Standardization of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score in a French population

[Management of hepatic encephalopathy: A general review]

Hepatic encephalopathy is a severe complication with high mortality in patients with hepatopathy and/or portosystemic shunts, partly due to the presence of hyperammonemia because of defective hepatic detoxification. Diagnosis is essentially clinical, characterized by various neuropsychiatric symptoms, possibly associated with hyperammonemia. Complementary tests, such as electroencephalogram to identify metabolic encephalopathy, or specific abnormalities on cerebral magnetic resonance imagery, may also support the diagnosis. Management is essentially based on treatment of triggering factors such as ionic disorders or sepsis, and symptomatic therapy with non-absorbable disaccharides (notably lactulose) or polyethylene glycol, possibly combined with rifaximin. Progression varies according to the initial severity and management of hepatic encephalopathy, but this condition is potentially reversible with treatment.

Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) - when, how, why, and why not: a guide for the unfamiliar

Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) has established itself as one of the most used tests for detecting minimal hepatic encephalopathy. To use it in a certain population one needs to determine what the norms are, and have a proper set of inclusion and especially exclusion criteria. When performing the test (either for validating or as a search tool) authors may benefit from a little guidance. All the 5 tests - DST (Digital Symbol test), Number Connection Test A (NCT A), Number Connection Test B (NCT B), Serial Dotting Test (SDT), Line Drawing Test (LDT) - have certain parameters to follow. In time, deviations have appeared, and comparability between different samples has become somehow limited. As new tests are emerging, and in order to compare, one must be familiar with the tests' variants, benefits, and limitations.

Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of hepatic encephalopathy: A multicentre study

Background & Aims

Data on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are conflicting, and data from multicentre studies are scarce. The aim of this study was to dissect the potential association between PPI use and minimal (MHE) and overt HE (OHE).

Methods

Data from patients with cirrhosis recruited at seven centres across Europe and the US were analysed. MHE was defined by the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). PPI use was recorded on the day of testing with PHES. Patients were followed for OHE development and death/liver transplantation.

Results

A total of 1,160 patients with a median MELD of 11 were included (Child-Pugh stages: A 49%/B 39%/C 11%). PPI use was noted in 58% of patients. Median follow-up time was 18.1 months, during which 230 (20%) developed an OHE episode, and 224 (19%) reached the composite endpoint of death/liver transplantation. In multivariable analyses, PPI use was neither associated with the presence of MHE at baseline nor OHE development during follow-up. These findings were consistent in subgroup analyses of patients with Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis and after excluding patients with a history of OHE. PPI use was also not associated with a higher risk of OHE, neither in patients with an indication for treatment nor in patients without an indication.

Conclusions

PPI use is not associated with a higher risk of HE in patients with cirrhosis. Based on these findings, at present, a prescription should not be prohibited in case of a generally accepted indication.

Impact and implications

Data on the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are conflicting. In this study, PPI use was not associated with a higher risk of minimal HE at baseline or overt HE during follow-up in patients with cirrhosis. Based on these findings, prescription of a PPI for a generally accepted indication should not be prohibited in patients with cirrhosis.

PHES scores have limited impact on the risk of overt HE in patients with minimal HE

BACKGROUND

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy, defined by the portosystemic hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), is associated with a higher risk of subsequent OHE. It remains unclear if there is a stepwise increase in OHE risk with worse PHES results.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy, as defined by abnormal PHES, were followed for OHE development.

RESULTS

In all, 207 patients were included. There was no stepwise increase in OHE risk with worse PHES results.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal PHES is associated with a higher OHE risk, but we found no stepwise increase in OHE risk with worse PHES results below the established cutoff.

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy is associated with a higher risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy and poorer survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is a frequent complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Its impact on predicting the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and survival has not been studied in large multicenter studies.

METHODS

Data from patients recruited at eight centers across Europe and the United States were analyzed. MHE was detected using the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). A subset was also tested with the simplified animal naming test (S-ANT1). Patients were followed for OHE development and death/liver transplantation (LTx).

RESULTS

A total of 1462 patients with a median model of end-stage liver disease of 11 were included (Child-Pugh (CP) stages: A 47%/B 41%/C 12%). Median follow-up time was 19 months, during which 336 (23%) patients developed an OHE episode and 464 (32%) reached the composite end point of death/LTx (369 deaths, 95 LTx). In multivariable analyses, MHE (defined by PHES) was associated with the development of OHE (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.74, p < 0.001) and poorer LTx-free survival (hazard ratio 1.53, p < 0.001) in the total cohort as well as in the subgroup of patients without a history of OHE. In subgroup analyses, MHE (defined by PHES) was associated with OHE development in patients with CP B, whereas there was no association in patients with CP A or C. In the subgroup of patients with available S-ANT1, MHE (defined by S-ANT1) was independently associated with OHE development. Combined testing (PHES+S-ANT1) was superior to single testing for predicting OHE and poorer LTx-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This large multicenter study demonstrates that screening for MHE is a useful tool for predicting OHE and poorer survival.

Prevalence of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE), in particular in different subgroups, remains unknown. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of MHE in different subgroups to identify patients at high risk and to pave the way for personalized screening approaches.

METHODS

In this study, data of patients recruited at 10 centers across Europe and the United States were analyzed. Only patients without clinical signs of hepatic encephalopathy were included. MHE was detected using the Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score (PHES, cut-off < or ≤-4 depending on local norms). Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were assessed and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,868 patients with cirrhosis with a median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) of 11 were analyzed (Child-Pugh [CP] stages: A 46%, B 42%, and C 12%). In the total cohort, MHE was detected by PHES in 650 patients (35%). After excluding patients with a history of overt hepatic encephalopathy, the prevalence of MHE was 29%. In subgroup analyses, the prevalence of MHE in patients with CP A was low (25%), whereas it was high in CP B or C (42% and 52%). In patients with a MELD score <10, the prevalence of MHE was only 25%, but it was 48% in patients with a MELD score ≥20. Standardized ammonia levels (ammonia level/upper limit of normal of each center) correlated significantly, albeit weakly with PHES (Spearman ρ = -0.16, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of MHE in patients with cirrhosis was high but varied substantially between diseases stages. These data may pave the way for more individualized MHE screening approaches.

Diagnosis and management of hepatic encephalopathy: The French recommendations

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent and severe complication of liver disease with poor patient outcomes. However, it is a poorly understood complication, with no consensus for diagnosis. Therefore, HE is often underdiagnosed. Differential diagnosis may be cumbersome because of non-specific symptoms, such as confusion, cognitive disorders, the aetiological factors of cirrhosis and comorbidities, which are often observed in cirrhotic patients. Therefore, an overt or covert form of HE should be systematically investigated. Advice is provided to drive patient work-up. Effective treatments are available to prevent or treat HE bouts, but the issue of single or combination therapy has not been resolved. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement largely improved the prognosis of cirrhotic patients, but HE occurrence of HE is often a fear, even when post-TIPS HE can be avoided by a careful selection of patients and preventive treatment. HE is an indication of liver transplantation. However, its reversibility post-transplantation and the consequences of transplantation in patients with other causes of neurological disorders remain controversial, which supports the performance of an extensive work-up in expert centres for this subset of patients. The present guidelines assist clinicians in the diagnosis of the overt or covert form of HE to implement curative and preventive treatments and clarify which patients require referral to expert centres for consideration for liver transplantation. These guidelines are very clinically oriented and address different frequent clinical issues to help physicians make bedside decisions.

Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy Score for the Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy in Thai Cirrhotic Patients

The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is the gold standard for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). Screening for MHE is frequently overlooked in clinical practice due to time constraints. Furthermore, the simplified animal naming test (S-ANT1) is a new simple tool for evaluating MHE in cirrhotic patients. The purpose of this study was to standardize the PHES in a healthy Thai population, assess the prevalence of MHE, and validate the S-ANT1 in detecting MHE in patients with cirrhosis. The study included 194 healthy controls and 203 cirrhotic patients without overt HE. Psychometric tests and the S-ANT1 were administered to all participants. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze factors related to PHES results, and formulas were developed to predict the results for each PHES subtest. In healthy controls, age and education were predictors of all five subtests. The PHES of the control group was −0.26 ± 2.28 points, and the threshold for detecting MHE was set at ≤ −5 points. The cirrhotic group had PHES values of −2.6 ± 3.1 points. Moreover, MHE was found to be present in 26.6% of cirrhotic patients. S-ANT1 had a moderate positive correlation with PHES (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). S-ANT1 < 22 named animals detected MHE with a sensitivity of 71.2%, specificity of 65%, and area under the receiver operating curve of 0.68 (p < 0.001). In conclusion, Thai PHES normative data have been developed to detect MHE in cirrhotic patients who do not have overt HE. The optimal cutoff for detecting MHE in Thai cirrhotic patients was PHES ≤ −5 points and S-ANT1 < 22 named.

The Prevalence and Association of Cognitive Impairment with Sleep Disturbances in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Introduction/Aim. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of cognitive impairments and their association with sleep patterns in a cohort of patients diagnosed with chronic liver disease (CLD). Material and methods. The present paper is a prospective cohort study, carried out over a period of 12 months, among patients with various stages of CLD. We evaluated the cognitive function through psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES), while sleep was assessed by actigraphy and two self-reported questionnaires: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results. Seventy-four patients with CLD were considered eligible and were enrolled between December 2020−November 2021. The prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) in the entire cohort was 41.9%, and the diagnosis was considered for PHES scores ≤ −3. Patients with cirrhosis recorded significantly lower PHES scores compared to patients with other CLDs but without cirrhosis (−3.19 ± 3.89 vs. 0.19 ± 2.92, p < 0.05). Patients who exhibited MHE suffered from poor sleep, daytime somnolence, disturbed nighttime sleep, and low overall sleep efficacy. Patients diagnosed with MHE and undergoing treatment with lactulose and/or rifaximin for prevention of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) showed better results in terms of sleep parameters compared to patients diagnosed with MHE but without treatment. Conclusions. This research increases awareness regarding the connection between sleep features and MHE in patients with cirrhosis and other CLDs. A deeper insight into the subclinical stages of HE and associated sleep disturbances is warranted in future studies.