Primary vitrectomy for degenerative and tractional lamellar macular holes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prediction of Functional and Anatomic Progression in Lamellar Macular Holes

Purpose

To use artificial intelligence to identify imaging biomarkers for anatomic and functional progression of lamellar macular hole (LMH) and elaborate a deep learning (DL) model based on OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) for prediction of visual acuity (VA) loss in untreated LMHs.

Design

Multicentric retrospective observational study.

Participants

Patients aged >18 years diagnosed with idiopathic LMHs with availability of good quality OCT and OCTA acquisitions at baseline and a follow-up >2 years were recruited.

Methods

A DL model based on soft voting of 2 separate models (OCT and OCTA-based respectively) was trained for identification of cases with VA loss >5 ETDRS letters (attributable to LMH progression only) during a 2-year follow-up. Biomarkers of anatomic and functional progression of LMH were evaluated with regression analysis, feature learning (support vector machine [SVM] model), and visualization maps.

Main Outcome Measures

Ellipsoid zone (EZ) damage, volumetric tissue loss (TL), vitreopapillary adhesion (VPA), epiretinal proliferation, central macular thickness (CMT), parafoveal vessel density (VD) and vessel length density (VLD) of retinal capillary plexuses, choriocapillaris (CC), and flow deficit density (FDD).

Results

Functionally progressing LMHs (VA-PROG group, 41/139 eyes [29.5%]) showed higher prevalence of EZ damage, higher volumetric TL, higher prevalence of VPA, lower superficial capillary plexus (SCP), VD and VLD, and higher CC FDD compared with functionally stable LMHs (VA-STABLE group, 98/139 eyes [70.5%]). The DL and SVM models showed 92.5% and 90.5% accuracy, respectively. The best-performing features in the SVM were EZ damage, TL, CC FDD, and parafoveal SCP VD. Epiretinal proliferation and lower CMT were risk factors for anatomic progression only.

Conclusions

Deep learning can accurately predict functional progression of untreated LMHs over 2 years. The use of AI might improve our understanding of the natural course of retinal diseases. The integrity of CC and SCP might play an important role in the progression of LMHs.

Financial Disclosures

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

MIXED PATHOPHYSIOLOGIES OF LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLES AND RELATED DISEASES: A Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the characteristics of mixed pathophysiologies in lamellar macular holes (LMHs) and related diseases using multimodal optical coherence tomography.

METHODS

Overall, 126 eyes diagnosed with LMH, epiretinal membrane foveoschisis, or macular pseudohole using the horizontal B-scan image according to the definition proposed by Hubschman et al in 2020 were analyzed using multimodal optical coherence tomography imaging including horizontal and vertical 5-line B-scan, radial scan, and macular three-dimensional volume scan images. If at least two diagnostic criteria for LMH, epiretinal membrane foveoschisis, or macular pseudohole were satisfied in these scans, the patient was diagnosed as having a "mixed type." Retinal traction force was quantitatively evaluated by measuring the maximum depth of the retinal folds using en-face images.

RESULTS

Mixed types constituted 34.1% of the cases. The LMH-related mixed group demonstrated intermediate characteristics between the epiretinal membrane foveoschisis/macular pseudohole and true LMH groups in terms of retinal traction and LMH-specific features and had a significant positive correlation between the maximum depth of the retinal folds and mean M-CHARTS scores (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

A thorough optical coherence tomography analysis is necessary to accurately diagnose LMH and related diseases. A significant positive correlation was observed between the maximum depth of the retinal folds and the degree of metamorphopsia in the LMH-related mixed group.

Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap

BACKGROUND

To compare conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus inverted flap technique in small idiopathic macular hole.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicentre cohort study including consecutive eyes with a ≤250 μm idiopathic macular hole treated with primary vitrectomy. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change and macular hole closure rate. Closure patterns on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and rates of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) recovery were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 389 and 250 eyes were included in the conventional ILM peeling group and in the inverted flap group, respectively. Hole closure rate was comparable between the two groups (98.5% in the ILM peeling group and 97.6% in the inverted flap group). Mean BCVA was comparable between the two groups at baseline (p = 0.331). At 12 months, mean BCVA was 0.14 ± 0.19 logMAR in the conventional ILM peeling group and 0.17 ± 0.18 logMAR in the inverted flap group (p = 0.08). At 12 months, 73% of eyes had a U-shape closure morphology in the conventional ILM peeling group versus 55% in the inverted flap group. At 12 months, ELM recovery rate was 96% and 86% in the conventional ILM peeling group and in the inverted flap group, respectively (p < 0.001); EZ recovery rate was 78% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The inverted flap technique provides no advantages in terms of visual outcome and closure rate in small idiopathic macular hole surgery. Additionally, this technique seems to impair postoperative restoration of external retinal layers compared with conventional peeling.

Volumetric Biomarkers of Visual Outcome after Surgical Repair in Lamellar Macular Holes

BACKGROUND

We investigate novel OCT parameters, based on the volumetric analysis of lamellar macular holes (LMHs), as prognostic indicators for visual outcomes after surgery.

METHODS

LMHs were divided into degenerative LMHs (D-LMHs) and ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS). Pre-operative clinical, OCT linear and volumetric parameters were collected. Volumes were obtained using the OCT automatic segmentation, such as central retinal volume (CRV) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) volume, or using a novel method to calculate volumes of specific LMH entities like epiretinal proliferation (ERP), foveal cavity (FC) in D-LMH and schitic volume (SV) in ERM-FS. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis evaluated the factors predictive for post-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

We included 31 eyes of 31 patients (14 D-LMH,17 ERM-FS). A pre-operative BCVA ≤ 0.48 logMAR was a predictor for achieving ≤0.30 logMAR at final follow-up. A lower pre-operative BCVA (p = 0.008) and the presence of ERP (p = 0.002) were associated with worse visual outcomes post-surgery. Moreover, novel pre-operative OCT parameters significantly associated with worse post-operative BCVA, such as increased FC volume (p = 0.032) and lower CRV (p = 0.034) in the D-LMH subtype and lower CRV (p < 0.001) and ERP volume (p < 0.001), higher SV (p < 0.001) and foveal ONL volume (p < 0.001) in the ERM-FS subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel volumetric OCT parameters can be prognostic indicators of visual outcome following surgery in LMHs.

Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Membrane Peel for Lamellar Macular Holes and Related Conditions Using a New Optical Coherence Tomography Consensus Definition

Purpose: To characterize the change in visual acuity (VA) in eyes treated with vitrectomy using the 2020 international consensus-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) definition of lamellar macular hole (LMH), macular pseudohole (MPH), and epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis (ERMF). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2022 of patients who had vitrectomy for symptomatic decreased VA from LMH, MPH, or ERMF performed by the same surgeon at a community hospital. Preoperative spectral domain (SD-OCT) was reviewed to classify patients using the consensus guidelines. Primary outcomes were the mean change in best-corrected VA at 3 months, 1 year, and the final postoperative examination. Results: Fifty-one patients were included, 30 with LMH, 14 with MPH, and 7 with ERMF. The VA was 20/63 at baseline, 20/62 (P = .79) 3 months postoperatively, 20/40 (P = .003) at 1 year, and 20/52 (P = .10) at the final examination for LMH; 20/64, 20/50 (P = .16), 20/40 (P = .040), and 20/40 (P = .02), respectively, for MPH; and 20/53, 20/50 (P = .42), 20/30 (P = .03), and 20/38 (P = .04), respectively, for ERMF. Subgroup analysis showed that eyes with LMH without ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption on SD-OCT improved from 20/57 at baseline to 20/39 (P = .01) at the final examination. Conclusions: There was no significant improvement in VA at the final postvitrectomy examination in eyes with LMH, while there was significant improvement in eyes with MPH and ERMF. This supports surgery in selected eyes with MPH and ERMF but possibly not in eyes with LMH, unless OCT shows no EZ disruption.

Internal limiting membrane flap with viscoelastic device for lamellar hole surgery with no postoperative positioning

PURPOSE

To propose a novel technique of an internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap using ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) with no requirement for postoperative head posture for the treatment of lamellar macular hole (LMH) repair.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 16 consecutive eyes of LMH patients who underwent vitrectomy with ILM flap with OVD. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), simultaneous cataract extraction, and ellipsoid zone disruption preoperatively and at the final follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age was 73.19 ± 7.26 years, and ten patients (62%) were females. The mean follow-up was 5.06±1.43 months (range 3-6). For all patients, BCVA was significantly improved at the final visit, from 0.65±0.36 logMAR units to 0.42±0.29 (p < 0.001). None of the patients had visual loss. Six patients had epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis, and the rest had LMH with epiretinal proliferation. Both subgroups presented a significant improvement in their BCVA with a trend for better improvement in the latter (p=0.09). Ellipsoid zone disruption was seen in 7 patients including one patient with a macular scar. There was no significant effect of ellipsoid zone disruption on the final BCVA (p=0.33). Twelve eyes (75%) underwent simultaneous cataract extraction. Mean BCVA at the final postoperative visit improved regardless of whether the eyes underwent simultaneous cataract surgery (p=0.39). CMT was also significantly improved at the final visit, from 200.06±46.8 μm preoperatively to 305.00±85.5 μm (p<0.001). No full-thickness macular holes were developed postoperatively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of LMH with ILM flap with OVD showed promising anatomical and functional results with no postoperative head position requirements.

Long-Term Results of Adjunct Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma in Lamellar Macular Hole Surgery Showing Lasting Restoration of Foveal Anatomy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-time results of highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) used as an adjunct in lamellar macular hole (LMH) surgery. Nineteen eyes of nineteen patients with progressive LMH were enrolled in this interventional case series, on which 23/25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed and 0.1 mL of highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma was applied under air tamponade. Posterior vitreous detachment was induced, and the peeling of tractive epiretinal membranes, whenever present, was performed. In cases of phakic lens status, combined surgery was carried out. Postoperatively, all patients were instructed to remain in a supine position for the first two postoperative hours. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, microperimetry, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were carried out preoperatively and at minimum 6 months (in median 12 months) postoperatively. Foveal configuration was postoperatively restored in 19 of 19 patients. Two patients who had not undergone ILM peeling showed a recurring defect at 6-month follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.29 ± 0.08 to 0.14 ± 0.13 logMAR (p = 0.028, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Microperimetry remained unchanged (23.38 ± 2.53 preoperatively; 23.0 ± 2.49 dB postoperatively; p = 0.67). No patients experienced vision loss after surgery, and no significant intra- or postoperative complications were observed. Using PRP as an adjunct in macular hole surgery significantly improves morphological and functional outcomes. Additionally, it might be an effective prophylaxis to further progression and also the formation of a secondary full-thickness macular hole. The results of this study might contribute to a paradigm shift in macular hole surgery towards early intervention.

Lamellar macular defects: are degenerative lamellar macular holes truly degenerative?

Purpose

To investigate morpho-functional changes after surgical treatment for ERM foveoschisis or lamellar macular hole (LMH), and to evaluate whether the two entities are associated with different healing processes and long-term outcomes.

Design

Retrospective interventional case series.

Methods

A total of 56 eyes, treated for lamellar macular defects and followed up for 24 months, were enrolled. The eyes were divided into two groups: 34 with ERM foveoschisis and 22 with LMH. Changes in the following features were evaluated and compared between the two groups: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) defects, central foveal thickness (CFT), and autofluorescence (FAF) diameter and area.

Results

After surgery, progressive BCVA improvement was observed with no significant difference between the two groups (p-value: 0.06). An increased number of eyes with intact outer-retinal layers was found both in the ERM foveoschisis and LMH groups. FAF diameter and area decreased significantly throughout the FU with no significant difference between the two groups (p-value: 0.2).

Conclusion

In the present study, significant functional and microstructural improvements were observed after surgery for both ERM foveoschisis and LMH, demonstrating considerable repair potential in both types of lamellar defects. These findings question the true "degenerative" nature of LMH.

Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit

There is a wide spectrum of macular conditions that are characterized by an irregular foveal contour caused by a break in the inner fovea. These include full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), foveal pseudocyst, lamellar macular hole (LMH) and macular pseudohole (MPH). Clinical examination of vitreomacular interface disorders is notoriously poor in differentiating these conditions. These conditions were initially described with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and the main goal was to distinguish an FTMH from the others. The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has revolutionized our understanding of the foveal microstructural anatomy and has facilitated differentiating these conditions from an FTMH. However, the definitions of the other conditions, particularly LMH, has evolved over the past two decades. Initially the term LMH encompassed a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. As OCT became more widely used and observations became more refined, two different phenotypes of LMH became apparent, raising the question of different pathogenic mechanisms for each phenotype. Tractional and degenerative pathological mechanisms were proposed. Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) associated with each phenotype were identified. Typical ERMs were associated with a tractional mechanism, whereas an epiretinal proliferation was associated with a degenerative mechanism. Epiretinal proliferation represents Müller cell proliferation as a reactive process to retinal injury. These two types of ERM were differentiated by their characteristics on SD-OCT. The latest consensus definitions take into account this phenotypic differentiation and classifies these entities into LMH, MPH and ERM foveoschisis. The initial event in both ERM foveoschisis and LMH is a tractional event that disrupts the Müller cell cone in the foveola or the foveal walls. Depending on the extent of Müller cell disruption, either a LMH or an ERM foveoschisis may develop. Although surgical intervention for LMH remains controversial and no clear guidelines exist for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), eyes with symptomatic, progressive ERM foveoschisis and LMH may benefit from surgical intervention.

Macular Holes: Main Clinical Presentations, Diagnosis, and Therapies

Macular holes are a spectrum of retinal diseases that comprehends full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs), refractory/recurrent macular holes, lamellar macular holes (LMHs), myopic macular holes (MMHs), traumatic macular holes, and macular holes secondary to other retinal pathologies or injuries. There are various classifications of the subtypes of macular hole, and only in recent times researchers defined a common nomenclature, especially thanks to the evolution in retinal imaging, offered by new instruments like the swept-source OCT. The proposed therapies for macular holes are different and range from a “wait-and-see” approach to the vitrectomy, with different results in each subtype of macular hole. This narrative review has the purpose to investigate the available evidence in literature to give a summary of the knowledge about these retinal pathologies.

Improving morphological outcome in lamellar macular hole surgery by using highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma

Purpose

To evaluate the use of highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in lamellar macular hole (LMH) surgery with regard to function and morphology.

Methods

We included 12 eyes of 12 patients with progressive LMH in this interventional case series. After 23/25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, 0.1ml highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma was applied under air tamponade. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment and peeling of tractive epiretinal membranes were performed whenever present. Phacovitrectomy was undertaken in cases of phakic lens status. Postoperatively, all patients were instructed to rest in a supine position for the first two postoperative hours. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, microperimetry, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus photography were carried out preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Foveal configuration was restored in 10 of 12 patients (83.3%) at 6 months postoperatively. Two patients who had not undergone ILM peeling showed a recurring defect at 6-month follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.29 ± 0.08 to 0.14 ± 0.13 logMAR (Wilcoxon: p=0.028). Microperimetry remained unchanged (23.38 ± 2.53 preoperatively; 23.0 ± 2.49 dB postoperatively; p=0.67). No patient experienced vision loss after surgery, and no significant intra- or postoperative complications occurred.

Conclusion

The application of PRP in the surgical therapy of LMH results in good morphological and functional outcomes. Additional peeling of the ILM seems to be mandatory when using PRP to prevent the recurrence of LMH. Strict postoperative supine positioning for 2 h avoids PRP dislocation. Larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the results.

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes

BACKGROUND

Lamellar macular holes (LMHs) are small, partial-thickness defects of the macula defined by characteristic features on optical coherence tomography (OCT), including a newly recognised type of epiretinal membrane termed 'epiretinal proliferation'. There may be a rationale to recommend surgery for individuals with LMHs, particularly those with functional or anatomical deterioration, or poor baseline vision causing significant disability, to stabilise the LMH and prevent further visual deterioration; however, there is currently no evidence-based consensus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of surgical interventions on post-operative visual and anatomical outcomes in people with a confirmed LMH.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, Scopus SciVerse, ISRCTN registry, US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We also searched reference lists of included trials to identify other eligible trials which our search strategy may have missed. The date of the search was 20 July 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving participants with a confirmed LMH diagnosis which reported one or more surgical intervention(s), alone or in combination, in at least one arm of the RCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods as expected by Cochrane. Two study authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for included trials. Trial authors were contacted for further information and clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

A single RCT was eligible for inclusion. Thirty-six participants were randomised in a 2:1 ratio; 24 were allocated to undergo surgery (pars plana vitrectomy, peeling of the epiretial proliferation followed by fovea-sparing removal of the internal limiting membrane) and 12 (10 following two participant dropouts) to observation. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was low for all outcomes due to selection and detection bias, and the low number of participants enrolled in the study which may affect the accuracy of results and reliability of conclusions. At six-month follow-up, change in vision was better in the surgery group (-0.27 logMAR improvement) than observation (0.02 worsening) (mean difference (MD): -0.29 logMAR, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.33 to -0.25). Central retinal thickness increased in the surgery group over 6 months 126 μm increase) compared with observation group (decrease by 11μm) (MD: 137 μm, 95% CI: 125.87 μm to 148.13 μm). Finally, at six-month follow-up, retinal sensitivity was better in the surgery group (3.03 dB increase) compared with the observation group (0.06 dB decrease) (MD: 3.09 dB, 95% CI: 2.07 to 4.11 dB). Vision-related quality of life and metamorphopsia were not reported. No adverse outcomes or complications were reported in the study, however, authors could not provide information on whether any individuals developed deterioration in vision of 0.2 logMAR or worse.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The included single trial demonstrated improvements in visual and anatomical outcome measures for participants with a LMH who underwent surgery compared with observation only. Therefore, we can conclude that participants who undergo surgery may achieve superior post-operative best corrected visual acuity and anatomical outcomes compared with observation only. However, the results of a single and small RCT provides limited evidence to support or refute surgery as an effective management option for LMHs. Future RCTs with a larger number of participants and with fewer methodological limitations and biases are necessary to inform future clinical practice.

Morphological Changes in Lamellar Macular Holes According to SD-OCT Examination over a Long Observation Period

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quantitative morphological changes in lamellar macular holes (LMHs) based on SD-OCT examinations and to assess the correlations among minimal retinal thickness (MRT), reading vision (RV), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over a 36-month follow-up period.

METHODS

A group of 40 patients (44 eyes) with LMH was evaluated, with an average age of 69.87 (SD = 10.14). The quantitative parameters monitored in the follow-up period (at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months) were tested for normality of distribution by Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.

RESULTS

The RV and BCVA values were stable, and no significant changes were found at any of the check-ups during the 36-month follow-up period (BCVA p = 0.435 and RV p = 0.0999). The analysis of individual quantitative LMH parameters during the 36-month follow-up period did not demonstrate statistically significant differences: MRT (p = 0.461), Max RT temporal (p = 0.051), Max RT nasal (p = 0.364), inner diameter (ID) (p = 0.089), and outer diameter (OD) (p = 0.985).

CONCLUSIONS

The observations at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months revealed moderate and significant correlations between RV and MRT. No significant correlation between BCVA and MRT was observed.