Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion: Single center experience of procedural characteristics, hemodynamic response, complications, and postoperative recovery

Anesthesia-specific Protocol for Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Procedures

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) procedures are being increasingly utilized to treat metastatic liver disease from uveal melanoma. The authors' institution has more than 15 years of experience with over 200 PHP procedures performed, far surpassing any other center in the United States. The anesthetic safety profile for PHP procedures is favorable and begins with preoperative patient evaluation and optimization. Intraoperative anesthetic management can be challenging, with extreme fluctuations seen in blood pressure and heart rate associated with direct hepatic artery chemotherapy delivery and the venovenous bypass circuit. Patients often need maximal doses of vasopressors for a short time period to treat these hemodynamic disturbances. Postoperatively, patients require a variety of blood products to resolve coagulopathy and may need diuretics to treat fluid overload. Anesthesia- and procedure-associated complications are rare and include anaphylaxis, arrhythmias, cardiac ischemia, pulmonary edema, and bleeding. PHP procedures are generally well-tolerated, and an anesthesia-specific protocol is imperative for their success.

Effects of Protamine Reversal on Coagulation Parameters After High-Dose Heparin Administration in Percutaneous Hepatic Chemosaturation Intervention

BACKGROUND

Intravenous protamine administration for heparin reversal after percutaneous hepatic chemosaturation intervention is generally recommended, but its effectiveness on coagulation parameters remains unclear.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective observational study, the effects of different postinterventional protamine doses on the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, platelet count (PLT), and hemoglobin (Hb) were analyzed in consecutive patients who underwent high-dose heparin administration (>300 U/kg body weight) and extracorporeal circulation for chemosaturation treatment. Due to the multiple treatments of individual patients, linear mixed-effects models were applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent 90 chemosaturation interventions, 68 (75.6%) of which involved heparin reversal with protamine. All investigated variables showed significant postinterventional alterations, while protamine use was associated with significantly lower aPTT, lower INR, higher PT, and higher fibrinogen levels, whereas PLT and Hb levels were comparable to those in procedures without protamine use. After adjustment for aPTT, significant independent effects of protamine remained for the INR and PT. Dose-dependent effects of protamine were observed for reductions in aPTT and an increase in fibrinogen levels, which were confirmed after adjustment for the heparin dose. A 10% higher protamine dose resulted in a 3% decrease in aPTT and a 4% increase in fibrinogen. An increase of 0.1 in the protamine-to-heparin ratio was associated with an increase of 9% in fibrinogen.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that protamine contributes to the normalization of the aPTT, INR, PT, and fibrinogen levels. Further prospective studies should be conducted to determine optimal dosing ratios.

Correction: Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion: Single center experience of procedural characteristics, hemodynamic response, complications, and postoperative recovery

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254817.].

Peri-Interventional Hemodynamic Management Strategies for Percutaneous Chemosaturation of the Liver in Metastatic Cancer

Background: Hepatic chemosaturation for inoperable liver tumors is a palliative treatment option with a beneficial effect on survival. However, the procedure regularly leads to circulatory failure during the filtration phase, and hemodynamic management is challenging. Our study aimed to compare two different strategies for hemodynamic management during chemosaturation to develop hypotheses for improving patient care and reducing peri-interventional morbidity. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including 66 procedures of chemosaturation between May 2016 and March 2024. Procedures were divided into two groups: group 1 was managed with norepinephrine as the only vasopressor and liberal use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES). Group 2 was managed with norepinephrine and vasopressin and the preferred use of balanced crystalloids. We compared these two groups with respect to hemodynamic parameters, laboratory values, and post-interventional complications. Results: The heart rate was highest and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lowest during the filtration phase in both groups (p = 0.868, p = 0.270). The vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) was significantly higher in group 2 during the filtration phase (31.5 vs. 89, p < 0.001). Group 1 received significantly more HES overall (1000 mL vs. 0 mL, p < 0.001). Lactate levels at admission to the ICU were higher in group 1 (22.9 vs. 14.45 mg/dL, p = 0.041). Platelet counts were lower in group 2 from directly after chemosaturation through day 2 (p = 0.022, p = 0.001, p = 0.032). The INR differed significantly directly after chemosaturation (1.13 vs. 1.26, p = 0.015). Overall, group 1 received significantly more blood products peri-interventionally. There were two bleedings and one ischemic stroke in the overall cohort. There was no peri-interventional mortality. Conclusions: Advanced hemodynamic management ensures low peri-interventional mortality and morbidity. High-dose vasopressors, including vasopressin and the preferred use of balanced crystalloids, are sufficient to stabilize circulatory function during chemosaturation.

Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Bleeding Complications and Prolonged Intensive Care after Percutaneous Hepatic Chemosaturation Procedures with Melphalan

Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion (chemosaturation) in patients with liver metastases is known to be associated with procedure-related hemodynamic depression and coagulation impairment, which may cause bleeding complications and/or a prolonged intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS). We retrospectively analyzed possible predictive factors for bleeding complications and an ICU LOS > 1 d in a cohort of 31 patients undergoing 90 chemosaturation procedures. Using a multivariable mixed-model approach, we identified the amount of perioperative fluid volume (OR 12.0, 95% CI 2.3-60.0, p = 0.003) and protamine (OR 0.065, 95% CI 0.007-0.55, p = 0.012) to be associated with bleeding complications. Furthermore, the amount of perioperative fluid volume was associated with an ICU LOS > 1 d (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4-19.0, p = 0.011). Heparin dosage, melphalan dosage, extracorporeal circulation time, and noradrenaline dosage had no significant effects on outcomes. Protamine use was not associated with anaphylactic or thromboembolic complications. Despite the limited sample size, these results suggest a restrictive perioperative fluid regime to be beneficial, and support the use of protamine for heparin reversal after chemosaturation procedures. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Heparin reversal with protamine sulfate after Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP): is less more?

PURPOSE

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a palliative intraarterial therapy for unresectable hepatic malignancies. During PHP, high-dose melphalan is infused via the hepatic artery to saturate tumor in the liver with the chemotherapeutic substance. The venous hepatic blood is filtered by an extracorporeal melphalan specific filtration system. Blood clotting in the extracorporeal filter system is prevented by administering unfractionated heparin (UFH) in high doses, which might be reversed with protamine sulfate after the procedure. Aim of this retrospective two-center-study was to analyze the potential effect of UFH reversal with protamine sulfate on complication rates following PHP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients receiving PHP treatment between 10/2014 and 04/2021 were classified according to their intraprocedural coagulation management: 92 patients/192 PHP received full UFH reversal with protamine (group_PROTAMINE); 13 patients/21 PHP in group_{REDUCED_PROTAMINE} received a reduced amount of protamine, and 28 patients/43 PHP did not receive UFH reversal with protamine (group_{NO_PROTAMINE}). Periinterventional clinical reports, findings and laboratory values were retrospectively evaluated. Complications and adverse events were classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEv5.0).

RESULTS

Thromboembolic events were recorded after 10 PHP procedures (5%) in group_PROTAMINE, six of which (3%) were major events (CTCAE grade 3-5). No (0%) thromboembolic events were recorded in group_{REDUCED_PROTAMINE} and group_{NO_PROTAMINE}. Hemorrhagic events were registered after 24 PHP (13%) in group_PROTAMINE, two of which (1%) were major (CTCAE grade 3-4). In group_{REDUCED_PROTAMINE}, only minor bleeding events were recorded, and one major hemorrhagic event was documented in group_{NO_PROTAMINE} (2%). There was a significant difference between the percentage of post-interventional thrombopenia in group_PROTAMINE (39%) and group_{REDUCED_PROTAMINE} (14%) versus group_{NO_PROTAMINE} (23%) (p=.00024). In group_PROTAMINE one patient suffered from a severe anaphylactic shock after the administration of protamine.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective study implies that there might be a link between the practice of protamine sulfate administration to reverse the full hemodilutive effect of UFH after PHP and the post-interventional risk of thromboembolic events as well as clinically significant thrombopenia. Our data suggest that the standard use of protamine sulfate after PHP in low-risk patients without clinical signs of active bleeding should be critically re-evaluated.

Regional chemotherapy for uveal melanoma liver metastases

Chemotherapy remains an important approach for the treatment of liver metastases from uveal melanoma (UM). Compared with systemic chemotherapy, regional chemotherapy has similar efficacy and fewer systemic adverse effects. Regional chemotherapy for UM liver metastases includes hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP). In this review, we aim to examine the efficacy of regional chemotherapy and compare HAI, TACE, and IHP in terms of overall survival (OS). The three approaches showed no obvious difference in OS results.

New perspectives in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma? Evaluation of chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion as a palliative treatment option

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are the second most common primary liver tumors and carry a dismal prognosis. Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a palliative, intra-arterial therapeutic approach that provides a high dose chemotherapy of the liver with reduced systemic exposure. Aim of this retrospective, monocentric study was to analyze PHP as a palliative treatment for unresectable CCA. Toxicity, adverse events and complications were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1). Median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and hepatic mPFS (mhPFS) were computed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. In total 17 patients were treated with 42 PHP between 10/2014 and 09/2020. No significant complications occurred during the interventions. mOS was 27.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 16.5-37) months from first diagnosis and 9.9 (IQR 3.8-21) months from first PHP. mPFS was 4 (IQR 2-7) and mhPFS was 4 (IQR 3-10) months. ORR was 25% and DCR 75%. Significant, but transient hematotoxicity was frequent with grade 3/4 thrombopenia after 50%, leukopenia after 26% and anaemia after 21% of the interventions. An increase of transaminases (AST increase after 21% and ALT increase after 14% of the PHP) developed more often than a deterioration of the liver synthesis capacity. Salvage treatment with PHP has the potential to prolong life in selected patients with unresectable, refractory cholangiocarcinoma. The interventional procedure is safe. Post-interventional toxicity is frequent but manageable.

[Anesthesiological and postinterventional management in percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion (chemosaturation)]

Percutaneous hepatic melphalan perfusion (PHMP) is a last-line treatment of inoperable primary or secondary liver tumors. Selective perfusion and saturation (chemosaturation) of the liver with the chemotherapeutic agent melphalan is performed via catheterization of the hepatic artery without affecting the rest of the body with its cytotoxic properties. Using an extracorporeal circulation and balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava, the venous hepatic blood is filtered and returned using a bypass procedure. During the procedure, considerable circulatory depression and coagulopathy are frequent. The purpose of this article is to review the anesthesiological and postprocedural management of patients undergoing PHMP with consideration of the pitfalls and special circumstances.

Chemosaturation of the Liver - an Update

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) is a treatment option for primary and secondary liver neoplasms and subject of intensive research. This present article provides an overview of CS-PHP regarding patient safety, feasibility and effectiveness based on recent studies.

METHOD

We performed a PubMed search including the search terms chemosaturation, hepatic chemosaturation, percutaneous perfusion and melphalan.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

CS-PHP is a promising procedure for the treatment of uveal melanoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma. There are insufficient data regarding the effectiveness of CS-PHP with respect to other tumor entities. Since CS-PHP can be accompanied by multiple transient side effects and complications, close interdisciplinary cooperation is necessary.

KEY POINTS

· Chemosaturation of the liver is a safe procedure.. · CS-PHP is a potent therapy for hepatic metastatic ocular melanoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma.. · The procedure requires close interdisciplinary coordination.. · CS-PHP is a repeatable and thus long-term therapeutic option for some patients..

CITATION FORMAT

· Ebel S, Struck MF, van Boemmel F et al. Chemosaturation of the Liver - an Update. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 30 - 37.

Analysis of patient’s X-ray exposure in hepatic chemosaturation procedures: a single center experience

Background

Hepatic chemosaturation is a technique in which a high dose of the chemotherapeutic agent melphalan is administered directly into the liver while limiting systemic side effects. We reviewed our institutional experience regarding patient’s X-ray exposure caused by the procedure.

Methods

Fifty-five procedures, performed between 2016 and 2020 in 18 patients by three interventional radiologists (radiologist), were analyzed regarding the patient’s exposure to radiation. Dose-area-product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were correlated with the experience of the radiologist and whether the preprocedural evaluation (CS-EVA) and the procedure were performed by the same radiologist. Additionally, the impact of previous liver surgery on DAP/FT was analyzed.

Results

Experienced radiologist require less DAP/FT (50 ± 18 Gy*cm²/13.2 ± 3.84 min vs. 69 ± 20 Gy*cm²/15.77 ± 7.82 min; p < 0.001). Chemosaturations performed by the same radiologist who performed CS-EVA required less DAP/FT (41 ± 12 Gy*cm²/11.46 ± 4.41 min vs. 62 ± 11 Gy*cm²/15.55 ± 7.91 min; p < 0.001). Chemosaturations in patients with prior liver surgery with involvement of the inferior cava vein required significantly higher DAP/FT (153 ± 27 Gy*cm²/25.43 ± 4.57 min vs. 56 ± 25 Gy*cm²/14.44 ± 7.55 min; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

There is a significant learning curve regarding the procedure of hepatic chemosaturation. Due to dose reduction the evaluation and chemosaturation therapy should be performed by the same radiologist. Procedures in patients with previous liver surgery require higher DAP/FT.

Thrombotischer Verschluss der extrakorporalen Zirkulation während hepatischer Chemosaturation trotz zielgerechter Antikoagulation

Die perkutane hepatische Chemosaturation ist eine Behandlungsoption bei nichtresektablen primären oder sekundären Lebertumoren. Dabei wird der Bereich der Lebervenenmündung der Vena cava inferior (VCI) mittels 2 Ballons von der Zirkulation isoliert, sodass die systemische Verteilung des über die Leberarterie applizierten Chemotherapeutikums Melphalan verhindert wird. Nach Passage der Leber und venöser Drainage aus der retrohepatischen VCI durchläuft das chemosaturierte Blut 2 parallel geschaltete extrakorporale Filter. Anschließend wird das gereinigte Blut jugulär rückgeführt. Das Verfahren geht oft mit einer ausgeprägten hämodynamischen Instabilität einher, deren Ursache nicht abschließend geklärt ist. Zusätzlich stellt das Gerinnungsmanagement eine Herausforderung dar. Die Autoren berichten von einem Fall, bei dem sich trotz ausreichender „activated clotting time“ (ACT) ein Thrombus im rückführenden Schenkel der extrakorporalen Zirkulation bildete. Gezielte Problemsuche und -lösung waren parallel zur hämodynamischen Stabilisierung und interdisziplinären Zusammenarbeit notwendig, um die Intervention erfolgreich durchzuführen und der Patientin eine sichere Therapie zukommen zu lassen.

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) with Melphalan in Liver-Dominant Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: The German Experience

Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) delivers high-dose melphalan to the liver while minimizing systemic toxicity via filtration of the venous hepatic blood. This two-center study aimed to examine the safety, response to therapy, and survival of patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) treated with PHP. A total of 66 patients with liver-dominant metastasized uveal melanoma, treated with 145 PHP between April 2014 and May 2020, were retrospectively analyzed with regard to adverse events (AEs; CTCAE v5.0), response (overall response rate (ORR)), and disease control rate (DCR) according to RECIST1.1, as well as progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). With an ORR of 59% and a DCR of 93.4%, the response was encouraging. After initial PHP, median hepatic PFS was 12.4 (confidence interval (CI) 4–18.4) months and median OS was 18.4 (CI 7–24.6) months. Hematologic toxicity was the most frequent AE (grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia after 24.8% of the procedures); less frequent was grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicity (increased aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) after 7.6% and 6.9% of the interventions, respectively). Cardiovascular events included four cases of ischemic stroke (2.8%) and one patient with central pulmonary embolism (0.7%). In conclusion, PHP is a safe and effective salvage treatment for liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma. Serious AEs—though rare—demand careful patient selection.