Guideline adherence in the management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: An audit of selected medical records in three Australian states

Comparing Treatment Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With ADHD to Other Disorders Within an Australian and Dutch Outpatient Cohort

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies at child and youth mental health services (CYMHS) suggest that children with ADHD have poorer outcomes compared to those with other diagnoses. This study investigates this in more detail.

METHODS

Children with ADHD were compared to those with ASD and those with emotional disorders, on routinely collected outcomes at CYMHS in Australia (N = 2,513) and the Netherlands (N = 844).

RESULTS

Where the emotional disorders group reached a similar level of emotional symptoms at the end-of-treatment as the ADHD and ASD groups, the latter two groups still had higher scores on ADHD and ASD symptoms (attention and peer problems). The poorer outcomes were mainly explained by higher severity at baseline. In Australia, an ADHD and/or ASD diagnosis also independently contributed to worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Those with neurodevelopmental disorders within both countries had poorer outcomes than those with emotional disorders. Services should aim to optimize treatment to ensure best possible outcomes.

Examining the pharmacological and psychological treatment of child and adolescent ADHD in Australia: Protocol for a retrospective cohort study using linked national registry data

INTRODUCTION

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder which affects 5% of children globally. In Australia, it is estimated that 4.1% of children and adolescents have ADHD. While research has examined the treatment and outcomes of children with ADHD attending public mental health services during their time in the public system in Australia, it is not known what treatment they received before and after these treatment episodes, which will provide a more complete understanding of these children's treatment journey.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will link clinical data from cohorts of children and adolescents treated in the public child and youth mental health and/or child development services in Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney to the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and National Death Index. MBS data will demonstrate the treatment journey with respect to clinicians seen, and treatment episodes from the public health service data sets will be examined to assess if the type and intensity of treatment are related to treatment outcomes. PBS data will reveal all psychotropic medications prescribed, allowing an examination of not just ADHD medications, but also other psychotropics which may indicate co-occurring conditions (eg, anxiety and mood disorders). Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics to describe the rates of specific medications and clinician specialties seen. Linear and logistic regression will be used to model how treatment and sociodemographic variables relate to routinely collected outcome measures in the public health system while controlling for covarying factors.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the following institutional ethics committees: (1) Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (HREC/21/QCHQ/76260), (2) The University of Queensland (2021/HE002143) and (3) The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (EO2021/4/1300). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences, professional associations and to public mental health services that treat ADHD.

A Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. CPGs have evolved during the last 2 decades from general consensus statements by prominent practitioners in the field to highly structured instruments. The Institute of Medicine has laid out specific standards for selecting the experts who develop a CPG and the process by which CPGs are developed. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been the focus of more than 20 CPGs created by governments and professional societies, both in the United States and internationally. There is a good deal of consensus across these CPGs regarding the principles of the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD. Drawing on the rich research base in ADHD, all CPGs emphasize the need for screening, a diagnosis based on history and standardized rating scales, as well as the use of evidence-based psychosocial and pharmacologic treatments. They vary in terms of their emphasis on the role of psychosocial treatment and the degree to which they address comorbid disorders in ADHD. Although limited research has shown ADHG CPGs do change provider practice, there is no research examining if the changes in practice brought about by CPGs impact patient outcomes.