Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting

Exploring Canadian genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with discussing medical assistance in dying (MAiD)

Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) is the Canadian equivalent of Physician aid-in-dying (PAD) in the United States. Through changes to the eligibility criteria for MAiD in 2021, Canada now has one of the most permissive assisted dying regimens in the world. This study describes Canadian genetic counselors' experiences, knowledge, and preparedness to discuss MAiD with their patients. Survey responses were collected from Canadian genetic counselors (n = 44) and were followed by semi-structured interviews with 14 survey participants. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview transcripts were analyzed using phronetic iterative analysis and an interpretive description approach. Survey data revealed that genetic counselors have discussed MAiD with patients referred for cancer, neurologic, metabolic, connective tissue, and cardiac indications (n = 18, 40.9%). While most thought that it was important for genetic counselors to be knowledgeable of (n = 41, 93.2%) and prepared to discuss MAiD (n = 43, 97.7%), many were not familiar with the eligibility criteria (n = 27, 61.4%) and the process for accessing MAiD in Canada (n = 29, 65.9%). Interview participants described discussions about MAiD that were initiated by themselves or their patients. Most participants felt prepared to explore a patient's thoughts about MAiD when the patient initiated the discussion but did not feel well-prepared to share detailed information about MAiD. Participants were interested in education and professional guidance to assist them in preparing to discuss MAiD. Learning objectives were developed based on participants' suggestions to assist genetic counselors in their clinical work and self-directed research and to aid in the development of professional guidelines and educational materials for practicing genetic counselors and genetic counseling trainees. As genetic counselors continue engaging in discussions about MAiD, it is critical that these sensitive conversations are approached with increased knowledge and awareness of MAiD legislation, the ethical issues surrounding MAiD in Canada, and relevant patient resources.

Using facial expressions instead of response keys in the implicit association test

Previous research found that when people are instructed to smile toward liked objects and show negative facial expressions toward disliked objects, their facial response is faster and more intense than when they are required to smile toward disliked objects and express negative facial response toward liked objects. The present research tested a technologically innovative indirect evaluation measure that was based on that finding. Participants completed an implicit association test (IAT)-a common indirect measure of evaluation, responding with their emotional facial expressions, rather than by pressing response keys. In two web studies, using emotional facial expression detection through a webcam, we found that the Facial Response IAT (FR-IAT) is a reliable and valid measure of evaluations, comparable to the keyboard IAT. Because facial responses provide more information than key responses, pursuing future improvements of the FR-IAT's methodology, software, and data analysis is a promising direction for enhancing the quality of indirect evaluation measurement. The same methodology and technology may also enhance other indirect measures of evaluation and cognitive tests related to emotion and judgment.

Project Inclusive Genetics: Protecting reproductive autonomy from bias via prenatal patient-centered counseling

Clinician bias negatively impacts the healthcare received by marginalized communities. In this study, we explored factors that influence clinician and trainee bias against individuals with intellectual disabilities and its impact on clinical judgment in prenatal genetic testing settings. Specifically, we examined bias toward a fetus with a higher chance of developing a disability. We compared genetics specialists with their non-expert counterparts. This web-based study included clinical vignettes, implicit association tests (IATs), and an educational module. 595 participants were recruited via their institution or professional society. We conducted statistical analyses, including regression models controlling for key demographic characteristics, to analyze recommendation patterns and degree of change after the module. Genetics expertise strongly correlated with appropriate testing recommendation when the patient would not consider pregnancy termination (r = 1.784 pre-module, r = 1.502 post-module, p < 0.01). Factors that influenced pre-module recommendation to test include increased age (r = -0.029, p < 0.05), high religiosity (r = 0.525, p < 0.05), and participant personal preference against testing (r = 1.112, p < 0.01). Responses among participants without genetics expertise improved after the educational module (Z = -4.435, p < 0.01). 42% of non-experts who answered inappropriately changed their answer to match guidelines after the module. Individual bias, along with structural and institutional bias, permeates family planning encounters and significantly decreases quality of care. We demonstrate here that anti-bias training is effective, particularly for non-expert providers, and it can improve the care provided to individuals with intellectual disability. Evidence-based training such as this one can help providers make appropriate genetic counseling recommendations.

Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Unconscious biases are one of the causes of health disparities. Health professionals have prejudices against patients due to their race, gender, or other factors without their conscious knowledge. This review aimed to provide an overview of research on unconscious bias among health professionals and to investigate the biases that exist in different regions of the world, the health professions that are considered, and the research gaps that still exist.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review by systematically searching PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and AMED. All records were double-screened and included if they were published between 2011 and 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 5186 records were found. After removing duplicates (n = 300), screening titles and abstracts (n = 4210), and full-text screening (n = 695), 87 articles from 81 studies remained. Studies originated from North America (n = 60), Europe (n = 13), and the rest of the world (n = 6), and two studies were of global scope. Racial bias was investigated most frequently (n = 46), followed by gender bias (n = 11), weight bias (n = 10), socio-economic status bias (n = 9), and mental illness bias (n = 7). Most of the studies were conducted by physicians (n = 51) and nurses (n = 20). Other health care professionals were rarely included in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies show that health professionals have an implicit bias. Racial biases among physicians and nurses in the USA are well confirmed. Research is missing on other biases from other regions and other health professions.