Effects of disusing closed suction drainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study

Simultaneous vs staged bilateral hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of satisfaction rate and complications

PURPOSE

Interest in bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been increasing over the past decade. This study aims to compare postoperative local and systemic complications, hospital readmissions, and satisfaction assessment in patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged bilateral THA.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted among patients who underwent simultaneous or staged bilateral THA between 2017 and 2020. Data on perioperative parameters, local and systemic complications, and 30-day hospital readmissions were collected. Patient satisfaction was assessed using Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). The comparison of continuous variables with normal distribution of variance was performed by ANOVA; for variables with abnormal distribution, the nonparametric test Mann-Whitney U was adopted. The distribution of dichotomous variables was analyzed by chi-square test, and statistical significance was calculated by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The study included 199 patients, of whom 156 underwent staged and 43 simultaneous bilateral THA. A total of 44 patients developed complications (21 systemics, 12 locals, and 20 postoperative anemia). There were no significant differences regarding local (simultaneous 5% vs. staged 6%; p = 0.999) or systemic complications (simultaneous 14% vs. staged 10%; p = 0.408). Only the incidence of postoperative anemia was significantly higher in simultaneous group compared with staged group (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in FJS between the two groups (p = 0.258).

CONCLUSION

No differences in local or systemic complications nor readmission rates were observed following simultaneous or staged bilateral THA. Simultaneous bilateral THA is non-inferior to staged implants in terms of safety and patient satisfaction.

Drainage in primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty

Drainage after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) used to be systematic to prevent complications and notably hematoma and infection. However, improvement in practices, the introduction of blood-sparing protocols and above all the conclusions reported in many studies have cast doubt on this dogma. There is abundant literature on the pros and cons of drainage after primary THA and TKA. The main endpoints were transfusion rates and volumes, total blood loss and variations in hemoglobin levels. Clinical endpoints comprised pain, edema, postoperative hematoma and, more rarely, short-to-medium-term function. Except for a few studies reporting greater pain and edema without drainage, there is agreement that drainage not only provides no benefit but actually aggravates postoperative bleeding. There are fewer studies of drainage in revision procedures for the hip and very few for the knee. The interest of drainage has not been demonstrated and again postoperative bleeding is aggravated. Whether in primary or revision arthroplasty, tranexamic acid is recommended when not contraindicated, whatever the administration protocol. However, it should not be seen as the sole and determining reason for abandoning drainage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

Do Patients with Borderline Anemia Need Treatment before Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative anemia has been identified as a modifiable risk factor for multiple adverse outcomes. In real clinical practice, considering treatment of anemia would increase costs and delay surgery. Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with mild anemia are usually neglected and still underdiagnosed or inadequately treated. This study investigated the effects of preoperative borderline anemia and anemia intervention before THA on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

We screened 706 patients from those receiving THA at our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022, with 112 in the borderline anemia group and 594 in the non-anemia group. The cohort for this retrospective study was created by using propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analysis. The primary outcome was perioperative blood loss, while secondary outcomes were the rate of allogeneic blood transfusion and human serum albumin transfusion, perioperative laboratory indicators, postoperative length of stay, and complications. The independent sample t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used to analyze continuous data, and the Pearson χ2 -test or the Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical variables.

RESULTS

After PSM, there was no significant difference in perioperative blood loss between patients in the borderline anemia group and the non-anemia group. The primary outcomes of hidden (p = 0.004) and total (p = 0.005) blood loss were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group. No statistical differences were found in allogeneic blood transfusion, human serum albumin transfusion, postoperative length of stay, or complications (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Anemia treatments for patients with borderline anemia before THA significantly reduced hidden blood loss and total blood loss in the perioperative period and decreased the drop of hemoglobin and hematocrit without increasing postoperative complications.

Outcomes of Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Perioperative Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia is an abnormally low level of blood platelets (less than 150,000/mL) resulting in an increased risk for bleeding. Typically, patients with platelet levels below 50,000/mL should delay arthroplasty or be transfused with platelets before surgery. However, existing studies are mixed regarding the effects of more moderate thrombocytopenia in terms of total knee and hip arthroplasty outcomes.

METHODS

This level III retrospective chart review examined the effects of different severities of preoperative thrombocytopenia on length of hospitalization, readmission, and transfusion rates in 5,617 primary total knee and hip arthroplasties at one tertiary academic medical center. Preoperative platelet levels were sectioned into clinically relevant groups and compared with clinical outcomes using univariable and multivariable models.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, having platelet levels of <100,000/mL and 100 to 149,000/mL was associated with a longer length of stay. However, after controlling individual demographics, there was no association between platelet levels and length of stay, nor with 30-day readmission. Finally, on univariate analysis, patients with platelet levels of <100,000/mL and 100 to 149,000/mL were more likely to have a blood transfusion, which remained true for those with <100,000/mL after controlling for individual demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

Total hip and total knee arthroplasty are safe in patients with varying platelet levels and not associated with increased length of stay or 30-day readmission. However, patients with more severe thrombocytopenia are more likely to receive red blood cell transfusions than patients with milder thrombocytopenia.

Comparison between simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty with and without drainage: A retrospective cohort study

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) is an effective procedure for patients with disease bilaterally. But there is concern about increased blood loss and complications of SBTHA than staged total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the differences in the clinical outcomes and complication rate of SBTHA with drainage and without drainage for reducing the concerns. Between October 2015 and April 2019, a retrospective cohort study was conducted with modified minimally invasive 2-incision method and a consecutive series of 41 SBTHA performed with drainage (Group I) were compared to 37 SBTHA performed without drainage (Group II). It was assessed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 2.1 ± 0.8 years (range, 1.0-4.8 years). Postoperative hematologic values (Hgb loss, total blood loss, transfusion rate), pain susceptibility, functional outcome (Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score) and complication were compared in the drained group and the non-drained group. Postoperative Hgb loss (I: 2163.2 ± 698.7 g, II: 1730.4 ± 572.5 g; P = .002), total blood loss (I: 1528.8 ± 421.7 mL, II: 1237.6 ± 325.9 mL; P = .001) and mean transfusion unit (I: 0.7 ± 1.0 IU, II: 0.1 ± 0.3 IU; P < .001) were significantly lower in the without drainage group than in the with drainage group. But the morphine equivalent (I: 132.7 ± 314.1 mg, II: 732.2 ± 591.5 mg; P < .001) was significantly larger in the without drainage group. No significant difference was found between the drainage group and without drainage group in Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at final follow-up. SBTHA without drainage can reduce postoperative blood loss and the requirement for transfusion without increasing other complication. But SBTHA without drainage is more painful method than SBTHA with drainage. Therefore, SBTHA without drainage will be a good option to reduce the burden on the patient by reducing postoperative bleeding if it can control pain well after surgery. III, Retrospective case-control study.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty With Contemporary Blood Management is Associated With a Low Risk of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data on blood loss and the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion after simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) with contemporary blood management including neuraxial anesthesia, routine tranexamic acid use, and a restrictive transfusion protocol. As such, we sought to determine the in-hospital outcomes of SBTHA, specifically analyzing blood loss and the rate and risk factors for transfusion.

METHODS

We identified 191 patients who underwent SBTHA at a single institution from 2016 to 2019. No drains were utilized and no patients donated blood preoperatively. Mean age was 59 years with 96 females (50.3%). The surgical approach was posterior in 138 (72.3%) and direct anterior in 53 (27.7%) patients. We analyzed blood loss, the rate of allogeneic blood transfusions, and in-hospital thromboembolic complications. We analyzed risk factors for transfusion with a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (11.5%) underwent allogeneic blood transfusion. All transfused patients were female. Univariate analysis revealed female gender as a transfusion risk factor since it had statistically significant higher proportion in the transfusion group than the nontransfusion group (100% vs 43.5%, respectively, P < .001). We did not identify any other singular significant risk factors for transfusion in a multivariable regression analysis. However, females with a preoperative Hb <12 had an elevated risk of transfusion at 37.5% (15/40 patients).

CONCLUSION

With contemporary perioperative blood management protocols, there is a relatively low (11.5%) risk of a blood transfusion after SBTHA. Females with a lower preoperative Hb (<12 g/dL) had the highest risk of transfusion at 37.5%.