Prioritizing solutions to incorporate Prosthetics and Orthotics services into Iranian health benefits package: Using an analytic hierarchy process

Applying systems thinking in the prosthetics and orthotics sector: investigating the common challenges in Iran

PURPOSE

We sought to explore the common challenges across stakeholder groups and also to recognize interactions among them to improve the Iranian prosthetics and orthotics (P&O) sector.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Interviews were performed from January to June 2019. Participants, including 13 prosthetists/orthotists and six P&O faculty members, were selected using purposive and snowball sampling. The collected data were analyzed using the framework analysis method. Additionally, a systems thinking approach was applied to theorize potential leverage points to improve P&O services in Iran.

RESULTS

Challenges in leadership and governance included lack of united stewardship, inappropriate inter-sectoral cooperation, and poor awareness among decision-makers. Financing challenges included high out-of-pocket payments, inadequate insurance coverage, and insufficient governmental funding. Service delivery challenges included lack of prosthetists and orthotists in hospitals and medical centers, corrupt activities and a weak referral system. Human resource challenges included insufficient practical skills of graduates, misalignment of theoretical and clinical training, and inadequacy of continuing education courses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the groundwork to develop and implement national strategies to address modifiable barriers and improve prosthetic and orthotic services.Implications for rehabilitationLack of united stewardship, inappropriate inter-sectoral cooperation, and poor awareness among decision-makers are the governance challenges of prosthetics and orthotics (P&O) and must be managed by the government.Government resources allocated to P&O services should increase, and P&O insurance coverage should improve.P&O services should be incorporated in health benefits packages to lessen the reliance on out-of-pocket payments.Planning should be done toward inclusion of P&O services in universal health coverage.Up-to-date scientific training and high-quality evidence are needed to enhance the practical skills of P&O graduates and consequently improve the quality of P&O services.Effective continuing training courses for P&O graduates are recommended.It is advantageous to provide P&O services in hospitals.

Methodological and reporting quality of qualitative evidence in the field of lower limb orthoses: a systematic review

This study aimed to assess the methodological and reporting quality of qualitative studies conducted in the field of lower limb orthoses (LLOs). The following electronic databases were searched from inception to 2022: PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, WoS, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and RehabData. Two authors independently screened and selected the potential studies. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programs qualitative checklist. In addition, the reporting quality of included studies was assessed using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) tool. The mean methodological quality score of included studies was 8 (from min = 2 to max = 9.5), and most of the studies had a score of more than 7.5. However, SRQR findings revealed that the overall reporting quality of included studies was not desirable in that the mean score was about 15.44 (from min = 6 to max = 19.5) out of 21. In total, the methodological quality of qualitative studies published in the field of LLOs was moderate. Further, the adherence of these studies to available reporting guidelines was unsatisfactory. As a result, when designing, performing, and reporting qualitative investigations, authors should pay more attention to these criteria.

The uncertainty related to the inexactitude of prioritization based on consistent pairwise comparisons

When the in/consistency in Pairwise Comparisons (PCs) is taken into consideration as the subarea of the Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) scientific field, it has many repercussions in various types of research areas including different modelling scenarios e.g. reduction of inconsistency during PCs, deriving appropriate consistency thresholds for inconsistent Pairwise Comparison Matrices (PCMs), completing of incomplete PCMs, aggregating of individual PCMs in relation to Group Decision Making (GDM) aspects, and PCMs in/consistency relation to credibility of Priority Vectors (PV) derived from PCMs with the application of various Priorities Deriving Methods (PDMs). The examination objective in the latter area of research is the uncertainty related to the inexactitude of prioritization based on derived PVs. However, only few research studies examine this problem from the perspective of PCM applicability for credible designation of decision maker's (DM) priorities in the way that leads to minimization of the prioritization uncertainty related to possible, and sometimes very probable, ranking fluctuations. This problem constitutes the primary area of interest for this research paper as no research study was thus far identified that examines this problem from the perspective of consistent PCMs. Hence, a research gap was identified. Thus, the objective of this research paper is to fill in this scientific gap. The research findings have serious repercussions in relation to prioritization quality with the application of PCs methodology, mostly in relation to the interpretation and reliability evaluation of prioritization results. Firstly, the research study outcome changes the perspective of the rank reversal phenomenon, which shed new light on many research studies that have been presented in the subject's literature for many decades. Secondly, the research study results throw new light on the discussion concerning the fuzziness of AHP's results. Last but not least, the effect of the research opens the unique opportunity to evaluate the prioritization outcome obtained within the process of consistent PCs from the well-known perspective of statistical hypothesis testing i.e. the probability designation of the chance that accepted ranking results which were considered as correct due to low probability of change may be incorrect, hence they should be rejected, and the probability designation of the chance that rejected ranking results which were considered as incorrect due to high probability of change may be correct and should be accepted. The paramount finding of the research is the fact that consistent PCMs provide PVs, which elements cannot be considered as established, but only approximated within certain confidence intervals estimated with a certain level of probability. As problems related to heuristics can be analyzed only via a computer simulation process, because they cannot be mathematically determined, the problem examined in this research paper is examined via Monte Carlo simulations, appropriately coded and executed with the application of Wolfram's Mathematica Software. It is believed that this research findings should be very important and useful for all decision makers and researchers during their problems' examinations that relate to prioritization processes with the application of PCs methodology.

Healthcare priority-setting criteria and social values in Iran: an investigation of local evidence

INTRODUCTION

Integrating social values into health technology assessment processes is an important component of proper healthcare priority setting. This study aims to identify social values related to healthcare priority setting in Iran.

METHOD

A scoping review was conducted on original studies that investigating social values in the healthcare system in Iran. The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO were searched with no restrictions on time and language. The reported criteria were clustered using Sham's framework of social value analysis in health policy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies published between 2008 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Fourteen of the included studies followed a quantitative approach with different methods to identify criteria, and the remaining seven studies used a qualitative approach. A total of fifty-five criteria were extracted and clustered into necessity, quality, sustainability, and process categories. Only six studies found criteria that were related to processes. Only three studies used public opinions as a source of value identification and eleven studies investigated the weight of criteria. None of the included studies explored the interdependency of the criteria.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that several criteria other than cost per health unit also need to be considered in healthcare priority setting. Previous studies have paid little attention to the social values that underlie priority setting and policy-making processes. To reach consensus on social values related to healthcare priority setting, future researches need to involve broader stakeholders' perspectives as a valuable source of social values in a fair process.

Integrating rehabilitation services into primary health care: policy options for Iran

BACKGROUND

Providing rehabilitation services in primary health care (PHC) is associated with numerous health, social, and economic benefits. Therefore, low and middle-income countries, such as Iran, should benefit from the advantages of integrating rehabilitation services into PHC. We conducted a qualitative study to determine policy solutions that could facilitate the integration of rehabilitation services into Iran's PHC network.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 participants, including health policymakers, rehabilitation managers, faculty members, and rehabilitation practitioners. Purposive and snowball sampling strategies were adopted to recruit participants. The WHO Health System building blocks framework analysis was applied to analyze the collected data.

RESULTS

Participants' perspectives and experiences outlined potential policy options including: (1) stewardship: increasing political support, strengthening the leadership of the rehabilitation sector, and promoting inter-sectoral collaborations; (2) service delivery: increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals, using local volunteers, deploying mobile rehabilitation teams, using telerehabilitation, and improving referral pathways; (3) financing: increasing government funding, preparing a package of rehabilitation services, and using appropriate payment mechanisms; (4) human resources: expanding rehabilitation workforce, training rehabilitation assistants, and enhancing employment and social opportunities; (5) information systems: establishing a comprehensive information system and an effective surveillance system; and (6) technologies: facilitating access to a range of rehabilitation equipment and raw materials, especially for prosthetics and orthotics services.

CONCLUSION

Based on the WHO six building blocks framework, this study identified several policy options for integrating rehabilitation services into the Iranian PHC Network. Some of the policy options include increasing political support, promoting inter-sectoral collaborations, increasing the skills and knowledge of healthcare workers, establishing effective referral pathways, strengthening team-working, and increasing government funding.

Toward good governance for the prosthetics and orthotics sector in Iran: Evidence from a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Prosthetics and orthotics (P&O) services are essential health services whose desired provision is considered as prerequisite to achieving universal health coverage. However, the P&O sector is sometimes not audited and governed, leading to groups that receive and offer the services to face challenges for benefits in Iran.

OBJECTIVES

To identify common challenges of governance for the P&O sector and provide some potential policy recommendations to strengthen it.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative study.

METHODS

This study was conducted using semistructured in-depth interviews with prosthetists and orthotists (n = 13), P&O academicians (n = 6), and healthcare policy-makers (n = 8). The interview guide was also established based on 10 dimensions of the Framework for Governance of Healthcare System.

RESULTS

Challenges identified included no legislation on P&O services, insufficient government support, uninformed policy-makers, and lack of interest by powerful stakeholders. In addition, nontransparent policy-making, inadequate distribution of workforce across the country, and lack of insurance coverage for P&O services were also raised as other challenges. The respondents identified the need for clear legislation to inform policy-makers and to seek advocacy from the government.

CONCLUSIONS

The governance of the P&O sector in Iran has faced with a number of challenges that have made it unable to respond to existing demands desirably. Hence, it is important and necessary to adopt effective and comprehensive policies to reduce current challenges and barriers and improve the governance for P&O services.