The temporal nature of social context: Insights from the daily lives of patients with HIV

Co-designing a blueprint for spreading person-centered, Whole Health care to HIV specialty care settings: a mixed methods protocol

BACKGROUND

Since 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has advanced a person-centered, Whole Health (WH) System of Care, a shift from a disease-oriented system to one that prioritizes "what matters most" to patients in their lives. Whole Health is predicated on patient-provider interactions marked by a multi-level understanding of health and trusted relationships that promote well-being. Presently, WH implementation has been focused largely in primary care settings, yet the goal is to effect a system-wide transformation of care so that Veterans receive WH across VHA clinical settings, including specialty care. This sort of system-wide cultural transformation is difficult to implement.

METHODS

This three-aim mixed methods study will result in a co-designed implementation blueprint for spreading WH from primary to specialty care settings. Taking HIV specialty care as an illustrative case- because of its diverse models of relationships to primary care - to explore how to spread WH through specialty care settings. We will use the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to organize quantitative and qualitative data and identify key determinants of WH receipt among Veterans living with HIV. Through a co-design process, we develop an adaptable implementation blueprint that identifies and matches implementation strategies to different HIV specialty care configurations.

DISCUSSION

This study will co-design a flexible implementation blueprint for spreading WH from VHA primary care throughout HIV specialty care settings. This protocol contributes to the science of end-user engagement while also answering calls for greater transparency in how implementation strategies are identified, tailored, and spread.

Stressful life events in electronic health records: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Stressful life events, such as going through divorce, can have an important impact on human health. However, there are challenges in capturing these events in electronic health records (EHR). We conducted a scoping review aimed to answer 2 major questions: how stressful life events are documented in EHR and how they are utilized in research and clinical care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three online databases (EBSCOhost platform, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify papers that included information on stressful life events in EHR; paper titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance by 2 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-seven unique papers were retrieved, and of these 70 were eligible for data extraction. Most articles (n = 36, 51.4%) were focused on the statistical association between one or several stressful life events and health outcomes, followed by clinical utility (n = 15, 21.4%), extraction of events from free-text notes (n = 12, 17.1%), discussing privacy and other issues of storing life events (n = 5, 7.1%), and new EHR features related to life events (n = 4, 5.7%). The most frequently mentioned stressful life events in the publications were child abuse/neglect, arrest/legal issues, and divorce/relationship breakup. Almost half of the papers (n = 7, 46.7%) that analyzed clinical utility of stressful events were focused on decision support systems for child abuse, while others (n = 7, 46.7%) were discussing interventions related to social determinants of health in general.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Few citations are available on the prevalence and use of stressful life events in EHR reflecting challenges in screening and storing of stressful life events.

Stressful life events in electronic health records: a scoping review

Objective

Stressful life events, such as going through divorce, can have an important impact on human health. However, there are challenges in capturing these events in electronic health records (EHR). We conducted a scoping review aimed to answer two major questions: how stressful life events are documented in EHR and how they are utilized in research and clinical care.

Materials and Methods

Three online databases (EBSCOhost platform, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify papers that included information on stressful life events in EHR; paper titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance by two independent reviewers.

Results

557 unique papers were retrieved, and of these 70 were eligible for data extraction. Most articles (n=36, 51.4%) were focused on the statistical association between one or several stressful life events and health outcomes, followed by clinical utility (n=15, 21.4%), extraction of events from free-text notes (n=12, 17.1%), discussing privacy and other issues of storing life events (n=5, 7.1%), and new EHR features related to life events (n=4, 5.7%). The most frequently mentioned stressful life events in the publications were child abuse/neglect, arrest/legal issues, and divorce/relationship breakup. Almost half of the papers (n=7, 46.7%) that analyzed clinical utility of stressful events were focused on decision support systems for child abuse, while others (n=7, 46.7%) were discussing interventions related to social determinants of health in general.

Discussion and Conclusions

Few citations are available on the prevalence and use of stressful life events in EHR reflecting challenges in screening and storing of stressful life events.

Stressful life events in electronic health records: a scoping review

Objective

Stressful life events, such as going through divorce, can have an important impact on human health. However, there are challenges in capturing these events in electronic health records (EHR). We conducted a scoping review aimed to answer two major questions: how stressful life events are documented in EHR and how they are utilized in research and clinical care.

Materials and Methods

Three online databases (EBSCOhost platform, PubMed, and Scopus) were searched to identify papers that included information on stressful life events in EHR; paper titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance by two independent reviewers.

Results

557 unique papers were retrieved, and of these 70 were eligible for data extraction. Most articles (n=36, 51.4%) were focused on the statistical association between one or several stressful life events and health outcomes, followed by clinical utility (n=15, 21.4%), extraction of events from free-text notes (n=12, 17.1%), discussing privacy and other issues of storing life events (n=5, 7.1%), and new EHR features related to life events (n=4, 5.7%). The most frequently mentioned stressful life events in the publications were child abuse/neglect, arrest/legal issues, and divorce/relationship breakup. Almost half of the papers (n=7, 46.7%) that analyzed clinical utility of stressful events were focused on decision support systems for child abuse, while others (n=7, 46.7%) were discussing interventions related to social determinants of health in general.

Discussion and Conclusions

Few citations are available on the prevalence and use of stressful life events in EHR reflecting challenges in screening and storing of stressful life events.

Structural Barriers to Well-grounded Advance Care Planning for the Seriously Ill: a Qualitative Study of Clinicians' and Administrators' Experiences During a Pragmatic Trial

BACKGROUND

Advance Care Planning (ACP) comprises an iterative communication process aimed at understanding patients' goals, values, and preferences in the context of considering and preparing for future medical treatments and decision making in serious illness. The COVID pandemic heightened patients' and clinicians' awareness of the need for ACP.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to explore the experiences of clinicians and administrators in the context of an intervention to improve ACP during the COVID pandemic.

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinicians and administrators across five sites that participated in the ACP-COVID trial.

APPROACH

We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews examining the context and approach to ACP. Interviews were analyzed using template analysis to systematically organize the data and facilitate review across the categories and participants. Templates were developed with iterative input and line-by-line review by the analytic team, to reach consensus. Findings were then organized into emergent themes.

KEY RESULTS

Across 20 interviews (4 administrators, 16 clinicians) we identified three themes related to how participants thought about ACP: (1) clinicians have varying views of what constitutes ACP; (2) the health system critically shapes ACP culture and norms; and (3) the centrality of clinicians' affective experience and own needs related to ACP. Varying approaches to ACP include a forms-focused approach; a discussion-based approach; and a parental approach. System features that shape ACP norms are (1) the primacy of clinician productivity measures; (2) the role of the EHR; and (3) the culture of quality improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high organizational commitment to ACP, we found that the health system channeled clinicians' ACP efforts narrowly on completion of forms, in tension with the ideal of well-grounded ACP. This resulted in a state of moral distress that risks undermining confidence in the process of ACP and may increase risk of harm for patients, family/caregivers, and providers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04660422.