep hygiene education was categorized as the first-line recommendation for both sleep initiation (8.4 ± 1.1) and maintenance insomnia (8.1 ± 1.5), while multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia was categorized as the second-line treatment for both sleep initiation (5.6 ± 2.3) and maintenance insomnia (5.7 ± 2.4). When reducing or discontinuing benzodiazepine hypnotics by switching to other medications, lemborexant (7.5 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.9 ± 1.9) were categorized as first-line recommendations.

Conclusion

Expert consensus indicates that orexin receptor antagonists and sleep hygiene education are recommended as first-line treatments in most clinical situations to treat insomnia disorder.

Association between the Use of Suvorexant and Hip Fracture in Older Adults in Japan Using a Nationwide Administrative Claims Database: A Matched Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The use of benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepines increases the risk for hip fracture, but the effect of suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, is not clear. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between suvorexant use and hip fractures in older adults.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted using real-world data (RWD) from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. with patients hospitalized between January 2019 and December 2020. Patients were aged 65-84 years and had been prescribed suvorexant at least once. Patients with hip fracture (cases) and those without (controls) were identified by matching up to 1:4 for sex, age (± 2 years), and hospital size category. Suvorexant exposure was identified the day before hospitalization. Hip fracture risk associated with suvorexant was presented as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Matching identified 389 cases and 1509 controls. The risk of hip fracture was not increased in patients treated with suvorexant [aOR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.20]. Additionally, concomitant use of suvorexant with other hypnotics did not increase the risk. Benzodiazepines (1.01, 0.46-2.22), nonbenzodiazepines (1.16, 0.57-2.34), and melatonin (1.80, 0.82-3.94) were combined with suvorexant. The risk was increased for the use of benzodiazepine without suvorexant (1.88, 1.10-3.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Using RWD in Japanese older adults, we showed that sleep therapy with suvorexant was not associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. The results provide evidence-based drug safety information for the selection of hypnotics for sleep disorders, which increase with age.

Comparative risk of fracture in community-dwelling older adults initiating suvorexant versus Z-drugs: Results from LIFE study

BACKGROUND

An increased risk of fracture has been reported in older adults taking hypnotics. However, few studies have reported the comparative safety of hypnotics with different mechanisms of action. We examined the risk of fracture in older adults initiating suvorexant compared to those initiating Z-drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a claims database within a longevity improvement and fair evidence (LIFE) study in Japan (1.5 million beneficiaries). People aged ≥65 years were included in this study. Exposure was defined as the initiation of either suvorexant or Z-drugs (eszopiclone, zolpidem, or zopiclone). The evaluated outcomes were hip fracture and all-cause fracture requiring hospitalization. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding and followed the incidence of the outcome for three different periods: 30, 90, and 365 days. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the weighted population to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Sensitivity analyses were performed with narrowed outcome definitions and inverse probability of censoring weights.

RESULTS

We identified 16,148 suvorexant new users and 54,327 Z-drugs new users. During the 30-day follow-up, 21 (16.6 events per 1000 person-years) and 53 hip fractures (12.2 events per 1000 person-years) were identified among suvorexant and Z-drugs new users, respectively (HR: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.76). The analysis for all-cause fracture showed an HR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78-1.36). Extended follow-up (90 and 365 days) showed similar results for both outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results except for an increased risk of all-cause fracture requiring surgery (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.87-2.29) during the 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that suvorexant has a generally comparable risk of fracture as compared to Z-drugs. Further research is needed to investigate the potential short-term increased risk of all-cause fracture requiring surgery among suvorexant initiators.

Machine learning versus binomial logistic regression analysis for fall risk based on SPPB scores in older adult outpatients

Objective

To compare the performance of the diagnostic model for fall risk based on the short physical performance battery (SPPB) developed using commercial machine learning software (MLS) and binomial logistic regression analysis (BLRA).

Methods

We enrolled 797 out of 850 outpatients who visited the clinic between March 2016 and November 2021. Patients were categorized into the development (n = 642) and validation (n = 155) datasets. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, number of medications, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (left-right average), handgrip strength (left-right average), total SPPB score, and history of falls were determined. We defined fall risk by an SPPB score of ≤6 in men and ≤9 in women. The main metrics used for evaluating the machine learning model and BLRA were the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, and F-measure. The commercial MLS automatically calculates the parameter range of the highest contribution.

Results

The participants included 797 outpatients (mean age, 76.3 years; interquartile range, 73.0-81.0; 288 men). The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the commercial MLS were as follows: AUC = 0.78, accuracy = 0.74, precision = 0.46, recall (sensitivity) = 0.81, specificity = 0.71, F-measure = 0.59. The metrics of the current diagnostic model in the BLRA were as follows: AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 0.75, precision = 0.47, recall (sensitivity) = 0.67, specificity = 0.77, F-measure = 0.55. The risk factors for falls in older adult outpatients were handgrip strength, female sex, experience of falls, BMI, and calf circumference in the commercial MLS.

Conclusions

The diagnostic model for fall risk based on SPPB scores constructed using commercial MLS is noninferior to BLRA.

Residual effects of low dose of suvorexant, zolpidem, and ramelteon in healthy elderly subjects: A randomized double‐blind study

Introduction

Methods

Result

Conclusion

Balance dysfunction the most significant cause of in-hospital falls in patients taking hypnotic drugs: A retrospective study

Purpose

Preventing falls in patients is one of the most important concerns in acute hospitals. Balance disorder and hypnotic drugs lead to falls. The Standing Test for Imbalance and Disequilibrium (SIDE) is developed for the evaluation of static standing balance ability. There have been no reports of a comprehensive assessment of falls risk including hypnotic drugs and SIDE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the fall rate of each patient who took the hypnotic drug and the factor associated with falls.

Methods

Fall rates for each hypnotic drug were calculated as follows (number of patients who fell/number of patients prescribed hypnotic drug x 100). We investigated the hypnotic drugs as follows; benzodiazepine drugs, Z-drugs, melatonin receptor agonists, and orexin receptor antagonists. Hypnotic drug fall rate was analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test. Decision tree analysis is the method we used to discover the most influential factors associated with falls.

Results

This study included 2840 patients taking hypnotic drugs. Accidents involving falls were reported for 211 of inpatients taking hypnotic drugs. Z-drug recipients had the lowest fall rate among the hypnotic drugs. We analyzed to identify independent factors for falls, a decision tree algorithm was created using two divergence variables. The SIDE levels indicating balance disorder were the initial divergence variable. The rate of falls in patients at SIDE level ≦ 2a was 14.7%. On the other hand, the rate of falls in patients at SIDE level ≧ 2b was 2.9%. Gender was the variable for the second classification. In this analysis, drugs weren’t identified as divergence variables for falls.

Conclusion

The SIDE balance assessment was the initial divergence variable by decision tree analysis. In order to prevent falls, it seems important not only to select appropriate hypnotic drugs but also to assess patients for balance and implement preventive measures.

Association of orexin receptor antagonists with falls during hospitalization

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The use of hypnotics, especially benzodiazepines (BZs), increases the risk of falls. Regarding the association of orexin receptor antagonists with fall risk, consistent results have not been obtained for suvorexant, and studies of lemborexant have not been reported. Therefore, this study investigated whether orexin receptor antagonists, including lemborexant, increase the risk of falls.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the medical records of patients hospitalized at Saga University Hospital in Japan between July 2020 and April 2021. Patients were retrospectively divided into the fall and non-fall groups, and the groups were compared for medication usage.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The fall and non-fall groups included 132 and 6857 patients respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the fall group used hypnotics (40.2% vs. 21.7%; p < 0.0001). Hypnotics remained significantly associated with a higher risk of falls after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-2.48, p = 0.01). In particular, the use of benzodiazepines was associated with a significantly higher risk of falls (adjusted OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.38-3.15, p = 0.0005). Meanwhile, suvorexant use was not linked to the risk of falls, and lemborexant use was associated with a significantly lower risk of falls (adjusted OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.09-0.84, p = 0.02).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The use of hypnotics is a risk factor for falls, but orexin receptor antagonists may represent a safe option for patients requiring hypnotics. Our results provide evidence supporting the safety of these drugs.

Psychotropics use and occurrence of falls in hospitalized patients: A matched case-control study

AIM

Several studies have suggested the use of psychotropics as a possible risk factor for falling. However, there were several limitations to these previous studies, such as the use of data obtained from administrative databases and the lack of information about the time interval between psychotropics use and falling. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to assess the association between psychotropics use and falling in hospitalized patients, using reliable data collected from medical records.

METHODS

A matched (age, sex, and inpatient department) case-control study of patients hospitalized at Tokyo Medical University Hospital was performed using the new-user design, based on data extracted from medical records. The outcome was the occurrence of falls. The use of four classes of psychotropics (antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, and hypnotics) was compared between 254 cases (patients who experienced falls) and 254 controls (patients without falls). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to clarify the associations between falling and the use of these psychotropics.

RESULTS

Univariable analyses demonstrated that the use of every class of psychotropic was statistically significantly associated with falling. Moreover, the association of the use of hypnotics with falls remained significant in the multivariable logistic regression model built including potential confounding factors, such as age, sex, inpatient department, body mass index, fall risk score measured by a fall risk assessment sheet completed on hospital admission, and the use of other classes of psychotropics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the use of hypnotics may be a risk factor for falling in hospitalized patients.

Narcolepsy-like symptoms triggered by lemborexant in the context of hyperactive delirium in a patient with bipolar depression: a case report

Lemborexant is a dual orexin antagonist (DORA) and is considered a safe and effective hypnotic. DORAs induce physiological sleep by blocking orexin receptors. Although the blockade of orexin signaling has triggered narcolepsy-like symptoms in rodents, there is currently no evidence of lemborexant inducing narcolepsy-like symptoms in humans. We describe the case of a 79-year-old Japanese woman with bipolar depression who experienced lemborexant-induced cataplexy and sleep attack. Her previous results on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test excluded the diagnosis of narcolepsy. She experienced narcolepsy-like symptoms on two occasions after she was administered lemborexant, in the context of hyperactive delirium, but not in a relaxed state. Her case suggests that lemborexant could trigger narcolepsy-like symptoms in patients with hyperactive delirium, even those with no history of narcolepsy. This case also emphasizes that clinicians must be very careful when they prescribe lemborexant to patients who experience hyperactive delirium.

Ramelteon protects against human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell injury induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via activating nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway

Acute lung injury (ALI) is classified as a moderate or mild acute respiratory distress syndrome and is a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality among the critically ill population. Ramelteon is a melatonin receptor agonist with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. The current study investigated the role of ramelteon in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs) and its potential regulatory mechanisms. A CCK-8 assay was used to examine the effect of ramelteon on the viability of LPS-induced HPMECs, HPMECs treated with ML385 [a Nrf2 inhibitor] and HPMECs treated with SnPP [a HO-1 inhibitor]. The Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway was additionally assessed by performing Western blotting. The levels of oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines in HPMECs were detected using kits and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. Cell apoptosis was evaluated via TUNEL staining. Furthermore, cell permeability was assessed using a FITC-dextran fluorescent probe, ZO-1 and occludin expression was determined via Western blotting. The results demonstrated that ramelteon elevated HPMEC viability after LPS stimulation. Additionally, ramelteon markedly reduced LPS-induced oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis. Moreover, cell permeability was notably decreased in ramelteon-treated groups and was accompanied by upregulated ZO-1 and occludin expression. Ramelteon treatment also activated the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway in LPS-induced HPMECs. Furthermore, the addition of ML385 or SnPP reversed the protective effects of ramelteon on LPS-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis and cell dysfunction in HPMECs. Collectively, the results suggested that ramelteon alleviated LPS-induced HPMEC damage by activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway, making it an effective treatment for ALI.

Correction: Non-GABA sleep medications, suvorexant as risk factors for falls: Case-control and case-crossover study

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238723.].

Insomnia: Pharmacologic Treatment

Insomnia afflicts many geriatric patients worldwide and results in both clinical and economic consequences. Prescribing hypnotics to the elderly is particularly challenging due to multitudes of adverse effects and drug interactions. Although benzodiazepines and "Z" drugs such as zolpidem have been popular in the past, they carry a high risk of adverse effects in the elderly, such as devastating falls and injuries as well as potentially an increase in mortality. Newer classes of hypnotics such as dual orexin receptor antagonists are much better tolerated and can be explored as a potential treatment for insomnia in the elderly.

Prompt improvement of difficulty with sleep initiation and waking up in the morning and daytime somnolence by combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder: a case series of three patients

Patients with delayed sleep-wake phase disorder (DSWPD) suffer from difficulties in sleep initiation at night, difficulties in waking up at the socially required time, and daytime somnolence. About half of the patients resist conventional light therapy and melatonin therapy. Therapy using hypnotics is not recommended due to its adverse effects. Recently, suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, has become available for clinical use. The drug is relatively safer than traditional hypnotics such as benzodiazepines. We report three DSWPD patients who were successfully treated by the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon. The first case was a 19-year-old woman who was experiencing difficulties in sleep initiation, difficulty in waking up in the morning, and daytime somnolence. She showed a prompt response to the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon. Her sleep phase advanced, and her daytime somnolence reduced. The second and third cases were 21-year-old and 17-year-old men, respectively, who also showed significant sleep phase advances. Although case 2 was resistant to ramelteon treatment, his sleep phase advanced after suvorexant started. His difficulty in falling asleep and his habit of daytime napping disappeared after the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon was started. Case 3 also showed a prompt response. His difficulties in falling asleep and waking up in the morning were ameliorated immediately after suvorexant with ramelteon was started. No obvious side effects were observed. Therapy using the combination therapy of suvorexant and ramelteon might be a reasonable option for DSWPD patients.

Association of drugs with special caution in the guidelines with falls: A case-control and case-crossover study in Japan

AIM

To determine the relationship between multiple medications and falls.

METHODS

This case-control and case-crossover study was carried out at Kudanzaka Hospital in Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan. A total of 325 patients who experienced their first falls when hospitalized between January 2016 and November 2018, and 1285 controls matched by sex, age and clinical departments were included in this study. Hospitalization duration and fall risk score were adjusted for in the analyses.

RESULTS

In the case-control study, multivariable logistic regression showed that increasing the intake of oral medications was not significantly associated with the incidence of falls (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.998-1.049). In contrast, drugs prescribed with special caution in accordance with the Elderly Oral Medication Guidelines were significantly associated with falls (odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.26). A similar pattern was observed in the case-crossover analysis. Among the drugs to be prescribed with special caution according to the guidelines, atypical antipsychotics, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics and magnesium oxide were significantly associated with the risk of falls.

CONCLUSION

The drugs to be prescribed with special caution according to the guidelines were associated with an increased fall risk. The risk of falls in hospitalized older people due to multiple medications varies among medications. Geriatr Gerontol Int ••; ••: ••-•• Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; ••: ••-••.