Externally validated models for first diagnosis and risk of progression of knee osteoarthritis

Constructing machine learning-based risk prediction model for osteoarthritis in population aged 45 and above: NHANES 2011-2018

Osteoarthritis is a widespread chronic joint disease, becoming increasingly prevalent, particularly among individuals over the age of 45. This condition causes joint pain and dysfunction, significantly disrupting daily life. The objective of this study is to develop an optimal machine learning model for predicting the risk of osteoarthritis in individuals aged 45 and older. This study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011 to 2018, which included a total of 2980 individuals. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n = 2235) and a validation set (n = 745). Five machine learning algorithms were employed to develop the predictive model for osteoarthritis. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the machine learning algorithms and identify the most significant features for predicting outcomes. The study involved 2980 participants and focused on predicting the probability of osteoarthritis occurrence using machine learning algorithms. Five algorithms were employed, analyzing 24 features from an average 60-year-old cohort, with 605 osteoarthritis diagnoses. After performing Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) to select 20 features, the CatBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.8109 and an accuracy rate of 0.7315, making it the most efficient model. The most influential factors in the predictions were Gender, Age, BMI, Waist Circumference, and Race. This study demonstrates that the CatBoost model with 20 features can effectively predict the occurrence of osteoarthritis. This accurate prediction model can help inform early interventions and patient management strategies, potentially improving patient prognosis. Further research will focus on enhancing the model performance, such as incorporating additional relevant features or refining existing ones. Additionally, validating the model in more diverse patient populations, and investigating its potential for real-time implementation in clinical settings would further increase the study's impact and facilitate its translation into clinical practice.

From past to future: Bibliometric analysis of global research productivity on nomogram (2000-2021)

Background

Nomogram, a visual clinical predictive model, provides a scientific basis for clinical decision making. Herein, we investigated 20 years of nomogram research responses, focusing on current and future trends and analytical challenges.

Methods

We mined data of scientific literature from the Core Collection of Web of Science, searching for the original articles with title "Nomogram^*/Parton Table^*/Parton Nomogram^*", published within January 1st, 2000 to December 30th, 2021. Data records were validated using HistCite Version and analyzed with a transformable statistical method, the Bibliometrix 3.0 package of R Studio.

Results

In total, 4,176 original articles written by 19,158 authors were included from 915 sources. Annually, Nomogram publications are continually produced, which have rapidly grown since 2018. China published the most articles; however, its total citations ranked second after the United States. Both total citations and average article citations in the United States rank first globally, and a high degree of cooperation exists between countries. Frontiers in Oncology published the most papers (238); this number has grown rapidly since 2019. Journal of Urology had the highest H-index, with an average increase in publications over the past 20 years. Most research topics were tumor-related, among which tumor risk prediction and prognostic evaluation were the main contents. Research on prognostic assessment is more published and advanced, while risk prediction and diagnosis have good developmental prospects. Furthermore, nomogram of the urinary system has been highly developed. Following advancements in nomogram modeling, it has recently been applied to non-oncological subjects.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the current nomogram status, which could enable better understanding of its development over the years, and provide global researchers a comprehensive analysis and structured information to help identify hot spots and gaps in future research.