1
|
Erciyestepe M, Selvi O, Dinç G, Öztürk AE, Aydın O, Dinç Sonuşen Ş, Güneş TK, Avcı T, Vatansever S, Çelik E, Atcı MM. Factors Affecting Recurrence and Survival in Stage IIA Colon Cancer Patients. Oncology 2024; 102:1009-1017. [PMID: 39008971 DOI: 10.1159/000540334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our study delves into the intricate interplay of risk factors and the strategic selection of adjuvant therapy, scrutinizing their influence on recurrence and survival outcomes in stage IIA (T3N0M0) colon cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study examined the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for stage IIA colon cancer. Identification of stage IIA (pT3N0M0) colon cancer involved a comprehensive review of postoperative clinical records and histological reports. Parameters such as demographic data, tumor characteristics, microsatellite instability status, tumor locations, recurrence risk factors, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels, and adjuvant treatments were systematically evaluated. RESULTS In our study involving 220 patients, 138 were male (62.7%), with a median age of 62 years and a median body mass index of 25.1 kg/m2. In the patient group without risk factors, no statistically significant difference was detected in disease-free survival (DFS) rates between those who received treatment and those who did not (p = 0.546). DFS rates of patients with >1 risk factor were statistically significantly lower than those with a single risk factor (p = 0.017). In patients with >1 risk factor, the DFS of those who did not receive adjuvant treatment was significantly lower than those who received adjuvant treatment (p < 0.001). In the patient group with recurrence, when adjuvant treatments were considered, recurrence was significantly higher in the group receiving capecitabine (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION The decision for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA colon cancer patients involves careful consideration of various parameters and risk factors. The evolving landscape of research may refine recommendations, ensuring optimal treatment outcomes while minimizing unnecessary toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mert Erciyestepe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Oğuzhan Selvi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gülhan Dinç
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Emin Öztürk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Okan Aydın
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Şermin Dinç Sonuşen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuğçe Kübra Güneş
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tugay Avcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Sezai Vatansever
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emir Çelik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhammed Mustafa Atcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li C, Zhang D, Pang X, Pu H, Lei M, Fan B, Lv J, You D, Li Z, Zhang T. Trajectories of Perioperative Serum Tumor Markers and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Retrospective, Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort Study. EBioMedicine 2021; 74:103706. [PMID: 34801967 PMCID: PMC8605392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The dynamic monitoring of perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is recommended by current colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines, while the benefits of additional measurements of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) have remained controversial. Methods This retrospective longitudinal cohort included 3539 CRC patients who underwent curative resection. Distinct trajectory groups were identified by the latent class growth mixed model. Patients were grouped into subgroups jointly by CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 according to preoperative levels and longitudinal trajectories, respectively. The end points were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Findings Three distinct trajectory groups were characterized for serum CEA, CA19-9, and CA125: low-stable, early-rising, and later-rising. Jointly, patients were grouped into six preoperative (trajectory) joint groups. Compared with the three-low group, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with death were 1.87 (1.29-2.70), 3.82 (2.37-6.17), 1.87 (0.97-3.61), 2.81 (1.93-4.11), and 4.99 (2.80-8.86) for the CEA-high, CA19-9-high, CA125-high, two-high, and three-high group, respectively. And compared with the three-stable trajectory group, the corresponding HRs (95% CIs) were 1.59 (1.10-2.30), 1.55 (0.77-3.10), 6.25 (4.02-9.70), 4.05 (2.73-6.02), and 12.40 (5.77-26.70) for the five rising trajectory groups, respectively. Similar associations between joint groups and RFS were observed. Notably, the trajectory joint group still had prognostic significance after adjusting for preoperative levels. The CA19-9-high group (HR: 3.82, 95% CI: 2.37-6.17) was associated with higher risk of death than the two-high group (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.93-4.11). Likewise, for the CA125-rising trajectory group and two-rising trajectory group, the HRs (95% CIs) were 6.13 (3.75-10.00) and 3.99 (2.63-6.05) for death, and 3.08 (2.07-4.58) and 2.10 (1.52-2.90) for recurrence. Interpretation In addition to CEA, the dynamic measurements of CA19-9 and CA125 are recommended to monitor the prognosis of CRC patients. Funding National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973147, 82001986, 81960592, 82073569, 81660545].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunxia Li
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China; Institute for Medical Dataology, Shandong University, Jinan, 250002, China
| | - Dafu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China
| | - Xiaolin Pang
- Department of Radiotherapy, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, China
| | - Hongjiang Pu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China
| | - Ming Lei
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China
| | - Bingbing Fan
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China; Institute for Medical Dataology, Shandong University, Jinan, 250002, China
| | - Jiali Lv
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China; Institute for Medical Dataology, Shandong University, Jinan, 250002, China
| | - Dingyun You
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China.
| | - Zhenhui Li
- Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Yunnan Cancer Center, Kunming, 650118, China; Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China; Institute for Medical Dataology, Shandong University, Jinan, 250002, China.
| |
Collapse
|