1
|
Liang HW, Ameri R, Band S, Chen HS, Ho SY, Zaidan B, Chang KC, Chang A. Fall risk classification with posturographic parameters in community-dwelling older adults: a machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2024; 21:15. [PMID: 38287415 PMCID: PMC10826018 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01310-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized posturography obtained in standing conditions has been applied to classify fall risk for older adults or disease groups. Combining machine learning (ML) approaches is superior to traditional regression analysis for its ability to handle complex data regarding its characteristics of being high-dimensional, non-linear, and highly correlated. The study goal was to use ML algorithms to classify fall risks in community-dwelling older adults with the aid of an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach to increase interpretability. METHODS A total of 215 participants were included for analysis. The input information included personal metrics and posturographic parameters obtained from a tracker-based posturography of four standing postures. Two classification criteria were used: with a previous history of falls and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test. We used three meta-heuristic methods for feature selection to handle the large numbers of parameters and improve efficacy, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to display the weights of the selected features on the model. RESULTS The results showed that posturographic parameters could classify the participants with TUG scores higher or lower than 10 s but were less effective in classifying fall risk according to previous fall history. Feature selections improved the accuracy with the TUG as the classification label, and the Slime Mould Algorithm had the best performance (accuracy: 0.72 to 0.77, area under the curve: 0.80 to 0.90). In contrast, feature selection did not improve the model performance significantly with the previous fall history as a classification label. The SHAP values also helped to display the importance of different features in the model. CONCLUSION Posturographic parameters in standing can be used to classify fall risks with high accuracy based on the TUG scores in community-dwelling older adults. Using feature selection improves the model's performance. The results highlight the potential utility of ML algorithms and XAI to provide guidance for developing more robust and accurate fall classification models. Trial registration Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huey-Wen Liang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Rasoul Ameri
- Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shahab Band
- International Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
- Future Technology Research Center, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
| | - Hsin-Shui Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Yulin Branch, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC.
| | - Sung-Yu Ho
- Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Bilal Zaidan
- International Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC
- SP Jain School of Global Management, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kai-Chieh Chang
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Yulin Branch, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Arthur Chang
- Department of Information Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bargiotas I, Wang D, Mantilla J, Quijoux F, Moreau A, Vidal C, Barrois R, Nicolai A, Audiffren J, Labourdette C, Bertin-Hugaul F, Oudre L, Buffat S, Yelnik A, Ricard D, Vayatis N, Vidal PP. Preventing falls: the use of machine learning for the prediction of future falls in individuals without history of fall. J Neurol 2023; 270:618-631. [PMID: 35817988 PMCID: PMC9886639 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11251-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, it becomes of paramount societal importance to support many frail-prone groups in our society (elderly, patients with neurodegenerative diseases, etc.) to remain socially and physically active, maintain their quality of life, and avoid their loss of autonomy. Once older people enter the prefrail stage, they are already likely to experience falls whose consequences may accelerate the deterioration of their quality of life (injuries, fear of falling, reduction of physical activity). In that context, detecting frailty and high risk of fall at an early stage is the first line of defense against the detrimental consequences of fall. The second line of defense would be to develop original protocols to detect future fallers before any fall occur. This paper briefly summarizes the current advancements and perspectives that may arise from the combination of affordable and easy-to-use non-wearable systems (force platforms, 3D tracking motion systems), wearable systems (accelerometers, gyroscopes, inertial measurement units-IMUs) with appropriate machine learning analytics, as well as the efforts to address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Bargiotas
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France. .,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France.
| | - Danping Wang
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Juan Mantilla
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Flavien Quijoux
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France.,ORPEA Group, Puteaux, France
| | - Albane Moreau
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Catherine Vidal
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France.,Service of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, 75013, France
| | - Remi Barrois
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Alice Nicolai
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Julien Audiffren
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Labourdette
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | | | - Laurent Oudre
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Stephane Buffat
- Laboratoire d'accidentologie de biomécanique et du comportement des conducteurs, GIE Psa Renault Groupes, Nanterre, France
| | - Alain Yelnik
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France.,Service of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM), AP- HP, GH St Louis, Lariboisière, F. Widal, Paris, 75010, France
| | - Damien Ricard
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France.,Service of Neurology, AP-HP, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées de Percy, Service de Santé des Armées, Clamart, 92140, France.,École d'application du Val-de-Grâce, Service de Santé des Armée, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Vayatis
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France
| | - Pierre-Paul Vidal
- Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.,Centre Borelli, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, ENS Paris Saclay, Paris, 75006, France.,Institute of Information and Control, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bargiotas P, Bargiotas I, Debove I, Lachenmayer ML, Vayatis N, Schuepbach WMM, Bassetti CLA. Sleep apnea syndrome and subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Sleep Med 2021; 86:106-112. [PMID: 34488169 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Τhe association between Parkinson's disease (PD) and sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) is not fully elucidated and very few studies reported on SAS outcome after deep brain stimulation (DBS). Here, we compare the clinical profile of PD patients with and without SAS and assess, for the first time, the value of pre-DBS SAS as predictor of post-DBS outcome in PD. METHODS Fifty patients were grouped into PD with SAS (PD-SAS+,n = 22) and without (PD-SAS-,n = 28), based on the Apnea-Hypopnea-Index (AHI≥5) in polysomnography. We used novel multivariate statistical models to compare pre-DBS profiles and assess post-DBS motor, non-motor and quality of life (QoL) changes in both groups. RESULTS In the entire cohort, 44% of patients had at least mild SAS (AHI≥5), while 22% had at least moderate (AHI≥15). Mean AHI was 11/h (NREM-AHI = 10.2/h and REM-AHI = 13.5/h). The two groups had equal demographics and PD characteristics, and did not differ in respect to unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS)-IIOFF, Body-Mass-Index, polysomnographic features, RBD, depression, sleepiness and QoL scores. The PD-SAS+ group had significantly higher scores in UPDRS-IIIOFF (41.1 ± 17.7 vs. 30.9 ± 11.7,p < 0.05) compared to PD-SAS- group. The groups did not differ in respect to post-DBS change in UPDRS-II, UPDRS-III, Epworth sleepiness scale, Hamilton depression rating scale and PDQ39 scores. Positive airway pressure therapy had no impact on post-DBS outcome. CONCLUSIONS In patients with PD and candidates for DBS, the presence of SAS is associated with increased motor signs, but not with a specific non-motor, QoL or sleep-wake profile. The presence of SAS prior to STN-DBS is not associated with worse outcome after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Bargiotas
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital (Inselspital) and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| | - Ioannis Bargiotas
- Universite Paris-Saclay, ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INSERM, Centre Borelli, F-91190 8 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Ines Debove
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital (Inselspital) and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M Lenard Lachenmayer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital (Inselspital) and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Vayatis
- Universite Paris-Saclay, ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, INSERM, Centre Borelli, F-91190 8 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - W M Michael Schuepbach
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital (Inselspital) and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudio L A Bassetti
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital (Inselspital) and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|