1
|
Teipel S, Akmatov M, Michalowsky B, Riedel-Heller S, Bohlken J, Holstiege J. Timing of risk factors, prodromal features, and comorbidities of dementia from a large health claims case-control study. Alzheimers Res Ther 2025; 17:22. [PMID: 39819557 PMCID: PMC11736938 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01662-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many risk factors for dementia have been identified, but the timing of risk is less well understood. Here, we analyzed risk factors in a case-control study covering 10 years before an incident dementia diagnosis. METHODS We designed a case-control study using insurance claims of outpatient consultations of patients with German statutory health insurance between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022. We included patients with an incident diagnosis of dementia and controls without a diagnosis of dementia matched 1:2 for age, sex, region, and earliest year of outpatient encounter. We selected exposures based on previous systematic reviews, case-control and cohort studies reporting on risk factors, comorbidities, and prodromal features of dementia. We calculated the prevalence of risk factors in cases and controls and odds ratios for each year before the index date, along with Bonferroni-corrected confidence intervals, using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS We identified a total of 1,686,759 patients with incident dementia (mean (SD) age, 82.15 (6.90) years; 61.70% female) and 3,373,518 matched controls (mean (SD) age, 82.15 (6.90) years; 61.70% female). Study participants were followed up for a mean (SD) of 6.6 (2.3) years. Of the 63 risk factors and prodromal features examined, 56 were associated with an increased risk of dementia in all years during the 10th and the 1st year before the index date. These included established risk factors, such as depression, hypertension, hearing impairment, nicotine and alcohol abuse, obesity, hypercholesterolaemia, traumatic brain injury, and diabetes. The greatest risk, with odds ratios greater than 2.5, was conferred by delirium, memory impairment, mental retardation, personality and behavioral disorders, sensory disorders, schizophrenia, and psychosis. Cancer was associated with a reduced risk of dementia. CONCLUSIONS This large case-control study confirmed established risk factors of dementia. In addition, the study identified non-specific diagnoses that showed a steep increase in risk close to the index date, such as psychosis, conduct disorder, and other sensory disorders. Consideration of these diagnoses, which may represent prodromal features rather than risk factors for dementia, may help to identify people with dementia in routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, Rostock, 18147, Germany.
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, Rostock, 18147, Germany.
| | - Manas Akmatov
- Department of Epidemiology and Healthcare Atlas, Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Michalowsky
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Steffi Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens Bohlken
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jakob Holstiege
- Department of Epidemiology and Healthcare Atlas, Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alaeddin N, Koch A, Etteldorf R, Stingl JC, Breteler MMB, de Vries FM. The impact of proton pump inhibitors on brain health based on cross-sectional findings from the Rhineland Study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:30486. [PMID: 39681582 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81011-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Reports linking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with cognition and dementia show conflicting results, with limited evidence on underlying biological mechanisms. However, existing studies did not investigate brain microstructure, which could provide valuable insights into early structural changes indicative of cognitive decline. Analyses were based on cross-sectional baseline data from the Rhineland Study (n = 7,465; mean age 55.3 ± 13.7 years, range 30-95 years, 56.5% women). Using multivariate linear regression, we investigated associations between PPI use and cognition and brain macro- and microstructural measures (fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) as measures of white matter integrity). Analyses were stratified by short-term (< 3 years) and long-term (≥ 3 years) PPI use, with additional age stratification (< 65 years; ≥65 years) for cognitive outcomes. PPI users, especially younger individuals, showed poorer global cognition and working memory. Notably, younger long-term users had worse total memory. PPI use was not associated with brain volume or FA, but both short-term and long-term users showed higher MD in cognitive-related brain regions. Our findings indicate that prolonged PPI use, particularly in younger long-term users, is associated with poorer cognitive performance. Moreover, PPI users showed higher MD, indicating potential white matter integrity disruptions. Further research is needed to ascertain causality and underlying mechanisms behind PPI-related cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nersi Alaeddin
- Population Health Sciences, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexandra Koch
- Population Health Sciences, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Rika Etteldorf
- Population Health Sciences, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Julia C Stingl
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Monique M B Breteler
- Population Health Sciences, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Folgerdiena M de Vries
- Population Health Sciences, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim SY, Lee KJ. Potential Risks Associated With Long-term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Maintenance Treatment Modality for Patients With Mild Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 30:407-420. [PMID: 39397619 PMCID: PMC11474548 DOI: 10.5056/jnm24059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) significantly affects the health-related quality of life and healthcare costs. The prevalence of this disease is increasing in Asia, leading to a rapid increase in the demand of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Despite effective symptom management during initial treatment, relapse rates after PPI cessation remain high in patients with GERD, warranting longterm maintenance therapy. Concerns regarding potential side effects related to the long-term use of PPIs are escalating with increased usage. Studies have reported diverse side effects of PPIs, such as increased fracture risk, cardiovascular concerns, enteric infections, neurological diseases, and potential associations with gastric cancer. However, definitive causal relationships remain unclear. This review comprehensively summarizes the latest knowledge on the potential risks associated with long-term use of PPIs. Continuous or noncontinuous therapy can be used as a maintenance treatment modality for GERD. For patients with mild GERD, including those with nonerosive and mildly erosive reflux disease, on-demand therapy following a sufficient period of continuous maintenance therapy is recommended as a long-term maintenance treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Jae Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahn N, Wawro N, Baumeister SE, Nolde M, Gerlach R, Tauscher M, Günter A, Güntner F, Rückert-Eheberg IM, Meisinger C, Linseisen J. Time-Varying Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Real-World Analysis from Germany. Drugs Aging 2023:10.1007/s40266-023-01031-7. [PMID: 37178361 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01031-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cumulative evidence of dementia risk in patients taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is still inconclusive, probably due to a variety of study designs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare how the association between dementia risk and use of PPIs differs by different outcome and exposure definitions. METHODS We conceptualized a target trial using claims data with 7,696,127 individuals aged 40 years or older without previous dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria. Dementia was defined as either including or excluding MCI to compare how the results alter by different outcome definitions. We used weighted Cox models to estimate the PPI initiation effect on dementia risk and weighted pooled logistic regression to assess the effect of time-varying use versus non-use during 9 years of study period, including 1 year of wash-out period (2009-2018). The median follow-up time of PPI initiators and non-initiators was 5.4 and 5.8 years, respectively. We also evaluated the association between each PPI agent (omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, esomeprazole, and combined use) and dementia risk. RESULTS A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk. A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk.A total of 105,220 (3.6%) PPI initiators and 74,697 (2.6%) non-initiators were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.05]. The HR for time-varying PPI use versus non-use was 1.85 (1.80-1.90). When MCI was included in the outcome, the number of outcomes increased to 121,922 in PPI initiators and 86,954 in non-initiators, but HRs remained similar, showing 1.04 (1.03-1.05) and 1.82 (1.77-1.86), respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used PPI agent. Although the estimated HRs for the time-varying use effect of each PPI showed different ranges, all agents were associated with an increased dementia risk. CONCLUSION Our large study supports existing evidence that PPI use is related to an increased risk of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayeon Ahn
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Nina Wawro
- Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Nolde
- Institute of Health Services Research in Dentistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Roman Gerlach
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns, KVB), Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Tauscher
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns, KVB), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Christa Meisinger
- Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Linseisen
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ahn N, Nolde M, Krause E, Güntner F, Günter A, Tauscher M, Gerlach R, Meisinger C, Linseisen J, Baumeister SE, Rückert-Eheberg IM. Do proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of dementia? A systematic review, meta-analysis and bias analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:602-616. [PMID: 36331350 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Previous studies on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake and the increased risk of dementia has shown discrepancies in their conclusions. We aimed to provide updated evidence based on extensive bias assessments and quantitative sensitivity analyses. METHODS We searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies that examined an association between PPI use and dementia, up to February 2022. Each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools for non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) or randomized trials (RoB2). Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% prediction intervals were computed using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses were adjusted for small-study bias. RESULTS We included nine observational studies with 204 108 dementia cases in the primary analysis on the association between PPI use vs. non-use and dementia, and the RR was 1.16 (95% CI = 1.00; 1.35). After adjusting for small-study bias by Copas selection model and Rücker's shrinkage procedure, the RR was 1.16 (1.02; 1.32) and 1.15 (1.13; 1.17), respectively. A subgroup analysis of PPI use vs. non-use regarding Alzheimer's disease risk yielded an RR of 1.15 (0.89; 1.50). The secondary analysis on the risk of dementia by use of PPI vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonist showed an RR of 1.03 (0.66; 1.62). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis provided no clear evidence for an association between PPI intake and the risk of dementia. Due to discrepancies in sensitivity analyses, however, some risk of dementia by PPI use cannot be ruled out. Since an unequivocal conclusion is still pending, further research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayeon Ahn
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Nolde
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Evamaria Krause
- Medical Library, Augsburg University Library, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Martin Tauscher
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria, Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns, KVB, Munich, Germany
| | - Roman Gerlach
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria, Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns, KVB, Munich, Germany
| | - Christa Meisinger
- Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Linseisen
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi HG, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim ES, Park HY, Min KW, Kwon MJ. Associations between proton pump inhibitors and Alzheimer’s disease: a nested case–control study using a Korean nationwide health screening cohort. Alzheimers Res Ther 2022; 14:91. [PMID: 35773740 PMCID: PMC9248149 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-022-01032-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Safety concerns against the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) based on the risk of dementia, especially Alzheimer’s disease (AD), remain controversial. Here, we investigated the likelihood of AD depending on previous PPI exposure, use duration, and PPI generation. Methods This nested case–control study comprised 17,225 AD patients who were 1:4 matched with 68,900 controls for age, sex, income, and region of residence from Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort data between 2002 and 2015 using propensity-score matching method. Conditional and unconditional logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the effects of previous PPI use on AD adjusting for multiple covariates. Results Prior PPI use increased likelihood for AD in current and past PPI users (adjusted odds ratio 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26–1.46] and 1.11 [95% CI = 1.04–1.18], respectively). Participants with either < 30 days, 30–90 days, or > 90 days of PPI prescription showed higher odds for AD (1.13 [95% CI = 1.07–1.19]; 1.18 [95% CI = 1.10–1.27]; 1.26 [95% CI = 1.16–1.36], respectively). Participants with either 1st-generation or 2nd-generation PPIs demonstrated higher incidences of AD in those with < 30 days (1.14 [95% CI = 1.07–1.22] and 1.13 [95% CI = 1.05–1.22], respectively), 30–90 days (1.19 [95% CI = 1.09–1.30] and 1.17 [95% CI = 1.05–1.29], respectively), or > 90 days (1.18 [95% CI = 1.07–1.30] and 1.27 [95% CI = 1.14–1.43], respectively) of prescription. Conclusions Prior PPI use, regardless of current or past exposure, duration of use, or use of 1st- or 2nd-generation PPIs, may increase likelihood of AD, providing supportive evidence of previous pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-022-01032-5.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yoon K, Kim JT, Kwack WG, Kim D, Lee KT, Yang S, Lee S, Choi YJ, Chung EK. Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Patients with Dementia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11426. [PMID: 36141699 PMCID: PMC9517486 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize the epidemiology of using potentially inappropriate medications associated with dementia exacerbation (DPIMs) in elderly outpatients with dementia. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for geriatric patients with dementia who were prescribed at least one medication in 2016 at a tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. The 2015 Beers criteria were used to define DPIMs. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with prescribing DPIMs in patients with dementia. Among 2100 patients included in our study, 987 (47.0%) patients were prescribed at least one DPIM. Benzodiazepines were the most frequently prescribed DPIM followed by anticholinergics, histamine H2-receptor blockers, and zolpidem. The risk of prescribing DPIMs was significantly increased in female patients (odds ratio (OR) 1.355) with polypharmacy (OR 5.146) and multiple comorbidities (OR 1.129) (p < 0.05 for all). Coexistence of Parkinson's disease (OR 1.799), mood disorder (OR 1.373), or schizophrenia (OR 4.116) in patients with dementia further increased the likelihood of receiving DPIMs. In conclusion, DPIMs were commonly used in elderly patients with dementia in Korea with benzodiazepines most frequently prescribed followed by anticholinergics. Female patients using polypharmacy with multiple comorbidities should be closely monitored to minimize unnecessary DPIM use and, ultimately, DPIM-related harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungwon Yoon
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Jung-Tae Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Korea
| | - Won-Gun Kwack
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Donghyun Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Kyung-Tae Lee
- Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Seungwon Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, College of Pharmacy, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Sangmin Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, College of Pharmacy, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Yeo-Jin Choi
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, College of Pharmacy, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| | - Eun-Kyoung Chung
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Korea
- Department of Regulatory Science, College of Pharmacy, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahn N, Nolde M, Günter A, Güntner F, Gerlach R, Tauscher M, Amann U, Linseisen J, Meisinger C, Rückert-Eheberg IM, Baumeister SE. Emulating a target trial of proton pump inhibitors and dementia risk using claims data. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1335-1343. [PMID: 35170158 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is important due to their widespread use, but the available evidence for an increased dementia risk among patients taking PPIs is inconclusive. The present study aimed to estimate the causal effect of PPIs on the risk of dementia by target trial emulation and time-varying exposure modeling. METHODS Using claims data of 2,698,176 insured people of a large German statutory health insurer, we conceptualized a target trial in which individuals aged 40 years and older were classified as PPI initiators or non-initiators between 2008 and 2018, and followed until diagnosis of dementia, death, loss to follow-up or end of study. Incidence of dementia (ICD-10 codes F00, F01, F03, F05.1, G30, G31.0, G31.1, G31.9, and F02.8+G31.82) was defined applying a 1-year lag window. We used weighted Cox models to estimate the effect of PPI initiation vs. non-initiation on dementia risk and weighted pooled logistic regression to estimate the effect of time-varying use vs. non-use. RESULTS 29,746 PPI initiators (4.4%) and 26,830 non-initiators (1.3%) were diagnosed with dementia. Comparing PPI initiation with no initiation, the hazard ratio (HR) for dementia was 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-1.58). The HR for time-dependent PPI use vs. non-use was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.50-1.63). Differentiated subtypes, including unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD), showed increased risk by PPI initiation and time-varying PPI use. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that PPI initiation and time-varying PPI use may increase overall dementia risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayeon Ahn
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg at University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Nolde
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg at University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Roman Gerlach
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns, KVB), Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Tauscher
- Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Bavaria (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns, KVB), Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Amann
- Independent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Linseisen
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg at University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.,Independent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Christa Meisinger
- Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg at University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ina-Maria Rückert-Eheberg
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg at University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.,Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|