An approach in medical diagnosis based on Z-numbers soft set

A progressive approach to multi-criteria group decision-making: N-bipolar hypersoft topology perspective

This paper investigates N-bipolar hypersoft topology (N-BHST), a novel extension of both the well-established N-hypersoft topology (N-HST) and hypersoft topology (HST). Deviating significantly from its precursor, the N-bipolar hypersoft (N-BHS) set, N-BHST introduces a multi-opinion approach to decision-making, augmenting robustness and adaptability. This innovative framework addresses identified limitations in N-bipolar soft topology (N-BST), especially in managing multi-argument approximate functions. The study analyzes various operators (closure, interior, exterior, and boundary) within the N-BHST framework, elucidating their interrelationships. Additionally, an examination is carried out on the enhancement of multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) using N-BHST, setting it apart from existing models. A numerical example is presented to illustrate its application in real-world decision scenarios.

N-bipolar hypersoft sets: Enhancing decision-making algorithms

This paper introduces N-bipolar hypersoft (N-BHS) sets, a versatile extension of bipolar hypersoft (BHS) sets designed to effectively manage evaluations encompassing both binary and non-binary data, thereby exhibiting heightened versatility. The major contributions of this framework are twofold: Firstly, the N-BHS set introduces a parameterized representation of the universe, providing a nuanced and finite granularity in perceiving attributes, thereby distinguishing itself from conventional binary BHS sets and continuous fuzzy BHS sets. Secondly, this model signifies a new area of research aimed at overcoming limitations inherent in the N-bipolar soft set when handling multi-argument approximate functions. Through the strategic partitioning of attributes into distinct subattribute values using disjoint sets, the N-BHS set emerges as a powerful tool for effectively addressing uncertainty-related problems. In pursuit of these objectives, the paper outlines various algebraic definitions, including incomplete N-BHS sets, efficient N-BHS sets, normalized N-BHS sets, equivalence under normalization, N-BHS complements, and BHS sets derived from a threshold, exemplified through illustrative examples. Additionally, the article explores set-theoretic operations within the N-BHS sets framework, such as relative null/whole N-BHS sets, N-BHS subsets, and two distinct approaches to N-BHS extended/restricted union and intersection. Finally, it proposes and compares decision-making methodologies regarding N-BHS sets, including a comprehensive comparison with relevant existing models.