Superiority of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate over entecavir for serum HBsAg level reduction in patients with chronic HBV infection: A 144-week outcome study after switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog

Switching from combination therapy with entecavir hydrate plus tenofovir alafenamide fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B based on nucleotide sequences of hepatitis B virus pregenome RNA

AIM

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection experiencing viral breakthrough (BTH) or partial response (PR) during lamivudine (LAM) or entecavir hydrate (ETV) administration often took ETV plus tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) due to the emergence of a drug-resistance mutation. However, in patients lacking drug-resistance mutation against TAF, sufficient antiviral effects may be achievable with TAF monotherapy. We assessed the drug-resistance profile through nucleotide sequences of HBV pregenome RNA, and subsequently changed to TAF monotherapy from ETV plus TAF.

METHODS

This prospective study included 25 patients with serum HBV-DNA below 20 IU/mL under ETV plus TAF administration. Pregenome RNA nucleotide sequences of HBV in the sera were analyzed using direct sequencing and deep sequencing. ETV was discontinued in patients without rtA194T and rtS106C + rtH126Y + rtD134E + rtL269I quadruple mutations in direct sequencing.

RESULTS

LAM-PR, LAM-BTH, ETV-PR, and ETV-BTH were observed in 1, 16, 7, and 1 patient(s), respectively. Pregenome RNA nucleotide sequences were analyzable in 20 patients. Among the 12 patients classified as LAM-BTH, six patients showed rtL180M + rtM204V/I in direct sequencing, and one patient showed minor clones containing rtL180M + rtM204V + A194T in deep sequencing at a frequency of 0.3%. In the six patients classified as ETV-PR, one patient harbored rtM204I. No clones showing rtS106C + rtH126Y + rtD134E + rtL269I quadruple mutation were detected in deep sequencing. Subsequently, ETV was discontinued, and serum HBV-DNA remained undetectable up to 48 weeks in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving ETV plus TAF due to partial response or BTH during initial LAM or ETV administration were able to safely transition to TAF monotherapy based on nucleotide sequences of HBV pregenome RNA in the sera.

Comparison of Pegylated Interferon Alfa Therapy in Combination with Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Purpose

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and pegylated interferon alfa (PegIFN-α) regimen compared to a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and PegIFN-α therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Patients and Methods

Patients who were treated with PegIFN-α in combination with TAF or TDF were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome measured was the HBsAg loss rate. The rates of virological response, serological response for HBeAg, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were also calculated. The cumulative incidences of response rates were compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

A total of 114 patients were retrospectively enrolled in the study, with 33 receiving TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment and 81 receiving TDF plus PegIFN-α treatment. The HBsAg loss rate for the TAF plus PegIFN-α group was 15.2% at 24 weeks and 21.2% at 48 weeks, while the TDF plus PegIFN-α group had rates of 7.4% at 24 weeks and 12.3% at 48 weeks (P=0.204 at 24 weeks, P=0.228 at 48 weeks). In subgroup analysis of HBeAg positive patients, the TAF group had a higher HBsAg loss rate of 25% at week 48, compared to 3.8% in the TDF group (P=0.033). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the TAF plus PegIFN-α group achieved virological response more quickly than the TDF plus PegIFN-α group (p=0.013). There was no statistical difference in HBeAg serological rate or ALT normalization rate.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the HBsAg loss between the two groups. However, subgroup analysis revealed that TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment had a higher HBsAg loss rate than TDF plus PegIFN-α treatment in HBeAg-positive patients. Additionally, TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment demonstrated better virological suppression for CHB patients. Therefore, TAF plus PegIFN-α treatment regimen is recommended for CHB patients who aim to achieve functional cure.

SEB genotyping: SmartAmp-Eprimer binary code genotyping for complex, highly variable targets applied to HBV

Background

SmartAmp-Eprimer Binary code (SEB) Genotyping is a novel isothermal amplification method for rapid genotyping of any variable target of interest.

Methods

After in silico alignment of a large number of sequences and computational analysis to determine the smallest number of regions to be targeted by SEB Genotyping, SmartAmp primer sets were designed to obtain a binary code of On/Off fluorescence signals, each code corresponding to a unique genotype.

Results

Applied to HBV, we selected 4 targets for which fluorescence amplification signals produce a specific binary code unique to each of the 8 main genotypes (A–H) found in patients worldwide.

Conclusions

We present here the proof of concept of a new genotyping method specifically designed for complex and highly variable targets. Applied here to HBV, SEB Genotyping can be adapted to any other pathogen or disease carrying multiple known mutations. Using simple preparation steps, SEB Genotyping provides accurate results quickly and will enable physicians to choose the best adapted treatment for each of their patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07458-4.