1
|
Li L, Sullivan A, Musah A, Stavrianaki K, Wood CE, Baker P, Kostkova P. Resilience during lockdown: a longitudinal study investigating changes in behaviour and attitudes among older females during COVID-19 lockdown in the UK. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1967. [PMID: 39044166 PMCID: PMC11267972 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In order to slow the spread of COVID-19, on March 23, 2020, a strict lockdown was implemented in the UK. This was followed by alternating periods of less restrictive lockdowns until most public health restrictions were lifted in the summer of 2021. While these measures were necessary, they significantly affected people's daily activities, lifestyles, and mental well-being.This paper presents a longitudinal research study that focused on females aged 55 + in the UK, aiming to understand how COVID-19 and the subsequent 15-month period of lockdowns affected their lifestyles and emotions. The study collected data through online surveys, where respondents reported the frequency and mode of access to activities, and their positive and negative emotional experiences during distinct study phases that encompassed both lockdown and less strict periods.In contrast to previous studies highlighting vulnerabilities for females and the elderly during lockdowns, this research found that the studied group maintained an overall positive outlook throughout the study period and successfully adapted to the lockdowns by increasing their engagement in certain activities, in particular, activities like 'getting active'. In addition, our findings indicate rapid adaptive behaviour change towards many online activities, such as cultural activities. However, the study also revealed negative emotions and a decrease in some activities during the second lockdown in 2020 and the subsequent lockdowns in 2021, underscoring the challenges inherent in prolonged periods of confinement. In addition, the study found negative affect associated with some activities, including working and studying from home.The findings provide valuable insights into how females aged over 55 coped with stressful circumstances, which can inform the development of resilient and mental health-conscious public health policies and responses in preparation for future pandemics or other hazards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Li
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Ava Sullivan
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- EcoHealth Alliance, New York, USA
| | - Anwar Musah
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katerina Stavrianaki
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline E Wood
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Philip Baker
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
- Crisis Response, British Red Cross, London, UK
| | - Patty Kostkova
- UCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies (dPHE), Department for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li L, Sullivan A, Musah A, Stavrianaki K, Wood CE, Baker P, Kostkova P. Positive and negative emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal survey study of the UK population. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297214. [PMID: 38324540 PMCID: PMC10849398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on society; it changed the way we work, learn, socialise, and move throughout the world. In the United Kingdom, policies such as business closures, travel restrictions, and social distance mandates were implemented to slow the spread of COVID-19 and implemented and relaxed intermittently throughout the response period. While negative emotions and feelings such as distress and anxiety during this time of crisis were to be expected, we also see the signs of human resilience, including positive feelings like determination, pride, and strength. A longitudinal study using online survey tools was conducted to assess people's changing moods during the pandemic in the UK. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) was used to measure self-reported feelings and emotions throughout six periods (phases) of the study from March 2020 to July 2021. A total of 4,222 respondents participated in the survey, while a sub-group participated in each of the six study phases (n = 167). The results were analysed using a cross-sectional study design for the full group across each study phase, while prospective cohort analysis was used to assess the subset of participants who voluntarily answered the survey in each of the six study phases (n = 167). Gender, age and employment status were found to be most significant to PANAS score, with older people, retirees, and women generally reporting more positive moods, while young people and unemployed people generally reported lower positive scores and higher negative scores, indicating more negative emotions. Additionally, it was found that people generally reported higher positive feelings in the summer of 2021, which may be related to the relaxation of COVID-19-related policies in the UK as well as the introduction of vaccines for the general population. This study is an important investigation into what allows for positivity during a crisis and gives insights into periods or groups that may be vulnerable to increased negative states of emotions and feelings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Li
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ava Sullivan
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Anwar Musah
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Geography, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katerina Stavrianaki
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline E. Wood
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Baker
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Crisis Response, British Red Cross, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patty Kostkova
- Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|