Utilizing the SEIPS model to guide hand hygiene interventions at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia

What we learned from the COVID-19 infection control and what we need in the future, a quantitative and qualitative study on hospital infection prevention and control practitioners (HIPCPs) in Tianjin, China

BACKGROUND

In December 2022, the epidemic prevention and control policy was upgraded and China came to a different stage of epidemic control. There have been no studies from the perspective of infection prevention and control practitioners (HIPCP) about the historic surge.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the needs of the healthcare system during the epidemic and to identify implications for better healthcare supply and infection control in the future.

METHODS

A longitudinal quantitative and qualitative study was performed based on two comprehensive questionnaire surveys among 497 HIPCPs before and during the epidemic peak in Tianjin, China.

RESULTS

The workload (8.2 hours vs 10.14 hours, P = 0) and self-reported mental health problems (23.5% vs. 61.8%, P < 0.05) among the HIPCPs increased significantly in the peak period. Ward reconstruction and resource coordination were the most needed jobs in hospital infection control, and rapidly increased medical waste during the epidemic needs to be considered in advance. Community support for healthcare personnel and their families, maintaining full PPE to reduce simultaneous infection of medical staff, and clinical training of infectious diseases for medical staff, especially doctors in advance are the most important things we learned.

CONCLUSION

Although it has been four years since the first outbreak of COVID-19, more improvements should be made to prepare for the next wave of COVID-19 or other diseases.

Delivery Room Resuscitation of Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Lessons Learned through Video Review

INTRODUCTION

Delivery room (DR) interventions for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are not well described. This study sought to describe timing and order of DR interventions and identify system factors impacting CDH DR resuscitations using a human factors framework.

METHODS

Single center observational study of video recorded CDH DR resuscitations documenting timing and order of interventions. The team used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to identify system factors impacting DR resuscitations and time to invasive ventilation.

RESULTS

We analyzed 31 video recorded CDH resuscitations. We observed variability in timing and order of resuscitation tasks. The 'Internal Environment' and 'Tasks' components of the SEIPS model were prominent factors affecting resuscitation efficiency; significant room and bed spatial constraints exist, and nurses have a significant task burden. Additionally, endotracheal tube preparation was a prominent barrier to timely invasive ventilation.

CONCLUSION

Video review revealed variation in event timing and order during CDH resuscitations. Standardization of room set-up, equipment, and event order and reallocation of tasks facilitate more efficient intubation and ventilation, representing targets for CDH DR improvement initiatives. This work emphasizes the utility of rigorous human factors review to identify areas for improvement during DR resuscitation.

Application of a Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach to Explore Care Transitions of Sepsis Survivors From Hospital to Home Health Care

STUDY AIM

This study aims to describe the transition-in-care work process for sepsis survivors going from hospitals to home health care (HHC) and identify facilitators and barriers to enable practice change and safe care transitions using a human factors and systems engineering approach.

BACKGROUND

Despite high readmission risk for sepsis survivors, the transition-in-care work process from hospitals to HHC has not been described.

METHODS

We analyzed semi-structured needs assessment interviews with 24 stakeholders involved in transitioning sepsis survivors from two hospitals and one affiliated HHC agency participating in the parent implementation science study, I-TRANSFER. The qualitative data analysis was guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to describe the work process and identify work system elements.

RESULTS

We identified 31 tasks characterized as decision making, patient education, communication, information, documentation, and scheduling tasks. Technological and organizational facilitators lacked in HHC compared to the hospitals. Person and organization elements in HHC had the most barriers but few facilitators. Additionally, we identified specific task barriers that could hinder sepsis information transfer from hospitals to HHC.

CONCLUSION

This study explored the complex transition-in-care work processes for sepsis survivors going from hospitals to HHC. We identified barriers, facilitators, and critical areas for improvement to enable implementation and ensure safe care transitions. A key finding was the sepsis information transfer deficit, highlighting a critical issue for future study.

APPLICATION

We recommend using the SEIPS framework to explore complex healthcare work processes before the implementation of evidence-based interventions.